Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Mainstream Thought

Posted by Bob on October 25th, 2007 under Coaching Session

Treasure sinks to the bottom. Anything worthwhile ends up on the bottom or is stranded on shore.

The only thing the mainstream will tolerate is water.

  1. #1 by Dave on 10/25/2007 - 1:39 pm

    These days this treasure sinks to a bottom (or washes up on the shore) of an incredible file system called the Internet.

    It is discoverable via Google by anyone with the gumption to look and discern and who has command of the English language.

    This is why I find it hilarious that third-worlders pronounce the doom of my race in my mother tongue, publishing their arrogance on my people’s invention, the Internet, too stupid to see the contradiction.

    Whites can only defeat themselves. We have no real nonwhite challengers.

  2. #2 by Al Parker on 10/25/2007 - 2:50 pm

    I thought everyone is planning for BUGS thought to become mainstream one day. How will this sound then?

    But to become mainstream, your terms would have to be accepted. How can the word ‘genocide’ be accepted as it’s used here, by its United Nations definition, when language is usage? This means genocide by its popular definition involves violence or at least one of the following:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    (Source: ICC Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II)

    You might be able to say something about (c) if whites didn’t still enjoy a very high quality of life. In short, if it really were genocide, wouldn’t it be at least a bit more apparent to whites? What group is too stupid to notice it’s own genocide?

    Doesn’t anyone feel genocide is a dishonest term as it is being used here?

  3. #3 by shari on 10/25/2007 - 7:04 pm

    That high quality of life is deceptive. It can’t be passed down generation after generation. Two children, for the well to do only, now, or none. If your sucessful and especially if your not, two careers, a must, unless you inhert it. This is what we have been taught. Sorry Dave, I’ll admit, I’m no where near as smart as you, and I appreciate a lot that you say, but do you have any children that you care about?

  4. #4 by Dave on 10/26/2007 - 11:57 am


    Although I have an (unofficial) wife, I do not have children. I come from a big intact extended family, was raised as a child not only by my parents, but both of my sets of my grandparents (I spent a lot of my childhood on their splendid farms).

    My own immediate family and my extended family are composed of affluent people who like sports and who like to compete. I just love Robert Whitaker because he is part of the old time Southern intellectual aristocracy (most Americans don’t even know this ever existed), and reminds me of members of my own family (the Virginian branch) with similar backgrounds and similar learning.

    I often wonder wonder if participants in this blog realize that Robert Whitaker’s command of real American history is second to none. It is really quite extraordinary and precious because knowledge of America’s real history is being lost.

  5. #5 by shari on 10/27/2007 - 8:27 am

    Dave, thank you. I am aware that knowledge of America’s history has been untaught,unlearned and supplanted with falsehood,which is dangerous. It’s upsetting too, because everyone seems too busy, with too many problems, to even care. At least this is my experience. So, when Al Parker says that genocide might be a dishonest word because of a high standard of living, I just want to throw up my hands. And I wondered where the best minds here are coming from, as far as what they cared about.

  6. #6 by Pain on 10/29/2007 - 12:38 am

    Al Parker-

    Read Bob’s blog.

    The UN official definition of genocide has already been posted. It does not require violence.

    The extinction of a race does not require violence, though at some point that will likely happen.

    China is genociding Tibet. It is violating UN rules and international law. There is no violence.

    There IS violence in ALL white countries against whites, anyway. Look for “The Color of Crime.”

    What a dumbass.

Comments are closed.