I’ll disagree. Mantra is a school of logic not a precise recital of words (wordism). Its about the why of PC and the results of such a religion. For ex; Cultist shrieks “racist” at me, me being a mantra trained thinker I do not respond with my own shriek, but instead dissect the cultist’s line of thought.
ME:
I think CL is right in that the Mantra MUST be state and repeated in all cases. And repeated.
And repeated. The Mantra totally changes he whole grounds of discussion, the whole world view.
But, as Simmons implies, the Mantra itself requires that YOU adapt to this new line of thought. The article below that CL was replying to makes this very clear. You have to have the mental DISCIPLINE to PREVENT HIS Meandering off.
You have just shown how the anti is EVIL, no matter how much he mewls about his good intentions. It is the time to show why he could have gotten so ridiculous, why it is so common.
Once again, this is simple but definitely not EASY. And, as Simmons says, you are trained here, you are not programmed. No red uniforms here. You have to get out there with your squirrel rifle and do it yourself. I gave you the rifle and the ammunition and taught you how to begin using them.
Simmons’s “Mantra is a school of logic” is absolute genius. But every second you have to keep CL’s warning in mind and STAY ON TARGET. REPEAT the Mantra itself until the other guy starts finishing it for you, and then repeat it some more.
If I were a redcoat officer, I could march you through every step. I would also leave you out there getting your butt shot off.
Personal discipline, personal initiative. There is nothing EASY about that simple combination.
#1 by Simmons on 09/17/2007 - 8:20 pm
I agree. But this thinking is already out there people are asking what exactly is “racism?” Our side parying with a rhetorical question. Even at AR the bastion of Black IQ dumbness at least every tenth reply queries what is this “racism” that the left deposits and the right verifies into every debate. Just a thought, billions have been spent on the indoctrination of PC to the idiot masses what has been spent to destroy it?
#2 by CL on 09/17/2007 - 8:27 pm
I agree 100% with Simmons’ point.
I don’t mean to imply that we go on some sort of robotic auto-pilot. That’s inconsistent with our free-thinking spirit. That’s illogical.
Analogies are by nature imperfect. If you like, the entire program of what we do can be likened to the “unhittable fastball” from my analogy. The mantra is the essence of that program.
The mantra is step #1. Its beauty lies in the fact that it functions as both sword and shield simultaneously. Therein lies its power. It exposes our opponents as either a) hateful genocidalists or b)self-hating cowards.
Step #2 is all sword. Once you have framed the argument with the mantra, you’ve (justly) claimed the status of victim and have free reign rhetorically to nail your opponent right into the ground. But you have to do it! You have to follow through! And you have to do it everytime, over and over again.
That’s the package. That’s the unhittable fastball.
Rubbing your hands and muttering to your opponent that “they might have a point” is your sorry curveball.
Trying to “find common ground” by conceding that any anti-white activity was ever good (ala before January 1, 1970) is your change-up that goes straight out of the ballpark. This is the Republican Party’s only pitch, as well as that of most “conservatives.”
Don’t be cute. Control your opponents. Stick with the mantra. But follow through!
#3 by CL on 09/17/2007 - 8:46 pm
Simmons wrote: “I agree. But this thinking is already out there people are asking what exactly is “racism?” ”
The Oxford English Dictionary is quite helpful in this regard. It admits that the term was coined for propaganda by the Jewish mass-murderer Leon Trotsky.
For reasons I think most of us here know, that won’t be mentioned on AR.
“Racism,” like every other pejorative, is nothing. It has no substance. If you cave to it, you’re throwing the sorry curveball. If you give it the slightest bit of credence, you’re throwing the sorry curveball.
The way you handle it is by observing that “racism” is used by genociders to justify genocide. Then you loop back into the mantra, even stronger than before.
This is the much-ignored step #2 of the mantra program, as outlined above. The beauty of the mantra is that it allows you to take the highest caliber ammunition of the opposition and throw it right back at them. “Racism,” and it’s brother “anti-semitism” (‘Most people today understand that an anti-semite is a person some Jew hates.’) are the big guns of the opposition. See how easy they are to turn around? And everytime you turn it around at them, your argument gets stronger.
Step #2: Follow through!
#4 by Hardric on 09/18/2007 - 8:38 am
Take a few simple ideas and pound them home.
WASH YOUR HANDS!
Avoid too much complexity.
Offense is good. You can’t win if you don’t score.
#5 by Hardric on 09/18/2007 - 8:58 am
I think one useful tactic is to mock and heap scorn upon the “Social Scientists.”
You know, the ones who have not yet learned to wash their hands.
Everyone with 2+ brain cells knows their cockamamie ideas are worthless.