Archive for July, 2007
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
I will not quote the source because, as Joe Sobran pointed out, if you don’t use “Season’s Greetings, it involves the ‘C’ word.”
I pointed out above that a recovering drunk and addict like me is in no position to attack others for doing bad things for pleasure. I DO have the right and obligation to attack ANYONE, including me, when their actions hurt others, and especially if they hurt my race.
The Big Book of AA points out that there are a lot more drunks than there are clinical alcoholics. That’s nice to know, but both groups look just alike when they end up in the Morgue.
They’re right. I’ve SEEN them.
I am not an alcoholic. I am anhedonic and obsessive. This means I enjoy very few things and, being obsessive, I overdid the few things I DO enjoy or, in the case of alcohol and drugs, that numbed the pain. I needed the program for the same reason that a card-carrying alcoholic did.
It HAPPENS that men have no attraction for me sexually. Women have done a bang-up job of controlling my obsession with THEM, but for some reason this is a favor I have not always appreciated.
It is easy for a person who LIKES exercise to tell me I just need to be strong and get regular exercise the way they do. It was easy for people to tell me I should do like them and just cut back on the drinking.
I cannot tell you how sick I got of that self-righteousness.
Hell, it’s easy to be immortal. You just don’t die. If there were any genetic immortals on earth some of them would tell us that our mortality is just a lack of will power.
So I can’t preach at gays. I would cheerfully kill them for trying to SPREAD their tendencies, but then again at my worst I never pushed alcohol on anyone, let alone a kid, in order to have a drinking buddy. But this is just common decency, not high morality.
You who are not drunks have to decide for yourselves whether you want to say to gays, “Just don’t do it,” but I don’t know whether, if I had been attracted to men, I could have controlled it so neatly, so I’m disqualified for the preaching at gays bit.
Decent gays stick to their own and, while white gays are a shame, I find straight whites who produce colored offspring INFINITELY more evil.
That is IMPORTANT, because too many in our movement spend too much time attacking homosexuals per se.
It is the same with Jews. If they were all like Hassidic Jews, I would have no problem with them.
STAY ON MESSAGE. Our right to preach begins and ends with saving our race.
I pointed out that Che said:
The Negro is indolent and lazy, and spends his money on frivolities, whereas
the European is forward-looking, organized, and intelligent.
– Che Guevara
Mexicans are a band of illiterate Indians.
– Che Guevara
Marx and Engels naturally wrote to each other in German, but they never used the correct German word Neger. They always used the word “nigger,” and unlike all other nouns in German, they didn’t capitalize it.
Marx asked Darwin’s permission to dedicate Das Kapital to Darwin and Darwin refused. The modern Marxist insists that Marx did not believe in the importance of genes. If you actually READ his introduction to Das Kapital, you will find that he makes it very clear that he recognized the revolutionary new ideas abut genes in his day, but that his book was about society.
Those revolutionary new ideas included De Gobineau.
Finally, I never expect an anti to THINK about anything, but when one says “From each according to his ABILITY, to each according to his need” one is taking it for granted that ABILITIES differ. According to modern Marxism, in a perfect Marxist environment, there would be no difference in ABILITY.
Before… I didn’t care. It just wasn’t an issue, I wasn’t brought up in multi-race areas. But when I did, and even in a highly social setting I didn’t paste on smiles — I merely ignored the entire thing — most of those guys have been married before and could never interest another woman (this proven, not a catty comment).
My non-reaction was subtly noted and it was interesting to see how the weeks following sorted out. WOW! did I indeed have some of those hard-won experience moments. Not only myself, but my friends and immediate relatives also. All done behind my back and in private converstation.
Bob, isn’t it a wonderful sort of different satisfaction when they finally won’t approach you face to face anymore. It leaves the “uninitiated” scratching their heads and wondering why such “nice folks” are getting such treatment.
Let me preface the next quote by saying that I never compare myself with the intellect and knowledge and perfection of Jesus (God). But He had a situation somewhat similar. After He threw the merchants and moneychangers out of the temple, and healed a lot of people pronouncing that their sins were forgiven, the political, but highly religious minority party of His day, the Pharisees, and chief priests, and elders approached Him in the temple on another occasion and asked: “By what authority do you do you do these things and who gave you this authority to do these things.?”
Instead of answering directly He used the common practice of a learned man of those days and said: “I will also ask of you one question, and answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things. The baptism of John [the Baptist] was it from heaven? or of men? answer me.”
Here you have it! “And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say, Why then did you not believe him? But if we shall say, Of men; they feared the people: for all men counted John, that he was a prophet [of God] indeed. So they answered and said to Jesus, We cannot tell.” So Jesus refused to answer them. In front of a huge group of witnesses, who really did understand just what happened there.
All of this and the internet are making silence really deafening. The stakes are just as high because the PC gods wield the power of the sword.
Side Note, the coaching is above:
I would never compare myself to Christ as God because, contrary to the popular belief I fully understand, I am not clinically insane.
I might compare myself to Jesus the man if I had the guts to go up on a cross the way He did. The Catch-22 here is that, unlike Him, I would be in no position to talk about it afterwards.
But Jesus made it very, very clear that we must follow in his footsteps. That is what you are doing here and what I try to do.
Shari: There are lots of thoughts I have here, but I might add something concerning ” lost arts.” I believe that we are the only ones that ever cultivated those arts in the first place. Whatever other races demonstrate of them, they learned from us. I hope, and I don’t think, those are ENTIRELY lost arts. Wouldn’t that be awful?
Shari, I want those “other thoughts” too.
I am well into my second childhood, so when you say you have candy but you’re not giving it to me I tend to sulk.
When it comes to discussing women, most men spend their entire time trying to prove they are not homosexuals. Speaking for men, the humorist Lewis Grizzard said, “If I found out I had AIDS, the dying part would be my SECOND problem. What I really couldn’t stand would be all those guys telling each other, ‘I KNEW ole Grizzard was queer.’”
Not bloody likely. Grizzard was married four times and had to pay big time with each divorce. He finally said, “I don’t even bother to get married any more. Now I just find a woman I hate and buy her a house.”
As I’ve said, the Gay Lib line is that a man who can’t stand being suspected of being light in the loafers is a LATENT homosexual. As a propagandist, I think this is a stroke of genius, because you can’t argue against it. The DEFINITION of “latent” is that you don’t KNOW it, so there is no way that you can argue that you aren’t a “latent” ANYTHING.
I find it tiresome to hear men constantly talking about how they lost their virginity before they lost their umbilical chords, but it is more than tiresome when it gets in the way of serious business. And there is no more serious business than what WE are doing.
Being a woman is a lost art. Being a man DEALING with women is a lost art. These things, so critical to the survival of any species, have been lost in various forms of Wordism. Feminism has its Wordist explanations of how sexes should relate which amounts to saying women should COMPETE with men.
The other side looks at the Koran or the Old Testament for a Wordist guide to how men and women should relate. But our real guide is in our genes or given us by God DIRECTLY.
SysOps and I have been working together for years. I dedicated my first two books to my ex-wife who is still one of my best friends. When I ran my Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I had to have an experienced woman as my Associate Director, which was a VERY high position on the Hill, where even receptionist is a hard job to get.
SysOps is not in my age group – few are, especially if you count the mileage as well as the years — but she has a LOT of hard-won experience. In action, she fits with me like a glove, and we accept our different belief system as a matter of course.
What is the FORMULA for this? That gets into Wordism, and there is no Whitakerism with a capital W. SysOps explains these things to women because, with the Wordist perversions out there that concentrate on them, she HAS to.
I just say to men, get off the “I’m not gay and I’ve had a thousand women” crap and get serious about learning the roles of the few intelligent, cult-resistant women there are. Otherwise we will stay an overwhelmingly male movement, and we NEED them.
AFKAN: It reads like one of the newp.org – North East White Pride – constellation, along with FS88, and other hard-core people, and I mean HARD CORE. Compared to them, we are Self-Hating White People.
They are very focused, and are getting the message out on all media possible, with lots of audio, and their own videos.
It sounds like they have been reading some of the more forthright posters on the VNN Blog, who cut through all of the vagaries and state, “If you aren’t defining all issues in terms of RACE, First, Foremost, Forever, you are missing the only point that matters. Try again.”
In short, your Meme is gaining traction.
Note that they quote from the very beginning – at the top right section of their main page – from Pastor V. S. Herrell. Pastor Herrell is the big thinker at christianseparatist.org. These are the people the Stormfront crowd refuses to go within twenty miles of; yet, when bad becomes worse, and worse finally becomes intolerable, these are the ones who will stand with us, and will do so solely on the grounds of a positive theory of RACE.
SF shuns them?
Gosh! RADICALS! How could a bashful respectable kid like me get mixed up with such folks?
Well, I’ve already driven off not only the respectable conservatives, but even Joe Sobran, too. I would take a perverse satisfaction if Kelso and David Duke considered me too unrespectable to talk to.
is pushing OUR message, even giving us credit, and advertising our site, so I recommend to our tech team that we put a link to them here. They are the CEOs, I’m Chairman of the Board. They have to make the final decisions on OPERATIONS like this, hence Chief Operating Officers.
Bob says I need to spell out the link between cults like the JWs and our mission.
We live inside a cult, a very big cult.
Speaking the truth scares people.
The truth is white genocide and the whole thing is explained in a nutshell in the Mantra.
People who are scared don’t think straight, so they do not think logically.
Thus they are easy to beat in an argument (keep it simple).
The truth scares them because they believe in lies: that it’s alright for aliens to invade ALL white countries and ONLY white countries, white genocide isn’t happening but white genocide isn’t a bad thing either and whites do not exist.
They babble when they talk because they believe lies and that makes them easy to beat in a debate.
You can get in a sentence or two before they start screaming, plugging up their ears, calling you names, or staring straight ahead as if they do not hear you.
You know that look; it means what you said hit home.
On a forum, you will be able to write out the Mantra a few times and win a few short debates before you are banned.
Stick to the mantra.
It is often best just to take small pieces of the Mantra out at a time, so people can ingest what you are saying without plugging their ears to your “preaching.”
Telling the Mantra to people is just like talking to Jehovah’s Witnesses or other cultees. Although they do not want to listen to you and you scare them — another part of them wants to hear you, and wants to be free.
The truth shall set them free.
The truth that the doctor prescribes for them is the Mantra, even if it’s just a blurb: “If the Mexicans don’t stop coming here, you know we all will be genocided.”
A: “You know, why is it that ONLY the white countries and ALL the white countries are being flooded with aliens?”
B: “Have you ever been to Mexico? How can you blame them for wanting to come here?”
A: “Yea, we sure made America prosperous. But of this flood keeps up, we’ll lose our prosperity and become genocided too.”
Let him chew on that. Cultees aren’t used to having too much truthfulness at one time; it makes them gag.
Quote from Bud Bundy, “When you pour a gallon of knowledge into a shot glass of a brain, some of it is going to spill out.”
Is this one of ours?
I made a heartfelt plea in the article below and all the comments were on Jehoah’s Witnesses. Could you please reread the article below and make a comment on it?
TWELVE of them, all GOOD!
I was reading the comments and nodding through each of them. They are none of them random, each one is what a seminar is all about.
You are making it more and more clear tome that we are deprogramming a cult, and we should tell people so.
If God can admit to being jealous, I guess I can too. I was disappointed when one comment dealt with Jehovah’s Witnesses but did not wind up with a sentence or two relating that to OUR mission. We need to practice staying on message here.
I would not have noticed this a year ago, but you are getting GOOD at this!
This is a busy day for me, but I’ll get to these great comments later.
I now get automatic feedback on when one of you hits the net with our message. I get the impression that, as Sarge says, a couple of us are doing the daily work and, as with all groups, most are not.
By the time I read the feedback, more than half the stuff has already been wiped by moderator, but at least a hundred people see it before they get to it.
AT LAST, we do not have to sit here and get infuriated as the media hit us without any way to respond. Every time you hit the net, you get a hundred of our enemies screaming for the moderator and boiling over WE are making THEM helpless!
If you have trouble doing it, tell us. US, what a wonderful word that is! Sarge, SysOps, Brain, Pain and the rest are here to urge you on with the energy I have spent up!
THIS IS THE TIME THAT COUNTS! NOBODY has EVER been n the cult’s tail the way WE are! And our message is growing. It seems slow to us, but historically, nobody who was not in a moment of sudden crisis has EVER had the effect we are having RIGHT NOW!
The cult doesn’t KNOW it’s a cult. So no one but us can know how much progress we are making. So you have to be your OWN cheerleader. Get yourself GOING!
The former KGB man was discussing how easy it was to get Americans to the point where “You could SHOW them the Gulag, and they still wouldn’t believe in it.”
I had a creepy experience of this.
In my Intelligence days, about 1970, I was crossing into a European Communists country, legally and openly for a change. I was on a bus and had noticed that a couple of middle-age hippies were on the bus. I was interested in how they would react to the border.
You see, ALL Communist countries had, at the least, cleared areas at the border with the skull and crossbones sign on them that said “minefields.” There were guards in sight with automatic weapons to shoot anyone who tried to escape.
The hippie creed in those Vietnam days was that if we were no different from Communists, it was because Communists were for Liberation. I wondered how that aged hippie couple would deal with the reality at the border.
I repeat, it was CREEPY! It was exactly like something out of a science fiction movie about the Pod People.
As we approached the border, both of them went into a coma. They stared straight ahead, not seeing the landmines, the guards, anything. They only came back to consciousness when the guard came on the bus to check our passports and the weapons and minefields were behind us.
A pure Pavlonian reaction! And I SAW it!
We kept asking pro-Communists, “If Communism is OK, why does EVERY Communist country have to KILL people who try to escape?” They twisted and they changed the subject, exactly like antis do here when we repeat the Mantra.
Pavlov’s antis simply cannot deal with this simple statement:
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
woundednietzsche: In having conversations with “those who can be saved”, I do discuss race issues in the context of a larger conspiracy. Usually because the fence sitters see the current race/culture wars as some natural chaotic expression of society. They do not comprehend why anyone would “want” to have these things happen to our nation and the white race. If you can help them begin to see events/policy/media as a concerted ongoing interlocking program aimed directly at them, at their children, they are more willing to do something about it, and at the very least find the courage to think outside the idiot box. Who wants to fight mother nature? Not me. Who wants to fight the media-brainwashers, the deniers of instinct, the cultural-marxist sappers who are destroying my tribe, my culture? Everyone does, who does not hate himself.
Great guidance but NEVER use the word “conspiracy.” It is part of THEIR arsenal.
“I do discuss race issues in the context of a larger conspiracy. ”
Use “part of the larger picture” or something, but NEVER “conspiracy.”
Please e-mail me at
so I can forward it to you.
At that point I ask that the anti slow down and explain exactly what they mean. Its simple, liberalism as practiced is the feminine mind seeking quick emotional relief, what I do is slow the process down let the contrary thoughts start to instill anxiety upon the cultist. EVERY ANTI IS A TARGET FOR INTERROGATION, not letting them run on the standards of liberal assumption that the cult relies on. This is fun much funner than having a screeching contest with the person.
“First, Anne Coulter tells millions about the ongoing Genocide of our Race. Now Fjordman talks about WORDISM and dictatorship……not bad. ”
Speaking about ideas getting out there. Fjordman the European blogger/writer that the brought the world Islamic horror stories from Europe has just laid out a fascinating read. Fascinating considering he has been adopted by the Neocons and that makes him a bundle of contradictions on OUR RACE issue. But read below……it is MUST reading for BUGS readers/commentators.
“Alexander Boot, a Russian by birth, left for the West in the 1970s, only to discover that the West he was seeking was no longer there. Boot believes that democracy, or in the words of Abraham Lincoln, the government of the people, by the people and for the people, has been replaced by glossocracy, the government of the word, by the word and for the word.
Glossocracy can be traced back at least to the slogan of the French Revolution in 1789, “Freedom, equality, brotherhood.” As it turned out, this meant mass terror, martial law and authoritarian rule. The more meaningless the word, the more useful it is for glossocrats. This is why the notion of Multiculturalism has been so useful, since it sounds vaguely positive, but ambiguous and could be used to cover up vast changes implemented with little public debate. The impulse behind Political Correctness consists of twisting the language we use, enforcing new words or changing the meaning of old ones, turning them into “weapons of crowd control” by demonizing those who fail to comply with the new definitions. The European Union, a French-led enterprise, is currently the world’s pre-eminent and most unadulterated glossocracy.
According to Boot, a dictator whose power is based on bullets is afraid of bullets. A glossocrat whose power is based on words is afraid of words. The EU has drawn up guidelines advising government spokesmen to use “non-offensive” phrases when talking about terrorism. The word Jihad should preferably not be used at all, or should be explained as a misunderstood term meaning peaceful struggle against oneself. These recommendations are being implemented. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, in an attempt to avoid offending Muslims, in the summer of 2007 banned his ministers from mentioning “Muslim” and “terrorism” in the same breath, following attempted terror attacks staged by Muslims – including several medical doctors – in Glasgow and London.”
First, Anne Coulter tells millions about the ongoing Genocide of our Race. Now Fjordman talks about WORDISM and dictatorship……not bad.
Read the whole thing below. But lets savor this line:”the government of the word, by the word and for the word.”
I love Soviet Dissidents. They are our kind of people. We are White DISSIDENTS.
Someone mentioned a few white areas lasting. I started talking abut how whites were being chased down EVERYWHERE on WOL when it started in 1998.
So here is what I wrote in the antis section of Stormfront:
Bill O’Reilly has repeated a dozen times that nothing all-white should be allowed anywhere in the United States. Universities in Canada won’t even LET anybody DEBATE multiracialism.
The motto of antiism is, “There is no room for (white) racism ANYWHERE!!!”
Wherever two or more whites gather together, there will the antis be also.
But our innocent little antis all say, “Well, if whites want to be to themselves, let them.”
I almost NEVER use the word “lie.” I have found that anyone who says liar a lot cannot be trusted.
A lie is an INTENTIONAL untruth. I am not sure antis come up to that standard. They are so well programmed that they can say they do not advocate pushing immigration or interracial marriage and ten minutes later say that intermariage is the Final Solution to the “race problem,” by whch they mean the white problem. I’ve seen it happen on TV discussion shows repeatedly.
If a respectable conservative were to call attention to that, he would lose his “respectable” label AND HIS LIVELIHOOD. In Europe he might be arrested, and the prison sentence is automatic.
But our innocent little antis never see any of this, the way no one ever saw the KGB carry anybody out of the aparments at night.
It’s what the KGB man said. Anti thinking is so screwed up that they could SEE a concentratin camp and not believe in it until THEY were put in it: