The Way Not Taken

Add YET to that title above.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaoX_SgNO70

The one thing I have DEFINITELY to offer you that you cannot get elsewhere is INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY.

This is CRITICAL now. We live in the age where the liberalism of my youth is totally discredited. More important, we have the KGB man link cited above. Our job is to GO BACK and, as commenters have pointed out, DEPROGRAM today’s society.

Which makes institutional memory critical. Our society is based on forgetting what we thought BEFORE programming.

In 1954, blacks had a chance to concentrate on equalizing their schools or integrating. Black leaders had no children in the public schools. Further the NAACP had never had a single black president. Both groups wanted integration uber alles.

At that moment in history, Southern whites would have done ANYTHING to avoid integration. Before the 1954 Supreme Court decision, Governor Byrnes had pushed through our first sales tax specifically to [w]in North Carolina, [where] the average black teacher pay was higher than the white. Affirmative action notwithstanding, that is no longer true.

In other words, in 1954 whites were ready to DEAL.

No longer. The fact is that integration is MUCH easier for Southerners than it is for Northerners. The rich folks whose children used to go to high tone public schools before 1954 send them to private schools now. No way Southerners would take a tax hike now to avoid mixing. The ones who COUNT are avoiding it now.

That was the road not taken. The NAACP concentrated on integrating upper class restaurants, getting whites used to future genocide, and now while the black community is more desperate than ever, all they talk about is the Confederate flag.

Black leaders and limousine liberals do not SEE the crack areas and the ghetto schools. The education establishment does very well indeed. In the District of Columbia over ten thousand dollars is spent PER PUPIL, 99%of them black. But nobody puts his child into one of those disasters voluntarily. I once saw Amy Carter standing in the school yard with two Secret Service agents standing beside her. The Carters bragged they sent THEIR child to DC schools. I know a lot of judges who ordered busing, and I have never heard of ONE whose grandchildren were not in private schools.

BUT EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN.

Blacks lost their opportunity. Blacks who could be employed have benefited from the help of their (relatively) high-income leadership and job quotas, but for the mass of blacks, things are worse than ever except for welfare checks.

But after fifty years and more of dealing with an anti-white obsessed black leadership, we are SLOWLY GETTING into a position to DEAL. What does not now exist is what was in place in 1954, a WHITE leadership.

Those who speak for whites, AS WHITES, will rule the future.

Immigration and white birth rates will not make the future. I was raised in a white minority. I spent a lot of time in Africa, where whites vastly outnumbered.

As the antis show every day, whites now make a weak, anti-white majority. But as a minority we will be more powerful than any minority in history. I look forward to the day when our national debt will be paid by corporations whose history is hunted down on VCRs and archives, and every anti-white act will be paid for as it deserves, with a small cut to the people doing the searching.

Who will protect today’s rich liberals and their heirs? Those who rushed to join the anti line when it became popular? Non-whites? They will have their OWN spokesmen, and the Teddy Kennedy and William Buckley types will be OUR business, not THEIRS.

It will be a variant of the Titanic, as today’s antis try to get on the white lifeboat.

We racists don’t KEEP records of antis. But when it PAYS to expose them, they are on the record, loud and clear, on the PUBLIC record. No anti[s] need fear [a racist] speaking up. When it PAYS, people will find them on the PUBLIC record. That was done on a small sale in the post-Reconstruction South. That is done by anti-racists to former racists today.

But the record in the 1880s and today is miniscule compared to the public record available in the near future. Each sell-out who tries to board the lifeboat has a [t]rail behind him that I, as one who spent a long time in Intelligence, [knows] is more detailed and will be more detailed than anyone can imagine.

We don’t do this for money, but society is not [only] vengeful, it is greedy. For every person who is ruined the way anti-racists want racists ruined, out of revenge, a hundred antis and their heirs will pay vastly for room on the boat. No blacks will want them. No Hispanics will want them. They will have their OWN boats. There is only one lifeboat for the anti-white whites, and it will be full of ANGRY, GREEDY people.

And I want it to be that way. My entire life has been ruined by anti-white whites, and I want to look forward to the day when they pay and pay and pay. I don’t hate minorities, [or] even Jews. But I DO HATE TRAITORS.

Especially the ones who act innocent, “Well, I’m just going along with what Mommy Professor said, and so is everybody else. That’s safe.”

Not i[f] I can help it, you son of a bitch.

On the whole subject of antimiscegenation law, I read practically nothing that is accurate, as I explained below about wikipedia’s “The Future District of Columbia.”

The following explains the status of blacks, including in the Quaker State, which someone said abandoned its anti-intermarriage law in 1790. In 1856 blacks were not allowed on trolleys in Philadelphia:

http://www.primaryresearch.org/bh/research/lauranzano/index.php

When I lived in Massachusetts, I read a book written in 1867 called “The History of Slavery in Massachusetts.” Pasted on the inside of the cover was an 1867 book review, written in 1867, bemoaning the fact that someone would dredge all this up JUST when they had the South by the throat to punish for slavery.

In that volume I had a living witness to the abolition of the MA anti-intermarriage law in ****1863****.

It was SCHOOL SEGREGATION that the abolitionists fought and THAT was abolished in 1843, the date given for the 1963 act abolishing antimiscegenation law. I read the argument for integration in 1842 in the 1960s in a book called “Documents of American History.” This was the 1960s, and every document relating to American history was, as the author stated, there to prove that abolitionists were1960s integrationists. Trivia like the Constitution was left out.

In the 1960s, we said that integration would lead to intermarriage. Modern Opinion in 1960 said that integration had NOTHING TO DO WITH INTERMARRIAGE. In 1967 the Supreme Court abolished all laws against intermarriage.

This is such a continuum today that everybody who talks about intermarriage laws ALWAYS confuses them with antislavery laws, integration, as in the case of our commenter, and so forth.

We have the same problem with the very EXISTENCE of the Fifteenth Amendment, giving blacks the right to vote. According to present interpretation, the “right” to vote, LIKE THE RIGHT TO INTERMARRY, WAS already included in the fourteenth amendment.

Why IS there a fifteenth amendment? Not only was it assumed that the fourteenth did not give blacks the vote, much less marry whites, but it was harder to cheat through the fifteenth amendment than it was the fourteenth, even with all the congressmen from the Old Confederacy denied their seats and votes.

NO ONE ever thinks about WHY, if the fourteenth amendment gave “equal rights” to blacks, the fifteenth amendment EXISTS,

These were critical distinctions to earlier generations, even to the Radical Republicans. When THEY ruled the South during Reconstruction, THEY enforced antimiscegenation laws. It never occurred to ANYBODY then that integration and, God knows, intermarriage, could not be outlawed by a STATE.

The bottom line is that Vermont almost certainly DID have an anti-intermarriage law, though they had almost no blacks. It is amazing that they FOUND a black slave for the state court to free in 1775, but slavery was on the books until then.

This was a lot of WORK. I get TIRED every time someone decides to go into this. No one knows ANY of the real history.

When I was a ten-year-old in Cuba, I already understood that Latin American countries had lotteries because it was the only chance that the average person had to get ahead.

Blacks weere mixed with whites there because, from the point of view of those who owned everything, all peasans were equal, just as the Queen of England tday says that any of her hundreds of millions of Commonwealth former subjects has the right to move to England, even if they do elbow out the white peasants.

Now we have state lotteries, the super-rich in charge, and everybody who is not rich is equal to everybody else. We live in Batista’s Cuba. To the very rich, all those peasants are the same. The LAST people who object to this attitude on race are the Marxists.

Leftism and respectable conservatism agree that all peasants are equal. So do today’s leftists. And we have also gone Latin American on assimilation.

Don’t worry. Batista’s Cuba will be replaced with a rightist or leftist form of Castro’s. Cuba rumbled for decades, then Batista’s Cuba collapsed in a matter of hours.

To others, the suppression and rumbling dissatisfaction shows that the System cannot be beaten. I watched the Soviet Empire go. I watched Batista go. I watched Perot come within a hair’s breadth of being elected president, certifiable though he was.

Nobody thinks the coming election will make any difference. Politics has ceased to have meaning, but the discontent is palpable. It just has nowhere to go.

I must have been raised in a different world, because all this strikes everybody ELSE, from racial defeatists to respectable conservatives, as STABILITY.

And remember, when the collapse of Batista came, Cuba went from fascist to Communist, ALL THE WAY. Russia went from Communist to fascist. If things are the way I see them, the safe, moderate position today will put you in enormous danger in the future.

You may have to EXPLAIN your “anti-racism:”

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

“…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag,… excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

This was taken for granted in 1907, and TR was one of the more liberal on the subject. Today it is absolute chauvinism.

When you discuss the Constitution, remember that the same thing would have been routine to say about the white race. We were discussing what to do abut Indians and blacks, not whether to assimiliate with them.

The reason the capitol of Liberia is named for a slaveholder is because President John Monroe FOUNDED Liberia country to return freed blacks to. Francis Scott Key was another who favored this solution. Those who were opposed to slavery always had the problem of what to do with the blacks after they were freed.

This is a major hunk of history you never hear a word about. Historians act as if everybody took it for granted that it was slavery or assimilation. In fact, the accusation of “Negro Equality,” much less intermarriage, was one of the major planks of those opposing Lincoln’s reelection in 1864. He denied it vigorously, of course.

How could our overly domesticated population of Americans possibly know that the “six million Jews” shrieking that began in the spring of 1945 was part of a “war atrocity claims game” that is as old as war itself, truth, as always and forever, “being the first causality of war”.

And how could they also possibility know that there is never and beginning and ending to war and its trajectory, the trajectory changing manifestation in forward linear time, but nevertheless one continuous trajectory from the horizon of the forgotten past to the horizon of what is impossible to ignore in the here and now.

Accordingly, WWII did not end in 1945 and continues today. It all continues, in the endless trepidations of the State of Israel, in a castrated Germany, in the generations of refugees infesting Dehli, Moscow, Cairo, Khartoum, Berlin, London, New York, cities ringed and inundated with populations of countless millions still floating in the same of old tide forcible evictions, economic desperation, and nationlessness.

Who in America really understand the continuous nature of these trajectories to see through today’s manifestations to the whole cloth of one conflict tumbling into another, the residue of the past’s reality ever present in the here and now?

And Americans crippled by one, and only one, atrocity claim? Not knowing that there have ten thousand of these in history, no less compelling in scope and ghastliness? These going back to antiquity into every age that has ever been, these claims being an integral part of war?

Americans are not and have never been up to this. They simply have not and do not have the street smarts or the “leather”.

But that will change as the current generation of weaklings and schmucks in their wholesale dereliction brought the whole cloth of the larger world and its tragic history to America with their fabulous and millennial doctrines of multi-racial and multi-ethnic harmony, doctrines only the weak, corrupt, sheltered, and pampered could possibly entertain.

They are now destined to learn the true meaning of their doctrines in radiant pain and suffering, and fated to be as steeply learned these matters as such “old world” peoples as the Sikhs in their eviction from their Indus Valley homeland, and the Serbs in their eviction from Kosovo, and the Tibetans in the Chinese usurpation of their homeland. I could go on with endless examples.

How is it possible that American people could be so utterly stupid as to let this happen? But happen it has. I see it every day in an America that is no longer American, and won’t be tomorrow and never will be again.

America is now immersed in the whole of the world and what it has always been in all of its tragic and horrible suffering, an endless trajectory of racial, ethnic, and religious conflicts.

Accordingly, the time for dumb, soft, sheltered, pampered, and no street smarts Americans is over.

George Orwell explained in his novel 1984 that a rational society must include “the right to say that two plus two equals four.” In The Crown Versus Joseph Pierce, 1987, the British court ruled to send a man to prison under the Hate Laws by declaring that “The truth is no defence.”

This phrase, “The truth is no defense,” has a long and disreputale history. In 1796, due to the support of George Washington, John Adams became the last president elected on the Federalist Party ticket by a hair’s breadth, beating Jefferson by three electoral votes.

In 1798, the Federalist Party won its last national victory. Due to the XYZ Affair, it carried a huge majority of both Houses of Congress. It passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1799, which largely outlawed criticism of government policy. It saw the first amendment as gun controllers see the second amendment today, as something that wasn’t really there.

After 1798 Jefferson did his critiquing anonymously. Publishers and editors went to prison in droves. One of their major demands was to get rid of the British-derived doctrine that, when it came to the King and His policies, “The truth is no defense.”

In 1800, the Federalist Party was defeated at every level. It began its steady slide into nonexistence. The PEOPLE, not the courts, got rid of that whorish doctrine, “The truth is no defense” in America.

Now we accept the idea that the truth is no defense in fact, if not in words. I lived with that for decades as scholar after scholar was ruined for telling the truth about innate racial differences. When he was fired, the screaming New York Jews and those who learned from them cowed the Masturbation Generation by screaming, “Six Million Jews!!!!”

We won, now that even the New York Times says that, “the hereditarian view of racial differences is far more acceptable today than it was” (previously). But the cost was staggering and the heroes forgotten.

And the LESSON is forgotten.

In the 1960s I listened quizzically as libertarians went into great detail about how Ayn Rand or LeFevre or some other Libertarian Truth had justified freedom in a tome. I thought how EUROPEAN this was. Screamers had crushed the old American idea that I have freedom because I will do what I damned well please.

The AMERICAN version of freedom is Grandma sitting on the front porch with a shotgun waiting for the government to run over her house to build a road. The AMERICAN version of freedom of speech is not a tome and a Wordist doctrine justifying freedom, but “two plus two equals four.”

Like everything in life, freedom is not a doctrine, it is a matter of sense. I will do anything I damned well please. If you say my money should go to “something worthwhile” instead of what, IN YOUR OPINION, is a “trivial” thing, I don’t give a damn, no matter how loud you shriek.

So the Objectivists tried to shout ME down at the University of Virginia for my racism. It didn’t work, by a long shot. So they stopped speaking to me. Since all they would have had to say to me was already in a book, that was no sacrifice.

I keep begging you to drop all that Wordism. ALWAYS INSERT “IN YOUR OPINION” when the shriekers shriek. We don’t need a Russian Jewess, bless her heart, to tell us THAT. Ayn Rand was just the only one who had to guts to shriek down the New York shriekers in the age of the Masturbation Generation.

When they shriek “racism” no one dares ask, “What, IN YOUR OPINION, IS Racism?” No respectable conservative EVER presses that question, or even ASKS it.

The anti-racists (anti-whites) were shouting, and for the obedience-trained Masturbation Generation, that was enough. They learned In World War II that the highest honor was to obey a sergeant who screamed in your face. Their children learned from them, and their libertarian children needed a BOOK to deal with the shouters.

Once it takes a BOOK to justify freedom, it doesn’t EXIST any more.

The list of states which did NOT have antimiscegenation laws keeps changing.
One quoted wikipedia entry said that “the future District of Columbia” had never passed such a law.

That “the future” was probably referring to the fact that it got BACK a local government only recently. It has been DC since congress created it. DC HAD a local government until 1883, when its charter was removed by Republicans because it was a pro-Southern and Democratic. One part of the Compromise of 1850 was to abolish the slave TRADE, certainly not slavery, in DC.

The local government set up, and the same congress that passed the fourteenth amendment funded, a SEGREGATED public school system. You BET they had and enforced an anti-miscegenation law.

Minnesota had SEGREGATED schools in 1909. The most unlikely states had laws like this, despite the fact that they had practically no blacks to enforce them on.

It is very hard to prove a negative, especially since practically nobody knows any history. Vermont probably did have one, since New Hampshire and Maine did.

Massachusetts abolished slavery about 1783, but abolished its anti-intermarriage law at the height of the Civil War in 1863. No one then challenged the right of a state to have one, and Lord knows who bothered to pass them back then in places like New Hampshire and Minnesota.

NO ONE then thought that prohibiting intermarriage was an imposition on ONE race. Which is why I keep pointing out that the idea that “We the People” included all races was simply a no-go to the REAL writers of the Constitution.

One reason for the “DUH-MEN Chorus” maybe that most people have not spent their lives battling these people and heard all their arguments a thousand times. In discussing Hell as just a poor “quality of life” I half-seriously apologized for using the term.

Back when I was working actively as an ally of pro-lifers, “quality of life” was the pro-choice slogan in defending foreign aid to pay for abortions.

Now commenters keep saying they never HEARD of it. I saw as CHRISTMAS special a couple of years ago where a guy form Christmas Future who looked Oriental said everybody looked like him in the future, a fusion of races.

Pat Robertson said intermarriage would ease our race problems just recently. “Assimilation” is the mantra of liberals and conservatives. Yet commenters keep telling me they never HEARD of such a thing! Antis will say it one day and deny it the next.

I’m too OLD to play this game! If you never HEARD of it, maybe that’s because someone who has been in this game forever has something to TEACH you.