Archive for August, 2007

Pain

Pain asked two questions.

I’ll deal with the second one first:

(2) Only you seem to have the experience in a bureaucracy to know how to make it work, or how to do without it. If populists won control of the government, how could they make sure that the bureaucracy did not work against them?

ME:

Pain, I spend most of my time dealing with questions like your first one: Why hasn’t the revolution taken place yet? That does no GOOD at all, but that is what people challenge me about.

Meantime, there is REAL world out there, where the revolution HASN’T taken place yet, and a bunch of amateurs quoting amateurs. I ran into that during the Reagan Administration.

I am trying to explain how to THINK abut real power in the real world. For every minute readers spend thinking abut what I am trying to tell them, nine minutes go to the standard stuff.
I keep repeating, “You can have the money, you can have the fame, you can have the t\titles. All I want to do is rule the world.” I realize that readers are going to think that’s cute and then go back to preaching and capitalizing RACE and stuff the way AFKAN does.

I keep repeating that the important things I have worked out seem so obvious they are humorous. Most readers think that’s cute and go back to routine thinking.

Then you ask me how a group taking power will recognize and get expertise. That is why I work so hard here to debunk present “expertise!”

It’s right HERE, Pain!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Skin Color

It I true that other animals have learned to avoid snakes that have brightly-colored skin. Bright color is the snake’s way of telling you that he is poisonous. The reason e wants other animals it is poisonous is by its brightness of color. In fact, there is a frog in Brazil that is poisonous and it, too, has bright-colored skin.

The reason these poisonous beings have that skin color is to show that they ARE poisonous. Granted that an animal which attacked and killed them would EVENTUALLY die for it, but in the meantime the poisonous animal could be dead from the attack, so the death of its attacker would do it little good.

So most animals avoid bright-colored snakes just for the color of their skin.

WE, who have been trained by Mommy Professor, know this is a pointless prejudice. There are bright-colored snakes that not only have no poison, they have no TEETH. So it is RIDICULOUS to avoid a reptile because of its skin color.

Up to half of the young men with black skin are in the prison and parole system. But, as Mommy Professor points out, at least half of them are NOT. So if woman gets on an elevator alone at night with a man, his skin color should make no difference. This is an official statement from CBS in its guide as to how to avoid violence.

So anyone who would not pick up a snake because it is bright colored is a racist and anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

Interested Parties and Talking Heads

I said before that no one would check out the Black Sea bottom because no one had an INTEREST on checking the Black Sea bottom. From Bible thumpers to social scientists to Political Correctness to Marxism, everybody likes history just the way it is, rooted in the Middle East.

BUT the guy who made millions locating the Titanic found this to be a great project. HE now has a vested interest in pushing the IMPORTANCE of history up around Mount Ararat which, in historical terms, is about as Middle Eastern as Mongolia today.

This is how things REALLY work, and it is impossible to explain to someoe who WANTS not to understand. Most people have a vested interest in seeing the world as they see it now.

But in the real world research is not done by abstract entities, it is done by PEOPLE. A PERSON has no incentive to go after truth. As I said, Futurology has nothing to do with the future. It has to do with trends in Futurology, getting grants and publicity in the field, TODAY.

I was just looking at a Time Magazine from November 21, 1932. In the International section, discussion of German politics was under Belgium. Belgium was up in arms over what the experts said was the certainty of the restoration of the Kaiser in Germany. Belgium, which had been invaded in 1914 and occupied by the Kaiser’s Germany for four years, had parades in the streets against the restoration of the Kaiser.

In its report on the Munich Putsch in 1923, Time referred to Hitler as a “monarchist.” World War I dominated their memory, and the Kaiser was NEWS in 1932, whereas Hitler was a nobody.

One talking head was quoted as saying,” It is not a question of reestablishing the monarchy, the question is how it will be reestablished,” in other words, would it be the still-living Kaiser Wilhelm II or his successor?

Kaiser Wilhelm II lived in exile in the Netherlands. When Hitler occupied that country in 1940, the former Kaiser was guarded from all contact by German troops. He died in 1941 under the Third Reich.

For someone making a living as a writer for Time, the readers had to be given something they recognized and loved or hated. That meant the Kaiser in 1932.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

20 Comments

kyle

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=60086

U.S. explorers said on Wednesday they have found signs of human habitation hundreds of feet below the Black Sea where a catastrophic flood occurred about 7,500 years ago, which some scientists say is linked to the biblical story of Noah.

Explorer Robert Ballard, famous for discovering the wreck of the Titanic, said his National Geographic expedition found a ”rectangular structure,” possibly that of a building, about 310 feet below the sea’s surface, indicating people lived there before a massive flood inundated the area.

“It’s architecture and artifacts were of the Neolithic bronze age, which is from about 7,000 years ago,” said Ballard. The team’s chief archeologist, Fredrik Hiebert, described the finding as the “Pompeii of landscapes” and said it was typical of the wattle and daub homes seen on land.

“This is a major discovery that will begin to rewrite the history of cultures in this key area between Europe, Asia and the ancient Middle East,” said Hiebert, an archeologist from the University of Pennsylvania.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

14 Comments

Mark to Pain

“***But please help us focus here. I think there are very many people who read this blog, but don’t post comments because they are unsure what you want.”

— Peter Pain

Mark replies:

Peter, don’t fret; Bob’s just pissed because I wouldn’t apologize to Hardric for his unwillingness to condemn the welfare crowd. If Bob can’t get his way he’s gonna’ stomp his cane and shake his finger until the neighbors all know his milk’s curdled. It has nothing to do with anything other than ego and old age irritabiliy. On the positive side it shows he still has spark. On the negative side it makes him look like an old coot. Either way, we’re gonna’ hear about it.

ME:

Needless to say, Mark’s wrong. I’m Practically Perfect in Every Way.

But Mark is saying more or less what I said below. This is a rough and tumble crowd. The person you must be satisfied with is YOU.

I just want Mark to get off this and on to something else, but the point we have here is CRITICAL: You should realize that, if you stick your finger in here it can get bit, just as I bit Mark’s and he bit mine.

If you can’t deal with that UNDER A CHANGEABLE PSEUODONYM, you won’t do us much good out in the real world anyway.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Comments

Z

What the instructor is trying to tell us is actually quite simple. Ideologies that don’t work, just don’t work. They never can work because they are flawed and the laws of the universe can and will never let them work.

The Soviet system was broken from the beginning. Even if all the “experts” (Who happen to be crypto-soviets) said it was an efficient system, in the end, it fell to pieces.

Multicultural Democracies don’t work. Just like communism, it has no base within the laws of the universe.

Despite the systems’ own torch light parades, which may feature the “model” multicultural school or the “very loving” interracial relationship, it only appears to work because of the effort put into these parades. In fact, the best comparison we can use was the BIG BAD May Day parades through Red Square we used to see. Today’s equivalent is the above mentioned “model” multicultural school.

But just as the missiles we saw were fakes, made just for the Parades, what we don’t see at the “model” school is the racial achievement gap test scores packed tightly away in the Principal’s desk.

The victories that the instructor speaks of are not recognized by the average expert. When the power structure gets its soon to be “North American Union” it will open the flood gates for non-whites. Many a “torch light searching racialists” will fall into despair as they figure the struggle is lost. However, this is only because the “torch light lookers” don’t know about the diversity price curve which states, as the number of non-whites goes up, the amount of tolerance from Whites goes down.

You see, the more multicultural a multicultural democracy gets, the closer it gets to its collapse. Just as the Soviet system was supposed to be highly efficient, when it actually had its efficiency tested, it fell into a pile of its own contradictions.

The “strengths” of the old USSR were its “organization”, “efficiency”, and “production possibilities.” Just as the Strengths of the New USSA are its “diversity”, “tolerance”, and “freedoms.”

But, remember when its greatest “strengths” were tested, it ended up collapsing in a pile of it own contradictions.

Today’s version of the SDI or “Wallace Democrats” (who are now named “Regan Democrats” by Conservative pundits) is the great unknown. I may see the mass migration of non-whits as today’s SDI. Just as the SDI forced the USSR’s collapse by exposing its greatest myth, the mass migration of non-whites (And all it’s derivatives) will expose this systems’ greatest myth. Historians may look back to find Ted Kennedy as our very own science fiction writer?

But its important to remember, while the SDI may have helped bring it down, its main reason for collapse was its own contradictions. The current system has no shortage of these.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

I Know it When I SEE It!

BoardAd is just going ahead and upgrading the system. He probably consulted with others, but he didn’t consult with me, which is exactly the way I like it. That was a LOT of work and he ruined his computer doing it.

But, contrary to the Masturbation Generation, I am not as impressed by his sacrifices as I am by his INITIATIVE.

A manager who does not hire people who are better at things than he is is a FAILURE. But if they are better, how does he JUDGE them? That seems tome to be what good management is about. The top guy succeeds if he RECOGNIZES good work and people who have initiative.

What they do WORKS,

Our whole world view interrelated. BoardAd’s work relates directly back to Wordism. A good Wordist wants Control. I just want it DONE. This is true of technical work like BoardAd’s and it is true of seminar participation.

A person who has it all in His Book has aborted his whole thought process. In Wordism, nothing is allowed to WORK. Everything is justification. That is why Communism was doomed. The market tends to weed out failure. Planning cements it into the system.

Once again, pleas NOTICE the IMPORTANCE of what I told Pain: “I don’t KNOW” what you should come up with, any more than I know what BoardAd should do to the system.

What I DO know what I am LOOKING FOR.

This makes things a lot harder on YOU than any form of Wordism would be. Our whole world view is very confusing in our Wordist society. I am looking for SOMETHING good and I don’t KNOW what it is YET. It would be one hell of a lot easier for you to search Bob’s Holy Writ and repeat what I want I want you to repeat, especially since that has been your entire training in this society.

But in the end, what would you have? Someone who comes up under ANY form of Wordism suffers the same disadvantage in dealing with US that Communism had dealing with market economies. That system produced people who were simply not capable of competing in a REAL economy.

Z describes this beautifully in the article above.

You must go out of here with that key asset: an ability to deal in REALITY, in things that WORK.

The power of a small group of people like THAT is incalculable. In fact, they are the ONLY people who have actual POWER.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Pain, I Don’t KNOW!

Pain wants me to be more specific about the future. My point is that I don’t KNOW the future.

If you want to just make static here, you can declare that things like my suggestion that Indians MIGHT want Aryan babies is nonsense. You could argue that the Soviet Empire would have collapsed, Reagan or not. I call them as I SEE them, and when I don’t think I SEE them, I don’t call them.

As I KEEP pointing out, a Prophet of Doom is as silly as any other self-declared Prophet, but while everybody laughs at ever OTHER self-declared Prophet, the Prophet of Doom is NEVER laughed at. It may come from the same place that our absolute worship of stone-faced Chinese and American Indians who babble crap and do nothing comes from.

If you have a frown on your face, people take you seriously. Since Prophets of Doom have no better track record than any other prophets — take a look at the famous predictions of 1900 of what couldn’t be done by top people — the only explanation is the Chinese one.

The East Indian/Aryan thing was simply a random example trying to get your head out of the latest newspaper. I don’t argue it because it isn’t my POINT. My POINT is that things will make up the future that sound absurd right now.

No Sovietologist lost a penny by being dead wrong about the future of the USSR. Nobody in intelligence lost anything by 9/11. I am alone in that I CARE about what will happen, not just about my next paycheck and a reputation.

NO ONE ELSE has talked about the GENERAL conflict between science and social science. You are a specialist in one or the other. But the simple fact is that you can’t predict the future I you are a specialist. Specialists ALWAYS get blindsided. But it also never costs them anything, so that is not going to change.

One commenter put it perfectly: We are going to have to learn to THINK.

Someone asked me about general guidelines from me about comments I wouldn’t bitch about. I can’t think of any. Mark is bitching at me right now. I have no idea what he is getting at. I will bitch at you from time to time. If you have a point to make, you just have to live with it.

The points I just made strike me as important. Mark will ignore them and continue whatever jag he is on. Others will concentrate on what Mark is saying.

I’ll just go ahead and make my points.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments