Archive for June, 2007
Danerebor Tells It Short and Sweet
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 06/19/2007
Moral of the story?
Don’t worry about “the future”. Worry about doing what’s RIGHT, right now.
In fact, why worry? Just do what’s RIGHT for US.
I’m So GREAT!
I screwed up and accidentally put Denebor’s IP in a copy and paste. He complained and by the time I read it it was fixed.
So how does MY screw-up which somebody ELSE fixed make ME great? If you have ever managed anything, you will KNOW.
I feel especially sorry for the beginning manager who has new and none-too-bright people to deal with. They LOOK like homo sapiens, but they will come to YOU to tell you water is running out in the bathroom. You go and see that, yes, water is running in the bathroom, and they didn’t CUT IT OFF.
Two of our blacks once knocked on our front door at the plant. My brother went to the door saw a bag right in front of him and the two blacks cowering away from and they wee standing back from a bag they had placed on the porch. They were afraid it was a bomb, so they had brought it to US.
It was a bowling ball that someone had, God knows why, had left in the woods. They had carried this possible bomb half a mile to our door and THEN backed away from it. Actually, the likelihood of someone leaving a bomb in the woods was in the same range as someone leaving a bowling ball, INSIDE a bag, in the woods. They did what they always did; they brought the thing to the Whitakers to figure out.
Bless their hearts, I guess they would rather carry a potential bomb in their hands rather than ask US to go look for it. But they should have known we would rather look at it than have them risk their lives over it.
When we went out to prospect for clay, two of them would dig an auger into the ground. I would get them started by winding my finger in the air clockwise, which is the way AMERICAN augers and screws go.
I ran campaigns, where everybody was a volunteer and nobody knew what they were doing.
I have led Africans, South Americans, and white Americans. When I got people on Capitol Hill who could just DO things, I was in hog heaven.
Other people who are used to managing people who are wholly dependent get SCARED when they get somebody under them who can do it themselves. That is why coming up through the management bureaucracy, like coming up through ANY bureaucracy, is such a disaster.
I don’t need to tell most of you what it feels like to work under somebody who got his job through the management bureaucracy. No, you’re not being hypercritical. They ARE the dolts you take them for, and it could not be otherwise.
As I say, anyone HERE with management background can understand why I am so PLEASED that, in a small unpaid group like this, people just DO things. The better you are, the better I can manage you.
That makes me proud of ME.
Panic Pays II
Posted by Bob in History, How Things Work on 06/18/2007
I was an econmics professor, but I grew out of it. Demography, population study, is a branch of econmics. No long-run demographic projection has EVER been accurate. In 1900 Indians were The Vanishig Americans.
Real economists call demographics Panic Science. Demographers who get published take the population tend of the last generation, make a geometric progressin of it, and declare the world is doomed one way or another. They’re always wrong but nobody remembers it.
For example, everybody remembers the movie Soylent Green but nobody remembers that, in 1972, demographers had taken the arithmetic growth of the Boomer Generation, projected it into the future, and decided that WHITE people wuld be standing on each other’s heads in the 21st century, hence the desperate overpopulation in that movie.
That panic led to a lot of demographers becoming famous and helped cause the population bust of the 1970s. Now THAT population bust is being projected into the future by NEW famous demographers.
Demographers who START the panics are smart oportunists. People who never cease to BELIEVE them need psychiatric help.
Panic Pays
Posted by Bob in How Things Work on 06/17/2007
It is not surprising that so many climatologists agree with global warming and global freezing. It is amazing that so many DISAGREE with it. After all, if you agree with Al Gore, there would be a cabinet-level job for a climatologist and a whole new Department of Climate.
By the same token, the intelligence community never did itself a bigger favor than allowing 9/11 to occur. Everyone who contributed to that disaster has been promoted, every department that failed has twice the budget ad ten times the power that it had before.
I have talked before about how other economists refer to demographics as Panic Science, since only those who take the latest population trends and expand them into a geometric progression, which ALWAYS means impending catastrophe, get famous.
The first rule in all fields is that panic pays and science is handicapped from the start. If you don’t understand this up front, you cannot evaluate any real data specialists put out,
“Professional detachment” is an oxymoron.
Alarmism rules professional opinion.
Dave
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 06/17/2007
BW in this post sure does a good job of getting to the point.
I think future generations will look back to the genetic anarchy of our times and not only be appalled by the ubiquitous and humiliating buffoonery, but also horrified by the vicious evil of the orthodox dismissal of the terrible suffering of countless millions afflicted with genetically borne ailments, disfigurations, and ugliness, all in the name of some sort of religious “good”.
The religious orthodoxy of our times, distilled especially by “pro-lifers”, finds glory and divine ecstasy in the worst possible brands of suffering and sustained agony, all in the name of “life” in its supposed unutterable baked-in-the-cake “nobility”.
Future generations will not only be horrified, but will not comprehend. How could people be that evil?
So the stupid, the horrifically obese, the chronically infected, the insane, and every ghastly disfigurement imaginable is celebrated as God’s means to propagate “compassion” in a supposed “lesson” about the nobility of life no matter what its guise, no matter how intolerable.
Accordingly, people like Mother Teresa are celebrated.
The thought police dare not let us contemplate her vested interest in the horrors, humiliations, and indignities of the slums of Calcutta.
Do not mention that she aligned for 60 years with the political interests that traffic and sustain slums that need not be, should not be, and could instead have been abolished.
Too many careers would be ruined for that. Accordingly, the Pope wasted few precious moments in running to Mother Teresa’s corpse. And if there was ever a careerist, that careerist is the Pope; delay might have terminated her “sainthood” mystique in all of its profitability.
And where would the prison industry and police be without drugs and gangs?
And what would Hollywood be without a cop show to show how noble the police are?
And where would pastors and priests be without retards and others writhing in intolerable flesh bound casements?
And where would the spirit be if there were suddenly no needs for heroism?
People in the future will not be able to comprehend this evil.
That is my hope.
Jun 17, 2:52 PM — Mark Vents
danerebor | groups.yahoo.com/group/snva_nationalists
Multiculturalism counterracts ‘assimilation’. You cannot have proud non-whites and Borg at the same time, even if our enemies want all-brown Borg.
We should quietly support La Raza and press 2 for spanish, at least for now. The less they have in common with whites, the better.
All the damn mexicans across the street from me only have mexican friends. Thank God. My PC white neighbors hate that.
The “DUHH, MEN” Chorus
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 06/17/2007
About three minutes ago I was watching a documentary about The Little Ice Age. They said the Vikings in Greenland should have noticed that the Eskimos had a type of spear that could catch fish in the winter, which, if the Norsemen had adopted it, would have helped them enormously. Then the documentary went straight into the line no one here remembers: “If they had mixed blood with the Eskimos they would have survived.”
Why it requires blood mixing to adapt a type of spear was not specified. It didn’t have to be. No one here except me would even remember they said that, it is so standard. When I discuss it here, I face the “DUH, MEN!” chorus, “I never did heerd nuthin’ lak THAT!”
It was less than ten minutes ago. But I will remember it for hours, even YEARS.
Having a memory is a LONELY business.
Mark Vents
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 06/17/2007
Mark says:
Forgive me Bob, but I’m gonna’ vent. My next door neighbor died and his kids held an estate sale, which attracted all the gutter trash too poor to live in my neighborhood. After watching this vermin (all white)tramp across my lawn even after I told them to get the hell off, I began to wonder why we should save the white race at all.
I believe, if serious about this, that in addition to saving the white race from extinction — the hard working white race, that is — we also have a duty to make extinct that portion of our race that is too lazy to work and leaches off our tax dollars and sweat.
I’m talking about white trash here, the welfare crowd, the social security disability whores who could work but won’t. The ones who race their kids to apply for welfare as soon as they hit 18. I don’t know about you but I’d much rather be surrounded by working blacks (few in number I’m sure) in leau of non-working good for nothing white trash.
Perhaps we should add a line to the Mantra about them. Or maybe wirte a whole new Mantra just for them.
Okay, I’m done venting. And yes, I feel better….
ME:
Good.
Actually, the biological revolution is going to take care of your concerns.
I see a tide moving. The biological revolution will not only LET us make choices on our children’s genes, it will FORCE us to. Random children cannot compete with bettered ones, like it or not.
And, while “pro-life leaders” have moreimportant things to do than remember the Golden Rule, children born relatively ugly and stupid will not APPRECIATE being born that way. And trash can no longer have any excuse for their children’s behavior. In fact, once the importance of heredity is realized, it will the parents, not the children, who will bear the brunt of the damage their children, and the credit for heights their children attain.
A welfare mother is a criminal, and long before 2200 that will become a legal realization. “Pro-lifers” are all for them
I remember back when “pro-lifers” were trying to outlaw in vitro, they gave the distinct impression that children born from in vitro fertilization would be soulless literally God damned robots.
They didn’t SAY that, they just left that impression. Since dealing with them, I have learned that if a pro-lifer says the sky is up you had better Google it first. Compared to their Truth, truth means nothing, which is a typically Wordist attitude.
The 30,000 in vitro children born as of a decade ago are normal, except for the fact that, unlike random offspring, they are all WANTED by their parents and are generally home-school material.
Yes, we are going to see a total change in the 21st century. By 2200 you will see as many dumb, genetically misformed children as you do Amish today. BUT if they are mixed-race, they will lack creativity, THE MAIN HUMAN CHARACTERISTIC WHICH CANNOT BE MEASURED. A high IQ Oriental world would be as stagnant as an ant colony.
So we are moving in intellectually. It will not be good enough just to produce paint-jobs like Japanese cartoons that make the children LOOK white. Don’t get into a Eugenics Balloon. Concentrate on destroying the mentality that makes the end of the white race a virtue.
Already people are denying they ever said that intermarriage is the solution to the “racial” problem. Already people are denying they ever HEARD of “assimilation.” These were Holy Writ a decade ago, though only I remember it.
I know I have won a battle when the media enforces its forgetfulness of its own argument.
The battles I win are forgotten. Which is just as well, because there’s always another hill to take, and most of our enemies and all of our friends forget my role in taking the last one.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for June, 2007
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
Mark and Tom
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses, How Things Work on 06/19/2007
1. Mark says:
You know what’s scary, Bob? I find myself asking you a question, like about 911, or looking for an answer to a question on WOL and then, after reading your opinion I find myself saying, “Okay, Bob says such and such so the matter’s settled.”
I even caught myself telling my wife something about race or politics or something — I forget exactly — and my only argument to back it up was, “Well, hon, Bob Whitaker said so.”
I’m gonna’ have to go have my head examined….
18 June 2007, 11:07 pm [Edit]
2. Tom says:
Ole Bob is going to slap me for this, but it means you’re a whitakerite.
ME:
This is light-hearted stuff, but it gives me a chance to define again what Wordism is.
Mark, keep in mind that what I am doing here is either wild egotism or I’ve learned a LOT of things people need to know. Over fifty years of experience, thought and pain went into it.
If I didn’t think my advice was the best you can get, I wouldn’t be doing this.
Most of what I say without pay is correcting what bureaucracies have drummed into you FOR pay. I try to explain how those bureaucracies work, and they penetrate every part of your life.
Tom, there is nothing wrong with being a whitakerite if by that you mean you learn the tricks of the intellectual trade I have developed. I always welcome correction, which a Wordist will not tolerate.
All learning is not Wordism. All intellectual habits are not Wordist. For example, I keep explaining that Guilt pays MONEY, so teaching and communications bureaucracies naturally push guilt.
Mark may NOW be a whitakerist, small w, but he will DEVELOP his own markism. Only if he becomes a Whitakerist, capitalized, will things have gone too far. A Whitakerist would look in the Book of Bob for every answer all the way t Utopia as an unimpeachable source. A whitakerist thinks about it on his own and examines the source of ANY information to the point of psychoanalysis. He figures out WHY the source, including Bob, said that in the first place.
Somebody is spending money to publish or publicize it and we want to know WHY. To us, there is no “professional objectivity.”
And “peer review” means The Party Line.
Real whitakerism is simple truth fighting millions of Truths.
5 Comments