Similarly, traditional education in the US put boys together to be taught only under men, and girls only under women. This is why high schools and universities were all male and women had their own system of education.

And the kids like it that way. A masculine male teacher will attract a swarm of male students, especially the wild, spirited ones that the lady teachers can’t handle and don’t want. Then a wolf pack forms, which to outsiders looks wild and scary (this is a desirable effect!), but on the inside is full of strong loyalty leading to the best work.

Old British boarding schools were right to take boys from their mothers, but I think they were wrong to take them from their fathers. Schools close to home are preferable to a sterile institution. The Spartans could keep the boys together with dad nearby because Lacedaemon was a tight community.

“Martial Societies” remove young boys from their mothers and put them under the supervision of males within a military organization, usually at the age of 8 or 9 years of age. These boys are then raised to be soldiers away from women.

For example, the armed forces of both France and Britain raised whole generations of boys, largely cut off from feminine influence for most of their lives, during the 18th and 19th centuries for career naval and army service.

Britain did a better job of this than France, Britain’s system being far more ethical for the welfare of these boys and their training, while in France these boys were little more than officers’ slaves. Accordingly, Britain developed superior military capabilities because of a loyalty and commitment over and above what the French were ever able to develop.

But the system of removing boys at a young age from their mothers and keeping them segregated from women died with the 19th century. This is one of these huge things that no one ever notices. Accordingly, it is just weird the way the US military is such a “family oriented” institution.

This has had a devastating impact on American military capabilities because it prevents the development of effective martial values. I think it is a major reason why the Pentagon is relying so heavily on private multi-national paramilitaries instead of regular forces. The private paramilitaries offer a means to reward martial skill and commitment with significant cash incentives. The private paramilitary people are far less “family oriented” than the regular forces.

We white nationalists need to understand these issues. For example, white nationalism cannot succeed along the BNP model. The BNP cannot even see that the task is competitive fitness within the failed nation state, which is what Britain and increasingly America really are – failed nation states.

In the failed nation state the feral dog is greatly advantaged, having insecurity for its feed. Facebook.com could become a important tool for a band of feral dogs. It might not, but I just offer it as an example.

Tame domesticated dogs cannot compete for they are forever struggling to live “normal secure lives”. That’s what the BNP wants, “normal secure lives” for white people. Ain’t gonna happen.

That’s why I can’t get “Mark’s Brilliant Line” out of my head: “Those who own the present own the Future. Those who own the present NEVER have any serious relationship to what is really going to happen.”

As for kids smoking marijuana, pretending to be rebellious, they don’t have time.

Even, or especially, those with high IQ horsepower had better straighten up fast.