Archive for August, 2007
This is a coaching session from Dave.
I left out his final comment on marijuana because I think commenters would obsess on that one paragraph. I hope this is an undeserved insult, but I hope it is useful cautionary one:
TV is an irrelevant thing because of the Internet. The real minds on the Internet show through like a cop’s 500-lumen flashlight. It has been fascinating to watch the Internet’s influence on the markets. The whole market commentariat evolves together with lightening speed based upon the highest IQs. I can trace the influencers with complete transparency and immediately detect those who have failed their homework or whose intellectual horsepower isn’t up to snuff.
This is a new world with its speed and access for those with IQ horsepower. The blocking intermediary has been flushed out and passes to elite clubs have been made much easier to obtain.
This process is in early stages. Take a look at Facebook.com. Facebook.com is yet another incipient engine of conspiracy, a fabulous tool in intelligent hands for loyalty coupled with a conspiracy is a badge of social class.
For example, I remember as a kid the Patty Hearst saga: These “revolutionaries” calling themselves the “Symbionese Revolutionary Army” sold each other out in the less than 5 seconds flat. Revolutionaries indeed! They were double-digit IQ mutt niggers pretending to be revolutionaries.
Pretending is something we do profusely as kids and we don’t usually drop the habit in adulthood. The kid who put together Facebook.com is a revolutionary. He is not a pretender. He puts to shame all Wordists.
Responsibility is there for those willing to shoulder it and pretending comes to an end when you realize our world is far more deterministic than our “rising expectations” culture dares to acknowledge. Fear takes the driver’s seat, ebbing and flowing over great secular eras. It has been so long since America has known the flow, the mass of Americans have forgotten it exists, yet the competitive struggle deepens and the consequences for delusion become ever more onerous.
“The Tough Guy approach is to learn “both sides,” to aggressively Question. But he is already into step two. His big concern is LOOKING doubtful, not in analyzing reality.”
I always thought that meant he knew who was wrong and was protecting him. So when he puts on the tough image, I’m thinking “What a wuss,” and he can tell he’s not fooling me, so he gets pissed.
You got it!
All my life the people who chickened out did so by sayng they were just being “realistic” and “experienced.” No member of the Masturbatin Generation said, “I’m not going to go out there and get my butt beat with you,” they said, “I was IN World War II, and I MADE my REAL sacrifices.”
The Masturbation Generation never said, “I had my butt kicked into line and was taught to obey without question.” They said, “I learned out in the REAL world that you just have to settle for things as they REALLY are.
I keep asking you to consider WHY any information is PRODUCED.
This is very different from asking you to DOUBT. It goes deeper, and should take MORE time. The Tough Guy approach is to learn “both sides,” to aggressively Question. But he is already into step two. His big concern is LOOKING doubtful, not in analyzing reality. If you “study the question,” that means YOU know all about it.
And for the Tough Guy, everybody seeing that you know it all is where the process stops. What good does any Wisdom do if it doesn’t show how wise YOU are?
Please note that I began here by analyzing WHY the Tough Guy says what he says, not by casting doubt on it from my endless fund of information about all aspects of the question. Why do ***I*** use this approach? Because the Tough Guy is aiming to look tough. I, on the other hand, am interested solely in power in the real world.
Look at that word “real.” Do you think it is accidental that whenever we hear the word “reality” it means something awful? But you could do this for YOURSELF: WHY does the word “reality” always mean something awful? It is because the person using that word is saying,
1) ***I*** really know what reality is, because of my virtues.
2) ***I*** have “been there.”
3) ***I*** am tough and experienced.
In other words, the person who defines “reality” is talking entirely about HIMSELF, which is precisely what reality is NOT about.
The most Tough Guy things I have ever done were a COVER. If you have papers to show you are working with a sewing machine company and someone figures out that you are actually a combat merc, they stop looking. To look any further would be like finding someone is covering up an armed robbery and then saying, “Well, this must be a cover for something SERIOUS.”
Like acting the Dumb Southerner in DC, this analysis of reality has a very, VERY practical side. That is WHY it is REALITY. That someone may be using being a merc as a cover simply doesn’t occur to people. Why?
Because the information people are used to from Tough Guys is aimed at making Tough Guys look TOUGH. Merc is the toughest so merc is the end of the chain.
In other words, “reality” begins and ends with his being a Tough Guy.
I just saw it for the first time.
A fighitng bug is a wonderful idea, but check and be sure we’re not using one we can be sued for.
“Ironically, the safe, comfortable past is an elegant trap…”
Thinking ahead and thinking things through does NOT mean central planning.
Populist leadership can be as simple as recognizing worth and expertise and drumming up support for those that have them, while at the same time recognizing what is insane and harmful and sweeping such people out of the way. But somebody, a generalist, needs to have an idea of what is going on, or there will be no change, no revolution, no politics.
Another example I gave in the past is how the West was won. There was no central planning. There was a little politics and there were guide books. The guide books described the trails heading West, how to survive in the wilderness, and how to scratch out a living wherever you were. This was revolutionary. This was planning. But it was NOT central planning.
There was a kind of bureaucracy involved in printing and selling the books, in the manufacture of the wagons, and in holding a group together while tracking months through the Great American Desert and keeping scalps away from bloodthirsty Injuns. There was planning, but no CENTRAL planning.
It is not that anyone thinks you are trying to create a mass movement, it’s that you still have more practical knowledge to share with those who could help you use it. I know you are tired, so if that’s it, then we will focus on organizing what you have already written, which is a job well done. Organizing always brings out new insights and general conclusions and this is what Dave is doing at National Salvation.
1) The white race is DOOMED, because it is due to decline from seven hundred million (guess) to (guess) three hundred million in this century.
2) Jews rule the world and are going to KEEP ruling it, though their population is about one in five hundred of the people on earth and is dropping like a rock.
Those who talk about Change cannot deal with real, honest-to-God change, just as the last people who know love are those who shout Love incessantly. No one is a better hater than a person who insists he is fighting Hate.
Marxism believed it was obvious that the best economy would be a PLANNED one. Instead of all that inefficient competition everyone would just pull together in an organized fashion. The term Social Progress has been laughed out of existence. Now they call it Change, though I haven’t even heard that term in a while.
But Social Progress or Change, it means that Political Correctness knows exactly where society is going, that it is going in his direction, so Change is on his side. Which is the exact set of assumptions that got Social Progress laughed off the map.
Wordists all claim to know exactly where the world is headed. Every Wordist also knows that if he could consistently predict the stock market that way, he could BUY the world in a few years. When peabrains like that actually take over an economy, anybody who should be trusted with sharp objects should know what will happen. But the experts and intellectuals declared it a success until it literally collapsed before their eyes.
The fatal weakness of Change is that it cannot deal with the slightest bit of real change. Marx assumed that what he thought were the trends of his day would continue unchanged. The proletariat would get poorer and more desperate. Even as he wrote, the first we of the city proletariat was becoming management and beginning to buy property and workers were being given the vote.
None of this concerned Marx in the least. A good Wordist never lets reality slow him down.
Everything here RELATES. To an extent a present reader finds it impossible to conceive, the Middle East was the absolute basis of ALL thinking that thought itself civilized In Marx’s day. There was no real change. Every Great Civilization progressed through rigid phases. The High Culture was the pyramid-building and scribe phase Egypt had reached and we had fallen from.
You don’t need a free market to tell you how to build a pyramid. In fact you don’t need a market economy to do ANYTHING that twentieth century history says High Cultures did. All you need is scribes to plan and organize it.
Meanwhile out in the real world slamming an Egypt-style planned economy into the modern world was like taking the Wright Brothers’ plane up against a modern jet fighter.
And that is why what I say sounds so confusing. After a lifetime of being given exact plans and specifications for building an endless number of Wordist pyramids, I am trying to get you back to a system that visibly takes Wordism apart when it goes for a test flight. I do not NEED a mass movement. I need to push certain basics to keep the movement in a rational direction.
But, as with the economy, the apparent winner is the equivalent of planning, the torchlight parade approach. Just as a Great Civilization was based on building pyramids, a great movement is based on getting millions of people out on the street. That is why someone like me spends WEEKS arranging that “spontaneous” crowd when The Candidate shows up. That’s the way Harry Truman did it and, by gum, that’s the way it’s done NOW!
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, mass meetings are strictly for show. The real campaign is one-on-one or the despised “campaign slogan,” which is really an attempt to express the public mood, however crude. It is not “good” in the sense Marx would define a “good” economy. A campaign slogan is as hit-or-miss, when judged on its “goodness” as the latest trend in consumer spending. But have you ever LISTENED to the total, changeless crap that is shouted at mass meetings. They are mobs, with the IQ of mobs.
The age of TV moved from the mass meeting to the slogan. Has anybody noticed that we are no longer in the age where television is the Latest Thing? In our age, an idea very rapidly becomes either outdated or a challenge that must be met. This is the first time in history when the ordinary person has the POWER to DEMAND an answer. It is very, VERY hard to do so, but one of my favorite things is watching the old “professional journalists” get together and moan about this modern age when “professionals” no longer control every outlet.
Thirty years ago everyone knew who the Anchor Man on CBS was. I don’t. IS there one?
People always want me to present a more “solid” set of ANSWERS. Everyone you know can present you with a solid list of what constitutes Change. Everyone but me. I deal in a world that changes from year to year. Rule One: No kind of Change can deal with real changes.
The most “progressive” economies on earth proved that.
Pain asked two questions.
I’ll deal with the second one first:
(2) Only you seem to have the experience in a bureaucracy to know how to make it work, or how to do without it. If populists won control of the government, how could they make sure that the bureaucracy did not work against them?
Pain, I spend most of my time dealing with questions like your first one: Why hasn’t the revolution taken place yet? That does no GOOD at all, but that is what people challenge me about.
Meantime, there is REAL world out there, where the revolution HASN’T taken place yet, and a bunch of amateurs quoting amateurs. I ran into that during the Reagan Administration.
I am trying to explain how to THINK abut real power in the real world. For every minute readers spend thinking abut what I am trying to tell them, nine minutes go to the standard stuff.
I keep repeating, “You can have the money, you can have the fame, you can have the t\titles. All I want to do is rule the world.” I realize that readers are going to think that’s cute and then go back to preaching and capitalizing RACE and stuff the way AFKAN does.
I keep repeating that the important things I have worked out seem so obvious they are humorous. Most readers think that’s cute and go back to routine thinking.
Then you ask me how a group taking power will recognize and get expertise. That is why I work so hard here to debunk present “expertise!”
It’s right HERE, Pain!
It I true that other animals have learned to avoid snakes that have brightly-colored skin. Bright color is the snake’s way of telling you that he is poisonous. The reason e wants other animals it is poisonous is by its brightness of color. In fact, there is a frog in Brazil that is poisonous and it, too, has bright-colored skin.
The reason these poisonous beings have that skin color is to show that they ARE poisonous. Granted that an animal which attacked and killed them would EVENTUALLY die for it, but in the meantime the poisonous animal could be dead from the attack, so the death of its attacker would do it little good.
So most animals avoid bright-colored snakes just for the color of their skin.
WE, who have been trained by Mommy Professor, know this is a pointless prejudice. There are bright-colored snakes that not only have no poison, they have no TEETH. So it is RIDICULOUS to avoid a reptile because of its skin color.
Up to half of the young men with black skin are in the prison and parole system. But, as Mommy Professor points out, at least half of them are NOT. So if woman gets on an elevator alone at night with a man, his skin color should make no difference. This is an official statement from CBS in its guide as to how to avoid violence.
So anyone who would not pick up a snake because it is bright colored is a racist and anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
I said before that no one would check out the Black Sea bottom because no one had an INTEREST on checking the Black Sea bottom. From Bible thumpers to social scientists to Political Correctness to Marxism, everybody likes history just the way it is, rooted in the Middle East.
BUT the guy who made millions locating the Titanic found this to be a great project. HE now has a vested interest in pushing the IMPORTANCE of history up around Mount Ararat which, in historical terms, is about as Middle Eastern as Mongolia today.
This is how things REALLY work, and it is impossible to explain to someoe who WANTS not to understand. Most people have a vested interest in seeing the world as they see it now.
But in the real world research is not done by abstract entities, it is done by PEOPLE. A PERSON has no incentive to go after truth. As I said, Futurology has nothing to do with the future. It has to do with trends in Futurology, getting grants and publicity in the field, TODAY.
I was just looking at a Time Magazine from November 21, 1932. In the International section, discussion of German politics was under Belgium. Belgium was up in arms over what the experts said was the certainty of the restoration of the Kaiser in Germany. Belgium, which had been invaded in 1914 and occupied by the Kaiser’s Germany for four years, had parades in the streets against the restoration of the Kaiser.
In its report on the Munich Putsch in 1923, Time referred to Hitler as a “monarchist.” World War I dominated their memory, and the Kaiser was NEWS in 1932, whereas Hitler was a nobody.
One talking head was quoted as saying,” It is not a question of reestablishing the monarchy, the question is how it will be reestablished,” in other words, would it be the still-living Kaiser Wilhelm II or his successor?
Kaiser Wilhelm II lived in exile in the Netherlands. When Hitler occupied that country in 1940, the former Kaiser was guarded from all contact by German troops. He died in 1941 under the Third Reich.
For someone making a living as a writer for Time, the readers had to be given something they recognized and loved or hated. That meant the Kaiser in 1932.
U.S. explorers said on Wednesday they have found signs of human habitation hundreds of feet below the Black Sea where a catastrophic flood occurred about 7,500 years ago, which some scientists say is linked to the biblical story of Noah.
Explorer Robert Ballard, famous for discovering the wreck of the Titanic, said his National Geographic expedition found a ”rectangular structure,” possibly that of a building, about 310 feet below the sea’s surface, indicating people lived there before a massive flood inundated the area.
“It’s architecture and artifacts were of the Neolithic bronze age, which is from about 7,000 years ago,” said Ballard. The team’s chief archeologist, Fredrik Hiebert, described the finding as the “Pompeii of landscapes” and said it was typical of the wattle and daub homes seen on land.
“This is a major discovery that will begin to rewrite the history of cultures in this key area between Europe, Asia and the ancient Middle East,” said Hiebert, an archeologist from the University of Pennsylvania.
“***But please help us focus here. I think there are very many people who read this blog, but don’t post comments because they are unsure what you want.”
– Peter Pain
Peter, don’t fret; Bob’s just pissed because I wouldn’t apologize to Hardric for his unwillingness to condemn the welfare crowd. If Bob can’t get his way he’s gonna’ stomp his cane and shake his finger until the neighbors all know his milk’s curdled. It has nothing to do with anything other than ego and old age irritabiliy. On the positive side it shows he still has spark. On the negative side it makes him look like an old coot. Either way, we’re gonna’ hear about it.
Needless to say, Mark’s wrong. I’m Practically Perfect in Every Way.
But Mark is saying more or less what I said below. This is a rough and tumble crowd. The person you must be satisfied with is YOU.
I just want Mark to get off this and on to something else, but the point we have here is CRITICAL: You should realize that, if you stick your finger in here it can get bit, just as I bit Mark’s and he bit mine.
If you can’t deal with that UNDER A CHANGEABLE PSEUODONYM, you won’t do us much good out in the real world anyway.
What the instructor is trying to tell us is actually quite simple. Ideologies that don’t work, just don’t work. They never can work because they are flawed and the laws of the universe can and will never let them work.
The Soviet system was broken from the beginning. Even if all the “experts” (Who happen to be crypto-soviets) said it was an efficient system, in the end, it fell to pieces.
Multicultural Democracies don’t work. Just like communism, it has no base within the laws of the universe.
Despite the systems’ own torch light parades, which may feature the “model” multicultural school or the “very loving” interracial relationship, it only appears to work because of the effort put into these parades. In fact, the best comparison we can use was the BIG BAD May Day parades through Red Square we used to see. Today’s equivalent is the above mentioned “model” multicultural school.
But just as the missiles we saw were fakes, made just for the Parades, what we don’t see at the “model” school is the racial achievement gap test scores packed tightly away in the Principal’s desk.
The victories that the instructor speaks of are not recognized by the average expert. When the power structure gets its soon to be “North American Union” it will open the flood gates for non-whites. Many a “torch light searching racialists” will fall into despair as they figure the struggle is lost. However, this is only because the “torch light lookers” don’t know about the diversity price curve which states, as the number of non-whites goes up, the amount of tolerance from Whites goes down.
You see, the more multicultural a multicultural democracy gets, the closer it gets to its collapse. Just as the Soviet system was supposed to be highly efficient, when it actually had its efficiency tested, it fell into a pile of its own contradictions.
The “strengths” of the old USSR were its “organization”, “efficiency”, and “production possibilities.” Just as the Strengths of the New USSA are its “diversity”, “tolerance”, and “freedoms.”
But, remember when its greatest “strengths” were tested, it ended up collapsing in a pile of it own contradictions.
Today’s version of the SDI or “Wallace Democrats” (who are now named “Regan Democrats” by Conservative pundits) is the great unknown. I may see the mass migration of non-whits as today’s SDI. Just as the SDI forced the USSR’s collapse by exposing its greatest myth, the mass migration of non-whites (And all it’s derivatives) will expose this systems’ greatest myth. Historians may look back to find Ted Kennedy as our very own science fiction writer?
But its important to remember, while the SDI may have helped bring it down, its main reason for collapse was its own contradictions. The current system has no shortage of these.
Brian is just going ahead and upgrading the system. He probably consulted with others, but he didn’t consult with me, which is exactly the way I like it. That was a LOT of work and he ruined his computer doing it.
But, contrary to the Masturbation Generation, I am not as impressed by his sacrifices as I am by his INITIATIVE.
A manager who does not hire people who are better at things than he is is a FAILURE. But if they are better, how does he JUDGE them? That seems tome to be what good management is about. The top guy succeeds if he RECOGNIZES good work and people who have initiative.
What they do WORKS,
Our whole world view interrelated. Brian’s work relates directly back to Wordism. A good Wordist wants Control. I just want it DONE. This is true of technical work like Brian’s and it is true of seminar participation (which he is also good at).
A person who has it all in His Book has aborted his whole thought process. In Wordism, nothing is allowed to WORK. Everything is justification. That is why Communism was doomed. The market tends to weed out failure. Planning cements it into the system.
Once again, pleas NOTICE the IMPORTANCE of what I told Pain: “I don’t KNOW” what you should come up with, ay more than I know what Brian should do to the system.
What I DO know what I am LOOKING FOR.
This makes things a lot harder on YOU than any form of Wordism would be. Our whole world view is very confusing in our Wordist society. I am looking for SOMETHING good and I don’t KNOW what it is YET. It would be one hell of a lot easier for you to search Bob’s Holy Writ and repeat what I want I want you to repeat, especially since that has been your entire training in this society.
Bu in the end, what would you have? Someone who comes up under ANY form of Wordism suffers the same disadvantage in dealing with US that Communism had dealing with market economies. That system produced people who were simply not capable of competing in a REAL economy.
Z describes this beautifully in the article above.
You must go out of here with that key asset: an ability to deal in REALITY, in things that WORK.
The power of a small group of people like THAT is incalculable. In fact, they are the ONLY people who have actual POWER.
Pain wants me to be more specific about the future. My point is that I don’t KNOW the future.
If you want to just make static here, you can declare that things like my suggestion that Indians MIGHT want Aryan babies is nonsense. You could argue that the Soviet Empire would have collapsed, Reagan or not. I call them as I SEE them, and when I don’t think I SEE them, I don’t call them.
As I KEEP pointing out, a Prophet of Doom is as silly as any other self-declared Prophet, but while everybody laughs at ever OTHER self-declared Prophet, the Prophet of Doom is NEVER laughed at. It may come from the same place that our absolute worship of stone-faced Chinese and American Indians who babble crap and do nothing comes from.
If you have a frown on your face, people take you seriously. Since Prophets of Doom have no better track record than any other prophets — take a look at the famous predictions of 1900 of what couldn’t be done by top people — the only explanation is the Chinese one.
The East Indian/Aryan thing was simply a random example trying to get your head out of the latest newspaper. I don’t argue it because it isn’t my POINT. My POINT is that things will make up the future that sound absurd right now.
No Sovietologist lost a penny by being dead wrong about the future of the USSR. Nobody in intelligence lost anything by 9/11. I am alone in that I CARE about what will happen, not just about my next paycheck and a reputation.
NO ONE ELSE has talked about the GENERAL conflict between science and social science. You are a specialist in one or the other. But the simple fact is that you can’t predict the future I you are a specialist. Specialists ALWAYS get blindsided. But it also never costs them anything, so that is not going to change.
One commenter put it perfectly: We are going to have to learn to THINK.
Someone asked me about general guidelines from me about comments I wouldn’t bitch about. I can’t think of any. Mark is bitching at me right now. I have no idea what he is getting at. I will bitch at you from time to time. If you have a point to make, you just have to live with it.
The points I just made strike me as important. Mark will ignore them and continue whatever jag he is on. Others will concentrate on what Mark is saying.
I’ll just go ahead and make my points.
I might as well keep talking to myself here.
As I discussed in an ignored article below, our previous problem was that we had to settle for organizing the masses, since the top of the idea chain was carefully protected at Harvard and in New York. Now the top of the idea chain is literally at our finger tips.
This changes EVERYTHING.
Someone dealt with my article Pro-White Collaborators on Stormfront with the reasonable suggestion that a real history of the pro-white movement be written. But that won’t do it PRECISELY because of what I just mentioned. All the sex appeal is in Torch Light Parades a la Hitler or the forty thousand Klansmen marching in DC in 1927.
Trying to describe the importance of the intra-conservative battle which led to the “Wallace” vote becoming the Reagan Democrats and therefore to the end of the Soviet Empire holds no place in history compared to “Mr. Gorbeczev, tear down this wall!”
In the American media, as I said an ignored article, the emphasis is on shouting enemy victories and minimizing our wins. All the Torchlight Parade stuff is THEIRS.
No, a history won’t do it, because a history of events has very little to do with a history of real power.
History and predicting the future have this same problem. In order for there to be a book on the future, somebody has to PAY for it. The whole field of Futurology has no connection to the future at all. Successful futurologists are people who get money and fame for predicting what people who have money and who buy books and who grant academic titles TODAY want to hear and deem reasonable.
The future is NEVER what people today deem reasonable. Least of all is the future ever what people in power and money TODAY deem reasonable.
Pain asks me to be more specific abut what I EXPECT. I can’t, precisely because I don’t KNOW what the future holds.
I do know that every Tough, Practical Man would have said I 1980, “So the whole Soviet Empire is just going to fold up and go away? Don’t be RIDICULOUS!”
In 1980, you would find out about the future of the Soviet Union by talking to a Sovietologist. Not one of them predicted anything like what happened. That is because Sovietologists concentrate on getting PAID, not on predicting the REAL future.
The end of the Soviet Union was being determined inside the minority party, getting them to go for the “Wallace” vote. How in Heaven’s name could a professional historian or Futurologist or Sovietologist, whose JOB depends on ignoring anything outside of Harvard and New York, POSSIBLY have a clue about THAT?
This is an example of how making a living predicting the future makes one absolutely helpless in the fact of the REAL future. The strategy Reagan used to bring down the Soviets had been publicly discussed among paleoconservatives for decades. Burnham talked about it for years in National Review.
Reagan found his Last Straw for the Soviet camel in the Strategic Defense Initiative, SDI. Senator Kennedy called it “Star Wars.” He never knew how close he was. SDI was invented by a SCIENCE FICTION WRITER, Larry Niven, in a conference Reagan had with science fiction writers.
Why would an incoming president have a conference with people no PAID “intellectual” would take seriously?
Because Reagan did not need someone to organize a torchlight parade. He needed people who could THINK. He did NOT need more people who knew how to say what they could get PAID for in the Fashionable Opinion market place.
In other words, a history of pro-white victories wouldn’t do the job because most pro-whites wouldn’t recognize a victory when they SAW one.
WordPress 2.2.2 is a security update and fixes the following problems:
wpx can include invalid named entities in comment author name
Unfiltered post titles in Recent Comments widget
“WordPress requires at least 4.1″ expression in wp-settings.php
Template: default broken
Restore comment editing fix that disabled rich text editing
deleted_link action is never called
Wordpress /edit-comments.php Database Error
add_option followed by update_option not always working
Wordpress uploads.php Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability
Bob, your point of view on eugenics is all wet.
Eugenics has never been attempted in large enough numbers to count. The rulers did the get the best women, but there were a million times more peasants who reproduced at a much higher rate, spreading their inferior genes. If eugencis was tried on a MASSIVE level we would see fantastic and wonderful results.
As I have pointed ut at least a dozen times here, eugenics is goig to become a PRACTICAL concern in the this century, not just a theoretical one, as we learn to pick genes in a practical way. But like everything else, it wil be used against whites.
As I pointed out, it already IS being used against whites.
And your current jag notwithstanding, RACE is the purpose of this blog.
The argument is that interracial marriage is fine becuse the best will sort themselves out, regardless of race. That is the history I was addressing. But as we begin to SELECT our genes, this non-racial eugencis stuff is going to become fanatical.
The argument that anyone who mentions genetics is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews has gone out. Naturally, as usual, I am the one looking for what will replace it. In the next generation everybody will say they knew it, but at this moment, the idea that eugenics will be used AGAINST race sounds like us “Nazis” have gone NUTS.
You are going to have an uphill struggle explaining why eugenics,which is inevitable, has to be INTRAracial. But by then you will have powerful allies who control the future.
In a couple of decades everybody s going to say they knew what I wrote about in 1976, that there is going to be a collision between the science establishent and the old SOCIAL science establishment. I have talked about it half a dozen times here, but it doesn’t have the sex appeal of a big story on TV.
When the establishments really start to collide, we will need to concentrate on preventing them from destroying us in the name of “pure” eugenics. It will be easier than it now appears.
I have been talking abut eugenics endlessly here, but you don’t seem to have noticed.
You don’t have to advocate it. All the Bible-thumpers and social scientists together can’t STOP it.
I was obviously tired when I wrote the piece about closing up shop for a week and deciding whether this phase of MY life is over. They were two different things, and I said them wrong.
I will not close down BUGS, even though that is what I now see that I clearly said in that article. This is not a matter of interpretation. When I screw up, it is blatant.
As you can see from my quoting the wrong person, I didn’t realize this was all Mark’s stuff. Mark is off on a roll about white trash. But it looked to me, after I had written a thousand word essay I thought was important, that EVERYBODY was off on this rant, pro or con.
So closing things down a week seemed like an alternative.
As to “closing down” BUGS, my point SHOULD have been that my life has come in phases. When my book team dropped the book that had cost me thousands of hours of work and thousands of dollars, I went on to something else.
By the time I had spent all those years and all that danger making the coalition that brought down the Soviet Empire, I dropped out of the game in 1980 because there was now credit for finishing the job under Reagan. This is routine for me.
That is not normal behavior. As I said, the grassroots movements I championed were ruined by little people who, for the ONLY time in their lives, got big-time attention and began to sound like every other official “leader” in our society. They did not realize that this field is overcrowded already with PROFESSIONAL respectable conservatives, so they were promptly forgotten.
I am the opposite. I start things until what I try to get across to people gets across and they FINALLYY see the point. I have been working on Whitakeronline since 1998.
I am now no longer BUGS.
I thought I might spend a week closing things down until Mark’s tirade passed and attention refocused. There will come a time when I leave BUGS and turn it over to YOU.
When I do, Mark and others need to realize that the subject of this blog is RACE. I wet to school with white trash, and I love them not. But they are a distraction here.
And, yes, when this stops being BOB’S blog, founded and paid for by ME, others will have less room for wandering onto other more personal things than I did.
I will start my OWN blog, dedicated to MY meanderings, which are really weird, and just come back here from time to time. I have to hold myself back here because we have evolved a purpose beyond my idiosyncratic thoughts. If you read the first intro to the Blog you’ll see that was its original purpose, but a causist is a causist till he dies, and we developed our direction right here.
All this is speculation. I will not abolish BUGS is someone is here to take it over.
Dealing with the Masturbation Generation makes he idea of “Being a Real Man” repulsive to me. Just so, the memory of all those conservative and grassroots “leaders” makes the idea of a permanent place with MY name on it, as the ONLY spokesman, cause my skin to crawl.
An originator should originate. Once he gets it to the point where good people see the point, or as with Reagan where the credit-takers will take over from there, he moves on.
An originator can move mountains if 1) He figures out where to START and 2) He knows when to QUIT.
I keep saying it, but, as ALWAYS, nobody GETS it:
“You can have the credit, you can have the money, you can have the fame, and you can have the titles.”
“All I want to do is rule the world.”
In our titanically large society, EACH of the above, taking credit, getting money, becoming famous and getting titles, is a full-time life’s work. You cannot do ANY of them and have POWER, too. That, too is a full-time life’s work.
The article below demonstrates the two rules you have to follow to be a Respectable Conservative:
1) Declare that liberals were always right until 1970 an grovel loudly about how bad conservatives were to oppose them and
2) NEVER remind a liberal that they were DEAD WRONG about ANYTHING.
This is easy for us to understand. But it is a lead-in to a point about many or most pro-whites which is NOT recognized.
It took US many, many years of facing professional ruin and angry mobs to get rid of what was absolute post-World War II doctrine: “Modern anthropology has proven that all races are equal in all in innate abilities” – a word or two varied, but it was always the same words. But if you ask most pro-whites, we never won a victory.
The myth of Soviet economic growth was dogma in the early 1960s. A few of us pointed out reality. It was by realizing that the USSR could not compete with America that led to what Kennedy denounced as “Star Wars’ and the collapse of the USSR. Gorbachev believed we could build a Strategic Defense Initiative and he is ON RECORD as promising ANYTHING to stop it.
SDI called the Soviet bluff. They simply couldn’t REALLY compete with America in any technical. This led to Soviet concessions, and the whole house of cards collapsed.
Liberals say it all just happened to happen on Reagan’s watch. Conservatives keep their mouths shut.
I spent a large part of my life on THAT, so it matters to me, but our subject here is RACE.
Due to science and due to OUR efforts, the average anti concedes things about genetics that he would have gotten conservatives to LYNCH somebody for saying a generation ago.
Pro-whites beat their chests endlessly about how brave THEY are and, as one person put it, “THEY can’t cut their out of a paper bag with a machete.”
I lived through the FBI Terror against the South, and that was NO PAPER BAG. Ignoring the Mafia, J. Edgar Hoover spent untold millions of dollars infiltrating pro-whit organizations. I just fought integration legally, and I had an FBI file by age fifteen.
Te Feds sent us to prison in droves. Those prisons were NOT paper bags, especially for OUR people. But here is some newbie bitching about how brave he is. That’s not important in itself. It is merely a symptom of the REAL disease.
The REAL disease is that pro-whites does EXACTLY what respectable conservatives do. They NEVER acknowledge that, against what was considered both insuperable power and Historical Inevitability, we WON SOME. Their time might better be spent learning about HOW to win some against these overwhelming odds RATHER THAN REPEATING THE ENEMY LINE THAT OUR ENEMIES NEVER LOST.
If you want to make your living in the media as an anti-liberal spokesman, there are two rules you must follow:
1) Grovel loudly, grovel often, and grovel FIRST.
When David Irving was sent to prison in Austria for disputing the number of Jews Hitler killed, Buckley jumped right on the bandwagon jumped right into the lynch mob, while other conservatives simply didn’t mention it.
Conservatives grovel endlessly about how THEY were not fighting for integration when Southerners were saying it would lead to intermarriage, to a collapse of school standards, to schools where kids would have to searched for weapons.
Conservatives says immigration somehow got out of hand, but they are ashamed that some conservatives did not support ending the racist National Origins quota system in 1965.
National Review runs front page articles praising Franklin Roosevelt.
Rue Two is related:
2) NEVER remind a liberal that the LEFT was ever WRONG.
You will never see a leftist groveling. Here is how the LEFT handles defeat:
The New York Times mentioned that “the hereditarian position on race is now much more acceptable than previously.”
Not a word about how he left demanded that anyone who said that “modern anthropologists have proven the races are equal in all innate abilities,” was immediately declared anaziwhowantedtokillsixmillionjews by the New York Times for decades. Not a word about the lynch mobs they commended against such heretics.
Every statement that the Communist economies were catching up to the West, repeated decade after decade, is forgotten. We found out that the entire Soviet economy, after seventy years of “progress,” was half the size of the economy of the Netherlands.
When a liberal makes another fashionable statement, no conservative will ever remind him of THOSE.
When the files of the KGB were opened at the beginning of the 1990s we found that McCarthy’s claims of Communist infiltration into the American government were, in fact, too modest. But when a liberal cries “McCarthyism,” you show you a re a True Hannity or the stuff National Review editors are made of by taking them seriously.
white trash and niggers are the same so what does it matter? Lazy and stupid in any race is lazy and stupid.
Ah,yes, what does it matter what a person’s race is if he works hard and is clean?
This is where I came in.
Every Great Civilization before the West let the top men have more women and more children.
Their ruins lie there. What happened?
Classiim was the hallmark of every civilization, yet only ONE factor ever actualy determined whether they fell permanently or went on: The color of the skin.
The color of the skin.
The color of the skin.
The color of the skin.
I have no idea WHY this is the case. What is important is not your own frustrations with trash. What is important is not your Work Ethic. What is important is the color of the skin.
All Experts disagree with this. All Fashionable Opinion disagrees with this. But experts and Fashionable Opinion are wrong as regularly as colored societies happen to go downhill and stay there.
I made several points in pieces here. All of them were ignored so everybody could have their period and bitch about white trash.
Maybe our job is done here. I am beginning to feel that way, and I’m too tired to play squabble.
I have had teams I worked hard with drop me before. I have had hundreds of comrades drift off into their own never-never lands before.
I am thinking about closing this blog down for a week, with no comment approvals or any more of my own unread crap, so I can think about whether this phase of my life is over. I almost did that tonight. Once I do, it’s done.
I was reading the comments, which you will have to read for yourself to keep up.
At first, just waking up, I was offended at Mark’s insult to Hardric and his cheap psychoanalysis of Hardric. Then I had my coffee and read the comments again. Mark’s personal comment is wrong, so I will ASK him to apologize for it, but the rest of what the Sarge says sounds, oddly enough, like what a Sarge SHOULD say.
Then I read the comments again and began to get the eerie feeling that they were psychoanalyzing ME without meaning to.
You see, in fifty years or so I have been through EVERY phase of what is being said REPEATEDLY. I gained my reputation in DC when I was in the “working class” phase of thinking. I was an Honorary Boston Southie. I was on the streets of DC and Louisville and DC getting working class people to rebel against the college-ruined brains of the establishment.
But, as Mark says, the white working class, which is different from the welfare class he describes, ended up asking for what it got. I learned that lesson by work on the ground.
Mark is describing the proletariat, which he is forced to deal with constantly, the crowd the Marxes and the Fondas are always praising and never get close enough to to SMELL.
I learned, painfully, that ideas filter DOWN. I couldn’t stop working people from adopting the fashionable crap.
Especially the LEADERS. As soon as some nobody gets interviewed as a Leader they try to sound like somebody ABOVE the working people around them.
I will never forget an incident when I, PERSONALLY, had spent my time and position organizing the joint demonstration in DC o anti-busers and textbook protestors in Washington against the educational establishment. THOUSANDS of working people traveled hundreds of miles on buses they paid for personally to join in the march. It was a true grassroots protest.
Then the Leaders made their speeches on the back steps of the Capitol to the thousands. Some bitch from Boston whose only accomplishment in life had been to get a leadership spot in Boston declared that she was against busing, but anyone who was against INTEGRATION should leave.
A lot of people DID leave.
Before that, there was a big battle among the Bostonians about who would speak for them. You see, this was a big deal up there, and after years of protesting a lot of the “leaders” had had a taste of a little power for the first and only time in their lives, and that was their only concern. That was when I happened to walk up just as a West Virginia protestor said, “I don’t understand what you’re fighting about. Whitaker speaks for us and he’s not even a hick.”
I liked that. I liked being an honorary Southie. But the bottom line I found out was that concepts flow from the TOP. By the time I was essential to electing Reagan and Communism was doomed, my attitude toward any further progress on saving our race through the working crowd would have made Mark here look like Little Mister Sunshine.
But one thing I knew: Things NEVER stay the same. From 1980 on I was in a kind of holding pattern. The TOP of the idea chain was out of reach, up in New York and Harvard.
And, indeed, things HAPPENED, one I could have predicted and the other I could not.
First, those Sophisticated Ideas everybody heard over and over and over got OLD. They got a NAME: Political Correctness. When everybody has been to college and hear them again and again and again, firmly ingrained slogans get OLD. Today, they get old FAST.
Five hundred years ago the Chinese were still wearing the same clothes they had worn five hundred years before. The same was true of the Middle East. The famous “cod piece” came and went in Europe. The West CHANGES. It changes pointlessly in most cases, but that is not the POINT. The POINT is that, once any set of ideas get a foothold in the Orient, it is there to stay. Back in the fifties, an expert on Japan described it as the “most constipated society on earth.” In Japan, you would routinely see statues of Jesus, Confucius and Buddha on the mantelpiece while the family voted for Marx.
Where college students used to come out with their diplomas and a desperate dedication to the New Ideas, they were now referring to “the old crap” their parents had talked about.
But we STILL lacked ACCESS to the TOP of the idea chain. Then ideas STOPPED coming from where “the same old crap” came from. The INTERNET sprang into being.
We are fighting the most ingrained idea of Political Correctness, anti-racism, anti-whitism. But if you LOOK at the anti-whit arguments, you will find that almost none of them parrot the LEFTIST line “conservatives” down at the bottom of the idea change chain are just beginning to repeat.
I carefully not that all the nostrums about gun control and socialism are GONE from the dialogue of all but the most OBVIOUSLY driveling antis. The idea that genetics does not exist is GONE.
But the anti-white syndrome is OLD. I heard it on the radio version of Long Ranger, Evil Whites against Noble Indians. I heard it in the civil rights crap. You can still hear it in North Carolina in the play Unto These Hills which I first heard in an all-white audience in 1950. We are fighting the hardest battle of all. That is why it is so critical for us NOT to get off on the immigration track or on the “white people deserve it” track.
After forty years, I watched THE TOP OF THE IDEA CHAIN OPEN UP. It is no longer at Harvard or in New York. The top of the idea train is RIGHT HERE!
Just when the perversions of the Masturbation Generation are becoming OBVIOUS nonsense, we have the top of the idea chain literally at our FINGERTIPS!
I spent plenty of time being frustrated and furious, so I can’t blame YOU for going through that. But get OVER it!
I have enough pent-up anger for all of you. But if I were starting NOW, knowing what I know and have experience, I would go after the reality only I am fully equipped to SEE.
Sarge, shoot NOW. We’ll sort out the bodies later.
Our only non-bitchy comment today.
“It means you will have to think for a change.”
We are used to using the politics of the majority.
But, really, we’re not anymore. We are an out of power minority.
Many of us don’t seem to understand this.
We fought two world wars to make the whole world democratic.
But “democratic” means “majority rules”.
Non-whites are the “majority”.
As long as your political/tactical view assumes white supremacy, you lose.
We are not the winners, we are the losers!
We may still be a numerical majority in our country but we ceased being the political majority fifty plus years ago.
Tactics based on mainstream political power will fail in the end.
We shall be as the Kurds.
And no, that doesn’t mean the end is near.
It means you will have to think for a change.