Archive for May, 2007
Dave’s Golden Words
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/31/2007
“One thing that has happened to me is that I have become less angry and more implacable.”
THOSE WORDS ARE PURE GOLD!
***********************************************************************************
____________________________________________________________________________________
Dave replies to AFKAN
One thing that has happened to me is that I have become less angry and more implacable.
I am “on to them”, our enemies, in whatever form they manifest themselves.
When BW criticizes the John Birch Society, for example, he is giving advice on how to effectively oppose “the directed society”.
The “directed society” needs its opposition to appear in organizational form and notice that BW’s advice is to eschew organizations and to focus on basics only. This is entirely correct and it separates him from the SF crowd and most other white nationalists significantly.
Unbeknownst to “the political opposition” when they choose to appear in organizational form, they have already been neutralized by the “directed society”.
This is why organizations such as Vdare are so ineffective in opposing nonwhite immigration.
The folks of Vdare just don’t get it.
They operate on the level Congressman Ron Paul operates. The “directed society” needs Ron Paul and the “directed society” needs Vdare.
Back in the 60s, Tim Leary, Ken Kesey, Jack Kerouac, etc. launched a “counter culture” that claimed to be a solution to the “directed society”.
However, the primary value of their “counter culture” was the advocacy of dereliction.
However, in contrast to the “counter culture’s” stated goals, the “counter culture’s” advocacy of dereliction was actually in alliance with the aims of the “directed society”.
That is why the “counter culture” was so warmly embraced by the corporate marketing machine. A drug scene, an immigration mess, and a ghetto scene is needed by the “directed society”.
From time to time even a rip-snorting riot is needed by the “directed society”.
Even now, fifty years after its birth, the corporate marketing machine can’t and refuses to give up “the counter culture”.
It makes me so sick I can hardly endure it; to have the vulgarity of dereliction slogged at me endlessly my entire life by our “official culture”.
But now “the directed society” in its hubris has upped the ante.
Now it is actually really and truly ignoring the most fundamental principle of how to unite society:
In the name of Political Correctness it is now fully applying separate legal and ethical standards according to ethnicity and religion by allowing ethnic, country of origin, and religious criteria (read “ethnic customs”) to trump the actual recorded and duly legislated or established criminal, civil law, and common law.
This is a catastrophe. It is a deliberate summoning of ethnic and racial conflict into being.
And it is this what BW sees that nobody else is seeing.
It never occurs to the Stormfronters or the British National Party folks that Political Correctness makes the “directed society’s” actual aim a deliberate fomenting of racial and ethnic conflict.
This is a big claim for me to make, but goddamn it, this is what I see with my own eyes and with my actual day-to-day experience as occurring.
I see it everywhere, for example, when sales taxes are not enforced against Asian restaurants, when African immigrants are allowed a pass by DHS regarding their growing labor trafficking trade (peons brought in from Africa to work as nannies and housekeepers for well-heeled and legalized immigrants in NYC and elsewhere), or LAPD’s dereliction in allowing gang dominion in the LA barrios, etc, etc. etc.
Get my drift?
For all those out there who want a race war, I say, by god, you are going to get what you want.
Accordingly, the law becomes a farce when country of origin and ethnic and religious “customs” are permitted to trump the actual law.
Therefore, Political Correctness makes race war in our time the actual policy of the “directed society”.
Make no mistake about it.
Computers Have SAVED the Art of Conversation
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 5/31/2007
Finally, over half a century later, I realize what we meant when we complained about kids who “pulled on their mothers handbags and screamed for attention.” Someone wrote a book called “Everything I Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” This piece is like that.
Why did we say everything about that kid “pulling on their mother’s pocketbook?”
There were generally two types of people I was raised with, people with the courtesy we practiced and the lower level whites and blacks. But when they were around us, they tried to learn from us. If one of their kids got out of hand, they would slap them. By the time a kid got old enough to reach and grab hold of their mother’s pocketbook, they didn’t do it.
In our case, by the time I got old enough to stand up and reach my mother’s pocketbook, it never OCURRED to me to do it. Yelling was trash, yelling was nigger stuff.
But it worked TWO ways. If a child who could barely stand said something, everybody LISTENED. If you are a child that age and you have a conscience, that makes you say something worthwhile and then shut up. You learn almost from your first words not to act like a nigger, not to be trash.
But in a way, I was spoiled rotten. Almost from the time I stopped wearing diapers, I was used to being LISTENED TO. But LISTENING was NOT what passes for listening today. Today “listening” means you stand there and let the other person FINALLY finish while you stand there panting like a dog to say what you want to say. You have no idea what the other person was talking about, but you let him finish, and that is LISTENING.
The result of one person waiting to say what he wants to say as soon as anther’s lips stop moving is what passes for “the art of conversation” which the Internet is supposed to have destroyed.
I just spent a week listening to this “art of conversation” and every minute of it I WAS dying to get back to this blog and to Stormfront. Only HERE do we have what I call conversations.
The computer has SAVED the real art of conversation.
I’m Spoiled
I have had to tell you over and over, at the risk of sounding like the Masturbation Generation, how tough I’ve had it. Sometimes this was the ventilating I needed to do, more often it points about ADD and the rest of my baggage I am carrying.
And often it was just plain sloppy self-pity. But nobody here is under the impression that I am perfect or even slightly superhuman. Every mistake I criticize I made and, more important, I MAKE. Which, I hope, does YOU some good. YOU can screw up, YOU can take action and goof it. You can say things you are ashamed of later.
We are white people. We don’t look to a Perfect Master or a guru. The one thing I am proud of is that I am out there making mistakes, looking stupid, TRYING to do it better, LISTENING when you call me on it.
I hope this makes it easier for you to deal with the real world. You are not in this to LOOK good. You can’t concentrate on our titanic task and try to look good doing it. THAT is the white man’s way, not finding some Perfect Model. A lot of people PREACH that, but they try desperately to LOOK good doing it.
Well, obviously you can’t look like an idiot all the time and get people to follow your lead, but when you begin to make looking good a main priority, you are no longer concentrating on what we are DOING. It’s a hard line to talk, but everything we do is a hard line to walk.
On this trip, I realized that, in a fairly rough existence, one of the ways I found out things YOU can USE is because in some ways I was SPOILED.
At age 66, in a crowded intellectual life, while others are bragging abut how they read some esoteric work, I am still defining BASICS.
During the past week I have had people yelling at each other around me. Nothing gets said, nothing gets listened to, and nothing gets DONE. I got a close look at a BASIC I took for granted before.
In my youth, I was raised in *** A *** Southern tradition. My family was not rich by modern standards, but we were by far the top family where we were. From the word go, surrounded by blacks and poor whites, I was taken very seriously as a leader before I reached my teens.
When I was out in the African and South American outback, I was the blond mercenary American people listened to. I was SPOILED in a way.
I naturally grabbed the job of being the writer and the spokesman for inarticulate people. I was, in the true sense of the word, raised to be an aristocrat among inarticulate people I identified with and who had to turn to me. This gave me training you couldn’t have gotten elsewhere. This gave me UNIQUE attitudes that cannot be taught.
I did NOT come up through ANY kind of bureaucracy. Everyone else in a leadership role today learns to obey the rules in the military way: You have to learn to obey orders before you give them. That is a firm basis of all Masturbation Generation thinking because all of today’s “leaders” and “spokesmen” did it that way.
The result is the “leaders” and spokesmen” we have today. Your job is to fit in and conform so that, when you reach middle age and all originality has been beaten out of you, you have learned to be the best conformist. THEN you become a Spokesman and a Leader.
You are also the perfect building material for Political Correctness.
One of the endless series of brags about being a Real Man I heard from the Masturbation Generation literally hundreds of times, though it seems like millions, had to do with making up a bed. They had to make up their bed with straight sheets so that the sergeant could bounce a quarter off of it.
WOW!
I never once made up a bed with a straight bottom sheet. Since my divorce changing sheets is a more or less annual occasion, and until they FINALLY started making bottom sheets with lots of room at the edges, I was there puffing and straining and cussing as one end came loose after another.
I was never a sheet-tightening Real Man. I have had to field strip an automatic weapon when it jammed at the wrong time, but I do not remember ever cleaning my own gun once in my life. On the other hand I never left my weapon in the field in a panic the way thousands did at Normandy.
But I am a Masturbation Generation wimp because I probably couldn’t clean my own pistols and I sure couldn’t make up a bed so a sergeant could bounce a quarter off of it.
I’m SPOILED. If I weren’t, this Blog would be written by one more Organization Man, and that you DON’T need.
This is a lead-in to the next piece.
GLORIOUS!!!!!
I was away from a computer for over a week and just sat down and looked over what happened!!!
I AM ECSTATIC !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a dream come true! You just grabbed it and ran!!
All my talk about how, if I was out of the picture, you would just grab it and run, but each time I went off for few days a year ago, things — excuse the expression — just petered out. I was very worried.
This is a dream come true.
In case I’ve been too subtle here, you done good.
Now I can do what ***I*** do, write.
Now that we have the body of work that I really needed to do, I can start putting in some new thughts.
But after all the years and all the hours and a huge expenditures, the job is DONE.
WE are moving. WE are ready to spread the message.
I talked to Antonio Fini while I was on the trip. He said he hadn’t been on the blog. I was disppointed, Then he addded, as an afterthought, “but I have been pushing the MANTRA.” My response was, “Why didn’t you tell me THAT to start with! You’re DOING it!”
This is now our home base, but the BATTLE, the POINT, is out there with the Mantra. You USE the Blog for your material. But this job is DONE. If my further writings help, great, but this is no longer Bob’s Blog and Bob’s Job.
I will write more, and I hope to live up to YOUR action. But the shoe is now exactly where all my effort went to putting it, on YOUR foot.
WE are on OUR way!
Completed WP 2.2.1 upgrade
Posted by Sys Op in General, How Things Work on 5/26/2007
Let us know if you find any problems and read the comments for some notes.
On the Road
I just tossed this together in five minutes on the road, so it probably doesn’t scan, but I’ll forget it if I don’t put it down, and somebody might make a song out of the idea.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU CANNOT SAY?
Do you know what you cannot say?
Some are perfect in every way.
You can say I’m a cheat, you can call me a liar.
You can call me on every single thing I do
But never never never never blame a …
You can call me a honkie
Or something even bigger
But never never never say someone’s a …
You can burn my flag and say my country’s lyin’.
But never never criticize the Land of Zion.
Do you know what you cannot say?
To err is human but some folks are divine.
If you want to survive you’d better walk that line.
Prometheus
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 5/23/2007
Prometheus says:
Anti’s on SF, in response to the “ANY and ALL” are now starting to falter. They are now starting to say “Oh, only lands OUTSIDE of Europe should have to accept masses of non-white immigrants.” This might seem like a trivial concession, I see it as a huge breakthrough.
KEEP PRESSING THE ISSUE
Anti’s have relied on the fact that people who want to protect thier race would crumble against their standard arguments. While they sat, we would make an argument, try to save face and win their approval.
Now it is THEY who are starting to reject Mommy Professors ideas, in order to appease US.
When an anti says “no wait, I didn’t mean that ALL white nations should have to go multiracial” he is making a harsh realisation. He is realising that what WE think of them, DOES matter.
richard
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work on 5/23/2007
After extensive testing ‘in the field’, I offer this observation on the mantra -
I’ve found that it’s far more effective if you contrast the clamour for ‘integration’ and ‘diversity’ in white countries with the lack of them for countries where the immigrants actually come from, rather than Japan and Taiwan.
For example, here in England non-white immigrants tend to come from former colonies in Africa, the West Indies or the Indian subcontinent. So I say, “Nobody says that Pakistan or Nigeria should accept millions of white imigrants and assimilate them”.
I realise that this tends to make the point about population density redundant, but I’ve found that it ‘hits home’ more.
The New Layout
Posted by Bob in Bob's Book, How Things Work on 5/23/2007
This was a complete surprise to me, and a very happy one. I had my usual problem logging in new. The password refused to copy and paste, so I typed it in, and it refused and then, after a minute, changed its mind.
To repeat, this was a complete surprise to me, and a very happy one. SysOps is our CEO, and my only problem is how long she will do it for us. But her sense of honor hopefully will get her to be sure somebody can take over for her before she stops doing the job for us.
I am heading for Joizey in a couple of hours and will be there till Monday.
READ THE COMMENTS. REPORTS are coming in, and they are CRITICAL! The Mantra is being manipulated successfully, the word “diversity” needs to be substituted in some place, and all this is BASED ON EXPERIENCE.
Just a year ago, if I didn’t write something for a day or two, comments would simply STOP. Now the REPORTS and cross-talk keep it going anyway.
This is successful management. This is where I wanted to be all these years.
Keep it going, gang!
You Want Hate? Here It Is!
To an anti who calls himself “a conservative German Patriot.”
You are the kind of person who makes me want to vomit, a “respectable conservative” who is a total tool of his masters. The kind of person who backs the Authorities when they throw people into prison for disagreeing, “(They) are a disgrace to free speech.”
Respectable conservatives, “Me Big Patriot” types LEAD the lynch mobs so Mommy Professor will pat them on the head. When Hitler was in power, you would have made a GREAT SS Trooper, especially against women and children.
No, I don’t hate minorites. But I DO hate traitors. I despise you, because I’m not sure you are up to the level of a real traitor.
I don’t even hate Marxists, though I have fought them in the field. But things like you, who back up any Power that is in control, I despise.
My REBEL Flag
Posted by Bob in About Bob, Coaching Session, History on 5/22/2007
My Rebel Flag
I was raised under the Confederate flag. Most of the people I knew lived under the Union under protest, in that they wished we had won the War.
The Confederate flag went up over the South Carolina in 1963, the year that South Carolina was forced to integrate its first school. This was NOT a coincidence. To me, the Confederate flag was NEVER our dead ancestor’s flag; it was MINE.
If you want to put into three words what my Rebel Flag is NOT, they are these:
“Heritage not Hate.” Those three words contain a BOOK full of misstatements.
First of all, “Hate” is the word applied by our ENEMIES to anybody who has the slightest concern about the survival of the white race. From “Heritage Not Hate” it is a tiny step to driveling about how one is not against intermarriage. To prove one is no “racist.”
There is no excuse. We ALL know what “Hater” means today.
If all a flag means to one is dead people, then you should bury it with them. The giggling pro-Confederates came up with what, by them, was a BRILLIANT ploy. They replaced the rectangular Confederate flag of my youth with the old SQUARE battle flag. A flag actually went into battle then, and a diagonal flag shredded too easily. So, to demonstrate that their flag was only relevant to dead people, they made it square.
I have no more identification with that square flag than I do with any other alien flag TODAY. The only point of an ugly square flag is to show that it only applies to the dead.
I am a Rebel. I do not identify with ANY flag because they are all in an alliance dedicated to genocide against my RACE. Like every flag today (except Nepal’s which is not square), my Starry Cross is a rectangular flag, and it stands for rebellion TODAY. It was prominent all over Eastern Europe when they REBELLED against the Soviet Union. Nobody in Eastern Europe gave a damn about MY “heritage.” They had a heritage of their own that was much older.
MY REBEL FLAG IS THE ONLY WHITE SYMBOL THAT CAN LEGALLY BE FLOWN IN ANY COUNTRY ON EARTH.
MY Rebel Flag is the symbol of TOMORROW, not yesterday.
Lord Nelson: ANY and ALL
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/22/2007
A writer cannot fully edit his own work. He keeps making the same mistakes over and over.
By the same token, a writer working alone has a gigantic disadvantage. It is EXACTLY like a person with one eye. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king, but no matter what, he can never achieve depth perception.
I had the same problem with the Mantra. All I ever got, alone, was one shot at getting someone to pay attention to it. But thereafter, every time they got into any debate, it was the same-old same old. They only heard me once. I will never forget when Jared Taylor had the perfect opening on Fox when someone MENTIONED in the midst of his interview that Japan was not being pushed to bring in immigrants, and he immediately got the conversation back to something like what a great Southern Gentleman he was.
When I was alone, I used to be absolutely rigid about the Mantra. Now I am getting depth perception! You cannot imagine how confusing depth perception is when you first get a second eye. In
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/great-anti-racist-challenge-378160p58.html
I KEPT waiting for Lord Nelson and Prometheus to go “wabbling back to the fire”* the way Jared did: They didn’t wabble.
And they didn’t wabble.
And they DIDN’T wabble.
I have TWO eyes now.
I finally had a chance to learn from what THEY were doing!
One of the major things Lord Nelson did was cut the essence of the Mantra down even FURTHER. He reduced it to ALL and EVERY. Then he went on from there. I came to realize that THAT is the essence of the difference between GENOCIDE and the “race mixing” they always talk about.
It is not enough to just use ALL and EVERY. You have to stick with the LOGIC of it. AFKAN, you cannot turn it into an excuse for another long rant about Covington or Jews or you lose your audience. But AFKAN at his worse is not as totally out of focus as most people got, with Jared Taylor’s example being about average.
Nelson beat me at my own game: BOILING IT DOWN and sticking with the ESSENCE. Like I say, he talks American perty good fer a furrinner.
***In case you think Mommy Professor’s Political Correctness is new, here is what Rudyard Kipling said in “The God’s of the Copybook Headings,” circa 1906:
“There are only three things certain since Social Progress began:”
“That the bitch returns to her vomit
The sow returns to her mire
And the burnt fool’s bandaged finger
Goes wabbling back to the fire.”
Follow Lord Nelson!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/22/2007
We face the problem that Akismet “sees” the Mantra as spam.
This problem results from ACTIVISM. It shows we have hit enough groups that the machine recognizes us. Since I have fought so many battles ALONE, this lifts my spirits enormously.
And I have WON battles alone! A small group to me is a legion!
I was afraid people were just writing in and taking no action. I couldn’t get REPORTS from more than one or two. My motto is the motto of “follow up,” which is the only thing that works:
“If you haven’t heard about it lately, it isn’t happening.” But in this case, even if I hadn’t heard abut it, it was happening.
To my relief, we have EARNED our first major hurdle, the hurdle of SPAM. How do we DEAL with it? My people are way ahead of me!
Lord Nelson’s and Prometheus’s entries in
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/great-anti-racist-challenge-378160p58.html
give you a perfect guide on how to steer around the Mantra-spam problem.
Read SysOps’ long comment on the spam problem.
http://whitakeronline.org/blog/2007/05/19/reply-on-stormfront-opposing-views/
If you have been alone for so long in this fight, THREE top people to reference is an unimaginable luxury! The Populist Forum, cited by the Communist newspaper as a big-money right-wing conspiracy, only had three of us in it!
I was at a get-together recently and pointed out that, at this stage in any revolution, people sit around and brag about who has BANNED, not who has PUBLISHED them. The whole Soviet Empire was brought down by people who were banned until the day it fell.
Samizdat, “self-publication” — is what real revolution comes from.
“Elites”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, How Things Work on 5/21/2007
Someone wrote me a PM on Stormfront asking how much I thought “The Elites” had to do with our present situation. I asked him what he meant by “Elites” and he gave me what to me was a fuzzy reply.
Just as I know the president of the United States has little real power, I know that groups who are apparently IN power aren’t.
Most people have no idea of the sheer SCALE of our society. Terrorists know that if you wiped out oil wells in their part of the world, their power would collapse. But where do you plant a bomb in the United States? You could blast every major city out of existence in the United States and the country would still function very well.
The Elite that controls the media is very, very conservative in the GENERIC sense of that word. Being in any Elite is a full-time job. You have to go with the flow, not decide which way the flow should be. That is why, when I look for causes, I look for something titanic, not a roomful of Big Conspirators.
I explained Political Correctness as the inevitable result of a giant professor-priesthood that has developed. We have a million full-time members of a professor-priesthood which we created and whose direction was as predictable as sunrise.
A Jew has a deeply imbedded cultural and by now genetic imperative to be hostile to every other form of loyalty. As soon as we decided to divide our society into two groups, Christians and The People of the BOOK, and kill everybody else, the development of hostile Jewry was as inevitable as Political Correctness became when awe created a giant academia with enormous money, control over our children’s minds and no outside accountability AT ALL.
ALL groups given power and money and no accountability go completely ape. Then we try to find some tiny cabal of people who are responsible for all this.
It is called Occam’s razor, and it is the basis of all Western science: Look for the simple, logical cause first, don’t build a whole theology or Conspiracy as a substitute.
Reply on Stormfront “Opposing Views”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 5/19/2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaceMixerWMBW:
“Roman soldiers killed Jesus.”
Actually what happened to Jesus was what happened to milllions of others, IN HIS NAME, durig the Inquisition. The Jewish authorities had no power to execute, but they had the power to convict.
If you read the Gospel, you will see Pilate washed his hands of what he had to do to Jesus. The Jews convicted Jesus and then “turned him over to the civil authorities” for execution.
Just so, the Church never EXECUTED anybody during the Inquisition. They convicted them of the same Heresy of which the Jewish authorities convicted Christ, and then “turned them over to the civil asuthorities,” who then had no choice.
You would condemn the Inquisition for doing that. You declare that Jews, using the exact same logic, were innocent.
Yur very screenname is the same hypocrisy. You are not a “race mixer” for Asia or Africa. Your sole interest is in getting rid of WHITES:
The White Mantra
” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org/
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
In other words, those of you who shout “Heresy” today in the name of Political Correctness are the same hypocrites you have been for over two thousand years.
__________________
A Funny
They were discussing dreadlocks on Stormfront, and someone mentioned Germanic warriors were supposed to have worn them.
My reply was:
“I can imagine Germanic warriors developing dreadlocks for battle.”
“But what you do to yourself to look so bad you scare a Roman Legionary is not necessarily a lovely style.”
Dave
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History, How Things Work on 5/19/2007
I find this the most compelling point of BWs thought: That economics is race. That’s all it is.
Yet the entire economic debate across the world can’t come to grips with it. And there is no area of our life where orthodoxy so completely shields the light.
The straightjacket of orthodoxy is cinched tight, as tight as can be. There was never a slave society in all history as buttoned up.
That’s why this notion that economics and race is the same thing is so revolutionary.
In economic thought, we are way ahead of everybody else, we have busted through the whole darned thing, this nonsense of contemporary economics.
If you can’t see the advantage of it, there’s something wrong with you.
Comment by Dave
ME:
Dave, you are right, with this caveat:
A monkey or a Mommy Professor can destroy what he cannot build. Any moron can kill the most creative person in the world. Andrew Young and the Poverty Law Center and minorities can grow rich with threats.
The real miracle of Communism was that it managed to keep a third of the world’s WHITE population in upper third world poverty for so many decades while the rest of the white world, and even Japan, Taiwan and South Korea flourished. With titanic effort, the white race can be held back, but not forever.
But your basic point is dead accurate. All those economic equations AFKAN mentioned today factor in everything BUT SKIN COLOR. Every discussion of Great Civilization factors in every bit of information but one: Everywhere a Great Civilization fell and STAYED down, the people of that former Great Civilization are now BROWN.
I can’t explain it, but no one can see the real world if he has to instantly EXPLAIN what he OBSERVES. Science is based on OBSERVING AND THEN EXPLAINING. Wordism insists that all things be explained within The Great Book BEFORE it can be observed.
So Communism, as a form of Wordism, didn’t WORK. And that was its fatal weakness.
Economic Debate is a Twentieth Century Throwback
As Aleksander Solzhenitsyn said just before the fall of the Soviet Empire, “Only Western academics still take Marxism seriously. In the Soviet Union, Marxist theory is nothing. It is LESS than nothing.”
I think a hundred million lives in the last spent in the twentieth century for which the Communist brand of Marxism was DIRECTLY responsible was enough. Mommy Professor will NEVER grow up, as Solzhenitsyn said. But it is time for US to enter the twenty-FIRST century.
In THIS century, the whole idea that one can manipulate the SOCIAL system to remake man into a peaceful, sharing Part of Nature is ludicrous. Thirty years ago, when that crap was doctrine, we hadn’t seen pictures of sweet little chimpanzees tearing a violator of their borders, LITERALLY, limb from limb.
No Mommy Professor tells you what his absolute, enforced PC doctrine was thirty years ago, because he would be a laughing stock.
Economics, from the US to Red China, is no longer even a matter of serious debate, much less The Pillar Upon Which The World Stands that it is to Marxists and libertarians.
If you are STILL arguing economics from an ideological point of view, you would find the Flat Earth Society fascinating.
Distaff Discussion
Good Grief, this is a Man dominated blog isn’t it? But Richard’s comment was FUNNY. I needed a good laugh this morning.
Comment by shari — 5/17/2007 @ 1:47 pm |Edit This
Yes, Shari. And the insights/male perspectives shown to women are not openly found elsewhere. One of women’s primary roles in the family was meant to be medicine. uuuuh, that’s as it should be.
Comment by Sys Op
ME:
Shari was laughingly expressing the expected female comment on what was said about the Old Maid, and SysOps clinched the point.
What could be more BORING than white male repeating exactly what is in the Politically Correct textbook? SysOps can get more stimulation than that from receiting the multiplication tables.
One of the major and unrecognized handicaps Political Correctness has is that it is BORING. I will watch a really interesting BBC documentary, and then comes the narrator “summing up.” I think, “And now, a word from our sponsor, Political Correctness…” He says exactly what he SHOULD say. I tune out because I could have Written it
Alan B Inspires an Essay on Creeps
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/17/2007
Using the creeps to get the ideas across is a great method. This may convince many others how creepy they come across and shut them up or bring them aboard our movement.
Comment by Alan B
ME:
At the top of my list of creeps is not the liberal, but the respectable conservative, a term I made popular with the old Blog. Your point is dead on. I held my nose and used them to spread the word for over forty years.
A lot of people mistake a bad mood for ruthless determination. So they tell me the Reagan Revolution, in OUR terms, was a fraud.
Well, DUHH! Tell me something I DIDN’T know forty years ago, when it was the Goldwater Revolt.
Brother Dave Gardner used to talk about an Old Maid rocking back and forth on her porch with a frown and saying,
“Well, I COULDA!”
To the Masturbation Generation, the Old Maid represented the height of Grim Determination. They came up with every excuse they could to show that their total lack of resistance to giving the world to nonwhites just showed how Tough and Moral they were.
Unlike the Old Maid, I went in and got screwed.
But I caused a lot of intellectual pregnancies myself.
Back then, “conservatives” of every sort, including the most radical, constituted the only opposition. In fact, the word “conservative” was DEFINED as anyone who opposed the liberal line. “Conservative” simply means you are opposed to Political Correctness, which was then called leftism. “Conservative” has nothing to do with generic conservatism. Political Correctness IS generic twentieth century conservatism.
Now that revolt has gotten so popular that nobody calls himself either liberal or Politically Correct, the creeps who made their careers on those labels have taken over “conservatism.” But when paleoconservatives talk about the neoconservative takeover there is a Masturbation Generation tone to their laments. They sound just like Jews. The tear their clothes and lament. “How could this happen to ME!”
Henry Kissinger’s invaluable quote as a professional diplomat:
“Any people that has been persecuted for two thousand years is doing something WRONG.”
I have yet to hear one single paleoconservatives ask, “What am ****I**** doing WRONG?”
From Alcoholics Anonymous: “Insanity is doing the same thing again and again and expecting different results.”
I joined the “conservatives” because it was the only rebellion in town. Let me repeat, the name “conservative” is specifically used today to ANYBODY who opposes the establishment in power “Conservative” is the word specifically used to refer to all radicalism, all rebellion, no matter how minor.
But the creeps are PROFESSIONALS. By that I mean they make their LIVING in this game. Nothing was less predictable than that, when liberals were discredited, a major portion of them would reinvent a conservatism they could SELL. Paleoconservatives, as always, were taken completely by surprise when this happened.
The question is NOT why, when liberalism became a word of shame, PROFESSIONALS took over and remade conservatism. Paleos still sit in astonishment at a development that was as inevitable as sunrise.
REPEAT: The question is NOT why, when liberalism became a word of shame, PROFESSIONALS took over and remade conservatism. The question is why paleos did not predict this and counter it.
Until paleos stop being amateurs and bitchers they will lose.
Meantime, I use the creeps AND the paleos to do what I CAN do.
SysOps and StevenP Message Each Other on the Front
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/17/2007
SysOp check this out:
In order to draw those 2000 visitors I’ve made 112 posts all over the net. Actually many more because extreme tracker consolidates all hits from some domains under one referrer. See the page called Referrer Tracking 2 for the full list.
Guess what such a high number of inbound links did to my google rank for “anti-white racist”: Google search
Number 2 after one month’s work. Pretty amazing isn’t it?
This suggests there is a very important side-effect to cutting out the intermediate activism platform. Getting activists to send traffic directly to the main websites may well result in a TREMENDOUS boost in google rankings for a whole slew of keywords at both blog and NS.
Comment by Stevenp — 5/16/2007 @ 8:07 pm |Edit This
AHAHAHAHAHAHA,
I love it. You’ve just done because it WORKS exactly what people in e-commerce/SEO get paid for day after day after day. But they don’t have NEARLY as much fun, or have the same GUT purpose as you and the others who use blogs and forums.
If you begin to put articles (250 words or so of verbiage) content pages up… that will only skyrocket and you’ll become one stop shopping for the Movement, and you and Dave control the content. If they link NS, that will do the same thing for Dave’s stats.
We’ll see what happens. All the social bookmarking will now become instrumental…. but a video will do more than anything else around.
The top SEO gurus and marketers are paying huge money to do it.
What I’m doing in my arena is making people blanch. They stop, and have nothing to say. I bat my baby blues and say when they can help me solve my problem, please come tell me.
One older gentleman winked and smiled the entire day — it wasn’t no come on, I’ll clue you.
Phenomenal.
REMEMBER, Stevep, your links with - /?xyz – ARE showing up on SiteMeter… it’s not a failure. I have all mine there on WOL tests. Extreme won’t do it we found, so we’re moving to a tracker that will.
If you get links and crosslinks TO WOL and NS, then that’s good. They have to have a way to GET here. The more links and places that other activists put up on their own, adding to on their own and cross-linking to each other is good. 250 words per posted article. Things run 250 to 500, but 500 is considered overkill unless it’s a technical or definition-heavy article. As NS has done, you link related articles into “funnels” or “silos” as the newer lingo is developing. Dave’s “funnels” are his upper menu/tab bars. All his links funnel links show on every page of that funnel’s articles. But, that’s NOT necessary; you link using TEXT ANCHORS within your articles to a related themes or definitions.
Comment by Sys Op
POINTER: I am putting StevenP’s longer, EARLIER message last because it is long and complicated. This is a technical point on MY end, as a writer: You need to envision the READER and arrange your message for HIM or HER:
Thanks Bob and SysOp – I’ve recorded your incoming hits from that testing blog. Unfortunately the test failed because the hits are reported coming from http://mantra7777test.blogspot.com/ period. I was hoping the modified URL (with the question mark) would show up somehow.
Ok here’s a tough one for you SysOp (because if you can’t answer it no one can). Please read the scenario below – I’d appreciate your thoughts on the parts marked *magic*.
Scenario -
The landing page is: http://whitakeronline.org/
There are two activists: A1 and A2.
Each activist has their own unique URL to send traffic to:
A1 uses http://whitakeronline.org/?A1
A2 uses http://whitakeronline.org/?A2
A1 goes to forum.com and posts the mantra. At the end of the mantra he adds the link http://whitakeronline.org/?A1
Fifty people read the mantra and five become curious enough to click A1’s link so whitakeronline.org’s tracker records five contacts coming from forum.com.
In addition, something *magically* records the fact that the link being used is http://whitakeronline.org/?A1 instead of plain http://whitakeronline.org/
A2 goes to forum.com and sees the mantra. He can’t repost it right away or he’ll get banned for spamming. So he adds a comment to bump the mantra while using the riddle as his sigline. At the end of the riddle he adds: Answer at http://whitakeronline.org/?A2
Twenty people read the riddle and two become curious enough to click A2’s link so whitakeronline.org’s tracker records two more contacts coming from the same page at forum.com.
At this point the tracker reports a total of seven visitors from the same page at forum.com while something *magically* informs us that five used A1’s link while two used A2’s.
An hour later A1 goes to this *magical* webpage and sees that 5 more visitors have come from links with his name after the ? (http://whitakeronline.org/?A1) and that therefore his total activism score has increased by 5 points. Motivated by the rising score he goes out looking for more places to post.
End of scenario.
SysOp please tell me there is a tracker or php module out there that can pull this magic. If there is, we can cut out the activism platform altogether and transfer all the techie complexity from the activist onto a single onsite tracker/module (preferably with public *magic* data).
If this is possible, the landing page (activism handbook) can then be hypercompressed into a simple appeal to help the activism effort by posting mantra or riddle using
http://whitakeronline.org/?YOURNAMEHERE as the forwarding link. That’s it. OK maybe an explanation on creating html links in posts would be needed too, but that’s just a sentence at most:
Anyway, I’ve modified the testing blog (http://mantra7777test.blogspot.com/) so that it now contains four of these theoretical activism links pointing to http://whitakeronline.org/. We can use that for testing.
—-
To anyone reading this who is wondering what the heck we’re doing, the answer is we’re developing an activism model. The point of this model would be to motivate activists into posting in order to bring in traffic that is converted into more activists. All the while exposing people to the mantra. This would effectively pour chain letter exponential growth, i.e. kerosene, onto the fire Bob keeps talking about.
If we can get this working here, I’ll set some sticks alight and run with them to http://majorityrights.com. They’re a very big blog (71,586 unique visitors for april) and I’m confident they’ll adopt this model IF – and only IF – I can show them it works. They’d then use it to foster their own activism and attract more readership. All the while spreading the mantra far and wide.
If it works for a big blog like http://majorityrights.com it’ll be a sure sell to other pro-white blogs/forums. They’re all welcome to encourage the activism-oriented among their readership to push the mantra if it gains them traffic.
In short, the potential blaze is so huge it’s worth trying again and again and again until we develop the right kerosene formula.
Comment by Stevenp
StevenP: Pointers From the Front
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/17/2007
Just for the record: The 2000 visitors are a fact (that’s been recorded by the tracker) whereas the 20,000 impressions are a speculation.
The ten to one ratio comes from the internet advertising industry. Generally speaking they’ll pay ten times as much for a “click-thru” as for an “impression”. The idea being that for every person that is so captivated by an ad as to click it, there are ten who see it but move on.
(ME: I go with the numbers people put their MONEY on.)
All my tracker does is record people who click the link. The number of people who see the mantra/riddle but move on without clicking the link is a guesstimate. I simply assume it follows the advertising industry’s standard 10-1 ratio but your guesses are as good as mine.
Comment by Stevenp
Don’t Play With Your Screen Name
I deleted someone’s comments because I thought it was from somebody else who puts all the effort I ask our people to put into posting outside the blog into reapting the same old superficial insults to us from new e-mail addresses. I thought this one came from him because he was playing with his screen name.
I give credit or blame to the wrong person all the time. Why do you think I can deal with it when you decide to be cute with your screen name?
Don’t write under another name, even if you add, “By the way the comment above was from X” right afterwards.
Please put your own comments under your own name. I have enough trouble remembering THAT.
Know-How is Harder to Teach
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 5/16/2007
Today a seminar is just another course. You read the stuff, you say something about it to prove you did, and then Mommy Professor tells you what you SHOULD have said about it at the end of the session, while you take notes.
At the end of the course, Mommy Professor tells you he is proud of what Independent Thought came out under his leadership, and then you take a test on what he told you to say about the readings.
In other words, a “seminar” in grad school is really just another course where your job is to swallow and regurgitate the Party Line.
This makes it hard to explain what a REAL seminar used to be and what makes this about the only real seminar still extant?
Back when there were real seminars, original thought, even eccentricity, was the hallmark of an “absent-minded professor.” Today if you are absent minded you get the same treatment in academia that you do in any other bureaucracy. You dress according to code. The code sometimes specifies that you be “with it” by wearing a coat and tie with jeans or even a hippie outfit, but the lines are as clearly drawn as they are in the Marine Corps.
Go to a convention of professors and you will people who look exactly like those in any other bureaucracy. They produce a standardized product, like any other bureaucracy. Our seminar is a throwback.
A real seminar is entirely different from a course. Being “allowed to participate in,” not “take,” a seminar used to mark when you were on your way to being a thinker YOURSELF, not just someone taking notes and regurgitating what you heard. In other words a seminar was that transition period between when you were a student and you became a professor with orignial ideas. Few professors today could conduct a real seminar, and those who could keep it to themselves if they want tenure and promotion.
When I do this seminar, as I keep emphasizing, I am not just giving you knowledge. I do not have a Whitakerism where you just memorize my book like The Thoughts of Chairman Mao and chant them back.
A seminar doesn’t teach you how to REACH my level. It teaches you how to START AT MY LEVEL. The course is successful when someone BUILDS on my thinking, as Al Parker did with his “One True Way man!” comment below.
In a world where real seminars no longer exist, it is a major job just to explain what one IS.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for May, 2007
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
Mantra on Youtube
Posted by Sys Op in Comment Responses, General, Race Matters on 5/30/2007
Lord Nelson writes:
Its Done!
Thanks to Brian, (Quality Geezer) and sys ops, the mantra video is on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiwf4Zwo_CI
May 30 4:56 PM
5 Comments