Archive for October, 2007

David Horowitz – Genocide With a Smile

The piece below, “TOLERANCE and NAMBLA,” is illustrated by the respectable conservative position genocide against. The sole spokesman on the subject for the respectable right is David Horowitz.

Horowitz condemns the ban on discussion of race to an extent respectable conservatives will not do – Buckley has endorsed the Thought Crime laws in Europe – so he is actually extreme for a respectable. But Horowitz insists that his approach will lead to “assimilation” – the end of whites – even BETTER.

Horowitz says all whites need to “assimilate” with non-whites because “Americans are BETTER than that” – meaning objection to the melting pot. Once a race-mixer, ALWAYS a race-mixer.

Yes, Horowitz is a Jew, but white gentile anti-whites are EXACTLY the same way. He speaks for the whole respectable right.

____________________________

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

1 Comment

Tolerance and NAMBLA

No one today says a child molester can be reformed. A generation ago every expert said they could.

There is a lesson here. Everybody but us is required to say that they can look at a black guy with a white girl and not even notice. If one can really convince oneself of that, one can also convince oneself that NAMBLA is right, and that men having sex with boys is so Ok it is not noticeable.

If you can REALLY do these things, just ONCE, is there ever any coming back?

We accept recovering alcoholics, but only if they are absolutely, unreservedly aware, every day of the week, that there is something WRONG with them. That is the ONLY route to recovery, and there is no guarantee of that one.

The same inhumanly difficulty exists in the case of those who are ever truly unoffended by the couple which will produce ugly mixes.

We all know that Tiger Woods would have nothing to do with a girl who looked like the daughter he and his beautiful Swedish bride will produce. We all know that OJ would have nothing to do with a girl who looked like the daughter he and his blond wife produced.

But one is REQUIRED not to notice this.

Once you go there, for ANY reason, you are in a whole new category.

Decency IS prejudice. .

Citizenship IS prejudice.

All loyalty, every “family value,” IS prejudice

An unprejudiced person is a psychopath.

A society that truly has zero tolerance for “racism” — the town motto of Waterton, Mass –or any other prejudice gets sicker and sicker in every way.

Anyone who can TRULY talk himself out of a normal prejudice once can NEVER be trusted

2 Comments

Cheap Forgiveness is Fatal

——————————————————————————–

I am very familiar with the fact that people simply WILL NOT change tactics.

In 1870 the French Army was bigger than the Prussian one. The Prussians moved fast, outflanked the French, and won.

In 1914 the available French Army was bigger than the German one, which had a two-front war. The Germans moved faster, outflanked the French, and the rest of the war was fought deep in French territory.

In 1940 the French depended on the immobile Maginot Line and the French Army was comparable in size to the Wehrmacht. The Germans used the Blitzkrieg, a brand new thing where they moved faster and outflanked the French.

Unless we get fanatical about real contrition, anti-PC forces are beginning exactly the same repeats.

Conservatives were desperate for respectability. So when the Neos, who had exploited liberalism at its high tide, deigned to take their titles and publications over to the anti-liberal side, conservatives welcomed them in as heroes. That was the end of conservatism.

Conservatives welcomed neos in the tradition of the Confessions of Saint Augustine and today’s evangelical ministers. Preachers always tell us what terrible sinners they were before they Found the Lord. Most, being psychopaths, probably WERE horrible people, but it wasn’t the sex and alcohol they moan about that made them that way. Most of them are worse today they were then.

So neos came in BRAGGING about what bit liberals they used to be. But there is a crucial difference. Liberals are PROUD of it. They look upon their years as liberals as pure righteousness. Now professional conservatism does too.

Look at the French example above and ask yourself, HOW MANY TIMES are we going to make this mistake?

I am interested in people conversion stories, but I am not ABOUT to excuse them. When someone writes about what a neutral he was or enemy he REALLY was to his own race, I want to hear some self-criticism, some denunciation, not a “Oh, well, it was just a phase” crap.

I LIVED through those “phases” you son of a bitch, I SUFFERED through them as you betrayed us. Forgiveness depends on true contrition. If you regard it as “just a normal phase,” then you are as bas as you were.

Conservatives ignored the PRACTICAL lesson that history’s most successful religion could teach them. When you are dealing with an institution that has been wildly successful in the real world like Christianity, you have to pay attention to its lessons. One of them is the insistence o contrition.

TOTAL contrition, as in St. Augustine.

We saw what happened to conservatism when it forgot about contrition.

Forgiveness must be EARNED. Cheap forgiveness is fatal.

_____________________________

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE CoUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

” It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

8 Comments

Ian Santiago

Al’s pessimism is neither welcome nor warranted! The “New World Order” will be OUR order and we will do things that will make Hitler, Heydrich and the rest look like choirboys by comparison. Think Vlad Tepes on steroids and you might get the idea.

I noticed that there has been talk of conspiracies here lately and I have been doing some research in that are as it relates to the racial struggle and I found some very interesting things. I will share if others have an interest?

The walls are a tumblin’ down folks and this following story has got the niggers and their utopian white leftists enablers all upset. God forbid that reality should get in the way of their insane fantasies. hehehehe

Viva La Raza Blanca!!!

Fury at DNA pioneer’s theory: Africans are less intelligent than Westerners
Celebrated scientist attacked for race comments: “All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”
By Cahal Milmo
Published: 17 October 2007
One of the world’s most eminent scientists was embroiled in an extraordinary row last night after he claimed that black people were less intelligent than white people and the idea that “equal powers of reason” were shared across racial groups was a delusion.

James Watson, a Nobel Prize winner for his part in the unravelling of DNA who now runs one of America’s leading scientific research institutions, drew widespread condemnation for comments he made ahead of his arrival in Britain today for a speaking tour at venues including the Science Museum in London.

The 79-year-old geneticist reopened the explosive debate about race and science in a newspaper interview in which he said Western policies towards African countries were wrongly based on an assumption that black people were as clever as their white counterparts when “testing” suggested the contrary. He claimed genes responsible for creating differences in human intelligence could be found within a decade.

The newly formed Equality and Human Rights Commission, successor to the Commission for Racial Equality, said it was studying Dr Watson’s remarks ” in full”. Dr Watson told The Sunday Times that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”. He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.

His views are also reflected in a book published next week, in which he writes: “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so……”

http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article3067222.ece

Watson’s partner in discovering DNA, Francis Crick, was an unapologetic Bell Curvist, and the entire media was screaming for his scalp forty years ago for attacking innate racial equality when it could get you destroyed.

Maybe Watson is getting a conscience in his old age.

21 Comments

Al Parker, Shape Up!

I hate to admit it, but Al Parker, one of my best, actually wrote:

Still, I need more to convince me that the Cause is more than an escapist belief system not extending beyond an angry, small and geographically dispersed group on the Internet.

To give such an example, there were a few demonstrations in Russia and Sweden in recent memory that actually show there are people out there that will attach their names and faces to their beliefs and march for them by the dozen. No torchlights, but slogans, colorful flags, and physical presence.

I must be of a different character, because to me, that commands more respect than I would have for an argument of a radical bent posted anonymously on an Internet forum by someone who appears to be a “lone nut”, i.e. not much different than a stranger who hands you a disagreeable religious pamphlet without giving a sense there are many in his congregation.

ME:

SIGH!

“, because to me, that commands more respect”

That depends entirely on whether you want to judge by your respect or WIN this frigging thing. If you REALLY want to command respect, you could commit Seppuku, but you wouldn’t be much use to us afterwards.

Al the crap you are talking about makes not the slightest difference. The millionth anti-white screaming anti-racist is like the absolute unanimity of professors in my youth that races were absolutely, unequivocally equal genetically in all things.

That’s GONE.

There were no marches against that belief. There were giant marches FOR it. I was bowled over when event the New York Times said the hereditarian view of race is now more acceptable. That is the nearest I ever heard a PC Center come to saying it was ever wrong! That means they have been beaten to DEATH. Jensen and Rushton are now main line in academic journals.

If you are depressed and feel like you have an iron deficiency, PLEASE don’t infect the rest of us with it. We have a war to fight.

Nothing you are talking about, least of all the marches, will be remembered at all in a few years. I remember when the word was that a few academic dissidents being shouted down were nothing compared to the riots staged by the anti-whites.

The ONLY thing that Fjordman said that will make any difference in the future is:

“The truth is that immigration policies bear little correlation to past colonialist history, population density or size. Ireland, Denmark, Britain, France, Sweden, Italy, Germany and the Netherlands have one, and only one, thing in common: The natives are white, and thereby have no legitimate claim to their own countries.”

In your determination to be depressed, you completely forget that I told that for twenty years I have battling to get someone to SAY this.

Someone asked me about arranging a “news leak” in DC and I replied, “Do you REALIZE how much WORK it takes to arrange a news lead” that LOOKS accidental and to get the press to take it seriously?”

It is hard for me to comprehend how, after being here so long, you can actually BELIEVE that the comments one needs, the ones that show a movement like this, are ACCIDENTAL.
That is amateurism incarnate!

Which is why I have been so alone in my battle. I mention a major break to someone, a mainline comment that I have been working on for YEARS, and the reply is that the guy who made the comment was as Jew or was ugly, or how it was all hopeless.

On and on and on and on and on, with the usual bragging about how “practical” and “realistic” the talker was.

SPARE ME!

Granted I don’t have the Practical Man outlook you do, but I do have a certain well-paid-for professional view of what needs to be done and how put our artillery shots down the right holes.

I was a lone nut and I need some more lone nuts, as you call us, to continue hitting where it matters. They are useless if they can’t see what is REALLY going on, the concepts that are the key and how to SPOT them.

Dammit, Al, stop sucking your thumb and join us!

10 Comments

Dave

BW says:

“You can be reasonable or you can be truthful”

“This is not diplomacy.”

“Every Truth is saleable and reasonable. The truth is neither.”

I say:

Do not take BWs above statement and turn it into DOCTRINE. BW did not say, “Diplomacy doesn’t matter”.

That would be an excuse for failing to master diplomacy, a practical necessity in the real world.

Something turns into Wordism at the very moment it furnishes an excuse for failing to do what is necessary.

ME:

The mistake Dave is pointing out is how they managed to justify the Inquisition in the name of the man who said, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

I meant that WE have to see what is not true, clearly and without compromise IN OUR OWN MINDS. THEN we must find a way to tell others what we have concluded. That, as Dave says, is a matter of diplomacy, advertising work, any of a number of things that we do not like to say we are doing because, to our Aryan minds, the words sound dishonest.

But you cannot just shout people into believing what is true. You have to recognize Wordism’s methods and counter them. Diplomacy, war, espionage, all these are real world methods. And if you can’t use them to spread the truth, a Truth will win.

Diplomacy often just means decency. The person who says he is “always frank” invariably is using that as an excuse for cruelty. Diplomacy can be a lie or kindness or a trick, depending on who uses it how.

I hope this explanation by Dave and me was unnecessary, but in any case, it makes the point that I cannot do without your applying common sense here.

2 Comments

Spreading an Idea

My concept of power is coming up with an idea and getting it to the world in general. Most people get an idea and write a book about it. That is RELATIVELY easy, thought I hope never to write another book.

“If I had had more time, I would have written less.” In other words, this old writers’ rule says that the more you want to boil your idea down, the more work you have to put into it. A big book takes a lot of work, but not nearly as much as thinking and rethinking a concept until one has it in a short form that seems obvious once somebody has heard it.

There is no reward for this but raw power. When someone finally writes a thick book saying what I worked out, the doctrine goes in his name.

But this endless work of boiling it down is only the beginning. Once an idea has been boiled down to “Labor VOTES” or “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries,” it is just the beginning, though that is more work than a book in itself. Once I get the formula and say it, I get a blank look and the person I am talking to goes onto discuss the Great Theory or The Latest Thing.

It was not until 1982 that I was able to put together The New Right Papers, and it was the vehicle for Societal Property Rights — “Labor VOTES” — to be the vehicle I had been seeking for years.

Getting a formula into tens of millions of minds — that is what Madison Avenue makes its billions doing. I pointed that out in my Arizona speech and got the usual dazed look back.

I did this on concept after concept, and I have found that it works best when no one traces it back to me. Power is NOT getting credit. Getting credit is a separate job altogether.

But try to conceive of the WORK involved here. Try to imagine the YEARS each idea took.

It is important for me to take credit here so that you will REALIZE that you have the only key to true power in the real world right here in BUGS.

All this is to introduce a comment from me:

YOU have made the Mantra proceed. You need to keep slamming at them with it and be encouraged by the fact that Fjordmann and others are getting the idea after I have been pushing it for over two decades.

We are changing the world, the REAL world, not the “I am Tough and Practical” world.

This is a geometric progression. When my ideas come back in a mainline source, it has gone from me to a hundred thousand. From a hundred thousand to a major impact on policy is a shorter process — though it seems long to us — than getting the first stage.

I join in Sarge in saying, “We are marching. YOU are the only ones who understand what we are doing. Power is the only encouragement you will get for a while. It has driven me for over half a century.

Now, with Fjordmann, you SEE it working. It took two decades to get this far.

But as long as only we see it, only we have the power.

4 Comments

AFKAN, and Do You REALIZE What We are Demanding?

AFKAN:In reply to Simmons:

you wrote:

*snip*
Dave and Afkan have slipped into the sand trap of trying to make sense of the idiots in charge machinations.
*end snip*

in reply:
We have spent fifty years fighting Shadows established by “the idiots in charge of machinations.”

We have been, effectively, played for Fools by people who define ALL issues in the Light of a Positive Theory of Race; at least, it is positive, and positively good, for them.

When I was much younger, I wondered why lawyers who went at each other tooth and nail in the courtroom would retire to expensive restaurants, and have expensive dinners together.

One day, my uncle told me, “See, the whole thing is like the professional wrestling you see on television. They support the System, and you are simply food for the System. The irreplaceable energy of your life simply feeds the Machine when you go to court. No matter who wins or loses, the lawyers win, because, either way, they are getting paid.”

Since then, the worlds “political oligopoly” have entered my vocabulary.

Since then, national politics is seen in an entirely different light; eight years of Bush, eight years of Clinton, eight years of Bush, eight years of…you get the idea.

So, I only am interested in the one issue that effectively leads out of the Platonic Cave in which we find ourselves, and that is the intellectual model of Family, as the microcosm of Race, Race, as the macrocosm of Family, and Race as the Living Bridge between Family and Culture.

For the first time, we transcend the false duality and double-bind mechanisms of political control inherent in the nature of “Wordism,” and can tap vital sources of Ideas, and Energy, in the fulfillment of something uniquely Creative, fighting the fight on Our Terms, for a welcome change.

OUR Terms.

For a Change.

ME:

OUR terms:

One thing we have trouble with is understanding what a fundamental revolution we are demanding. That is why AFKAN keeps capitalizing RACE, but he doesn’t do the WORK to fully explain, or maybe to think out, what he means.

The simple fact is that, in explaining reality, race substitutes for EVERYTHING people make a living on. Jesus may save your soul, but that is not what preachers make a living on. That is not a doctrine they can get power from. They need “Judeo-Christianity,” something that allows them to say that God is a social agenda.

Listen to O’Reilly. He says that “the idea that some children can learn better than others is evil.” That’s a quote.

We are proceeding into utterly uncharted waters. There was a comfort in the idea that civilization had a clearly identifiable beginning and that mankind is a single, utterly malleable unit.

There were civilized people. Those who had become the heirs of Egypt, and savages of all races and who only needed the ministrations of civilized folk, of paid intellectuals. There was a lot of argument over which ministrations were the True Ministrations, but the basic concept that All Mankind needed the right words was not questioned.

Nobody but me seems to realize how fundamental this assumption is to everything we call civilization, including Western Civilization.

We are saying it is not true.

While others crowd around and decry Neoconservatism as if it were some kind of Special Jewish Concept. It is an opportunistic concept in which Jews take the lead.. But abolitionist-minded New Englanders, National Review types, would have led the charge and invented Neoconservatism had there been no Jews — and they had had the smarts.

I see neocons as one of a number of natural responses to the them that will crush present social thinking the way that modern medicine crushed bleeding two hundred years ago.

Nobody studies the embarrassing history of the end of bleeding in favor of bacteriology. Nobody will even notice the disappearance of everything that was Intellectual in our age.

Neoconservatism says that liberalism as not what we said it was, a set of ideas that would lead to disaster. No, says neoconservatism, liberalism was correct until on or about January 1, 1970. Then, unaccountably, it went wrong. That is the doctrine of conservatism today, as detailed by National Review.

The establishment is becoming more and more openly oppressive. That is because everything it is based on is becoming more obviously ridiculous every day. Rome did not disagree with Galileo; it simply said that the implications of what he said were destructive to Doctrine.

What AFKAN calls RACE violates the fundamental Doctrine of professional Intellectualism, that there is room for Compromise. If we do not accept some form of Neoconservatism, even Judeo-Christianity, we are saying that thousands of Intellectuals were complete nincompoops.

No, we are saying, they did not “have a point to make.” They were totally destructive and far, far, far worse than useless.

That is why no historian has EVER written a history of the actual transition of medicine in the early nineteenth century. The Royal Navy was still regularly bleeding crews in 1815, despite one of our commentators who says that bleeding was out of date long before then.

It wasn’t.

But there was no COMPROMISE between Galen’s crap about balancing humors and reality.

Period.

If race is everything, then every single professional in the social sciences back to classical times is a damned FOOL. As in the case of Galen versus reality, there is stark naked CHOICE. People don’t LIKE that. They want a Judeo-Christianity, a Neoconservatism, that bridges the gap, something that says that everybody had a point, that Intellectualism was not a vicious, silly, destructive FRAUD.

But it WAS a vicious, pretentious, destructive fraud.

Let the Orient worship profound-sounding horseshit.

The wheel, declared to be the most fundamental of inventions, did not EXIST anywhere but in Indo-European lands. I am a fan of the comic strip BC, but no caveman had the wheel. China had it because they were in contact with Indo-Europeans.

We have no history; we have a set of convenient lies agreed upon, as has been stated before. It makes everybody happy. Truth NEVER makes everybody happy.

Race is the crunch. EVERYTHING is racial.

There is no compromise that is not an outright lie.

There will be many, many “neos” after Neoconservatism has been forgotten. But something is true or it is not true.

PERIOD.

They are Wrong.

We are RIGHT.

There is no NEO anything.

This is not reasonable.

You can be resonable or you can be truthful

This is not diplomacy.

Every Truth is saleable and reasonable. The truth is neither.

9 Comments