Archive for September, 2007
I suspect that religion was the cause célèbre of this debate.
I also think that we need to take a practical approach to religion as an issue, since it won’t be going away soon. Anyone who can use the power of religion in a positive way on behalf of racial issues has my blessing. Post the Mantra on the church bulletin board. Raise the issue in Sunday School Class. Testify about it in Prayer Meeting. “Praise the Lord, He saved me from corrupting my genes. He saved me from helping to commit Genocide against the White Race.”
Keep in mind, at one time there were very strong feelings in Europe over Protestantism vs Catholicism. People died over this.
Do you think soldiers in WWI and WWII refused to fight alongside someone because they had a different flavor of religion?
David Duke proclaims himself to be a Christian. God bless David Duke.
William Pierce was a Cosmotheist. God bless William Pierce.
Mel Gibson is a Traditional Catholic. God bless Mel Gibson. (Well, ok, I am not sure about his racial stance, but he made some interesting movies).
You are racially aware. God bless you.
Race is the issue. Race trumps everything.
Someone just wrote me that if Pain didn’t stop being mean to them, they would stop posting “YOUR Mantra.”
Look, gang, you’re all [not] kids and I don’t [shield] you or me. The letter said Pain was “my lapdog.”
How Pain regards me is not my responsibility, and I am NOT your Mommy Professor.
I will do anything for the cause. But I have learned that when somebody starts shedding tears and threatening to stop working for the cause unless I do something, if they MEAN it they’re not much good anyway. Back in the early sixties I was picketing against integration at drugstore counters. One guy would show up, demand something, and then cry. The guy was a college senior!
Then he would go away. Over and over.
Such people are dangerous, as I have written before. When THE CAUSE needs them most, they will desert it.
I depend on people here. If you are going to go away, please don’t ask me to trust you. I end up depending on you, and suddenly I’m left hanging in the air. That’s the nastiest kind of betrayal, and I’ve had too much of it in my long, long fight.
Now wishing I’d never mentioned the C word, I do have a question.
If ANYONE is allowed to improve their children’s genes the Sister Theresas who want birth control abolished and the Politically Correct who oppose all genetics will be doomed. Their offspring will be as helpless and as quaint as the Amish. Children with brains and LOOKS will rule.
If genetic engineering can remove the link between your preferred sexual partner and offspring, what kind of impact on the racial future will that have? Is the black family down the street going to raise blue eyed blond triplets?
Here we go again!
On The Family Guy they said news was when a pretty little BLOND girl was missing. They had a police spokesman mention a little girl with an Anglo-Saxon name was the only child killed in a bus accident and all the reporters were interested. Then it turned out the name was Rodriguez an they lost interest, “THAT’S not NEWS.”
All the major news anchors in South America would pass in America as Anglo-Saxon. They’re largely blond.
I have difficulty believing you haven’t read what I wrote about Indians wanting Aryan children.
Your question about “the blacks down the street” is the standard sarcasm directed at anyone who has the guts to talk frankly about strange thing that COULD happen in the future. Nothing is easier or more sophomoric than ridicule, “So the whole USSR will just break up.” was one of these cheap shots.
I don’t know what your all-important down the street blacks are going to do. Black looks are not favored, least of all by blacks. The desperation with which their “beauty” is pushed is a dead giveaway.
That is THEIR dilemma
Why do you use such ridiculous sarcasm?
I wrote a piece a long time ago about one of the most important changes in historical direction, but [people] weren’t ready for it then. Now you are really tuning in, so I am going to repeat a few things that were missed before.
One of the great signposts of our new age was when the SST, the Supersonic Transport, was cancelled. For a century the entire history of aviation had been a steady progression to faster and faster. The end of the SST was an announcement that aviation was satisfied with 600 mph maximum speeds.
In the 1970s manned space travel came to an end. That, like ever-faster planes, was an inevitability that underlay all futurology before then. No one even realized at first that the end had come. By the same token, the end of the SST came as no surprise to anybody.
Another embedded twentieth century absolute was the Big Computer. All the science fiction stories had a giant computer built by a giant corporation like the IBM mainframes of the 1960s.
No one, least of all those who lived through it, can see the fundamental change here. They shrug. Like the collapse of the Soviet Empire, like the IQ differences between races, no one disputes it now. But far more important, no one pays any attention to the total redirection of history represented here.
The One Big World idea was expressed in the urban programs of the Great Society. Population was concentrating in cities, so in time everybody would be in a megalopolis. This concentration was an underlying theme of all futurology. One famous architect designed the mile-high building of the future where Future Families would inevitably live and work. They would almost never leave their ultimate urban world inside the building. In fact, they would seldom go several floors up or down. Their entire lives would be lived within a one-hundred yard three-dimensional space.
The only movement would be in Large Space Ships, in a confined space where thousands of people would go out to the stars.
Space is now populated by orbiting satellites. As it becomes practical, we will incidentally go up there. But no longer is this considered a giant government project. Satellites go up for companies and some are built by unlikely countries for contracting out to smaller entities.
When I was young genetics was beyond our each. It was a government program of racism and eugenics on the Nazi model (just as democratic socialism was on the Communist model) model or a government program of race mixing and sterility for intelligent people pushed by the ruling establishment. We who wanted a better future for children were on the absolute defensive.
Now the Bible-Thumper-Political Correctness coalition is fighting a losing battle against allowing PRIVATE eugenics.
Communism demanded the government ownership of the means of production. So did democratic socialism. But anyone who called a democratic socialist a Communist was simply considered ignorant. But a person who wants the race preserved and eugenics was routinely called a Nazi without any disagreement, however democratic the means [by which] he wanted it done. America was funded by people who considered race-mixing evil and outlawed it. It is now required doctrine that all the Founding Fathers were Nazis.
Everything was One World. The whole world had to be integrated or segregated by law. In 1950, at the beginning of the Korean War, a proposal was made that, since the draft was being reinstituted, soldiers would able to decide for themselves whether they wanted to be in all-white units, all-black units, or integrated units.
Obviously, integrationists could not allow this. If whites were allowed to settle in segregated communities ANYWHERE – including, AFKAN, the Northwest – integration would collapse. As we said THEN “a little bit of integration is like a little bit of pregnancy.” As O’Reilly says, there can be no segregated ANYTHING ANYWHERE in America.
The same problem has put the anti-whites on the defensive in the field of genetics. If ANYONE is allowed to improve their children’s genes the Sister Theresas who want birth control abolished and the Politically Correct who oppose all genetics will be doomed. Their offspring will be as helpless and as quaint as the Amish. Children with brains and LOOKS will rule.
But don’t count them out. These Bile-thumpers and PC freaks hate people. They are, in fact, truly evil. If we don’t wage the war, they might find a way.
But the tide has definitely turned. It has been hidden in plain sight.
The MSM franchises in nonwhite countries are imitations of the American, British, and European MSM (with the Jewish influence absent) and anything European or American is presented as “sophistication”. In fashion and style, the narcissistic elements in nonwhite countries are Caucasian in substance and character, and nearness to things European, American or British always invariably represent status.
The ambit of the imitation in the nonwhite counties cannot be overstated. But ironically, this imitation is a vehicle where the assertions of indigenous (nonwhite) pride rides, these indigenous assertions of nonwhite racial pride ironically riding in the worship and imitation of OUR culture and racial traits.
It is not sustainable for it is an irreconcilable peculiarity for indigenous nonwhite pride to ride in the EMBRACE of all things racially and culturally WHITE.
Therefore, things “thoroughbred” are destined to become fashionable in both white and nonwhite countries and already the celebrities with their Asian and Negro adoptees seem intolerably passé.
This is because Political Correctness is too weak of a container for racial envy, and envy is an emotion that is too great and powerful for it not to evolve to new forms. Accordingly, the nineteenth century sensibility about race and racial purity is a much more durable container.
The resurrection of chattel slavery now occurring under the guise of the global financial marketplace is connected and interrelates to all this. As we know, the so-called global financial marketplace is nothing but a cover for a “plantation system” of caste, based upon gradations of skin color and exploitation through creditor-debtor arrangements, and made incredibly effective and efficient through computer platforms and automated surveillance run by the banking system and its handmaidens in the courts and government.
The silly affections of “democracy” now furnishing cover for the reinvention of chattel slavery are rapidly giving way to the brute force reality, the commercial and investment banking elites being the agents of plantation management.
At some point in the redevelopment of chattel slavery under these arrangements, affectations of “democracy” become unnecessary as the “legitimacy procurement” services of such affectations become redundant.
And Europe is slowly being flushed down the toilet owing to Europe’s high levels of taxation and government presence while America and Asia are increasingly running the show.
You can’t have high levels of taxation and make chattel slavery work for the “masters” are always confronted with the age-old issue of the “slave rebellion”. In Europe this is known as the “Islamic revolt”. Taxation prevents the opportunity for the slave to buy his way out, as the opportunity to “buy your way out” must exist for the institution of chattel slavery to be sustainable.
Otherwise, all parties to the chattel slavery transaction are trapped.
Accordingly, the thing has to “centrifugically” blow apart. This leads to the kinds of situations Castro, Chavez, and that clown in North Korea are running, which are nothing but slave systems gone awry.
Try getting a European to understand these basics. Try getting hordes of fools in America to do the same. Good luck.
Mommy Professor has been working against you for generations. But racial purity is the next big trend. Count on it. You heard it first at BUGS.
Racial purity is the next big trend because competition forces it. Few see this reality, but BW made the call early on.
The resurrection of chattel slavery through debt obligations has been made possible through computer technology, information sharing, and low cost surveillance. Before the advent of the Internet and low cost computing, the controls necessary to make debt slavery work were simply too expensive for the present era. This is a big unheralded change in our lives. Our Asian clients are learning quickly of the advantages of a credit card enslaved populace as the best forms of coercion are those forms not perceived as coercive. Getting sucked into debt does the trick nicely.
But government can blow this all to hell through excessive taxation. It is bad enough to be in debt, but worse if the level of taxation prevents you from ever getting out from underneath your debts regardless of onerous bankruptcy laws.
Slavery is an art. Lay on too many restraints and be too transparent in the application of force and you kill hope. That invites rebellion. This is exactly what is happening in Europe.
BW has been very prescient about this. The European policy is absolutely ridiculous. They are inept at running slave societies, yet they invite the darkies in. Now they are left with the stark choice of kicking the darkies out, or letting the whole thing blow to hell.
This can happen in America too. If the Feds respond to the next big government-financing crunch by upping the level of taxes, they will light the fuse for a real shindig on the racial and ethnic conflict front.
BW has said it and it cannot be truer: Free society and multiracial society are incompatible. You can’t have both.
Mark recommended a South African site and said it was almost as thought-provoking as this one. I made the point that we are UNIQUE. Another commenter referred to the recomended site as “copy and paste” as opposed to our doing our own writing ourselves.
This seminar exchange made me think of the uniqueness of BUGS, and I used the term “copy and paste” there a lot. I joked about attacking Mark, but he knew it was in jest. But he COULD have taken the entire diatribe about copy-and-paste sites PERSONALLY.
Now Simmons said something harmlessly that got me to thinking about the whole problem of scattergun arguments. I will write the piece later, but it occurred to me that this would be a good time to remind you that this is a SEMINAR. I expound on what you REMIND me of. Not everythig I have to say about cut and paste sites versus our uniqueness has to do with Mark personally. Not everythng I say about ego making one turn to shotgun arguments instead of beating in the message is a personal criticism of Simmons.
I am NOT a subtle man. If I mean YOU, your name will be up front. But in a SEMINAR you have to let me expound on what you make me think of without taking it as a personal attack.
We have a job to do, a job NO ONE ELSE IS GOING TO DO. Let’s leave the personal crap over on SF.
I sometimes slip words like “subjugation” and “submissiveness” in place of genocide, but then again I’m a bit of a free thinker and willing to make a mistake or two.
That’s fine if your big concern is yourself. If your big thing is to be a free-thinker this neednot concern yo
But if you are dedicated to the CAUSE, artistic variation is a BAD ida. We need to hit GENOCIDE. This thing is way beyond subjugation. Lord Nelson took my criticism of his talking about”outpopulating” well, and this is the same thing.
The ONLY way to beat our concepts into their brains is to give them NO wiggle room. If You VARY the tems to look good or not to look bad or to look “free-thinking,” that gives them wiggle room. We have to get this to the point where any of the code words, anti-racism, assimilation, and so forth, cause the word “genocide” to pop up in theirminds or they get nervous that it will pop up in others. THEY HAVE NEVER MET THS KIND OF ATTACK BEFORE.
Your little play with words can do tremendous damage. It’s like shooting powder instead of a bullet.
It’s not subjugation, it’s GENOCIDE. It’s not outpopulating, it’s GENETIC mixture.
STAY ON MESSAGE.
Simmons wrote: “I agree. But this thinking is already out there people are asking what exactly is “racism?” ”
The Oxford English Dictionary is quite helpful in this regard. It admits that the term was coined for propaganda by the Jewish mass-murderer Leon Trotsky.
For reasons I think most of us here know, that won’t be mentioned on AR.
“Racism,” like every other pejorative, is nothing. It has no substance. If you cave to it, you’re throwing the sorry curveball. If you give it the slightest bit of credence, you’re throwing the sorry curveball.
The way you handle it is by observing that “racism” is used by genociders to justify genocide. Then you loop back into the mantra, even stronger than before.
This is the much-ignored step #2 of the mantra program, as outlined above. The beauty of the mantra is that it allows you to take the highest caliber ammunition of the opposition and throw it right back at them. “Racism,” and it’s brother “anti-semitism” (’Most people today understand that an anti-semite is a person some Jew hates.’) are the big guns of the opposition. See how easy they are to turn around? And everytime you turn it around at them, your argument gets stronger.
Step #2: Follow through!
I’ll disagree. Mantra is a school of logic not a precise recital of words (wordism). Its about the why of PC and the results of such a religion. For ex; Cultist shrieks “racist” at me, me being a mantra trained thinker I do not respond with my own shriek, but instead dissect the cultist’s line of thought.
I think CL is right in that the Mantra MUST be state and repeated in all cases. And repeated.
And repeated. The Mantra totally changes he whole grounds of discussion, the whole world view.
But, as Simmons implies, the Mantra itself requires that YOU adapt to this new line of thought. The article below that CL was replying to makes this very clear. You have to have the mental DISCIPLINE to PREVENT HIS Meandering off.
You have just shown how the anti is EVIL, no matter how much he mewls about his good intentions. It is the time to show why he could have gotten so ridiculous, why it is so common.
Once again, this is simple but definitely not EASY. And, as Simmons says, you are trained here, you are not programmed. No red uniforms here. You have to get out there with your squirrel rifle and do it yourself. I gave you the rifle and the ammunition and taught you how to begin using them.
Simmons’s “Mantra is a school of logic” is absolute genius. But every second you have to keep CL’s warning in mind and STAY ON TARGET. REPEAT the Mantra itself until the other guy starts finishing it for you, and then repeat it some more.
If I were a redcoat officer, I could march you through every step. I would also leave you out there getting your butt shot off.
Personal discipline, personal initiative. There is nothing EASY about that simple combination.
Inresponse to the articlebelow, Flanking Arguments, CL brings me up short:
The corollary to this is when you abandon what works.
One of the great banes of baseball managers everywhere is the pitcher who is throwing one pitch the opposing player/line-up can’t hit, but who inexplicably decides to “diversify” to his less stellar stuff. He’s often seen looking over his shoulder 2 to 3 seconds after making the change.
It’s called being “cute,” and it invariably kills the perpetrator in sports, business, and war.
The mantra is the unhittable fastball. Your curveball is crap. Don’t be cute.
The last battle fought between Americans and Englishmen was at New Orleans. After Braddock got cut to pieces by Indians in 1755, after the eight years of revolutionary war, two an a half years into the War of 1812, which, as everybody knows, was actually over when the Battle of New Orleans, the British got cut to pieces by the same old thing.
The redcoats marched up and the Americans stayed down and shot them to pieces from cover. The same thing happened after Lexington and Concord in 1775.
So I am very familiar with the fact that people simply WILL NOT change tactics.
In 1870 the French Army was bigger than the Prussian one. The Prussians moved fast, outflanked the French, and won.
In 1914 the available French Army was bigger than the German one, which had a two-front war. The Germans moved faster, outflanked the French, and the rest of the war was fought deep in French territory.
In 1940 the French depended on the immobile Maginot Line and the French Army was comparable in size to the Wehrmacht. The Germans used the Blitzkrieg, a brand new thing where they moved faster and outflanked the French.
So when I find the Mantra and it WORKS, it is no surprise at all that the response is a loud yawn.
Anther approach that has no tradition or recommendation except that it works is talking about WHY something is said. It hits the other side from the rear. It outflanks them. Instead of going into the usual routine about black-white IQ, I simply point out that any professor who does NOT come to that conclusion is likely 1) to be mobbed and 2) to lose his job, and he certainly will get no promotion.
Everybody KNOWS this, but our folks are so thick-headed that they NEVER BRING IT UP. From up from Africa stuff to every single Politically Correct idea, if you let them talk about how Mommy Professor X has discovered a new “fact” that proves Political Correctness and then point out that that is what they get PAID to do, Mommy Professors products are caught completely off guard.
Everybody KNOWS this, but we aren’t supposed to be bright enough to bring it up.
And we usually AREN’T.
For defense we have our Maginot Line. For attack, we have our red uniforms to march in.
The whole history of America has been shaped by Puritan thought, which led to white self-hatred before Jews got here in numbers.
Jonathan Edwards was born in 1703, so he wrote a century after the original Puritans got here, but he is considered the greatest of ALL American theologians by many historians, if not most.
Here Edwards says what causes the most joy in a Puritan’s heart:
The Eternity of Hell Torments
by Jonathan Edwards
Fourth, the sight of hell torments will exalt the happiness of the saints forever. It will not only make them more sensible of the greatness and freeness of the grace of God in their happiness, but it will really make their happiness the greater, as it will make them more sensible of their own happiness. It will give them a more lively relish of it: it will make them prize it more. When they see others, who were of the same nature and born under the same circumstances, plunged in such misery, and they so distinguished, O it will make them sensible how happy they are. A SENSE OF THE OPPOSITE MISERY, IN ALL CASES, GREATLY INCREASES THE RELISH OF ANY JOY OR PLEASURE.
I must have of woke up on the wrong side of my tombstone writing a couple of things below.
I edited them.
Coach, I am starting to think you have supernatural powers.
Quote by Bob:
“They will divide us by CLASS, with our present leaders soaking in the sunshine of Big Name approval”
Recent anti thread on Stormfront:
BTW. AFKAN, Great comment.
AFKAN can do great things. I hope he and Mark and others realize that I don’t get pissed off at people I despise. To me, wasting the brilliance I NEED is EVERYTHING.
Yes, LN, I am am psycho, psychic, WHATEVER.
Actualy the two are related. You have to be psychic to understand. You have to be psycho to risk a strait jacket by SAYING what you understand.
I went to the site you have here and wrote:
You were on a drunk for weeks and woke up in a strange place. You look out the window and see people with dark skins.
NOTHING ELSE. All you see is that they all have DARK SKINS.
Tell me about the country you woke up in.
This is a PRACTICAL question, not a Mommy Professor theory.
What youy immediately know about any brown-skinned country is that It is either desperately poor or has revenues from white people who found the oil and are pumping it.
And that’s IT in the real world.
Now back to you and Mommy Professor’s version: There is a subtle gradation here, not understod by ignrant racists like me. As every rapper says when he faces racism, “YOU IGNUNT!!!”
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, it is the color of the skin you live or die by.
When I put forward the Mantra, is often Me no hear “intermarriage” before. What assimilation? What that have do intermarriage?” and like brilliance.
Lord Nelson, on the other hand, went out there and DEMANDED that antis give him ANY alternative they had to genocide against whites. He is beating them over the head with it, and he is beating them to death.
When someone says, “Me no hear ‘race problem,’” you can either use that to ACT or you can REACT and come to me with your tail between your legs.
I get SICK of doing ALL the translating. When they say that, YOU have a chance to define things the way LN does.
When someone asks you a question, that is a chance for YOU to SAY SOMETHING.
Now for something that seems completely different.. If experts get caught by every historical benchmark with their noses up their behinds, I can afford to be wrong a LOT in my predictions. WOL has all the examples here on record.
Right now there is a protest of about a thousand against the Iraq War – the media says “thousands,” so that’s a max. The REASON I say that is because it is a leftist march. It is leftist march because the organization used AMSAWR, Against War and Racism.” What in Heaven’s name does “racism” have to do with it?
Translation for the brain damaged: Consistently over the past four decades, an organization that was pro-Communist always used the term “Racism” in its title. This was obvious to anybody who could reason. Anti-racist means openly anti-white, just as Temperance means Prohibition.
Back on Earth, the word Temperance excludes two things by definition. Temperance means not ABUSING alcohol. It means the moderate USE of alcohol. So a non-drinker is, by definition, not “temperate.”
As with Anti- Racism this requires a second of painful THOUGHT. As soon as I hear “Anti-Racist” in a title, it is the same as “Marxist and I can go ahead. But I can’t because it is tripwire. I have to go back and explain this to each and every person who has decided to abandon his frontal lobe on me – AGAIN.
Capitalized, Anti-Racist ALWAYS means Marxist. It has always meant Marxist for forty years. But I have to go back and pick up the stumbling who can’t speak the political language.
Over and over and over and over and over.
“All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.”
Experts routinely fail to perceive WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DETERMINED.
As BW has pointed out, and ONLY BW has pointed out, nonwhites do not want to rule the world.
Instead, they want a world where they get what they want without having to shoulder the responsibility for making it work (the business of “making it actually work” being, as always, the responsibility of white people and only white people).
Consider that 65 years ago we had Japan giving up forever any desire to exercise global power, while 35 years ago the Maoists invited us back to organize China’s affairs. 10 years ago we had West and Central Africa return to us through EU administered currency unions while Indonesia never really left, being held together only through European, British and American military aid and NGOs. India returned to us through alliance with our Central Asian Fortress (they cannot afford their jet fuel without us paying for it) while they beg us to teach their middle class multitudes mortgage finance.
On and on, everywhere you look it is the same story or some sort of similar story, and make no mistake, Iran is included.
It is only a small portion of the Islamic world that refuses to come to terms with our rule, something the military is grateful for, for it is wonderful to have somebody available to beat the hell out of, be able to justify it, and get paid for it too.
And we are literally drowning in the role of “big dog”, the whole world wanting to get close to anything and anybody white, penetrating borders in mass to prove it, or throwing bombs to disprove it, (that is throwing bombs to disprove what cannot be disproved).
All this while moronic Western European governments yet again “toll the bell at the gates of hell” for the white man (for what is more preposterous than this monstrosity they call the European Union and its un-administerable policies?)
And yet again America is caught in the trajectory of European tomfoolery and impending economic collapse.
But don’t ask to MSM to explain it for the MSM certainly doesn’t SEE it.
As is usual for WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DETERMINED.
Some quick thoughts on self-selected impotence:
Everyone that does the “me combat veteran! me TOUGH” is automatically announced their moral EQUALITY to everyone else, and their moral SUPERIORITY to most others, as the tool that compensates for their subsequent failure in virtually all other areas.
It is easier to moan, than it is to actually DO SOMETHING, no matter how small or trivial it may seem.
What we see as the most militant of those near to White Nationalism/Western Nationalism, the “Militia Movement,” is people who realized the game is rigged. They then went about exactly the wrong way to change the game, declaring their debts to be illegal (unConstitutional currency), and dressed up in camo “uniforms,” waved their old squirrel rifles in the air, and talked of overthrowing the government with force.
ALL of them were men who spoke of their great deeds during WWII/Korea/Vietnam, the great glorious deeds of a glory-filled youth.
In their impotence, they adopted the Forms of a Glorious Past that never was, without adapting the Forms to the Substance of a new day, a new world.
They accepted the Terms and Definitions of their implacable RACIAL Enemy, without realizing it, and fell into traps of their own, unwitting, devise.
Their impotence is projected outward onto us, and our situation, saying, in effect, “Don’t try, Son. I’ve established my moral credentials and superiority, and I KNOW it can’t be done. After all, I couldn’t do it, and for me to admit that it is possible would place the balme for failure on me. If you were to succeed, even slightly, you would be seen as my better, and my excuses would be removed. I can’t have that.”
This is called Human Sacrifice.
Mark thought my reference to “copy and paste” was another swipe at his comparing the South African site, which IS good, to BUGS, which, it is critical to point out, is unique I wouldn’t be doing it.
‘Tis profoundly true that I love to give Mark hell now that I’m too old for him to punch in the mouth, but I am afraid that in this it misses the point. As I KEEP explaining, something that someone said REMINDS me of something.
I had a visceral dislike of Mark’s comparing that site to BUGS, and someone put it better than I had by calling it a copy-and-paste site. But that term “copy-and-past” gave me a new insight. It is a term for so much about comments that I criticize.
There is so much hard thinking to be done here, so many expressions like mderpelding’s all big events in history come as a complete surprise to experts, that I get a sense of frustration when AFKAN, who COULD speak short profundities, goes right back into his groove for the hundredth time. He’s improved that a LOT.
To me, “copy and paste” has the broader meaning of making BUGS just another blog. If that’s what it is, what the hell is the POINT? I’ve DONE my stints as one more foot soldier a hundred times over.
No, Mark, “copy and paste” means a lot more than it did when we originally discussed it. It gets to the heart of what we are doing.
All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.
They all went against “current trends”.
All those past experts believed that tomorrow would always be an extension of yesterday. With today as a midpoint.
In hindsight, we can all sift through tons of facts to provide a rational narrative to explain what was inexplicable to our ancestors. We then pronounce ourselves as smarter,savvier,better educated, and more evolved than those poor fools caught flat-footed in the past.
So, with our better understanding, through hindsight of world events, we know what’s going to happen. Not only that, but we know what was done wrong in the past; so of course those mistakes will never be repeated and the future will be ours to control.
It’s like a man walking.
He approaches an intersection. He looks at his watch and says to himself,”Well yesterday at 9:31 AM I crossed this street and there were no cars. It is now 9:31 AM. Historically, there have been no cars. Therefore, I can cross safely”.
You might view this example as silly.
But this type of causal reasoning is endemic to western white people.
The most dedicated “aryan” superhero marching around playing Nazi is the natural enemy to a “Semmelweise”.
Can’t anybody think for themselves anymore?
“All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.” is GREAT!
Got this today from amazon, a new book by Victor Davis Hanson, outlining this neocon thought leader’s solution to the immigration problem… intermarriage with non-white immigrants. Yes that will return America back to its glory days. Turds like Hanson can make a great living today getting paid NOT to think and publishing volumes like this to prove it.
In this revised and updated edition, Mexifornia examines the predicament of those vigorous, ambitious Mexicans that make California strong but who are hurt by inadequate policies that damage them and this country. Ultimately, Hanson hopes that our traditions of assimilation, integration and intermarriage can yet remedy the immigration crisis that continues to grow and shape America’s future.
I tell you what I’m REALLY sick of. I heard this endlessly from the The Greatest Generation, and it is popular on SF. It comes in three parts:
!) “Me Tough Guy, me SUFFERED, me know REALITY.”
2) “Reality always BAD!”
3) He then shows he’s a Tough Guy by sitting there and blubbering about how hopeless everything is.
He says I’m not a Tough Realist because I don’t blubber.
I hope I NEVER get that “Tough.”
There is PLENTY of room here for copy and paste and how it affects what we are doing. But I really like thought within our framework, putting together seemingly unrelated ideas.
The “No Compomise” articlebelow is an example. Before you copy and paste Covington or Hitler or somebody, take a look at what it ACTUALLY says.
We all hear people say “I’ve got a life.” But we ONLY hear that as discouragement. The SF grumps sit around and talk abut how HOPELESS everything is because everybody isn’t our therein a torchlight parade.
It is a REALITY that most people don’t spend their lives concentrated on saving our race. So hatis our reaction? We can do what we always do when we lose, and moan and dribble and cry over it, or we can take that reality into account.
We can quote Hitler and wait for the whole population to come out with their torches and sob abut our disappointment iwth everybody else.
Or we can do what successful revolutionaries always did and GET REAL..
Nobody is going to RECOGNIZE that the article below, n how revolutions succeeded, is another take on the same “I’ve got a LIFE” reality. I pointed out how Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini all took power because most people wanted someone to come in and end the chaos.
I will now reveal to you that that was why I corrected the earlier wording from “planning for victory” to “planning for the other side’s FAILURE.” Nothing like the Perot phenomenon of 1992 ever came close to happening any time before in American history, when Perot said he would be wiling to run and was soon leading the candidates of the entire electoral history, power, and machinery of a sitting president and his opponent.
People on our side mostly remember only that he had big ears and then go back to their Death Watch and competing with the Professional Mourners.
The Western world has chaos. It is growing daily. We need to plan for THAT, before the neoconservative types take us over the way the neocons did the conservatives.
Has anybody noticed how much the collapse of the World Trade Center resembled the fall of the Soviet Empire? One day they were dominant and permanent figures on the New York skyline and the next day they weren’t there any more.
When I watch the WTC coming down, I see the Soviet Empire coming down.
At the end of a piece below, I said, “Conservatives were so busy groaning about how hopeless everything was that they never planned for victory”
That couldn’t have been WORSE put. It is exactly the wrong point. What conservatives did not plan for was the enemy’s COLLAPSE, not their own victory. I am a victim of the torchlight parade crap theories of victory I have head for over half a century.
I, of all people, should know better than THAT!
Lenin had never addressed a large crowd in his LIFE before the Germans sent him into Russia in 1917. He was sent AFTER the Tsar fell. The history I always heard said that he overthrew the Czar and then took over. On such factual diddling one’s whole picture of the world is changed.
Even the Bolsheviks were fairly satisfied when Lenin got to Moscow. Marxism held that the new stage of history had been reached, and the steady progress of democracy to socialism to communism had gone from the feudal Tsarist stage to the capitalist phase in 1917.
That was Marxism. What Lenin saw was a huge hole that could be filled by his Party. That was why the Germans sent him in. Only Lenin would take power, hand the Germans all of their empire except most of Russia so they could rules what was left of Russia.
Flash forward to Mussolini. I have said here at least a dozen times that Il Duce almost missed the March on Rome when his Party took power. I[n] f[ac]t, he was a lot like Perot, but successful. He just announced that Italians should march on Rome and demand control of the entire government. As he slept that march materialized and nobody thought that Il Duce himself wouldn’t KNOW it!
I quoted the November 21, 1934 New York Times as saying that the restoration of the German monarchy as a certainty. The only question was whether it would be the old Kaiser or his son.
It seemed like good idea tat the time. A majority of the Reichstag was held by Nazis and Communists, and Times’ experts in Berlin were as brilliant as paid Sovietologists in 1980. They looked at the Nazis a[s] revanchiste, revengists, who jut said Germany hadn’t lost WWI.
To them, Hitler was a “monarchist.” No government could be formed without either the Stalinists or the Nazis. It was impossible for Americans, who worshipped monarchy and looked up to Sophisticated European Thinking the way universities STILL do, to believe that that uneducated little guy could make them forget Kaiser Bill ever lived.
We watched the Soviet Empire collapse in the 1980s, we watched Perot lead for the presidency in 1992, we watched the World Trade Center, both buildings go down in 2001, and we none of it has had the SLIGHTEST effect n SF thinking. If we knew the REAL history of Communism and Fascism, none of this would surprise us.
But SF toodles along as if history were the way Political Correctness writes it, its explanation is just different.
Some of my readers are beginning to realize that there is NO compromise here. There are teasing mentions of Semmelweis from my book.
Medicine faced this situation in the early nineteenth century. Galen’s theories about the Balance of Humors in the body and the need for bleeding ran head on into bacteriology.
The world is either that I say it is, a group of perfectly understandable movements which require mental discipline to handle, or everything is planned in some dimly lit little room or the Bilderbergers get-togethers.
The world does not get LESS complicated with realism, it gets MUCH harder. A RIGOROUS study of supply and demand is more mentally taxing than wandering over Mercantilists theory and gold and silver theories down through the ages
As with priesthoods, all you have to do is learn Ancient Languages and you can quote Galen’s crap and sound learned. You can quote mystic “natural value” stuff from ancient time’s economics. The Catholic Church is beginning to realize how it screwed itself when it abandoned Latin. There is no way that stuff sounds as profound in English.
A language course won’t substitute for RIGOROUS thinking. Like Lenin and Hitler and Mussolini and September 11, real world power politics is neither a plot nor a gradual process.
In POWER politics, you can’t STRADDLE. And you can’t copy and paste the stuff you like and get anywhere.
Many are called, but very, VERY few are chosen.
“Meanwhile all SFers can think of is the big noses.
Why won’t anybody THINK about what I say?”
Because they need a dragon to slay. Most of them and most whites can’t just unify for the sake of our race. It’s as if we as a group are unable to act without an outside source to act upon, and at that we can’t do it as a group without a “Great Leader” to show us the way. Why they can’t see that once they slay that dragon another will inevitable appear frustrates me to no end. It’s about our race! So no the jews aren’t THE problem, we are THE problem because we don’t put our white race first. That’s why the Mantra works.