I wrote a piece a long time ago about one of the most important changes in historical direction, but [people] weren’t ready for it then. Now you are really tuning in, so I am going to repeat a few things that were missed before.

One of the great signposts of our new age was when the SST, the Supersonic Transport, was cancelled. For a century the entire history of aviation had been a steady progression to faster and faster. The end of the SST was an announcement that aviation was satisfied with 600 mph maximum speeds.

In the 1970s manned space travel came to an end. That, like ever-faster planes, was an inevitability that underlay all futurology before then. No one even realized at first that the end had come. By the same token, the end of the SST came as no surprise to anybody.

Another embedded twentieth century absolute was the Big Computer. All the science fiction stories had a giant computer built by a giant corporation like the IBM mainframes of the 1960s.

No one, least of all those who lived through it, can see the fundamental change here. They shrug. Like the collapse of the Soviet Empire, like the IQ differences between races, no one disputes it now. But far more important, no one pays any attention to the total redirection of history represented here.

The One Big World idea was expressed in the urban programs of the Great Society. Population was concentrating in cities, so in time everybody would be in a megalopolis. This concentration was an underlying theme of all futurology. One famous architect designed the mile-high building of the future where Future Families would inevitably live and work. They would almost never leave their ultimate urban world inside the building. In fact, they would seldom go several floors up or down. Their entire lives would be lived within a one-hundred yard three-dimensional space.

The only movement would be in Large Space Ships, in a confined space where thousands of people would go out to the stars.

Space is now populated by orbiting satellites. As it becomes practical, we will incidentally go up there. But no longer is this considered a giant government project. Satellites go up for companies and some are built by unlikely countries for contracting out to smaller entities.

When I was young genetics was beyond our each. It was a government program of racism and eugenics on the Nazi model (just as democratic socialism was on the Communist model) model or a government program of race mixing and sterility for intelligent people pushed by the ruling establishment. We who wanted a better future for children were on the absolute defensive.

Now the Bible-Thumper-Political Correctness coalition is fighting a losing battle against allowing PRIVATE eugenics.

Communism demanded the government ownership of the means of production. So did democratic socialism. But anyone who called a democratic socialist a Communist was simply considered ignorant. But a person who wants the race preserved and eugenics was routinely called a Nazi without any disagreement, however democratic the means [by which] he wanted it done. America was funded by people who considered race-mixing evil and outlawed it. It is now required doctrine that all the Founding Fathers were Nazis.

Everything was One World. The whole world had to be integrated or segregated by law. In 1950, at the beginning of the Korean War, a proposal was made that, since the draft was being reinstituted, soldiers would able to decide for themselves whether they wanted to be in all-white units, all-black units, or integrated units.

Obviously, integrationists could not allow this. If whites were allowed to settle in segregated communities ANYWHERE – including, AFKAN, the Northwest – integration would collapse. As we said THEN “a little bit of integration is like a little bit of pregnancy.” As O’Reilly says, there can be no segregated ANYTHING ANYWHERE in America.

The same problem has put the anti-whites on the defensive in the field of genetics. If ANYONE is allowed to improve their children’s genes the Sister Theresas who want birth control abolished and the Politically Correct who oppose all genetics will be doomed. Their offspring will be as helpless and as quaint as the Amish. Children with brains and LOOKS will rule.

But don’t count them out. These Bile-thumpers and PC freaks hate people. They are, in fact, truly evil. If we don’t wage the war, they might find a way.

But the tide has definitely turned. It has been hidden in plain sight.

Mark recommended a South African site and said it was almost as thought-provoking as this one. I made the point that we are UNIQUE. Another commenter referred to the recomended site as “copy and paste” as opposed to our doing our own writing ourselves.

This seminar exchange made me think of the uniqueness of BUGS, and I used the term “copy and paste” there a lot. I joked about attacking Mark, but he knew it was in jest. But he COULD have taken the entire diatribe about copy-and-paste sites PERSONALLY.

Now Simmons said something harmlessly that got me to thinking about the whole problem of scattergun arguments. I will write the piece later, but it occurred to me that this would be a good time to remind you that this is a SEMINAR. I expound on what you REMIND me of. Not everythig I have to say about cut and paste sites versus our uniqueness has to do with Mark personally. Not everythng I say about ego making one turn to shotgun arguments instead of beating in the message is a personal criticism of Simmons.

I am NOT a subtle man. If I mean YOU, your name will be up front. But in a SEMINAR you have to let me expound on what you make me think of without taking it as a personal attack.

We have a job to do, a job NO ONE ELSE IS GOING TO DO. Let’s leave the personal crap over on SF.

Simmons wrote: “I agree. But this thinking is already out there people are asking what exactly is “racism?” ”

The Oxford English Dictionary is quite helpful in this regard. It admits that the term was coined for propaganda by the Jewish mass-murderer Leon Trotsky.

For reasons I think most of us here know, that won’t be mentioned on AR.

“Racism,” like every other pejorative, is nothing. It has no substance. If you cave to it, you’re throwing the sorry curveball. If you give it the slightest bit of credence, you’re throwing the sorry curveball.

The way you handle it is by observing that “racism” is used by genociders to justify genocide. Then you loop back into the mantra, even stronger than before.

This is the much-ignored step #2 of the mantra program, as outlined above. The beauty of the mantra is that it allows you to take the highest caliber ammunition of the opposition and throw it right back at them. “Racism,” and it’s brother “anti-semitism” (’Most people today understand that an anti-semite is a person some Jew hates.’) are the big guns of the opposition. See how easy they are to turn around? And everytime you turn it around at them, your argument gets stronger.

Step #2: Follow through!

I’ll disagree. Mantra is a school of logic not a precise recital of words (wordism). Its about the why of PC and the results of such a religion. For ex; Cultist shrieks “racist” at me, me being a mantra trained thinker I do not respond with my own shriek, but instead dissect the cultist’s line of thought.

ME:

I think CL is right in that the Mantra MUST be state and repeated in all cases. And repeated.

And repeated. The Mantra totally changes he whole grounds of discussion, the whole world view.

But, as Simmons implies, the Mantra itself requires that YOU adapt to this new line of thought. The article below that CL was replying to makes this very clear. You have to have the mental DISCIPLINE to PREVENT HIS Meandering off.

You have just shown how the anti is EVIL, no matter how much he mewls about his good intentions. It is the time to show why he could have gotten so ridiculous, why it is so common.

Once again, this is simple but definitely not EASY. And, as Simmons says, you are trained here, you are not programmed. No red uniforms here. You have to get out there with your squirrel rifle and do it yourself. I gave you the rifle and the ammunition and taught you how to begin using them.

Simmons’s “Mantra is a school of logic” is absolute genius. But every second you have to keep CL’s warning in mind and STAY ON TARGET. REPEAT the Mantra itself until the other guy starts finishing it for you, and then repeat it some more.

If I were a redcoat officer, I could march you through every step. I would also leave you out there getting your butt shot off.

Personal discipline, personal initiative. There is nothing EASY about that simple combination.

Inresponse to the articlebelow, Flanking Arguments, CL brings me up short:

The corollary to this is when you abandon what works.

One of the great banes of baseball managers everywhere is the pitcher who is throwing one pitch the opposing player/line-up can’t hit, but who inexplicably decides to “diversify” to his less stellar stuff. He’s often seen looking over his shoulder 2 to 3 seconds after making the change.

It’s called being “cute,” and it invariably kills the perpetrator in sports, business, and war.

The mantra is the unhittable fastball. Your curveball is crap. Don’t be cute.

When I put forward the Mantra, is often Me no hear “intermarriage” before. What assimilation? What that have do intermarriage?” and like brilliance.

Lord Nelson, on the other hand, went out there and DEMANDED that antis give him ANY alternative they had to genocide against whites. He is beating them over the head with it, and he is beating them to death.

When someone says, “Me no hear ‘race problem,’” you can either use that to ACT or you can REACT and come to me with your tail between your legs.

I get SICK of doing ALL the translating. When they say that, YOU have a chance to define things the way LN does.

When someone asks you a question, that is a chance for YOU to SAY SOMETHING.

Now for something that seems completely different.. If experts get caught by every historical benchmark with their noses up their behinds, I can afford to be wrong a LOT in my predictions. WOL has all the examples here on record.

Right now there is a protest of about a thousand against the Iraq War – the media says “thousands,” so that’s a max. The REASON I say that is because it is a leftist march. It is leftist march because the organization used AMSAWR, Against War and Racism.” What in Heaven’s name does “racism” have to do with it?

Translation for the brain damaged: Consistently over the past four decades, an organization that was pro-Communist always used the term “Racism” in its title. This was obvious to anybody who could reason. Anti-racist means openly anti-white, just as Temperance means Prohibition.

Back on Earth, the word Temperance excludes two things by definition. Temperance means not ABUSING alcohol. It means the moderate USE of alcohol. So a non-drinker is, by definition, not “temperate.”

As with Anti- Racism this requires a second of painful THOUGHT. As soon as I hear “Anti-Racist” in a title, it is the same as “Marxist and I can go ahead. But I can’t because it is tripwire. I have to go back and explain this to each and every person who has decided to abandon his frontal lobe on me – AGAIN.

Capitalized, Anti-Racist ALWAYS means Marxist. It has always meant Marxist for forty years. But I have to go back and pick up the stumbling who can’t speak the political language.

Over and over and over and over and over.

Got this today from amazon, a new book by Victor Davis Hanson, outlining this neocon thought leader’s solution to the immigration problem… intermarriage with non-white immigrants. Yes that will return America back to its glory days. Turds like Hanson can make a great living today getting paid NOT to think and publishing volumes like this to prove it.

Review excerpt:
In this revised and updated edition, Mexifornia examines the predicament of those vigorous, ambitious Mexicans that make California strong but who are hurt by inadequate policies that damage them and this country. Ultimately, Hanson hopes that our traditions of assimilation, integration and intermarriage can yet remedy the immigration crisis that continues to grow and shape America’s future.

There is PLENTY of room here for copy and paste and how it affects what we are doing. But I really like thought within our framework, putting together seemingly unrelated ideas.

The “No Compomise” articlebelow is an example. Before you copy and paste Covington or Hitler or somebody, take a look at what it ACTUALLY says.

We all hear people say “I’ve got a life.” But we ONLY hear that as discouragement. The SF grumps sit around and talk abut how HOPELESS everything is because everybody isn’t our therein a torchlight parade.

It is a REALITY that most people don’t spend their lives concentrated on saving our race. So hatis our reaction? We can do what we always do when we lose, and moan and dribble and cry over it, or we can take that reality into account.

We can quote Hitler and wait for the whole population to come out with their torches and sob abut our disappointment iwth everybody else.

Or we can do what successful revolutionaries always did and GET REAL..

Nobody is going to RECOGNIZE that the article below, n how revolutions succeeded, is another take on the same “I’ve got a LIFE” reality. I pointed out how Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini all took power because most people wanted someone to come in and end the chaos.

I will now reveal to you that that was why I corrected the earlier wording from “planning for victory” to “planning for the other side’s FAILURE.” Nothing like the Perot phenomenon of 1992 ever came close to happening any time before in American history, when Perot said he would be wiling to run and was soon leading the candidates of the entire electoral history, power, and machinery of a sitting president and his opponent.

People on our side mostly remember only that he had big ears and then go back to their Death Watch and competing with the Professional Mourners.

The Western world has chaos. It is growing daily. We need to plan for THAT, before the neoconservative types take us over the way the neocons did the conservatives.