In the piece below, I made my point by attacking a new comrade who was doing his best for our cause.
This was inexcusable, but all I can do is apologize:
Hannibal14, I humbly ask you to forgive the unforgivable.
More needs to be said.
This was INEXCUSABLE on my part.
But a gentleman’s apology must ALWAYS be accepted,and I offer it. Otherwise we’ll end up shooting each other in duels, as the best of the Old South did, instead of fighting our common enemy.
But for all my talk about being a pro and caring about my comrades, I make an attack on a dedicated comrade like THIS.
For giving money to what he beleves is right!
I had a point to make, but this is a classic example of how NOT to make it.
I don’t know what to do when I really screw up except to apologize and try not to do it again.
I was the one who said here in public that someone hurt my feelings by putting “Coach” in quotes. That was two days ago. And here I am absolutely VICIOUS to a new comrade who is doing his part.
Hannibal 14 will do me a great favor if he ACCEPTS my apology.
#1 by Hardric on 08/10/2007 - 10:00 am
Yes, not a bad idea to be gentle with those who are sincere and upright in their beliefs, even as we work to take them down the road of Racial Politics.
Whites have interests just as other racial groups do.
My family has interests. No one tells me to devote all of my time and resources to another family and neglect my own.
Nothing hard to understand about that. Doesn’t take a Ph.D. in Political Science to figure that one out. Should I identify with Jesse Jackson or Robert Whitaker? #-o
Anyone want to write “Racial Politics for Dummies,” maybe you can get a best seller.
#2 by Dave on 08/10/2007 - 11:46 am
Operations and strategy is the same thing.
Unless operations and strategy are married into operations alone, opinions and stated goals are meaningless. This is why BWs effort to create and insinuate powerful words into the public consciousness is critical. BW not only has beliefs and goals, he has an operational means to implement them owing to his ability to create unforgettable phrases that have a good chance of spreading spontaneously.
The Neoconservatives and liberal Democrats prevailed because they focused on operations aimed at dominance through an aggressive operational implementation, realizing that ideology without an implementation is meaningless.
This is why the Conservatives went down, they believed the power and rightness of their beliefs was all they needed and that the operations could be ignored. Hence many are now hanging with Ron Paul, something easy to do for the lazy.
Nevertheless, we are very advantaged in the current environment. Think about it: National Review is irrelevant. Its implementing organization is irrelevant and its publication is irrelevant. The OPERATION of the Internet has made it so.
And the Internet is developmentally iterative. Accordingly, the blogosphere will morph into more effective manifestations and the inventors these new organizations of the Internet’s operation in the social realm will own the world.
Much more is awaiting irrelevancy than National Review.