Mark recommended a South African site and said it was almost as thought-provoking as this one. I made the point that we are UNIQUE. Another commenter referred to the recomended site as “copy and paste” as opposed to our doing our own writing ourselves.

This seminar exchange made me think of the uniqueness of BUGS, and I used the term “copy and paste” there a lot. I joked about attacking Mark, but he knew it was in jest. But he COULD have taken the entire diatribe about copy-and-paste sites PERSONALLY.

Now Simmons said something harmlessly that got me to thinking about the whole problem of scattergun arguments. I will write the piece later, but it occurred to me that this would be a good time to remind you that this is a SEMINAR. I expound on what you REMIND me of. Not everythig I have to say about cut and paste sites versus our uniqueness has to do with Mark personally. Not everythng I say about ego making one turn to shotgun arguments instead of beating in the message is a personal criticism of Simmons.

I am NOT a subtle man. If I mean YOU, your name will be up front. But in a SEMINAR you have to let me expound on what you make me think of without taking it as a personal attack.

We have a job to do, a job NO ONE ELSE IS GOING TO DO. Let’s leave the personal crap over on SF.

Simmons wrote: “I agree. But this thinking is already out there people are asking what exactly is “racism?” ”

The Oxford English Dictionary is quite helpful in this regard. It admits that the term was coined for propaganda by the Jewish mass-murderer Leon Trotsky.

For reasons I think most of us here know, that won’t be mentioned on AR.

“Racism,” like every other pejorative, is nothing. It has no substance. If you cave to it, you’re throwing the sorry curveball. If you give it the slightest bit of credence, you’re throwing the sorry curveball.

The way you handle it is by observing that “racism” is used by genociders to justify genocide. Then you loop back into the mantra, even stronger than before.

This is the much-ignored step #2 of the mantra program, as outlined above. The beauty of the mantra is that it allows you to take the highest caliber ammunition of the opposition and throw it right back at them. “Racism,” and it’s brother “anti-semitism” (’Most people today understand that an anti-semite is a person some Jew hates.’) are the big guns of the opposition. See how easy they are to turn around? And everytime you turn it around at them, your argument gets stronger.

Step #2: Follow through!

I’ll disagree. Mantra is a school of logic not a precise recital of words (wordism). Its about the why of PC and the results of such a religion. For ex; Cultist shrieks “racist” at me, me being a mantra trained thinker I do not respond with my own shriek, but instead dissect the cultist’s line of thought.

ME:

I think CL is right in that the Mantra MUST be state and repeated in all cases. And repeated.

And repeated. The Mantra totally changes he whole grounds of discussion, the whole world view.

But, as Simmons implies, the Mantra itself requires that YOU adapt to this new line of thought. The article below that CL was replying to makes this very clear. You have to have the mental DISCIPLINE to PREVENT HIS Meandering off.

You have just shown how the anti is EVIL, no matter how much he mewls about his good intentions. It is the time to show why he could have gotten so ridiculous, why it is so common.

Once again, this is simple but definitely not EASY. And, as Simmons says, you are trained here, you are not programmed. No red uniforms here. You have to get out there with your squirrel rifle and do it yourself. I gave you the rifle and the ammunition and taught you how to begin using them.

Simmons’s “Mantra is a school of logic” is absolute genius. But every second you have to keep CL’s warning in mind and STAY ON TARGET. REPEAT the Mantra itself until the other guy starts finishing it for you, and then repeat it some more.

If I were a redcoat officer, I could march you through every step. I would also leave you out there getting your butt shot off.

Personal discipline, personal initiative. There is nothing EASY about that simple combination.