It I true that other animals have learned to avoid snakes that have brightly-colored skin. Bright color is the snake’s way of telling you that he is poisonous. The reason e wants other animals it is poisonous is by its brightness of color. In fact, there is a frog in Brazil that is poisonous and it, too, has bright-colored skin.
The reason these poisonous beings have that skin color is to show that they ARE poisonous. Granted that an animal which attacked and killed them would EVENTUALLY die for it, but in the meantime the poisonous animal could be dead from the attack, so the death of its attacker would do it little good.
So most animals avoid bright-colored snakes just for the color of their skin.
WE, who have been trained by Mommy Professor, know this is a pointless prejudice. There are bright-colored snakes that not only have no poison, they have no TEETH. So it is RIDICULOUS to avoid a reptile because of its skin color.
Up to half of the young men with black skin are in the prison and parole system. But, as Mommy Professor points out, at least half of them are NOT. So if woman gets on an elevator alone at night with a man, his skin color should make no difference. This is an official statement from CBS in its guide as to how to avoid violence.
So anyone who would not pick up a snake because it is bright colored is a racist and anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
#1 by shari on 08/26/2007 - 11:55 am
Tell that to those white tourists inside the superdome during Katrina. They said they never were so scared in their whole life and it wasn’t the storm they were referring to.
#2 by Simmons on 08/26/2007 - 1:07 pm
Mommy prof has a cult based on emotions and their triggers, but unfortunately we have taken on some of these bad habits. Our poinous snakes are Jews, mention them and fears of near metaphysical proportions seem to take place. No mention of people here but over at Liberty Forum there is a poster named John de Nugent that seems to make a living warning about the Jew threat, and of course these bright colored snakes are named Hebrus Omnipotentus. We are white men we use reason we avoid or kill the truly harmful poisonous snakes or collect them and study them we do not deify snakes. And of course the CofCC plays that game too, last week I browsed their site and learned that Sarah Silverman was going to destroy christianity with her “Blaphsemy.” Give me a chance to ask that snake about 6 questions and watch it slither back into the grass where it belongs, but I guess that is not good for fundraising.
#3 by Pain on 08/26/2007 - 3:47 pm
Bob I must ask you two questions.
Please answer these two questions.
Please answer these two questions.
Please answer these two questions.
(1) Let’s go back to the YouTube video with the KGB defector. We should be ripe for revolution NOW. Somebody else must have noticed this too. If PC fanatics rolled out the tanks tomorrow, would that make it easier or harder for us to follow their revolution up with a populist revolution?
(2) Only you seem to have the experience in a bureaucracy to know how to make it work, or how to do without it. If populists won control of the government, how could they make sure that the bureaucracy did not work against them?
Please answer these two questions.
#4 by Lord Nelson on 08/26/2007 - 5:08 pm
There are time I feel like throwing a dozen White antis into a pit of those bright coloured snakes. And saying ‘don’t worry, death is just a social construct’.
#5 by Z on 08/26/2007 - 7:24 pm
This is why I come to this site. The Instructor may have no regard for spelling or grammar, but I can honestly say that I always walk away from the lesson better off than before.
It should also be pointed out that the people who scream loudest about ALL ANIMALS BEING THE SAME” are the same people who don’t live anywhere near the habitats’ of any of the bright color snakes.
#6 by mderpelding on 08/26/2007 - 11:56 pm
Beautiful…
Remember the study done with little black kids being shown pictures of black and white people and then choosing which picture that they preferred?
I can’t remember the name of the study but as I recall the black kids in the study preferred whites over blacks in the pictures.
I think the study was used as evidence in “Brown vs. Board of Education”.
A few years ago, some black girl in New York redid the study. Little black children reacted favorably to white people but unfavorably to black people.
Or was it preference of dolls? I don’t remember.
Anyway, our resident expert sociologists posited that these results showed that these children were suffering from the absence of positive black role models in pop culture.
The children were adopting moral positions. White good, Black bad.
But morality is abstract. Children think concretely.
My point;
Black children naturally fear other blacks. They have no fear of whites.
Something to remember.