Archive for June, 2007
Balloon: “Displacement”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/16/2007
I have noticed one person in SF sometimes putting the question as: “Antis can find no solution to the race problem that does not involve the DISPLACEMENT of whites in white countries.”
This is one of those very subtle and fatal problems. It is not DISPLACEMENT; it is GENOCIDE we are worried about. You will find lots of people might charge in on your side, because now you are referring to immigration and not to the Holy of Holies, intermarriage. We just have to be sure they don’t take ALL our Lebensraum so we can all settle down and assimilate.
You don’t MEAN this, but you SAID this. It is the worst POSSIBLE conclusion, everybody joyfully decides it’s immigration, not race, and you float off into their balloon without even knowing it. That is why messing with the Mantra is so perilous. You HAVE to LEARN to get the WHOLE message in there, you have to learn to do it RIGHT.
Now I’ve made Pravda, the Australian Parliament, BNP and the Village Voice
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 6/15/2007
And those are only the ones I happened to HEAR about!
Here is how a group of twenty or so of us caused a panic in New Jersey and NYC:
http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0724,tucker,76913,2.html/full
The secret is that the mass of Americans are as alien to the “Elite” as they are to us. They are ALWAYS terrified that the masses are going to come get them.
Stop bitching about THEIR power and USE their fear of US!
Al Parker
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/15/2007
Oh, how about this one:
Our issue is not the Islamification of Europe… it’s white survival.
The subject of Islam in Europe is so DECEPTIVE. Too many people who talk about it are Zionists, religious nuts and anti-racist “conservatives” who care NOTHING for race.
Prometheus
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/15/2007
I get frustrated with Stormfront for incessantly drawing attention away from the basic point.
We are NOT about creating a nation based on IQ, or just based on crime. These are excuses that white people use to try and justify a white nation. They are aware that their is a threat to their race, then try to justify its existance by SELLING our race to liberals.
As soon as we pins the value of our races existence to the value it has to a wordist nation, we set ourselves up for failure. This validates the idea that a nation isn’t about the race of people that created it, and allows anti’s to rip our movement apart by demonstrating how the white race isn’t critical to the nation.
We aren’t here to protect the welfare of our nation, we ARE the nation.
Al Parker
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/15/2007
A few more…
Our issue is not demonstrating that Jews are all-powerful… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not proving a conspiracy by an elite… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not explaining how rotten Israel is… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not liberals vs. conservatives… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not electing Ron Paul… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not opposing amnesty for illegal aliens… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not about moving from one place to another… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not the revival of nationalism in the West… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not about running around in jackboots… it’s white survival
Our issue is not revising the history of World War II… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not the latest tragedy committed against whites… it’s white survival.
Our issue is not whether or not Stalin was part Jewish… it’s white survival.
Balloons: “The Races”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/14/2007
Every time you let someone discuss “the races” instead of the Mantra, you lose.
No matter what a good reply you come up with, no matter how much the audience marvels at your wit, the subject has become “the mixing of THE races.” You have let people see the problem as race in general, not the obvious genocide of OUR race.
The White Mantra
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org/
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
Prometheus
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/14/2007
I’ve often thought about how you can ’snap’ people out of it.
Learn from what the liberals did. They destroyed the old ideas, then conviently came with a solution of their own. They said that racial seperatism was ‘outdated’. They said ideas of heredity were gone with the Nazis. They created a vacuum to fill. They didn’t take those ideas they claimed were outdated SERIOUSLY.
Political Correctness is a joke, a relic from the past. Treat is as such, and it will become that. No one wants to be the neighbourhood clown, the joker. As soon as we stop taking SERIOUSLY thier ideas, as soon as we stop debating crime stats, ‘white guilt’, racial differences as a matter of environment, as issues that require analyis and treat them as nonsensical parrotings, then they will appear as fools.
SIGH!
Someoe said:
The family guy is notoriously politically correct, even though it claims not to be, and often, superficially, seems not to be.
In a previous episode, they had a scene where one guy warns a couple that their daughter would marry a black man, and the couple immediately dissociate with this guy.
They didn’t mean to say anything with the ‘fleas’, but people will slip up, and quite accidently say something that is a lot more profound than what they intended it to be. Whites are taught that they are not ‘a people’, so they never see themselves the same way they see other races.
So people would see this, and automatically think of the fleas as being representative of other, non white races. But as with any equilibrium, you change one side, the other side changes too.
ME:
SIGH!
PLEASE notice the point I made.
I don’t care about “The Family Guy,” the influece of Jews on television, how the Jewish Conspiracy got tgether in the dead of night to plan this particular line on this particular show.
I MADE A POINT.
Discuss the Bilderbergers when I’m dead.
We are Reminding People of What They Know
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/13/2007
On “The Family Guy” fleas were taking over the house.
The Family Guy said, “There is only one thing we can do. We have to learn the flea language, breed with their women, and we will have peace.”
Inside themselves, people know how ludicrous the situation is. We are bringing it OUT:
The White Mantra
” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
Shari
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 6/13/2007
Shari says:
You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized, here. That’s all I can say.
ME:
Shari, SysOp and I have had many a long discussion, as sane people will in an insane world, about men and women. Some of it was mutual reassurance, the kind two sane people residing in an asylum would have to assure each other that these other people really are the nuts.
Some of our talk was about men and women. We agreed that men and women are DIFFERENT. They are different, not in the Women’s Lb way, as competitors for the male role, but dffere3nt in a SYMBIOTIC way.
SysOps said it was God, I tend toward evolution, but whatever it was had a REASON for making us different, and it wasn’t so that Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan could make a living.
As usual, while some theorize abut this, I USE it. Both of my first two books in my own name are dedicated to my ex-wife, who is still my trusted friend. She made the Populist Forum operate and was essential to all the rest.
When I took over the Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I chose a brilliant experienced woman as my Associate Director. I was amused that one of my staffers who was a conservative anti-racist was shocked and upset that he had to work under a WOMAN.
Now I have SysOp kicking me ar …, I mean, making deferential suggestions to me.
What you express is a feminine opinion. Women are more GENERICALLY conservative than men. I have tried to explain this many times to professional politicos who wonder why women now vote more liberal than men. They give me the usual dazed cow look and then go back to their complicated discussions.
An old bull like me charges into the new age. You look at it quizically. For me to say yours is a normal feminine approach would have the Women’s’ Libber lynch mob out in force. You and SysOp have no trouble being called women.
We are the only sane ones in this funny farm.
Comment Candy
The thing that makes me get up in the morning is the comments here. I get my coffee and go to the comments. Today was a treat. SysOp and Brain were deciding what to do about our banner. Neither of them deferentially asked for my opinion. They both know they’ll GET my opinion if I have one. SysOps handed the action over to Brian, team-style.
Then came the other comments on content, the biological revolution and the balloons people in the movement drift away in. A LOT of thought there. But, best of all, it not balloon thought, drifting off into random thinking that would have been done if I had never been born. It was disciplined thinking INSIDE our parameters. It was work only I would have done a couple of years back.
READ THE COMMENTS! This is US now, not just ME.
Shari
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 6/12/2007
You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized, here. That’s all I can say.
– Shari
ME:
Shari, SysOp and I have had many a long discussion, as sane people will in an insane world, about men and women. Some of it was mutual reassurance, the kind two sane people residing in an asylum would have to assure each other that these other people really are the nuts.
Some of our talk was about men and women. We agreed that men and women are DIFFERENT. They are different, not in the Women’s Lb way, as competitors for the male role, but dffere3nt in a SYMBIOTIC way.
SysOps said it was God, I tend toward evolution, but whatever it was had a REASON for making us different, and it wasn’t so that Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan could make a living.
As usual, while some theorize abut this, I USE it. Both of my first two books in my own name are dedicated to my ex-wife, who is still my trusted friend. She made the Populist Forum operate and was essential to all the rest.
When I took over the Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I chose a brilliant experienced woman as my Associate Director. I was amused that one of my staffers who was a conservative anti-racist was shocked and upset that he had to work under a WOMAN.
Now I have SysOp kicking me ar …, I mean, making deferential suggestions to me.
What you express is a feminine opinion. Women are more GENERICALLY conservative than men. I have tried to explain this many times to professional politicos who wonder why women now vote more liberal than men. They give me the usual dazed cow look and then go back to their complicated discussions.
An old bull like me charges into the new age. You look at it quizically. For me to say yours is a normal feminine approach would have the Women’s’ Libber lynch mob out in force. You and SysOp have no trouble being called women.
We are the only sane ones in this funny farm.
Politics in the New Millennium
I am corresponding with my only liberal close kinsman. He mentioned he was getting more conservative on some things and attributed it to age. That is, after all, what we have experienced for ages, getting more conservative as we get older.
But I made my living observing people’s politics closely, and I think he is only partly right. He hasn’t changed as much as he thinks he has, and I have gotten more radical as time passes. My observation is that neither of us has really changed much.
Those we call liberals today are actually generically conservative. They like things as they are, Politically Correct. I PREFERRED things as they WERE.
But that is only part of it. The ISSUES have changed completely. In our youth conservatives stood for states’ right, a.k.a, segregation, and anti-Communism. Now all National Review talks abut is forcing “democracy” on other countries and crippling medical research.
On the latter point, liberals are generic conservatives. Liberals insist that everything is a result of environment, and none of THEIR funds AND PUBLIC ATTENTION should go into genetic manipulation. You see the hilarious combination of fundamentalist preachers and Harvard Professors of Ethics uniting to suppress human cloning and embryonic research.
I predicted this in the last page of my 1976 book. There is a civil war growing up in academia today which is more important than ANYBODY’S bubble, but as usual only I notice it.
The Battles of Lexington and Concord just happened in Britain. Laws against medical research were loosened, but scientists demanded they be loosened more and the social science/”religious” side was outraged they were loosened at all.
As was the case in 1775, it will be a while before scientists declare Independence from the academia now ruled by social scientists and Political Correctness. You see the same kind of declarations of loyalty coming from them now, feverish ones, that the Founding Fathers gave to the King between early 1775 and July, 1776.
I pointed out at length in my first book (in my own name) that the basic weakness of heredity was that there was no MONEY in it. You can control tens of billions of dollars and public attention when you promise to change thins by social programs, but heredity WAS a fixed quantity.
WAS.
Every year people expect more from forbidden research. Every year hard scientists get tireder of sitting at the back of the academic bus.
I said in my 1976 book that tomorrow’s scientific establishment would be more powerful and more dangerous than the PC one we have now. The routine response to my mentioning it is “SSSH! Let’s ignore it and talk about Ron Paul!”
Needless to say, I won’t DO that, and many a person will float away in his bubble to avoid it.
So here I am in 2007 exactly where I was in 1957: Looking straight at a future I see perfectly and everybody else ignores.
SysOp
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 6/11/2007
Speaking of Ron Paul, and the civil politic — I was up on SF looking for some specific data (to see if it’s there) and came upon this new thread, top and center:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/law-school-here-come-377653.html [log-in member only access]
Re: Law School… here I come!!
LadyCeltic, you scored 178 out of a possible 180? You freakin’ rock, girl!
~~Zoe
This is awesome as far as *I’m* concerned. But I’ll add the caveat that home schoolers are scoring perfect scores on ALL the SATs and their derivatives. The Oregon boy who scored 100% + (got the extras also) was one of many children living in a motor home with his parents working odd jobs in different places so they could stay ahead of the “law” and were setting up in large library parking lots. Their story was phenomenal, but most looked askance at this not-so-attractive group and would say they were weird and would have taken those children away in half a millisecond.
I don’t follow all the different National competitions for various things, but there are not a lot that are not won (all top finalists) by home schoolers.
These people are all regular white folks, it isn’t “rocket science” it’s GETTING THE HELL OUT OF THE SYSTEM and keeping minds and bodies and spirits intact.
The Ron Paul types are the only ones who GET IT. Without highly intelligent, high-charactered (squeaky-clean personal and business lives) men under a rock-solid constitution adhered to by a judiciary that takes EVERYTHING back to the prime principles of original intent-oriented case law and enforcement of same… the system WILL fail. Bob taught constitutional law and forgot more than I know. But at least I know the best of the basics.
This poor lady will learn NOTHING of law the way it was meant to operate, but maybe she can get by long enough to get her piece of paper and her education on what’s right on the side from the best. It’s all available through home schooling sources. Any degree, any field, any level. Do you know about MIT…?
ME:
MIT? I assume you don’t mean the Mass Institute.
A word about genes. A child who has a parent who is capable of and willing to give them an education at home has hellaciously good genes. It also means the family can afford the TIME of one parent to do it. More good genes!
Social scientists are always talking about “breaking the chain of domestic violence” by pointing out that children who were abused by their parents abuse THEIR children. But identical twin tests have shown that identical twins adopted separately AT BIRTH tend not only tend to commit the same NUMBER OF crimes, they commit the SAME crimes at the same AGE! They also have the same taste in toothpaste and so forth.
So there may be no breakable “chain of domestic violence.” People with the sort of genes that make them beat their children may just produce CHILDREN with the genes that lead to child abuse.
Social scientists justify their existence by confusing heredity and environment.
Tactical Problem
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 6/11/2007
BUGS — No sooner said than done!
I submit a problem to the Seminar.
I would prefer the whole top line to read:
Bob’sUndergroundSeminar(BUGS)
That would reduce it to the 29 spaces the present top line is limited to. If they’re HERE, they’ll know it’s whitakeronline.org
BUT let’s leave the Bob’s Blog everywhere else FOR NOW. One advantage I have over The Talent is that I know how confusing the smallest change can be for us civilians in the computer wars.
Damn it, gang! Give me some comments!
This sort of “simple” thing is CRITICAL.
BUGS
Honesty made me keep calling this Bob’s Blog.
I left for a week and you kept it going. Now it really is Bob’s Underground Seminar, BUGS.
So it is time for SysOps and Brain to change it.
I should be ashamed of myself! When I was in my early teens, my father insisted that real management meant that me and my siblings should be able to outwork every black or white worker on the brick plant without passing out.
They were tough but we had to be tougher.
I was put in the roughest places and I never “monkeyed out.” I was TOUGH. That made mercenary combat easy for me later.
I am impressed by that today. I say to myself, “WOW!”
Actually I say to myself, “WOW! That was really stupid! I am still suffering from the brain damage it caused, and my brain was a more precious resource than all of THEM put together!”
So I should be ASHAMED to OPENLY depend on Brain (sic) and SysOps.
I consider everything SysOps and Brain (sic) and Pain and Dave and the rest of you do to be what ***I*** do. After years of thinking about it, the old idea of management seems dumber and dumber to me. Instead of understanding the Wisdom of My Elders, experience makes me see it as stupider and stupider.
It AMAZES me that anyone should think that a high level manager should be COMPETING with The Talent.
But let me conclude on a somber note:
There is a nasty rumor going about that every time SysOp recommends something I say, “Yes, ma’am” and then grovel and whimper.
This is NOT true.
I NEVER whimper.
Honesty is Fatal, But Useful to YOU
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session on 6/10/2007
I said at the end of the last piece that, when you drift off in your balloon, you will not regret the time you spent with me. I predicted, insultingly, that you would eventually drift off in your own little balloon. Shouldn’t that offend you enough to make you desert the blog?
I remember once when a girl said to me, “I really thought a lot of you until you said THAT (I forget what it was).”
My reply was, “If your friendship is THAT easily lost, I’d rather not be burdened with it.” That was not my planned retort, it was my honest reaction.
I remember the last time Mark gave me hell, and I LIKED it. It took me a while to consider his POINT, because I was so pleased that here was somebody who didn’t need diplomacy. That will confuse most people because when someone gets the nickname “Sarge” one expects him to be Mister Nice Guy all the time.
No matter what balloon you eventually drift away in, the sort of brutal honesty Mark and I share is unique in the political/propaganda world. Many a person who has drifted away from me has expressed a nostalgia for the one time they were close to “an honest person who pulled no punches.”
Honesty is a lousy tactic. It is definitely not Shrewd. But the Shrewd people are all gone, and I’m still here.
Bubbles 2
Now that WE are Bob’s Blog, I can ventilate some. No longer is a Word From Bob Himself an excuse for someone here to desert us.
But this ventilating contains lessons. I have been in this game, determined ONLY to save my race, for fifty-five years. I have watched hundreds or thousands of people drift away from the cause in their little bubbles.
I THOUGHT I just watched AFKAN drift away in his bubble. My apologies to AFKAN. It was just Al Parker being cute. AFKAN will forgive me.
But my mistake would have been fatal before.
When this blog was just me, I was on a knife edge. People who swore they were dedicated above all to the survival of our race would get insulted and what they took as an insult to them or their pet bubble would cause them to instantly drop everything they had said they learned here.
I watch as Stormfronters leave our tiny group with our special mission to join a group collecting immigration petitions or hailing Ron Paul as Our Savior. There are MILLIONS of THEM, but our people deplete our tiny, historic ranks to get in on the Latest Big Thing.
I have spent fifty-five years watching one Latest Big Thing after another. To me the Jehovists who were saying that we could not plan for the long-term because if a Catholic were elected president in 1960 there would never be another election in America are as fresh in my memory as the Ron Paul for God crowd is now.
I know every bubble people drift off into from personal, raw, painful experience. From the obsession with uniforms of the man who founded WOL to the guy I described before I had worked with for half a century and who suddenly became a fanatical defeatist t those who would sell us out in an instant for the pope or their particular version of Jehovah and Traditional Values, I know ticking time-bombs when I see them. All of them have gone off in my face, repeatedly.
I was in at the founding of the Southern League, later the League of the South. Then it drifted off into a multicultural balloon. It had a Jehovist program. I saw that early and went along because I could use it until it blew away completely in its balloon.
I made my living off of the Goldwater-Reagan bubbles. I am fighting my fight on that money today. I get a little tired of people telling me Reagan was not the Real Revolution. I knew that going in.
I could tell you a hundred bubbles I watched people drift off in their balloons, and I could probably describe yours. But you will never regret the time you spent with me before your bubble took you away.
Bubbles
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/10/2007
I get so TIRED of pulling people back from dumb. This Ron Paul crap makes me wonder if I should just give it up.
Our problem is not immigration. Our problem is racial survival. I get so SICK f the usual dramatic, “Before it’s too late” line everybody likes to put in there. WOW! It gets your blood chilled, right?
Wrong.
The worst thing that could happen for RACIAL SURVIVAL would be a cutoff of immigration NOW. There are already plenty of coloreds to interbreed with and make us just another brown country. That’s what Ron Paul stands for.
How in the HELL do MY people get into this kind of “Yuck-yuck, see, I got everybody with me” crap? This is why I am so careful with the Mantra. That little phrase “assimilate (i.e., intermarry with)” is subtle and absolutely, PLEASE NOTE, absolutely critical to, everything I exist for. If you drop it you’re just one more antiimmigrationist.
Intermarriage is the Holy of Holies. The person who started WOL went back to serve in Iraq and our last argument was almost a fist fight over whether his black sergeant could have a white woman if he wanted one.
ONLY THE MANTRA TAKES ON INTERMARRIAGE AS GENOCIDE!!!!!
Yet here I have people panting after Ron Paul, who would fight for intermarriage as a libertarian harder than any liberal.
Join me or join them, but for God’s sake stop being DUMB!
The Yuck-Yuck Bit
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/10/2007
I get so TIRED of pulling people back from dumb. This Ron Paul crap makes me wonder if I should just give it up.
Our problem is not immigration. Our problem is racial survival. I get so SICK of the usual dramatic, “Before it’s too late” line everybody likes to put in there. WOW! It gets your blood chilled, right?
Wrong.
The worst thing that could happen for RACIAL SURVIVAL would be a cutoff of immigration NOW. There are already plenty of coloreds to interbreed with and make us just another brown country. That’s what Ron Paul stands for.
Only a minority white population will fight intermarriage. This is the opposite of the “too late” crap.
How in the HELL do MY people get into this kind of “Yuck-yuck, see, I got everybody with me” crap? This is why I am so careful with the Mantra. That little phrase “assimilate (i.e., intermarry with)” is subtle and absolutely, PLEASE NOTE, absolutely critical to, everything I exist for. If you drop it you’re just one more anti-immigrationist.
Intermarriage is the Holy of Holies. The person who started WOL went back to serve in Iraq and our last argument was almost a fist fight over whether his black sergeant could have a white woman if he wanted one.
ONLY THE MANTRA TAKES ON INTERMARRIAGE AS GENOCIDE!!!!!
Yet here I have people panting after Ron Paul, who would fight for intermarriage as a libertarian harder than any liberal.
Join me or join them, but for God’s sake stop being DUMB!
Right, Dude!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 6/9/2007
The Dude says:
The one thing I get from Bob is that language is key. When citing facts, figures, history, ideas, etc., it is how you say things. That is the best way to attract people to the “cause” or any cause for that matter.
Norfront and Al Parker Express My Opinion on Ron Paul
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session on 6/9/2007
Jun 8, 10:59 PM
Al Parker says:
I’ll tell you who isn’t one in a million: Ron Paul, who is promoted happily by Stormfront.
In response to allegations of racism, Paul said:
“Racism is simply an ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly as members of groups rather than individuals. Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist.”
This doesn’t mean he simply opposes Sharpton and Jackson. It also means he would oppose white people deciding what is in their best interests as a racial collective. You all know he is another kind of Pat Buchanan — he is for “culture” and “America” uber alles. No, I don’t think they are being ‘respectable.’ I think they really believe it and would go to lengths to enforce it.
Someone should gently break this to Stormfront.
——-
Jun 9, 5:15 AM
NorFront says:
“He is for “culture” and “America” uber alles. No, I don’t think they are being ‘respectable.’ I think they really believe it and would go to lengths to enforce it.
“Someone should gently break this to Stormfront.”
You’ll never find a popular white politician who believes in racial differences, that won’t change until the NWO empire crumbles. Ron Paul would stop the flow of illegal immigrants, and stabilize america for a few more years. Our perspective in Europe is that these conservative right wing politicans buy us time. They are like a dam to slow down immigration slightly, and give us more time to work with the people. There is no quick solution.
——-
Seeking Talent Takes Moral Courage
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 6/8/2007
It is important never to let your dislike for an enemy blind you to what he can TEACH you. An old North Carolina joke has one man saying to another:
“You’re ugly, your feet stink, and you don’t love Jesus.”
To outsiders this is a funny demonstration of a hick. But if you are a Southerner, you see the wisdom in it. Like other Southerners — and Brits — North Carolinians think nothing is as funny as making fun of themselves. Actually, it’s a form of egotism.
I like to make fun of ME as a redneck, and that is pure egotism. I think the Yankee naiveté that I have exploited all my life is funny. Others think it is ridiculous for me to play the ignorant bumpkin, but ***I*** enjoy it because it reminds me of so many instances where Yankees fell for a more subtle version of it.
What is behind this “You’re ugly, your feet stink, and you don’t love Jesus?” It is a very profound insight: if you decide that EVERYTHING about your enemy is weak and ugly and bad, you are a damned fool. But that is a trap many people, especially the ones who think they are Knowledge Personified, fall into all the time.
Your average North Carolinian, raised on Porch Talk, knows that. Your average Harvard grad has no idea of it.
I despise Alexander Hamilton. But I admire the man. He did in fact get his power by being George Washington’s staff man. But unlike Eisenhower, who never was near combat, Hamilton did get into the war and was a hero when he did. In fact his big break with Washington came because Washington needed him at headquarters and Hamilton wanted to get back to fighting.
You see, this Lesser Generation, who fought the Revolution before the Greatest Generation, had plenty of men on both sides who wanted to FIGHT. The Greatest Generation whines about how it got SHOT AT, poor babies, and how “We fought a WAR for those benefits.” Washington was SWAMPED with young men like Lafayette and Hamilton who DEMANDED to stop scribbling and get out there and get ripped to pieces by shrapnel.
THEY were not the Greatest Generation, you see. I despise Hamilton. But the Masturbation Generation could not come up to his kneecap.
Below, with my usual subtlety, I shouted,
A MANAGER WHO DOES NOT SEEK OUT PEOPLE WHO ARE SMARTER THAN HE IS IS A FAILURE.
That is what leaves me in absolute awe of George Washington. George Washington was, to put it plainly, not all that bright. But you have to have a real grasp of American history to appreciate this man’s MORAL courage. At his first Cabinet meetings, this slow reader had Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin. In all of history no one was ever able to summon three greater minds than this. Each of them could have had your average Harvard genius for lunch.
TRY, just TRY, to imagine any media or academic bureaucrat today, with an IQ forty points above Washington’s, appointing and ordering around a set of intellectual giants like THAT.
I am very smart, but I am old and tired. I am officially disabled. So I can either seek worshippers of my guruship or I can do what Washington did. Washington was one in a million. I want to be one in a million.
I’m a FANATIC. All that matters to me is that somebody grab the flag that is worthy to carry it.
And if that doesn’t flatter your soul, you don’t have one.
Mark to SysOp
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 6/8/2007
BTW, are you related to Bob? You seem much smarter than him and I picked up on that pretty fast. Don’t tell him I said so, though.
ME:
I take that as a compliment.
ANY HIGH LEVEL MANAGER WHO DOES NOT SEEK OUT PEOPLE WHO ARE SMARTER THAN HE IS IS A FAILURE.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for June, 2007
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
Mark
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 6/11/2007
Mark says:
“I said in my 1976 book that tomorrow’s scientific establishment would be more powerful and more dangerous than the PC one we have now.”
Bob, how is this true? If science breaks with acadamia, as you predict, and if people demand geneticaly altered genes producing white babies instead of their brown or black (also as you predict) then how does this hurt the white race? Seems to me the best thing that could happen is science breaking the PC yoke that restricts research. I mean, if they could make us live longer, feel younger, and be whiter, what’s the harm in any of this? Or am I missing something here?
ME:
On the contrary, I’m all for it.
My point is that this train is coming around the corner and nobody notices it.
We have the very recent example of conservative success and its immediate takeover by the neos. Neos took over while conservatives bitched and babbled to each other. So if we spend ur time talking abut the latest balloon we will get blindsided, too.
All power for good has dangers. The greater the power, the greater the danger. But you can’t deal with the danger involved by just wishing it away. Some of my bloggers will join in the hopeless objectins to the whole biological revolution, so I treaded carefully about it.
But I am the most most RADICAL person you will ever meet. I have nothing invested in the world as it is and where it is now going, so I am all for radical human technology. I keep repeating that the one thing that is certain is that the trends of hte past have nothng to do with the future,but people keep saying “before it’s too late” and other standard stuff, which means they didn’t HEAR what I am saying.
9 Comments