Archive for October, 2007

mderpelding

I join a distinguished group fo commenters in congratulating mderpelding on this really SHORT, really excellent, insight:

Our great weakness when confronted with so-called progressive thought is to be conservative. Resisting change gives the initiative to the other side. So then we counterstrike. The progressives call this being a “reactionary”. They are correct. This is a defensive position and the best outcome of defense is the status quo. In extremis it means extinction.

Every Roman battle began with the Javelin throw.

Note that it didn’t begin with an enemy attack.

*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

What a great opening salvo!

3 Comments

The Mantra*** and Roman Javelins

People who talk about Roman discipline in detail would have lost a real Roman battle if they were in command back then.

Why? Because they are so obsessed with the formation and the short sword that they forget the javelin. Every Roman battle began with each soldier throwing his javelin at the beginning. This was absolutely essential in every battle.

That javelin throw was so routine that it is barely mentioned. It took seconds, and then they formed up for battle. I was very young then but I seem to remember every Roman soldier carried sixty to one hundred pounds of equipment along in the tens of thousands of miles of marching he did in his twenty-five years carreer. Every one of them carried his javelin all that way for the one throw. The javelin alone was as cumbersome and heavy as the short sword and shield he toted all that way.

For one throw at the beginning.

It is hard to explain battle, so it is hard toe explain why the initial javelin throw was so essential that they carried it all that way and always began the battle that way. But the fact that they DID it shows how essential it was.

This initial javelin throw was a sine qua non because the Roman strategy was based on dispersing the enemy in the way all those flying javelins did it. It gave them time to form up for a defense or a charge. The form of the enemy that came at them was determined by that mass of deadly spears in the air.

So, while AFKAN and others are making essential points about the fight itself, you will lose if you forget the initial javelin throw. Our indispensable, sine qua non javelin throw at the beginning of ANY battle is the Mantra***. Without it, the enemy forms up his own way and goes on the offensive. The Mantra must be the keystone of our attack, because it is a shock, and it puts the enemy on a PREDICTABLE defensive at the outset as all those flying spears did:

*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

24 Comments

Upgrade to WordPress 2.3.1 Complete

WordPress 2.3.1 is a bug-fix and security release for the 2.3 series. 2.3.1 fixes over twenty bugs.

Click here to see bug list

3 Comments

Stormfront Exchange

I put Tolerance and Namble on SF Opposing Views.

An anti said he agreed with me about my condemantion of NAMBLA but not on my attacks on interracial datingand on my attack on alcoholics.

I replied that my stataement about alcoholics was the official position of Alcoholics Anonymous. He replied that he hadn’t moticed that for a reason.

The exchange follows:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered1234
Sorry, it was hard to discern from the other stuff. love and tolerence is a creed.

ME:

Please don’t think I’m just being rude by talking to others here about you. You bring up a vital point.

Unregistered here could never know it, but he has made my point. I discussed the fact that we all know that neither Tiger Woods nor OJ Simpson would have anything to do with women who looked like the mulatto daughters they produce with their blond wives. But a white man who thinks that way is anaziwhowatnstokillsixmillionjews.

No anti can SEE what I am saying. And it takes a LOT of mental perversion to be able to overlook this completely.

As this anti says, he was looking for buzz words like love and tolerance. These people imprisoning us for disagreeing with us really do believe they represent love and tolerance.

I was discussing this “tolerance” and NAMBLA and like perversions and just how warped one’s thinking have to be to actually not notice the children a blond and a black will have.

“Tolerance and love” in the anti creed is, of course, the exact opposite of tolerance and love in the real world. The Inquisition talked about Love and Mercy all the time. If you are bnr4ainwaashed enough, you can honestly believe that you are screaming people down for Love or jailing disagreement in the name of Tolerance.

Unregistered here is incapable of seeing that. He can see the Inquisition misused Christianity, he can see NAMBLA is pushing perversion in the name of tolerance. But he is incapable of seeing himself as doing the same thing in the case of forbidding whites to see what Tiger Woods and OJ.

Which happens to be my exact point.

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

1 Comment

To Simmons and Everybody Else I am Unfair to

I was unfair to Simmons twice. He gave a specific example of what I was talking about and al I noticed was that he had started by saying who we should get after first.

I HATE being unfair. But let me give you a smell of what the other extreme looks like.

Every congressional staffer is desperately sick of congressmen using committee time to flatter each other. You are working a hundred-hour week, you have fourteen balls in the air, and the Member you need to see FINALLY drops by the Committee. He says, “I want to start by saying something to my friend Mr. Bovine, from the third district of Pennsylvania. He and I worked together on the Lice Farmer Subcommittee on legislation …” and on and on and on.

Or, as we staffers would privately say to each other, “He’s a great guy, I’ve known him for years, and we just spent a wonderful half hour in the Men’s Room together.”

Translation: We were SICK of that crap.

I apologize a lot. But every time I do somebody belated justice I am not doing what you are here for. Believe me, nothing would be more boring than a seminar in which I was scrupulous about this.

Being fair can get ENDLESS.

I am serious. There is an advantage to having a tired old man here. It cuts the crap.

And believe me, gang, it is crap you do NOT want.

4 Comments

AFKAN is on Target This Time!

The above post might seem trivial, to some, but I think it is of greater importance in the light of Bob’s theme for this thread.

In an earlier post, mrpelding noted our need for a new religion. I commented on this, noting that all other religions bind the followers BACK, while Christianity – True Christianity – bound its followers FORWARD.

White Nationalism, Western Nationalism, and what could be called a possible “Movement” involving these Ideals – call it WN2/M – has not made the headway it should have for numerous reasons. Among those is the so-called “Golden Age” – Rockwell, Oliver, Pierce – was formed in the clear background of a race war defined as a “Civil Rights Movement.”

ALL of these men could remember a White America, and KNEW that only a White America could be a Great Nation.

Since then, the “Civil Rights Movement” has been part and parcel of a Gramscian Institutional Transformation, and WN2/M went nowhere, compared to what could have been.

Thus, even now, the personal battles of thirty years ago are being refought daily on various WN bulletin boards and forums…

I am convinced it’s because they, essentially, stopped moving forward; they saw the issues in one context, and are trapped in that intellectual context.

Some have moved forward, even while these battles try to drag them back – like the archaic religions, they draw them BACK to a past that never really was, where they never spend any time creating a better future.

There are exceptions, but even these are spending too much of their time fighting yesterday’s conflicts.

My nephews shall not have anything to do with these dramas.

I have explained to them the conflicts they see being worked out, and have explained why nothing much has happened around WN2/M activities; everyone is still arguing over who should have won The Big Game back in high school, while our Opposition went on to colleges, and universities…

And I am tired of it.

So, we are looking to an incredible future, with the best of Bob’s Insights – and the Insights of his posters – in starting with the intellectual framework of Family First – Family, as the microcosm of Race, Race as the macrocosm of Family, and Race as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

And, if they can learn with Paul’s Meet-Ups about diplomatic and political skills, and can apply them to good effect with Dobson’s Third Party, so much the better.

If this leads to them leading a new nation twenty years from now, ALL based on the foundation of Family, and Race, so much the better.

At least, I will have offered them honor, discipline, and the stars…

10 Comments

Nick Griffin at Clemson

Mr. Griffin is head of the British National Party. This was posted in Stormfront Britain:

I drove a hundred miles or so and stayed at the motel overnight to hear Nick at Clemson, South Carolina. Nick was so tired he could hardly make the speech, but it was still worth it.

He was only able to afford to take one bodyguard with him, my buddy who looks like a Sherman tank’s big brother, and they are going to Detroit next, where there will be trouble.

I listened to Nick, not just as the ideologue I am, but also as one who made his living in practical politics. There was rot in it, but the rot interested me. He said “It’s not about race,” but I have written the same thing in speeches for dozens of congressmen, senators, and the president.

That’s politics, gang!

Lincoln can be quoted as taking every position from condoning slavery to black suffrage. Picking apart speeches is not important. Elections take place in REAL TIME, so you write for the time you are in.

Mr. Griffin said that the BNP got total of 500,000 votes recently and elected 44 local officers.

I know all about picking those figures apart.

Still, I was overwhelmed.

The American perspective can be useful to you in this respect. We are in a better position to see the progress of electoral revolution.

In your parliamentary system a party which is in the minority, even if it is enormous, appoints as many ministers as a party which consists entirely of one person in the loony bin, i.e., none. So electoral grassroots rebellion is not an ongoing theme there.

Here, everything from graduated taxed to prohibition to abolition showed up in minority parties, TINY minority parties, before it became national policy. The Free Soil Party, which was the predecessor to the Republicans, got about one percent of the votes in 1848.

Your 500,000 would be a giant in that process. I believe half the electorate stayed home, which would make the 500,000 casting a vote for SOME office for BNP as much as 3 or 4 percent of the electorate.

Remember, each person doing that is forfeiting his vote on the major parties, so it is quite a long way to go. The conventional wisdom is that if you vote for a minor party, you are “throwing away your vote.”

But big parties only address marginal issues.

In American history, the only people who USED their vote to make any difference were the ones who cast it for minor parties, for those parties represent the big issues of the future. Believe me, real politicians NOTICE if one percent “throw away their votes” on a single issue!

The BNP is well on its way.

1 Comment

AFKAN

On another WN Forum, a poster decided to accept the painfully gained advice of Dr. David Duke for actually making the beginning of headway IN PREPARATION FOR the actual practice of the responsible assumption of political power.

Some time back, Dr. Duke argued we should get involved with the political parties at the grassroots level, where they offered FREE courses on how to organize and get things done, in the current political framework. Everything is there for you; expert advice on fund raising, finance, sign design and manufacture.

Great idea.

My variation was to work within the new Ron Paul organizations – Internet based, Meet-Up types – and learn with them, gaining practice on a playing field where it would cost us nothing, but offer us a chance to deal with the politics of true alienation.

The other choice – if you are serious about the issues involved in forming a nation – would be to get with Dr. James Dobson’s new proto-party, NOW, and work within that system using the same techniques that worked for Gramsci, in his followers long march through the Institutions. Our difference would be to use the word “Family,” but always apply it, in practice, to mean “Race.”

The tree fell in the forest, and, no one seems to have heard it.

Not one word of commentary on a solution to issues the owner and founder of the board claims to have had in mind when he designed the board.

Not one – not from anybody.

I have done this with my nephews looking over my shoulder, explaining to them what I was doing, and why it mattered.

They were amazed at the complete lack of response to the suggestion.

The answer, of course, is simple.

Tonight, and for the next few days, we shall be discussing the differences between a meeting to alter the Articles of Confederation, and the ratification of the new Constitution by the affected States in 1791.

They have the time ahead I don’t, and I know they will enjoy attending Ron Paul Meet-Ups – “Hey, guys, a chance to meet women for free!”

I’ll find the local Dobson people, and get them to work with them, too, if an opportunity develops.

The lesson?

The Lesson of how a meeting to revise the Articles of Confederation became the foundation of a New Nation is also a lesson in how a small, intelligent, organized minority, given time and a singular focus, can form the lever that rests of the back of the indifferent, moving them into the formation of a New Nation.

Nobody shows up?

More opportunities for US!

2 Comments