Archive for August, 2007
Mark, This is not a Church
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/16/2007
About a thousand times I have dealt with a discouraged pro-white who wondered whether this sorry crowd was worth saving. Several hundred times I was that pro-white.
Yes, Mark, I understand.
I have to remind myself that, torchlight parades and Triumph o the Will nowithstanding, we ae not a Opera here. We are not trying to save a set of moral giants. We are trying to save the only part of the world thqt is not a group of large ants like the Orient, declining and falling as they build huge, pointless stuff.
Our Bible roots are still there and many of us do not see any point if the white race’s glory does not come from Above or from some Light that falls indifferently on different Cultures a la Yockey.
After all the drama others can offer, our task sounds a bit drab: We are trying to save white skin because nothing else matters. You can have Great Civilizations that stagnate and make big noises and leave monumental ruins. That’s impressive, but not a billionth as impressive as a Nova.
Now THAT’S impressive.
The problem is that the Nova, in itself, is unimportant. Likewise Great Civlizations, a la Ozymadius.
You can know all there is to know about Chinese Civilizatio or Native American culture, but i is POINTLESS. Nothing about them tells us anything we need to know TODAY.
SF had a debate about whether blacks invented the banjo. OK for a discussion, but who cares?
You learn about history only by studying white history. Black “History” is all about how WE handled THEM and some dream-fulfillment about Great Black Civilizatios.
Worrying about white morality must be left to religion, including the ones that don’t CALL themselves religions.
Whites are the only game in town. They are the only thing above large insects.
You do not save children because they are nice. You just save the future.
There are plenty of Morality Plays. We are not one of them.
Whites can go to the stars. Whether they wipe their noses in the interim is not our problem.
READ THE COMMENTS!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/15/2007
Yes, Virginia, there used to be REAL professors.
This reminds me of the beginning of Dickens’s A Christmas Carl, which said that Marley of Scrooge and Marley had been dead for two years, and if you didn’t understand THAT, the rest of the story would make no sense.
There used to be REAL professors, like ME. If you don’t understand THAT, nothing I say here will make sense.
You are probably the only people in the world in a real, old-fashioned seminar with a REAL professor.
READ THE COMMENTS and you will see my students, MY products, asking and answering critical questions in OUR terms. I don’t need to say word here.
Mark, as a real thinker, questioned the whole basis of the blog. Which means he went back to basics. My other students answered him on these basics.
Meanwhile, what is the Ole Prof doing?
I am FASCINATED by looking up the CORRECTIONS our Back Bay Grouch made to my history lesson. For me, the real history he made me go back to is an ADVENTURE. And that, Virginia, is what REAL professors WERE like.
This is FUN! This is ACCOMPLISHMENT! This is why the modern academic bureaucracy could not tolerate me.
As one commenter pointed out in a masterpiece of understatement, “Bob is not Jesus.” It was intended and taken as a compliment. He said that I would die for the truth I teach as Jesus did, but I am NOT Jesus.
But to be a modern academic bureaucrat you must claim to represent “The Way, the Truth, and the Light” if you don’t want to die of starvation. In fact, it is the way to material success and a very fat life-style. You have to be one of the High Priests who lived well and sent Jesus to the Cross.
Coming down from that High Drama, there is Old Professor Bob, like old bumbling Peter, trying to follow along the best he can. I like to think that that is what Jesus meant when he made the joke about Peter being the Rock on which he built his church.
Not the Old Testament. Not self-torture. Not a Final Truth. Just doing your best to be a good person.
THAT church will never teach error. But NOT because it has all Truth already in hand, as Pope and Puritan claim to. I know a lot of sincere Christians whose faith would COLLAPSE if evolution turned out to be TRUE.
Our modern established faith, Political Correctness, has made you think of a professor as someone who the Truth in hand. What he calls a seminar is obedience training.
As seminar leader, I am first among equals. I do not intend to be the ONLY one who goes back to basics, as Mark did, or who explains the basics, or the one who must give deserved compliments to those who DO all these good things. I steer YOU to do these things and if I have to do them, it is with a sigh. It means I have not done MY job in getting you to use what I have spent my life obtaining, a WAY of thinking.
So while you are extending on what I have taught, I am off chasing a fascinating correction. Yum-yum! More knowledge, what Odin/Wotan hung on Yggsdradil to obtain and lost an eye for!
I HUNGER for knowledge, and it tastes GOOD! I LOVE corrections if they are not just intended to be a stumbling block, a way to Miss the Point.
The modern academic bureaucracy or any other High Priesthood cannot STAND truth, especially truths that collide with their Wordist Final Truth. They kill people for that. Thy kill EACH OTHER for that.
Why?
Because Absolute Truths collide. The truth CONVERGES, on the Cross and on the World Tree and in a real seminar.
Ole Prof Bob has had his say. Now I want to get a biography of Nathaniel Pierce Banks, the Speaker of the House elected in 1855.that The Grouch made me find. I hunger for truth.
Yes, Virginia, that is what real professors used to be all about.
Z
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/15/2007
I may be mistaken but what I think Bob is saying is that we should welcome more immigrants? Well, not really “welcome” but realize that they are actually a benefit for us. This acts as a sort of economic price curve. As the supply of non-whites goes up, the tolerance for them goes down. Similar to when prices go up and the demand goes down.
The globalists realize this too. That is why every effort will be made to limit free speech in this country. But, what if this fails them too? What if limiting free speech only forces some of our more radical brethren to tone down their rhetoric? This would remove one of our enemies favorite weapons; using the nutzis as an example of who we are.
After all, look at Europe. Europe’s Nationalist parties are much more influential than us and they actually have police state regulations.
So bottom line, the multicultural empire is destined to fail, we just need to make sure we present a viable alternative when it happens.
So it would seem we would need to figure out what that alternative looks like?
Thanks, Grouch!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/15/2007
“When the Republicans in 1854 and took over the House of Representatives in 1855, the Whig Party was simply FORGOTTEN.”
This incorrect. The 1854 poll returned a divided Congress: 84 Dems, 62 Americans; 60 Whigs and 46 Reps.The 1856 election produced a solid Dem majority: 132 Dems, 90 Reps, 14 Americans and 1 independent. By 1858 the Reps attained a plurality, but not a majority. There were 116 Reps to 83 Dems, 19 Oppositions, 8 Anti-Lecompton Dems, 7 Ind. Dems and 5 Americans.
In 1860 the House sat 108 Reps, 8 fewer than in the previous Congress, but the succession of Southern states reduced the other parties to a true minority status with 44 Dems, 30 Unionists and 1 Ind. In 1862 Rep support further eroded. The tally was 86 Reps, 72 Dems 25 Unionists and 2 Ind. The Reps were again a plurality only.
In 1864 the Reps gained a lopsided majority which lasted until 1870 when they held the House but by a balanced margin: 136 Reps, 103 Dems and 3 Ind. The six year reign of the Radicals was over. The reps gained a strong victory in 1872 with Grant at the head of the ticket: 199 to 88 with 5 Inds. In 1874 the House fell to the Democrats:182 Dems, 103 Reps and 8 Inds.
The 1850s was a period of political division as varying politicians jockeyed to find a stable party divide. The War produced it and what was in essence a 6 to 10 year reign of radical terror. After that the parties were competitive with the Republicans doing better.
The thrust of your argument is right, if not all the details. My apology for being a bit of a footnote guy but inattention to detail gives opponents an opening to deride on side issues while avoiding the important points.
ME:
This is the sort of correction that is CRITICAL!
I’ll look all this up, but this is not nitpicking, it is IMPORTANT to
my descriptions of history!
THANK YOU!
Many Thanks
For the Record
— Belaboring the Obvious
You may wonder why I put Dave’s discussion of economics up front. Dave and I both know that economic theory is of little interest to real people. But he and I both have separate and original points to make here.
Like German rocket scientists, Albert Speer and Leni Riefenstahl were German geniuses. But since Germany lost the war credit goes elsewhere.
I taught basic economics, so I am puzzled as to why people waste money on Ambien, Lunesta, or even Sleep Aid. I also wonder why people are so impressed by hypnotists. I was able to put everybody in the room to sleep in half an hour.
Including me.
But that is real economics. Marxism killed, conservatively speaking, a hundred million people in the last century. It is an ECONOMIC fanaticism.
Dave’s discussion of Albert Speer brings up a point about history no one has stated but me, so I want to put it on record. Speer was far, far ahead of the Nobel Laureates who taught me, but that is for later, if ever.
Let me get onto politics and history and the silly masturbation generation obsession with economics.
Hitler was a hell of a politician. He said in Mein Kampf that he had not the slightest interest in economics, but all the parties he was competing with were based on economic theories, communists, socialists, and the old Nationalist Party whose real aim was to use nationalism to keep the Krupps types in power.
So, Hitler said, he needed SOME economic theory, so he grabbed one. I doubt the economist whose ideas he adopted ever actually READ Mein Kampf, and Hitler obviously never expected him to, so his ego was never deflated.
That was raw politics, stated so flatly that it fascinated me.
Nothing is more forgettable than another economic theory, so I forget what it was. It is hard to imagine anything sillier than the whole twentieth century obsession with economic dogma.
So much of what I say is so simple it sounds like a joke. But the fact is that when he took power Hitler regarded the Depression as a bother, so he got rid of it. John Maynard Keynes published his groundbreaking theories about how to deal with the Depression in 1937. By 1937 Hitler has already ended the German Depression using the obvious methods Galbraith proposed.
Hitler invented the Volkswagen. The “bug” shape is on a sketch with his name on it. He built the Autobahn to run the VW on, what we now call the Interstate Highway System.
In 1936, Hitler was the most popular head of state of state on earth.
As I have said, in 1619 the present Virginia state legislature began with the election of the first Virginia House of Burgesses. In 1619 the first boatload of white women came to Jamestown. In 1619 the first boatload of what John Smith called “twenty niggurs” came to Virginia as indentured servants, to help with the tobacco type John Rolphe had developed that was selling like hot cakes in England.
Spaniards had been here for over a century but they never developed a palatable tobacco before. The year 1619 saw Jamestown prosper. After all the starvation before, it was never again to be as poor as the Englishmen who stayed home.
So 1619 was a banner year.
Then in November 1620 the Pilgrim got to Massachusetts and founded America.
So in 1936 Hitler had used public works to end the German Depression. In 1937 John Maynard Keynes wrote the book that founded the whole idea of ending a Depression with public works.
America was founded by the Pilgrims because the South lost the Civil War. Keyes founded Modern Economics because Hitler lost World War II.
Dave on Albert Speer and Economics
The most effective attack on regulation I ever ran across was recounted by Albert Speer in explaining how he went about expanding German war production in the face of relentless Allied bombing.
He redefined the meaning of the word “transaction” from its financial meaning to a social meaning: “Any thing two or more humans must meet or communicate with each other to resolve”.
He then ordered senior management to count the “transactions” involved in the production chains and organizational structures they oversaw. He then ordered them to reduce the “transactions” in their operations by 50% within a period of three weeks, putting on a specially missioned audit team to measure compliance.
This forced his senior management to get rid of the bullshit. After satisfying compliance, Speer ordered further reductions in “transactions” forcing ever-greater efficiency in achieving results.
It is well known with enduring amazement Germany’s ability to maintain output in the face of such heavy damage to its infrastructure during the latter phase of WWII. Albert’s Speer’s management genius played a major part.
Of course, for reasons of political correctness, Albert Speer is never taught in business schools. But in learning of Albert Speer’s methods, I came to realize that there isn’t a politician in existence who has the slightness clue as to how to actually reduce regulation, yet with the right method, it can be done in a heartbeat.
It’s like what BW says, “There are times when the adults must take over” and the very notion of accountable government is that elected representatives must control public money, how much is spent and what it is spent for. Yet without control of “transactions” in the Albert Speer sense, this cannot be accomplished.
Instead our government relies on mandated financial and performance audits, forever measuring what is irrelevant and supporting yet another industry (e.g. the audit industry) with pork of no social value. Regularly state legislatures and Congress are informed of gigantic unauthorized expenditures, and regularly state legislatures and Congress levy no sanctions whatsoever for the violation of contracts the very essence of which constitutes their power as elected officials.
When anybody says America is a “democracy” I know they are clueless as to what they are talking about. To be a democracy elected officials must have effective control over public expenditure. Nowhere does this exist in America.
SF Reply Describing OUR Work
Re: Action, Is anyone willing to take it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic Conservatist
When are Wns going to stand up and fight? The time for politics is over. Action is the answer yet none seem willing to aknowledge it. Trying to handle problems through speech is becoming more and more impossible in todays PC age.
(moderator note) please bear in mind the advocating of illegal activities are prohibited by forum guidelines.)
MY REPLY:
This is what I call “torchlight parade” stuff.
We are working steadily in my blog/seminar.
A successful revolutionary must know two things:
1) Politics is the art of the possible, that is, what is possible NOW;
BUT
2) Rule 1 is normally used as an excuse for not advocating a revolution. But in the real world, a revolution has to be approached in the same way.
My blog/seminar is working steadily towards a revolution. The torchlight parades you see on the History Channel come AFTER people like us have done their work one day at a time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtic Conservatist
When are Wns going to stand up and fight? The time for politics is over. Action is the answer yet none seem willing to aknowledge it. Trying to handle problems through speech is becoming more and more impossible in todays PC age.
(moderator note) please bear in mind the advocating of illegal activities are prohibited by forum guidelines.)
Posted in Antis Section of SF
Shakazulu gave me the usual song and dance about how the minority vote was increasing. I explained to him that that the growing diversity of the electorate is the reason the courts are taking over real decisions from a public which can no longer form a concensus.
But the courts are just stepping in. Something else will replace them as the old representative democracy dies.
There never has been and never will be a multiracial democracy.
I say “the same old song and dance” because Republicans have been talking about this for fifty years as a reason to go after “The Negro vote” and then the black votes and now the African-American vote.
No one but me ever MENTIONS that the history of the last decades has been exactly the opposite. I worked on Capitol Hill when Republicans kept trying to placate the minority vote and never got it. They were a minority and expected to STAY that way.
In 1980 Reagan went after the old Wallace vote and won a landslide and took the SENATE for the first time since 1955. In 1994, as the minority vote grew steadily and could be seen, Republicans won control of BOTH Houses of Congress in 1995 by rejecting moderation.
YES, minorities are growing. But why is it that Republicans TODAY still more House seats than they did from 1959 to 1995?
While the old song-and-dance about growing minorities is true, the real trend has been the other way around. NO ONE NOTICED.
Now Bush is an old style moderate, i.e., neoconservative.
As Paul Harvey says, HERE is the REST of the story:
In 1848, the Whig Party won the presidency for the last time. SERIOUS opponents of slavery expansion like Lincoln were Whigs. By 1855 the Whigs disappeared without a trace. They could not address slavery. The existence of a huge black population made civil war inevitable.
Even Grant voted Democratic in1856 because he knew a Republican victory would mean a war.
Republicans are a shadow of the old Whigs,
Do the ARITHMETIC. HOW could Republicans WIN more and ore as the solidly Democratic minority vote GREW? Only if the voter gap no one DARES discuss was growing steadily. WHITES went Republican FASTER than the minority vote grew.
Nobody wants to look at the elephant in the living room. So it’s Iraq and right to life. The Whigs were mostly about tariffs. They were a stopgap as the slavery issue grew. That’s OK to elect the Bushes and keep respectable conservatives in jobs, but it has a definite time limit.
The lesson shakazulu is teaching is correct, but he does not THINK about what he is saying. Recent history gives us the OPPOSITE lesson of the facts that he and compassionate conservatives are trying to draw from it.
In 1860 Lincoln won with forty percent of the popular vote. The South rebelled and lost. So Republicans ruled American politics until 1933. Every Southern nightmare about Republican rule came true.
Back to the present. My point is that the very statistics shakazulu and respectable conservatives keep quoting, if you grasp HISTORY, is that the present system is unstable, to say the LEAST.
There never has been and will never be a representative democracy which is multiracial. The minority vote has been a “Yes, Massah” vote, first for the Radical Republicans and then of liberal Democrats. There was nothing multiracial about it.
The whole shooting match has been white rule.
But the old left is beginning to split, as the Democrats did in 1860. The liberals’ Faithful Colored Companions have been overridden by brown Hispanics, who are beginning to demand their OWN voice, unlike blacks. The gay vote bloc and the feminists are not so slave-like as blacks are.
White antis are going to be shocked that their nice safe boat, with brown folks obediently rowing it, will stop being safe. This is happening now, but no one wants to talk about that, either.
When the Republicans in 1854 and took over the House of Representatives in 1855, the Whig Party was simply FORGOTTEN.
Then the Supreme Court stepped in in 1857 with the Dred Scot Decision. A divided electorate could not find a consensus on the question of the expansion of slavery, so the Court stepped in and opened ALL territories to slavery
That was the last straw.
Those who opposed the expansion of slavery openly were still a minority, but they won in 1860 because they were a UNITED minority. Within ten years, every nightmare of the old Democrats became a reality.
Antis, your nightmare may be closer than you think, but you, like the old Southern Slavocracy, will be BLINDSIDED by where it REALLY comes from.
Historical comparisons are useless if they are followed too literally. ALL I am saying is that no anti can imagine his comfortable brown-rowed boat being unstable.
Let me REPEAT:
HISTORICAL COMPARISONS ARE USELESS IF THEY ARE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY.
But my point is that this system is cracking apart. It’s just that no one wants to see it, least o all those who want to ignore race or who think the present system is doing something inevitable.
Which is the anti theme.
In concentrating on his big ears and his nuthood everybody today ignores THE PEROT LESSON. Perot announced he would be willing to be president on the least-watched mainline cable show in America, and was soon leading BOTH major candidates in the polls. The Soviet Empire had collapsed with a whimper in 1990.
We had Clinton and a Republican Congress and the Bush stopgap, so it is easy to overlook the reality if your attention is riveted on Perot’s ears or the latest headlines.
The Perot showed that he was a nut, dropped out, and everybody in the media forgot him with a sigh of relief.
Mir was sent into space by the Soviet Empire. While it was up there, the entire seemingly terrific power that sent it up ceased to exist. Things happen THAT fast, as they did in 1855.
If he would THINK about his own numbers, Shakazulu has shown that this system is on its way OUT. If he would THINK about what he said, and if white nationalists would stop whining abut immigration and look at REALITY, they would see the same thing.
If a bullfrog had wings it wouldn’t bump its butt every time it jumps,
Get some WINGS!
Don’t just QUOTE.
THINK!
Regulation
You seemed to enjoy my lawyer qoutes, and they had a PURPOSE. I want you to REALIZE just how dumb professionals ARE,once they have their credentials to keep from being judged on making sense.
I helped make a lot of laws, rules and regulations. In one case, we were discussing some adjustment of labor law for the Reagan program — I was still on Capitol Hill then. They were quoting Administration policy, which said, “Regulations should be limited to the number one has the resources and power to keep track of and enforce.”
To me, this was like saying, “You have the freedom to do anything that does not injure others.” Like so much Wisdom, it sounds profound but is actually meaningless. Every tyranny in history said the same thing: if you dispute Communism, you are hurting others, if you discourage people in the True Faith, said the Inqusition and the Puritans, you are sending people to Hell.
No one EVER said you should have regulations you can’t enforce. But in early 1981 this was Ultimate Wisdom from the New Administratin, Holy Writ, so only one persn sitting there would do anything but ooh ad ahh over its profundity.
My comment was, “You say that ‘Regulations should be limited to the number one has the resources and power to keep track of and enforce.’ May I pont out that God Almighty is STILL trying to enforce TEN?”
AFKAN
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/14/2007
In reply to Dave:
Good points, all. (SEE? YOU ARE MISSING THE SEMINAR IF YOU DON’T READ THE COMMENTS!!! I CAN’T REPODUCE ALL THE GOOD STUFF UP HERE).
Dave:
I actually believe Wordism developed fairly late in the Game (ME: 1200 BC ISNOT LATE, EVEN TO OLD BOB. Do you mean it is new in the AMERICAN DIALOGUE?) as the way to destroy cognition, and the use of the Mind as a tool for development.
The extreme perversion, of course, is the inversion, where a word in practice means the exact opposite of what it would mean, in theory.
Thus, “equality of opportunity” becomes perverted into “mandated equality of outcomes,” and all power eventually resides in the totalitarian state, where our lives are simply capital to be allocated.
The greatest error we have made is trying to be rational with the irrational; the raw drive for Power does not need the limits of Words. It simply operates, ruthlessly, and only stops when a countervailing power forces it to stop.
Years ago, in Psych class, the topic was bullies, and the Prof – Jewish, of course – was dealing with the issue of how do we deal with them, how can we understand them, etc. He posed the question, “Why do people act like bullies?” My answer – alone, in a lecture hall of more than 200 – was simply:
“They act like bullies because they ARE bullies, and being bullies simply works for them. They will stop only when the costs outweigh the benefits. A good ass-whipping is one example.”
Total silence, and the class looked straight ahead, in silence.
He literally ignored me, and went right on, Let’s talk about some of the tools we can use to understand bullying behavior. Now…”
The System implicitly, and now explicitly, rewards the intellectual equivalent of impotence. It really can not hold together in its present form for much longer.
I was discussing where this MUST lead on another forum, and described what Symbol I use for motivation. It is the picture drawn by Ayn Rand near the end of “Atlas Shrugged,” where the Taggart Transcontinental is stranded on the prairie, and the light at the front of the train grows dimmer, ever dimmer, as Eddie Willers cries helplessly in front to the symbol of a value system rejected by the degenerate society. In the distance, on the one hand, the Hidden Communities of people reuniting to survive, and on the other hand, the Raiders.
I have argued elsewhere that accepting White Nationalism is the functional equivalent of a religious conversion; small, step by step, beginning with finally accepting the plain evidence of the Senses, that SOMETHING is profoundly wrong, and that the foundation of all of this comes down to RACE, writ large, as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture, with Family as the microcosm of RACE, and RACE as the macrocosm of Family.
I listen to people talk about Hannity and Limbaugh as if they were men of substance, saying things of substance, and I feel a sense of pity, for their situation, mingled with contempt, for what curses they have left for their posterity…
I judge all actions, no matter how great or small, in the light of RACE – First, Foremost, Forever, and cringe in quiet horror at the future their posterity will face.
THEIR posterity, but hopefully, not mine.
The next time my nephews come to visit, I will discuss “Atlas Shrugged” with them, and ask them if they can see ALL decisions as reflections of one big decision: “New Atlantis,” or helpless abandonment on the prairie, at the mercy of the kindness of strangers, who happen to be their implacable RACIAL Enemies.
The Reality we are dealing with goes beyond Words, but is shaped by Words, in this Earth.
Shaped by, but not limited to…
Good Point from Pain to Use
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/14/2007
ME:
It’s funny how they use “race does not exist” to justify white genocide. Call them on it. Say: “You are trying to hide the crime of white genocide by pretending there are no white people! I am real, and I do not want to be genocided.”
Essentially their argument is the same as catching a naughty child red-handed with your wallet in his hands. You say: “Give me back my wallet!” He says: “What wallet, I don’t see any wallet” as he waves it in your face.
Anyone who holds your wallet while claiming there is no wallet, is stealing it. Anyone who says he cannot see the white race with his own eyes, is GENOCIDING whites.
Tell the genocider: “By denying the obvious, you confess a crime!”
The race-criminal is flooding ALL white countries and ONLY white countries with the Third World…
(Put Mantra here.)
ME:
Way to go, Pain!
“It’s funny how they use ‘race does not exist”” to justify white genocide.” from Pain is a great lead in to
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net/
The Lynch Mob Forms on the RIGHT
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/12/2007
Hannity of Hannity and Colmes said that “When I see an interracial couple, all I see is two Children of God.” The obvious question is, “If that’s all you saw, how did you know it was an INTERRACIAL couple?” But nobody lies like a “Christian” anti-racist, so why bother?
I understand that when David Duke said he was against interracial marriage, Hannity screamed, “You really ARE a Nazi!”
The guy who writes the last page of National Review complained about the high Moslem birth rate in Europe and the low “Christian” birth rate. He immediately got a huge volume of complaints that he was a racist. He said is Islam is not a RACE.
Let me rush to testify to his innocence. National Review is a New York City Catholic theocratic magazine. Like William Buckley, the new crowd that runs it would be glad to see the stinkiest pygmy marry the most beautiful intelligent tall Nordic blond if a man in a dress said the right words over them.
But it has to be the RIGHT dress and it has to be the RIGHT words. They tell us racism is about superficial things, tribalism and so forth. What’s REALLY important is not the genes of the children, but the dress and the WORDS they demand.
I will go further. Speaking of Europe, Buckley applauded the imprisonment of David Irwin in the only mention NR made of it. Since Joe Sobran was fired, there is not a single member of the NR staff who would not be proud to PRESIDE at the lynching of any “Racist.”
They are pathetically upset that Yale and New York City don’t APPRECIATE that. But in the meantime, they are indispensable to anti-whites by providing any side issue, from immigration to abortion to prayers in schools to more war in Iraq and war on Iran, to keep attention off the little matter of genocide against MY race.
And they are the first to demand that anyone who MENTIONS that genocide be suppressed and punished.
Yes, It Really IS Like That!
This is from an e-mail I got. Very often I feel funny telling you how screwed up things are among the so-caled professionals.
This all sounds FAMILIAR to me!
Subject: DISORDER IN THE COURTS PLEASE,ATTORNEY & CLIENT
These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.
_______________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
____________________________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, “Where am I, Cathy?”
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!
_______________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-one-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: Uh, he’s twenty-one.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you kidding me?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Uh…. “What was I doing ???”
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Now whose death do you suppose terminated it?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Guess.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people. Would you like to rephrase that?
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
________________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh….are you qualified to ask that question?
________________________________________________
– And the best for last: —
ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.
In SF
Jamie, an old friend of mine said that “Your real talent is that things jump out at you that other people don’t even notice.”
In the article about us that you cite in the Village Voice — which, by the way, contained far too few references to ME — I note the following comment about YOU:
“Radio broadcasting is one of the many odd skills he (Kelso) has acquired over a lifetime of being on the fringe of society …”
This was in the Village Voice, right? The one that brags it is BEYOND societal opinion, right? It’s RADICAL, right?
But KELSO is put down because he has spent “a lifetime of being on the fringe of society.”
That is a pretty blatant statement that jumps out at me and nobody else NOTICES, YOU have spent “a lifetime of being on the fringe of society.”
Where has the Village Voice been all that time?
Certainly not, like you, “on the fringe of society.”
No way. The Village Voice is an integral PART of today’s society. Respectable conservatives constitute one group that gets paid for its standard and packaged (S&P) crap, and the Village Voice is another S&P wing.
Kelso, on the other hand, is “on the fringe of society.” No one but me would NOTICE how strange it sounds for The Village Voice to condemn someone for being REALLY on the fringe of society, as opposed to their FAKE — and lucrative — version.
Jamie, the Village Voice has condemned you — let me repeat it once more — for “being on the fringe of society.”
Is anybody CAPABLE of noticing the irony but me?
Dave
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/10/2007
Operations and strategy is the same thing.
Unless operations and strategy are married into operations alone, opinions and stated goals are meaningless. This is why BWs effort to create and insinuate powerful words into the public consciousness is critical. BW not only has beliefs and goals, he has an operational means to implement them owing to his ability to create unforgettable phrases that have a good chance of spreading spontaneously.
The Neoconservatives and liberal Democrats prevailed because they focused on operations aimed at dominance through an aggressive operational implementation, realizing that ideology without an implementation is meaningless.
This is why the Conservatives went down, they believed the power and rightness of their beliefs was all they needed and that the operations could be ignored. Hence many are now hanging with Ron Paul, something easy to do for the lazy.
Nevertheless, we are very advantaged in the current environment. Think about it: National Review is irrelevant. Its implementing organization is irrelevant and its publication is irrelevant. The OPERATION of the Internet has made it so.
And the Internet is developmentally iterative. Accordingly, the blogosphere will morph into more effective manifestations and the inventors these new organizations of the Internet’s operation in the social realm will own the world.
Much more is awaiting irrelevancy than National Review.
Apology to Hannibal 14
In the piece below, I made my point by attacking a new comrade who was doing his best for our cause.
This was inexcusable, but all I can do is apologize:
Hannibal14, I humbly ask you to forgive the unforgivable.
More needs to be said.
This was INEXCUSABLE on my part.
But a gentleman’s apology must ALWAYS be accepted,and I offer it. Otherwise we’ll end up shooting each other in duels, as the best of the Old South did, instead of fighting our common enemy.
But for all my talk about being a pro and caring about my comrades, I make an attack on a dedicated comrade like THIS.
For giving money to what he beleves is right!
I had a point to make, but this is a classic example of how NOT to make it.
I don’t know what to do when I really screw up except to apologize and try not to do it again.
I was the one who said here in public that someone hurt my feelings by putting “Coach” in quotes. That was two days ago. And here I am absolutely VICIOUS to a new comrade who is doing his part.
Hannibal 14 will do me a great favor if he ACCEPTS my apology.
My Take on Kelso’s Ron Paul Fixation
——————————————————————————–
Not $80 to Stormfront. I am sure your 80 will make a big difference in Paul’s multi-million dollar campaign.
As usual, while everybody else is joining The Latest Big Thing, I’ll remain one of the few who stay on GENOCIDE agaist our race.
There are already plenty of immigrants here to destroy my race. There are very few of us who concentrate on THAT.
Paul has a hundred times our numbers already. But run out, yell loudly, and spend your effort on him. You got nothing IMPORTANT to do, right?
I’ll be here when you get back if Ron Paul gets elected and lets you down. Gee! a presidential candidate who promised and turned on you! Whoda thunk such a thing could happen? Surely, THIS one is the exception!
I’ll be here if he fizzles.
Either way, I’ll be HERE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hannibal14
I sent in $80.00 to his campaign on Tuesday.
He may not agree with OUR philosophy but he’s the best out there.
Unfortunately, I didn’t read the pages before the last one. I’ll send 20 dollars out to Copperhead tomorrow.
No Neoracism!!!!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 8/9/2007
One of our finest bloggers admitted that he used to think civil rights was good. Others admit they did not recognize the importance of the race issue before.
We need these life experience statements. I don’t think that anybody who reads what I write and who has seen into my soul can imagine that anybody is more wiling than I am to take a comrade into my heart.
So anything but “Forgive and forget” would seem to be not only my tendency, since I glory in your awakening, it would seem to be good POLICY to let it be known that conversion is costless.
But in fact “forgive and forget” is POISON in the real world of power politics.
Let us take a look at Neoconservatism. Conservatives were so happy to have neoconservatives taking their side that they made conversion a positive VIRTUE. All the years of warning liberals of where what they were doing was leading was FORGOTTEN.
The result is that Neoconservatism now OWNS conservatism. All the lessons of the results of the betrayal today’s then-liberals are LOST. Neoconservatism now RULES.EVERY SINGLE “conservative” power base.
Unrestrained forgiveness leads to DISASTER. All the reformed junkies talking about their wild abuse of drugs often give young people the distinct impression that you can away with it when you are young. Laughing at yourself in recovery is fine, IF you are laughing AT the damned fool who did it. But if that laughter becomes a sort of nostalgic tolerance for yourself when you were on your wild side, it is hideously destructive.
A good young man who decides to dedicate himself to God seldom admits he was a good person before. He makes up a raging beast, a Great Sinner, and the congregation eats it up. And too many people have gotten the impression that, in order to become a Great Christian, you must be a sadistic animal before.
I am a very bad sport about the people who were betraying our race when I tried, year by year and almost in tears, to warn them where they were going.
There was a time when people like Communists like Russell Kirk and Whitaker Chambers came over in full awareness of what they had done. Their conversion was absolute. But as the obvious evil of Communism and the threat became ever more visible, conservatives began to equate those who were FINALLY abandoning making the power of that evil what it was were freely handed he same status as the Kirks and the Chambers’s.
And those who switched to anti-liberalism naturally began to slowly change the fundamental conservative attitude. You see, they were right about everything and those who had fought the fight for decades had been wrong. Liberalism was just fine until about 1970. National Review says that all the time. National Review explicitly condemns its founders in every issue.
And that, believe it or not, is why we are in Iraq right now. If you will go back to the process that got us into Vietnam, the unanimous Tonkin Resolution in Congress, you will see the EXACT thinking that we call neoconservative today.
But no one notices that Neoconservatism, which now rules totally over conservatism today, says that it has exactly the same attitudes and beliefs that “The Best and Brightest” in the Kennedy Administration had when they got us into the LAST Iraq! But this time it is the CONSERVATIVES who got us into Vietnam.
We are in Iraq because conservative “forgive and forget” went NUTS!
It is a very small step from understanding and forgiving an alcoholic to trusting him with just one drink.
There is something WRONG with alcoholics. There is something WRONG with someone who can see a black and blond dating and suppress his natural disgust. There is something WRONG with someone who can betray working people who are trying to find some way to fight the evil of integration any way they can, and especially a person who was raised in the South and spend 28 years in the FBI doing this, USING their common Southern identity to do it.
The good people I knew who went too far and imprisoned by those FBI monsters were shown NO forgiveness.
“Well, gee, it didn’t turn out the way it should have” CANNOT be ALLOWED to be sufficient.
So how can we handle this?
First we get over the idea that someone who was traitor and who wants to leave it behind CANNOT leave it behind.
Maybe the little matter of the takeover by Neoconservatives and our easily-ignored difficulty in Iraq went right by some readers. Maybe some who missed it can be made to notice what happened with IMMIGRATION.
There was a time when the outstanding characteristic of most immigrants was GRATITUDE. Most immigrants wanted desperate t become AMERICANS. I know many people, including my own grandfather, who were not taught their family tongue – though his family were Germans who had come here in the seventeenth century, because America was now an English-speaking country.
Now the very idea that America is anything BUT the immigrant’s own culture is banned. A Neoconservative would say this change occurred by some freak accident at the same time that liberalism, by some freak accident, got out of hand.
No, immigration changed its character when Joe Sobran and Pat Buchanan were on the side of immigrants, who were Catholics like them. Pat Buchanan’s statement that Americans died at Normandy to open Europe to third world immigration occurred thirty years ago. But it can NEVER be forgotten.
Those of us who fought the fought and issued the warnings do not owe YOU. Conservatives went or Neoconservative conversion big time. “True Blue Americans” went for the “nation of immigrants” thing while hog. The immigrants didn’t make this mess. The JEWS did not make this mess, they just used the tools the evil traitors gave them.
If you went along with it, YOU made this mess.
Conservatives forgot this lesson with Neoconservatives. “True Blue Americans” forgot this lesson on immigration.
It is a DISEASE. It was FATAL to them.
No, the mistakes you made are NOT all right. They show something is WRONG with you, something that could be FATAL to OUR movement. DIG IT OUT OF YOURSELF. Give special attention to those who were ALWAYS faithful.
We do not need a Neoracism.
BackBay Grouch
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/8/2007
You could both be right – and wrong. Decisions, especially those made by corporations and governments often reflect various agendas, some overt, some hidden. Often I feel that the greatest unascribed cause in most events is the stupidity of the actors.
Tory
Tory says:
The above analyses concerning the timing of the pedophilia excitement just doesn’t ring true to me. (And, by the way, I’m sure we all recall the witch hunt just a decade or so ago for pedophiles running day care centers… This pedophilia hunting is not brand new.). I think the reason it’s all over the media now is that there is a cable tv channel for everything. And somebody figured out he could get ratings by having a Pedophilia Hunt cable tv channel.
ME:
It could have been done ten years ago. Pedophiles on the web were big Pat Robertson stuff then. But you could still be right.
It is hard to to decide whether the media bureaucracy is responding to pressure or has just been too dumb all these years not to exploit what was in front of them.
My guess is that they are responding to the pressure to censor “Hate.”
But my guess could be wrong. The point is that Expert Advice, the stuff I got paid for, is always just a GUESS.
The way it should work is that real leaders pay me to hear my guesses and then make serious decisions.
But some people take the guesses of people like me and turn them into Eternal Truths. That is Wordism. At least a hundred million people were killed in the last century by people who followed Marxist Wordism.
Which puts you front and center. “Hey,Bob, that doesn’t ring true to me.”
Screw the Experts. Your job is NOT to listen obediently to US. You provide US with a LIVING. Thanks for the money.
But when the direction of our world is decided, it is YOUR job to make the call.
When the Media Start Worrying About Sexual Deviants, It’s Time to Worry About THEM
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 8/7/2007
NBC is catching web pedophiles at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY8BkoyH8m4&mode=related&search
Why? I think the reason is the growth of white nationalism on the web.
This is the way it SHOULD be done. Pedophiles who use the internet, especially SCHOOL Teachers, should be EXPOSED. But the timing is very suspicious, and it won’t stop there.
The media never worried about pedophilic school teachers BEFORE, and it’s as old and well known throughout the public schools as pedophiles in the priesthood, something EVERY Catholic bishop knew about, even if he didn’t help the pedophiles out, a generation ago.
The media led in the battle to get pedophilic homosexual scoutmasters in the Boy Scouts.
Remember the media kept saying priests were molesting CHILDREN, and it took them forever to admit it was BOYS who were being molested.
No matter how many times I repeat it, those who have mastered the art of Missing the Point will miss what I am saying. I am NOT asking “Why expose pedophiles?”
I am asking “Why NOW?” Why, after all the decades, is the media allowing this sort of thing to air NOW.
Before the Missing the Point experts go into their usual blather about moral righteousness, let me remind you the key word is NOW.
Normally the age-old molestation of children by teaches was a secret, like the priest thing. But the media is beginning to allow stories like this NOW because of a simple agreement between liberals and “Christian” conservatives that, as white nationalism grows on the web, is becoming urgent for them.
“Christian” televangelists are leading the fight to censor the web. Also Pat Robertson is pushing intermarriage and interracial adoption. So they demand that we “protect the children” by censoring the web, and are happy to join those who want to ban “Hate,” too.
All to protect the children.
That’s why NOW.
Is This One of OUR People on SF?
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 8/7/2007
Until the head is removed, the problem will remain.
We may not have to…
The beast has a mind of its own now. Notice in the past few years where the vanguard Jews go? They’re becoming “conservative.” Orthodox rabbis call for increased birth rates, some even call for expanded conversions. Neocons try to marry evangelistic “democracy” to Israeli interests. Pro-Israeli talking heads, like Limbaugh, are joined by Jewish Savage, Levin and others.
They’re running scared.
Hostile press coverage of Israel’s on-going Lebanon adventure reveals a new game. The emotional child has usurped the cunning father. Just as they lost control of Christianity and Communism, the new creation turns on its founders. Call it Internationalism, or Fonte’s Transnational Progressivism, Diffuse Marxism, Racial Marxism, whatever. Even Jews are divided. Some habitually stick to the old egalitarian deconstructions, some realize the created-thing has an agenda of its own.
The habit will continue to single out two Nazis in Minnesota while excusing 2 million wahabis in Michigan. Good. Accidental allies abound.
Momentous times. We’re not only living through Peak Oil, but also seeing Peak Moyle. Que chaos – and new opportunity
Comments not Good This Time
Posted by Bob in Comment Responses on 8/6/2007
I did see little thought and a lot of off-hand attacks.
Most important, one person used this blog to spread dirt on other white nationalists. I leave it in to show what should be DELETED.
Oh, well, everybody is entitled to one bad day.
“The South” is NOT “the south”
This is not the kind of thing we should be paying big attention to, but southern and Southern are two completely different things. The most heavily populated region in the south is the Los Angeles area, which extends to the Mexican border.
The most southern state is Hawaii. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is to the south of ALL of them. Today, as sign of disrespect, south always starts with a small “s.” However it is understood to refer to the Old Confederacy.
The first civil rights triumph of blacks a hundred years ago was to make people write “Negro” instead of “negro.” No one would be allowed to write “negro” in a mainline publication today.
Hence the demotion of “South” to “south.”
William Buckley, of all people, agreed with me on this.
As several members of my family found out to their amazement, EVERYBODY who was a leader in the Reagan movement knows who I am. There was a cove article attacking me in National Review attacking and a review of both my books, one, at the same time another camp in NR was attacking me, entitled “Read This One!” by a Senior Editor.
I wrote articles and reviews for NR when I was still, albeit barely, respectable.
Bill Rusher, publisher of NR, wrote the Foreword to my first book and GAVE me a lifetime subscription to the magazine. In that Foreword, he had to distance himself from my criticism of his friend William Buckley in the book.
This took guts on Rusher’s part. Not only did I attack his employer in that book, I SPECIFICALLY demanded the preservation of the white race in it, probably the last mainline book that ever did so.
I once said to Rusher, “With all the attacks Buckley took for ‘God and Man at Yale,’ I doubt what I said bothered him much.”
Rusher disagreed. He said, “The man is only HUMAN, Bob.”
The point of this is that I wrote Buckley about the fact that referring to Old Confederacy attitudes as “southern” is just plain BAD SPELLING. He QUOTED me verbatim in his “Notes and Asides” column in National Review and then asked, “Are you kin to the Caleb Whitaker in Camden?” Buckley was raised in Camden, SC.
This puzzled me. Just to avoid me like the plague, every respectable conservative knows who I am, ESPECIALLY William Buckley. I even had run-ins with two of his brothers. Then I realized how much he agreed with my POINT. To quote me, he had to show he didn’t realize who I WAS.
Despicable though he’s become, Buckley’s a pro. And he REALLY doesn’t like the anti-South jag the guys he turned NR over to are on. Buckley knows no one but me would MAKE this point, so it was either act naïve or not mention it.
All this deduction also gives you an idea of what I mean when I say being a pro in this business requires considerable, hard-won, experience.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for August, 2007
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
granmontblanc, Hardric and Ron Paul
Posted by Bob in About Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 8/11/2007
gerardmontblanc says:
I am one of the ignoramuses supporting Paul. What do we have to lose by giving
him a shot? It’s a no brainer that he can’t be a white nationalist and compete
for President, and really his chances of winning are quite small. The reason I
support him is because the white nationalist message can be incorporated into
my support regardless of his WN provenance or lack thereof. This because his
ideas about immigration, the FED, the nanny state, Iraq are similar to ours.
Further, comparing his positions to the positions of “top tier” candidates is
an excellent way to highlight the traitorous nature of politicians who compete
with him–a way to point out that his republicrat opponents. PSMr. Whittaker,
I compliment you on your mantra and have in fact posted it on my blog. I
listened to all of your porch talk MP3s and read your book Why Johnny Can’t
Think–my compliments. Regards. Gerard. M.
ME:
There is only one t in my name. We used to have two, but we had to sell one for food.
“The reason I support him is because the white nationalist message can be incorporated into my support regardless of his WN provenance or lack thereof.”
I have found that is a hard resolution to hold to in the heat of supporting a candidacy. I, for one, found it far too easy to agree with enemies of our race for possible extra votes, and was later ashamed of what I had done.
DON’T MISS MY REAL POINT HERE. Sure, Dr. Paul has more of our positions than others. His rebellious candidacy represents another hole in the blanket the establishmet is trying to put the fire out with. It is already smoldering visibly.
But my point is whether OUR LIMITED RESOURCES should be used in jump in on massive anti-immigration petitions, political candidacies and the like.
My point is whether OUR LIMITED RESOURCES should be used in jump in on masive anti-immigration petitions, political candidacies and the like.
My point is whether OUR LIMITED RESOURCES should be used in jump in on massive anti-immigration petitions, political candidacies and the like.
We can USE Ron Paul, but only if we keep OUR MESSAGE in mind. As Hardric says,
Hardric says:
No, gerardmontblanc, you are no ignoramus. There is nothing wrong with using every tool available to get a message across. Let me give an example.
I was in a small gas station store and upon arriving at the counter overheard an older White Woman talking to a younger one who was behind the counter. The older woman had apparently looked at a Ron Paul flyer someone put there.
“I have never heard of him” said the older woman.
“Neither have I” said the younger woman.
Now it would have served no purpose for me to go into a long dissertation on the Constitution and all of the things that have gone wrong with America in the last 225 years.
I needed to get my message across simply and quickly.
“He’s the best man out there” I said in a knowledgeable manner.
“Why” said the older woman.
So I proceeded to recount some of the virtues of Ron Paul.
Having thus obtained their undivided attention (and they were interested), I went to my message.
The real problem, I said, is a racial one. And it is a very simple problem. White people need to start defending their own Racial Interests like any normal and sane group would be expected to do.
I got no disagreement there. I am sure that these woman knew enough about their own family history to be aware that their ancestors did exactly that.
2 Comments