Archive for September, 2007
When I put forward the Mantra, is often Me no hear “intermarriage” before. What assimilation? What that have do intermarriage?” and like brilliance.
Lord Nelson, on the other hand, went out there and DEMANDED that antis give him ANY alternative they had to genocide against whites. He is beating them over the head with it, and he is beating them to death.
When someone says, “Me no hear ‘race problem,’” you can either use that to ACT or you can REACT and come to me with your tail between your legs.
I get SICK of doing ALL the translating. When they say that, YOU have a chance to define things the way LN does.
When someone asks you a question, that is a chance for YOU to SAY SOMETHING.
Now for something that seems completely different.. If experts get caught by every historical benchmark with their noses up their behinds, I can afford to be wrong a LOT in my predictions. WOL has all the examples here on record.
Right now there is a protest of about a thousand against the Iraq War – the media says “thousands,” so that’s a max. The REASON I say that is because it is a leftist march. It is leftist march because the organization used AMSAWR, Against War and Racism.” What in Heaven’s name does “racism” have to do with it?
Translation for the brain damaged: Consistently over the past four decades, an organization that was pro-Communist always used the term “Racism” in its title. This was obvious to anybody who could reason. Anti-racist means openly anti-white, just as Temperance means Prohibition.
Back on Earth, the word Temperance excludes two things by definition. Temperance means not ABUSING alcohol. It means the moderate USE of alcohol. So a non-drinker is, by definition, not “temperate.”
As with Anti- Racism this requires a second of painful THOUGHT. As soon as I hear “Anti-Racist” in a title, it is the same as “Marxist and I can go ahead. But I can’t because it is tripwire. I have to go back and explain this to each and every person who has decided to abandon his frontal lobe on me – AGAIN.
Capitalized, Anti-Racist ALWAYS means Marxist. It has always meant Marxist for forty years. But I have to go back and pick up the stumbling who can’t speak the political language.
Over and over and over and over and over.
“All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.”
Experts routinely fail to perceive WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DETERMINED.
As BW has pointed out, and ONLY BW has pointed out, nonwhites do not want to rule the world.
Instead, they want a world where they get what they want without having to shoulder the responsibility for making it work (the business of “making it actually work” being, as always, the responsibility of white people and only white people).
Consider that 65 years ago we had Japan giving up forever any desire to exercise global power, while 35 years ago the Maoists invited us back to organize China’s affairs. 10 years ago we had West and Central Africa return to us through EU administered currency unions while Indonesia never really left, being held together only through European, British and American military aid and NGOs. India returned to us through alliance with our Central Asian Fortress (they cannot afford their jet fuel without us paying for it) while they beg us to teach their middle class multitudes mortgage finance.
On and on, everywhere you look it is the same story or some sort of similar story, and make no mistake, Iran is included.
It is only a small portion of the Islamic world that refuses to come to terms with our rule, something the military is grateful for, for it is wonderful to have somebody available to beat the hell out of, be able to justify it, and get paid for it too.
And we are literally drowning in the role of “big dog”, the whole world wanting to get close to anything and anybody white, penetrating borders in mass to prove it, or throwing bombs to disprove it, (that is throwing bombs to disprove what cannot be disproved).
All this while moronic Western European governments yet again “toll the bell at the gates of hell” for the white man (for what is more preposterous than this monstrosity they call the European Union and its un-administerable policies?)
And yet again America is caught in the trajectory of European tomfoolery and impending economic collapse.
But don’t ask to MSM to explain it for the MSM certainly doesn’t SEE it.
As is usual for WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DETERMINED.
Some quick thoughts on self-selected impotence:
Everyone that does the “me combat veteran! me TOUGH” is automatically announced their moral EQUALITY to everyone else, and their moral SUPERIORITY to most others, as the tool that compensates for their subsequent failure in virtually all other areas.
It is easier to moan, than it is to actually DO SOMETHING, no matter how small or trivial it may seem.
What we see as the most militant of those near to White Nationalism/Western Nationalism, the “Militia Movement,” is people who realized the game is rigged. They then went about exactly the wrong way to change the game, declaring their debts to be illegal (unConstitutional currency), and dressed up in camo “uniforms,” waved their old squirrel rifles in the air, and talked of overthrowing the government with force.
ALL of them were men who spoke of their great deeds during WWII/Korea/Vietnam, the great glorious deeds of a glory-filled youth.
In their impotence, they adopted the Forms of a Glorious Past that never was, without adapting the Forms to the Substance of a new day, a new world.
They accepted the Terms and Definitions of their implacable RACIAL Enemy, without realizing it, and fell into traps of their own, unwitting, devise.
Their impotence is projected outward onto us, and our situation, saying, in effect, “Don’t try, Son. I’ve established my moral credentials and superiority, and I KNOW it can’t be done. After all, I couldn’t do it, and for me to admit that it is possible would place the balme for failure on me. If you were to succeed, even slightly, you would be seen as my better, and my excuses would be removed. I can’t have that.”
This is called Human Sacrifice.
Mark thought my reference to “copy and paste” was another swipe at his comparing the South African site, which IS good, to BUGS, which, it is critical to point out, is unique I wouldn’t be doing it.
‘Tis profoundly true that I love to give Mark hell now that I’m too old for him to punch in the mouth, but I am afraid that in this it misses the point. As I KEEP explaining, something that someone said REMINDS me of something.
I had a visceral dislike of Mark’s comparing that site to BUGS, and someone put it better than I had by calling it a copy-and-paste site. But that term “copy-and-past” gave me a new insight. It is a term for so much about comments that I criticize.
There is so much hard thinking to be done here, so many expressions like mderpelding’s all big events in history come as a complete surprise to experts, that I get a sense of frustration when AFKAN, who COULD speak short profundities, goes right back into his groove for the hundredth time. He’s improved that a LOT.
To me, “copy and paste” has the broader meaning of making BUGS just another blog. If that’s what it is, what the hell is the POINT? I’ve DONE my stints as one more foot soldier a hundred times over.
No, Mark, “copy and paste” means a lot more than it did when we originally discussed it. It gets to the heart of what we are doing.
All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.
They all went against “current trends”.
All those past experts believed that tomorrow would always be an extension of yesterday. With today as a midpoint.
In hindsight, we can all sift through tons of facts to provide a rational narrative to explain what was inexplicable to our ancestors. We then pronounce ourselves as smarter,savvier,better educated, and more evolved than those poor fools caught flat-footed in the past.
So, with our better understanding, through hindsight of world events, we know what’s going to happen. Not only that, but we know what was done wrong in the past; so of course those mistakes will never be repeated and the future will be ours to control.
It’s like a man walking.
He approaches an intersection. He looks at his watch and says to himself,”Well yesterday at 9:31 AM I crossed this street and there were no cars. It is now 9:31 AM. Historically, there have been no cars. Therefore, I can cross safely”.
You might view this example as silly.
But this type of causal reasoning is endemic to western white people.
The most dedicated “aryan” superhero marching around playing Nazi is the natural enemy to a “Semmelweise”.
Can’t anybody think for themselves anymore?
“All major historical events were a complete surprise to contemporary experts.” is GREAT!
Got this today from amazon, a new book by Victor Davis Hanson, outlining this neocon thought leader’s solution to the immigration problem… intermarriage with non-white immigrants. Yes that will return America back to its glory days. Turds like Hanson can make a great living today getting paid NOT to think and publishing volumes like this to prove it.
In this revised and updated edition, Mexifornia examines the predicament of those vigorous, ambitious Mexicans that make California strong but who are hurt by inadequate policies that damage them and this country. Ultimately, Hanson hopes that our traditions of assimilation, integration and intermarriage can yet remedy the immigration crisis that continues to grow and shape America’s future.
I tell you what I’m REALLY sick of. I heard this endlessly from the The Greatest Generation, and it is popular on SF. It comes in three parts:
!) “Me Tough Guy, me SUFFERED, me know REALITY.”
2) “Reality always BAD!”
3) He then shows he’s a Tough Guy by sitting there and blubbering about how hopeless everything is.
He says I’m not a Tough Realist because I don’t blubber.
I hope I NEVER get that “Tough.”
There is PLENTY of room here for copy and paste and how it affects what we are doing. But I really like thought within our framework, putting together seemingly unrelated ideas.
The “No Compomise” articlebelow is an example. Before you copy and paste Covington or Hitler or somebody, take a look at what it ACTUALLY says.
We all hear people say “I’ve got a life.” But we ONLY hear that as discouragement. The SF grumps sit around and talk abut how HOPELESS everything is because everybody isn’t our therein a torchlight parade.
It is a REALITY that most people don’t spend their lives concentrated on saving our race. So hatis our reaction? We can do what we always do when we lose, and moan and dribble and cry over it, or we can take that reality into account.
We can quote Hitler and wait for the whole population to come out with their torches and sob abut our disappointment iwth everybody else.
Or we can do what successful revolutionaries always did and GET REAL..
Nobody is going to RECOGNIZE that the article below, n how revolutions succeeded, is another take on the same “I’ve got a LIFE” reality. I pointed out how Lenin, Hitler and Mussolini all took power because most people wanted someone to come in and end the chaos.
I will now reveal to you that that was why I corrected the earlier wording from “planning for victory” to “planning for the other side’s FAILURE.” Nothing like the Perot phenomenon of 1992 ever came close to happening any time before in American history, when Perot said he would be wiling to run and was soon leading the candidates of the entire electoral history, power, and machinery of a sitting president and his opponent.
People on our side mostly remember only that he had big ears and then go back to their Death Watch and competing with the Professional Mourners.
The Western world has chaos. It is growing daily. We need to plan for THAT, before the neoconservative types take us over the way the neocons did the conservatives.
Has anybody noticed how much the collapse of the World Trade Center resembled the fall of the Soviet Empire? One day they were dominant and permanent figures on the New York skyline and the next day they weren’t there any more.
When I watch the WTC coming down, I see the Soviet Empire coming down.
At the end of a piece below, I said, “Conservatives were so busy groaning about how hopeless everything was that they never planned for victory”
That couldn’t have been WORSE put. It is exactly the wrong point. What conservatives did not plan for was the enemy’s COLLAPSE, not their own victory. I am a victim of the torchlight parade crap theories of victory I have head for over half a century.
I, of all people, should know better than THAT!
Lenin had never addressed a large crowd in his LIFE before the Germans sent him into Russia in 1917. He was sent AFTER the Tsar fell. The history I always heard said that he overthrew the Czar and then took over. On such factual diddling one’s whole picture of the world is changed.
Even the Bolsheviks were fairly satisfied when Lenin got to Moscow. Marxism held that the new stage of history had been reached, and the steady progress of democracy to socialism to communism had gone from the feudal Tsarist stage to the capitalist phase in 1917.
That was Marxism. What Lenin saw was a huge hole that could be filled by his Party. That was why the Germans sent him in. Only Lenin would take power, hand the Germans all of their empire except most of Russia so they could rules what was left of Russia.
Flash forward to Mussolini. I have said here at least a dozen times that Il Duce almost missed the March on Rome when his Party took power. I[n] f[ac]t, he was a lot like Perot, but successful. He just announced that Italians should march on Rome and demand control of the entire government. As he slept that march materialized and nobody thought that Il Duce himself wouldn’t KNOW it!
I quoted the November 21, 1934 New York Times as saying that the restoration of the German monarchy as a certainty. The only question was whether it would be the old Kaiser or his son.
It seemed like good idea tat the time. A majority of the Reichstag was held by Nazis and Communists, and Times’ experts in Berlin were as brilliant as paid Sovietologists in 1980. They looked at the Nazis a[s] revanchiste, revengists, who jut said Germany hadn’t lost WWI.
To them, Hitler was a “monarchist.” No government could be formed without either the Stalinists or the Nazis. It was impossible for Americans, who worshipped monarchy and looked up to Sophisticated European Thinking the way universities STILL do, to believe that that uneducated little guy could make them forget Kaiser Bill ever lived.
We watched the Soviet Empire collapse in the 1980s, we watched Perot lead for the presidency in 1992, we watched the World Trade Center, both buildings go down in 2001, and we none of it has had the SLIGHTEST effect n SF thinking. If we knew the REAL history of Communism and Fascism, none of this would surprise us.
But SF toodles along as if history were the way Political Correctness writes it, its explanation is just different.
Some of my readers are beginning to realize that there is NO compromise here. There are teasing mentions of Semmelweis from my book.
Medicine faced this situation in the early nineteenth century. Galen’s theories about the Balance of Humors in the body and the need for bleeding ran head on into bacteriology.
The world is either that I say it is, a group of perfectly understandable movements which require mental discipline to handle, or everything is planned in some dimly lit little room or the Bilderbergers get-togethers.
The world does not get LESS complicated with realism, it gets MUCH harder. A RIGOROUS study of supply and demand is more mentally taxing than wandering over Mercantilists theory and gold and silver theories down through the ages
As with priesthoods, all you have to do is learn Ancient Languages and you can quote Galen’s crap and sound learned. You can quote mystic “natural value” stuff from ancient time’s economics. The Catholic Church is beginning to realize how it screwed itself when it abandoned Latin. There is no way that stuff sounds as profound in English.
A language course won’t substitute for RIGOROUS thinking. Like Lenin and Hitler and Mussolini and September 11, real world power politics is neither a plot nor a gradual process.
In POWER politics, you can’t STRADDLE. And you can’t copy and paste the stuff you like and get anywhere.
Many are called, but very, VERY few are chosen.
“Meanwhile all SFers can think of is the big noses.
Why won’t anybody THINK about what I say?”
Because they need a dragon to slay. Most of them and most whites can’t just unify for the sake of our race. It’s as if we as a group are unable to act without an outside source to act upon, and at that we can’t do it as a group without a “Great Leader” to show us the way. Why they can’t see that once they slay that dragon another will inevitable appear frustrates me to no end. It’s about our race! So no the jews aren’t THE problem, we are THE problem because we don’t put our white race first. That’s why the Mantra works.
“They are too busy reading Pat Buchanan on Jews in Neoconservatism to realize what the phenomenon itself is.”
I would like to see you quit hitting poor Pat over the head. He has changed, Bob. CHANGED. He’s still respectable — but not as respectable as he once was, thank the non-existant god in the non-existant heavens! There’s still time for his full conversion.
Check out Pat’s August 21, 2007 article entitled “The Color of Crime” and you will see he is on a closer page to us than you give him credit for. Also, he’s the only one of the respectables who had the courage to write two books about the destruction of the West via immigration. While it may not be the Mantra, Pat is at least reaching people WE cannot reach — and making them think.
People that read Pat and THINK will eventually turn to us for the advanced course in social engienering. I did and I’m sure there are others like me.
That should be worth someting.
I talked about Pat’s place that way some time ago.
Top Ten Reasons Why Race Does Not Exist
1. Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, white countries for everybody!
2. You just say race does not exist because you would be fired from your job if you did not.
3. Kool-aid anyone?
4. You say race does not exist, yet you insist that ALL white countries and ONLY white countries be flooded with non-whites. Then you say ALL of us in white countries and ONLY white countries must assimilate, i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
5. Let’s fire all the Kindergarten teachers. Kindergarten teachers do not exist.
6. Let’s genocide all the whites. Whites do not exist.
7. Of course you WOULD say that whites do not exist; you want genocide!
8. ME: You stole my wallet.
YOU: (Waves wallet.) What wallet? I don’t see no wallet.
9. ME: You are genociding my race.
YOU: What race? I don’t see no race.
ME: That’s because you are genociding us.
10. Culture is a social construct. Race is FOLKS.
Neoracism would be an open admission that genociding the whites is the goal. The mantra would deal with the new type racism even more because the cover of “equality” would be thrown off.
No, Neoracism will be an exact replay of Neoconservatism. When liberals policies failed so obviously that it became the l word, they needed an exit strategy. So they made up a new title that said that everything they did before was fine. The official line today is that everything liberals did until on or abut January 1, 1970 and then the whole thing suddenly and inexplicably went out of control.
Which is EXACTLY why we are right back in Vietnam again today.
Meanwhile all SFers can think of is the big noses.
Why won’t anybody THINK about what I say?
I was so proud of Lord Nelson for describing Neoracism in its formative stages. He thinks he missed a point because I had just discussed the phenomenon and given it a name. He is ONE step behind me. Everybody else is a Marathon back and losing ground.
They are too busy reading Pat Buchanan on Jews in Neoconservatism to realize what the phenomenon itself is.
Neoracism will say that everything anti-racists DID was good. As Lord Nelson said, with them we will need the manta more than ever. Neoracism will say that GENETICS is important, NOT RACE. They will divide us by CLASS, with our present leaders soaking in the sunshine of Big Name approval and leading the lynch mob against those who keep pointing out that their new-found heroes are TRAITORS, and it won’t WORK.
That is exactly what conservatives do today. THAT IS WHY WE ARE BACK IN VIETNAM!!!!
Kennedy and Roosevelt are GODS to neos, and more than gods to professional conservatives. So we are doing the same thing in the name of conservatism we did forty years ago in the name of liberalism. Reality doesn’care about the label. Do the same again, under any title, and you get the same results.
Fool me once, shame n you. Fool me twice, shame on ME.
Conservatives were so busy groaning about how hopeless everything was that they never planned for victory. That is SF today. Conservatives won the war and lost the peace.
In a similar vein, the following article is a real eye opener. it would explain why I am so brilliant, what with my blue Galician Spanish eyes and all.
I see a sea change on the horizon and my recent trip to Europe has made me even more wildly optimistic than I was before. I hope that this blog does not become infected with the corrosive pessimism of Stormfront.
Why blue-eyed boys (and girls) are so brilliant
Scientists discover what may have made Stephen Hawking – and Lily Cole – so intelligent
By BEN CLERKIN – More by this author »
Last updated at 11:33am on 20th August 2007
The colour of your eyes could determine your achievements in life, say scientists.
They claim those with blue eyes are more likely to sparkle academically than those with brown.
They are more intelligent and gain more qualifications because they study more effectively and perform better in exams
Viva La Raza Blanca!!
I would like to talk about a disturbing new trend, and how it shows the need to keep using the mantra:
We all know that in any war strategy and tactics continue to evolve, but I have been shocked to notice comments in the main stream media that almost sound like they have been taken from mein kampf. (But with NO racial context)
There was a debate a few weeks ago on BBC radio 4 about helping UK children from disadvantaged areas to do better at school, and every lefty professor agreed that you cant expect kids from poor families to perform as well as kids from middle class families because they had inherited their parents inferior genes.
I could not believe my ears, and this is one example of many I have noticed.
As I write this, it is being reported on the TV news that scientists at York university have developed a program to tell if a child has genetic defects by studying the shape of its face. Try to imagine this being reported in a positive way just a few years ago.
We are dealing with an enemy that has infinite resources and it appears they realize that after 40+ years of the standard guilt trip, compassion, and Utopian melting pot type propaganda, people are getting fatigued and are ready for something different.
It must be embarrassing for the establishment after decades of preaching the “Utopian Multi Cult Paradise” to see the growing threat of homegrown Muslim terrorists and Black crime stats.
And so you can expect a subtle change from multi cult paradise, to (FAKE) eugenic or Nitsche type propaganda in the future.
There may even be an announcement in the MSM that the multi cult has OFFICIALLY, failed.
But the usual suspects who imposed it will be relentlessly preaching the new ideology.
You can expect in the near future, our mommy professors to be preaching eugenics and survival of the fittest like never before.
The TV. along with every other establishment mouthpiece will be banging out the message 24/7 of how the generations of poor Whites have had their chance and failed. And that they must be replaced or mixed with the cream of the third world in order to effect a healthier and happier world, and create a kind of coffee coloured Ubermensch or Master Race.
Of course this exciting U-turn in accepted and respectable beliefs, will share two things with the old:
1. It will apply to ALL, White countries, and ONLY, to White countries
2. And the real purpose will have remained unchanged.
Having thought about this, I really don’t think the architects of our destruction have anywhere else to go. And soon the social constructs (White Antis) will be parroting the new ideology as if it was their own idea. Many will believe it really was.
But its interesting how the same old mantra deals with this new type propaganda just as easily as it did with the old.
Its because the mantra ignores the bait put down by our enemies and gets straight to basics.
The mantra simply points the spotlight on what its really all about:
The ongoing program of GENOCIDE against the White race.
What you are describing is NEORACISM, which is what I figured would be coming down the line soon.