Comments lately have been good, but they keep reminding me of Socrates’ men in a lightless cave examining an elephant. One says it is ears, one says it’s a trunk, etc.

One asks about creativity, another about what is to be done in government, another makes an equally good point about another aspect. All this shows thought, but it does not reflect an understanding of the whole.

A great example of what I am talking about is the TV series Connections. It discusses, routinely, the bouncing around, not just of abstract concepts, but of practical ideas which flow from different applications of seemingly totally unrelated tings in Western Civilization. These things are talked about as GIVENS, a part of the whole.

But “real” analysis consists of digging into obscure writings of some ancient Greek or some ancient Egyptians and showing how, slowly and painfully, it led to what we call “us.”

There is not the barest relationship between the dynamic of the society described in “Connections” and the Learned Philosophers of Ancient Civilizations.

All that ancient history, as I said by the time I was eighteen, was “a series of northern invasions.” There would be another undiscussed “northern invasion” and a Great Civilization, fed by the slaves on the bottom from the old society, would get another infusion of “barbarians,” who, of course, had nothing to do with the new vitality and limited creativity — and lots and lots of writing for historians to look at.

But only the old writing, not the “barbarism,” made history. It was coincidental, in fact it is not even mentioned as coincident, that each new phase of Great slave-based Civilizations began with a “northern invasion.”

Everybody as taught that, but only I noticed it.

In my teens.

I’m used to that by now.

When society finally reached Northern Europe and was all white, the explosion occurred. A totally new society developed. It found a use for Africans, the same use they had always had and have today, field hands, bloc voters, and a supply of sperm to get rid of this “white race” which is the obvious explanation for everything Wordists want to attribute to thier Holy Books.

This is the PICTURE. After I am dead, someone will come along and GET IT.

One of my favorite true stories is about a famous writer who got crabby and got his comeupance. It happens to me here all the time.

He replied to a letter where a reader had a question by saying, “I am sick and tired of letters like this that are written just to get my signature.”

The recipient of this nasty note cut his signature out of the letter and sent it back to him.

Served the bastard right!

But answering letters does cost a writer his stock in trade: writing time and effort. It costs him money, but correspondence is also his life’s blood. He needs that feedback. It is worth money to him.

I talked below about discipline. People always ask a writer how to get published, but, like the centurion who has troops who forget to recite, “Throw the pilum first,” you know that the person who comes up to you to ask this is not listening.

You could do endless good by hitting your favorite writers with the Mantra. Take it from me, writers DO look at what you write to them, IF YOU DO IT RIGHT.

Once again, what I have to say is common sense, but few will really hear me.

First of all, writers –- or the assistants who are paid to cull out the obvious spam before it reaches the writer — take about five seconds to dismiss it. If it is long and preachy, out it goes. If it says what has been said, it goes into the “This is another letter about X.” This is not useless, because it goes into the X file, like congressional correspondence. But the writer or congressman is interested in your missive on a purely statistical basis, “One more letter protesting X.”

Enough of those and he will change his stance on X or not write a one-sided piece later. But he will not really READ what you say. You are an important statistic, but a statistic only.

A writer or an editor or the culler instantly recognizes whether your letter is written TO HIM. This is a DISCIPLINE. You have to have read and show interest in the writer’s WRITING or the editor’s MAGAZINE.

Once again, I have explained this obvious point to lots of people, and they promptly forget it when they do the writing. They send out a note about what they are thinking that could be written to anybody. That won’t make it past the culler.

You have to remember that you are writing to a person who PRACTICES writing discipline.

I see my concepts showing up in writers I have written to. More important, it joins the conversation among writers if you make it interesting. Publications remain politically correct, but most writers hate at least some of it. Make what you say interesting IN THEIR WORLD.

What I do is make a SHORT point about something HE wrote, quoting it. Then I might add, “I wish you wouldn’t be so politically correct on the racial stuff. I know it sounds paranoid, but all this “anti-racism seems to me to come down to “Asia for Asians, Africa for the Africans, and white countries for everybody.”

No, don’t explain WHY you said that. The most obvious sign of spam is hammering on how innocent it is.

It is point that bothers you, not spam. Keep it there.

After that short digression, I try to make another point ABOUT HIS WRITING, one that will interest him. This is professional level work. This is WORK and DISCIPLINE. It doesn’t look like spam because it ISN’T.

Don’t try to fool a pro. Any writer you are really INTERESTED in and THINK about can be reached with our message. If all you are really interested in is making that point, he will smell it. That why I specified, “your favorite writers” above.

No, it won’t lead to his getting on his knees and converting. But it has a HUGE effect torchlight parade types cannot see

.

Z is concentrating on my radio broadcasts, and is getting a lot out of them. He asks me to do more.

But it was also Z who EXPLAINED why I don’t:

“As Bob has pointed out, he can’t teach advanced calculus if you don’t know the multiplication tables. Maybe you should go learn the multiplication tables first, before you attend class here? Go to Stormfront and ask these questions, this will only distract us.”

One major reason I don’t do more is because I have to keep reteaching the basics. I am a teacher. I have to keep hammering away at the Mantra, but definitely not because if is fun for me to do so. You think YOU are bored hearing about it? Try it from my end!

It is like a priest who, after forty years of hearing confessions, secretly wishes that SOMEBODY would come up with one novel sin! Every time a lot of comments go by WITHOUT repeating and extending on the BASICS, I have to go back again. There is no way for me to know, by some psychic means, that you really mean to go from the basics.

I have a lifetime of experience fighting from the basic training, and teaching how to do it. I have spent hundreds of hours prepping congressmen and candidates and senators and the rest for critical debates and testimony in important hearings. I have heard, “Yes, Bob, PLEASE don’t say that again, I will REMEMBER that point.” I have then sat there watching C-Span as they missed the opportunity to make the point that would have cinched it. The perfect opportunity is lost.

You’ve been in that position. How many times has somebody said that they will remember something critical to the point where they asked you to stop repeating it, and then totally forgotten it when the crunch came?

The Mantra is just a good example of this. How many times, after ramming the point home, did a Roman centurion listen to a soldier list the steps for battle and forget throwing the pilum?

I am here because I am good at this. I am here because I got PAID for this.

There are a lot more basics than the Mantra. There is “Heresy!” But if you forget the Mantra, you will surely forget the follow-up. Most important, you cannot argue sticking to the LOGIC of the Mantra. When someone gets off on why white countries deserve immigration because of colonialism, you must not answer THAT. You must reply, “You are JUSTIFYING GENOCIDE.”

There is room for though and variation, but it must be VARIATION FROM THE BASICS.

I would LOVE to be able to go on into new things with new broadcasts, but every time you seem to be wandering, I have to go back again. This is not disrespect for you. I have had to do this with everybody right up to President Reagan and my hero and mentor John Ashbrook.

This is why, in Western Civilizations, fields of study are called DISCIPLINES. They are not disciplines in places where an “intellectual” is someone who dribbles nonsense that sounds good. Intellectualism is not free association. In a serious discussion, if you wander off into clichés the way they do in the East, you will be laughed at. That is why, as Back Bay Grouch pointed out, sociology is a joke.

Anyone I think is qualified to be here should be insulted if I let you off the hook.

Many, many times I am ready to write something that interests me and might interest you, but someone is back off a side dribble. So with a deep sigh I go off to bring the wandering sheep back into the fold.

What a good teacher teaches depends on the students. I cannot put in new stuff until you absorb the old and make this a DISCIPLINE.

Tighten it up, gang, and I can have more fun.

ME:

“Robert Whitaker’s writing and audios are the prose of loyalty. That is all they are. There is no other agenda in those writings and audio but loyalty.”

Absolutely perfect!

DAVE:

Life is baked in the cake traumatic. That’s why all the suffering along the way seems so darned prosaic.

But the problem with the Greatest Generation is that they got cut a deal they didn’t deserve AFTER THE WAR. And if there ever was a generation that was emblematic of why it is bad for people to get cut deals they don’t deserve, it was they.

They completely lost sight of the meaning of loyalty, the singular most pressing problem we are dealing with today.

And this is the real reason so many of our “white nationalists” get lost. They are unable to come to grips with the real issue, as it is hard to find your way home once you are truly lost. Another way of saying this is that they live in the same environment everybody else lives in and that is an environment where people ARE NOT held accountable and severely punished for disloyalty.

Who gets let into our country and who gets political rights is not a matter of philosophy. The policy followed by the Greatest Generation was an insanity that cannot be responded to by any form of coping.

There is no means of disposing of the divisions they insinuated into American life.

One can either be goddamned loyal or one can either be goddamned killed. That is what is really comes down to. There is no dancing around it, this, the real arithmetic of the “body politic”.

Robert Whitaker’s writing and audios are the prose of loyalty. That is all they are. There is no other agenda in those writings and audio but loyalty.

And the more I have come to understand this, the angrier it makes me that are those out there that cannot deal with that simple fact. It is flat out an outrage.

Accordingly, I wonder if the other participants really get the larger picture, the larger picture that Robert Whitaker is really responding to in doing all of this.

THOSE BASTARDS THAT CALL THEMSELVES THE GREATEST GENERATION RUINED US. THEY LITERALLY SENT US TO HELL.

But if we have to go the hell to relearn loyalty, so be it, because that is what is really going on. This is about loyalty, nothing else.

The more clearly you see that, the more clearly you are on the right track.

Thanks AFKAN. I might have been too tough on Ian, and I hope he is not too sensitive. I’m sometimes forgetful that most are not like me. Still this secret plans stuff in essence leaves most people defenseless when the spotlight of the wreckers singles you out. Many years ago Don Black wrote something directed towards posters on his site that I found useful, “if you won’t say it in a Federal court don’t say it here.” I like the Mantra, and if I had a world audience for my show trial it would come first and be repeated as punctuation.

ME:

Simmons shows his professional side. On Capitol Hill, we used to say, “If you don’t want to see it on the front page of the Washington Post, don’t write it down.”

Reguklar conservatives are amateurs and, above all, DUMB. Smart people have to be loners. The main part of professional consefrvztive time is spent with “It’s all HOPELESS” or not.

Sound familiar? So naturally no one else even understands the point I make about the ironic usefulness of media bias.

Ironically, because of its blind, slavering hatred (look at Rosie!) the media actually DID ITS JOB in the case of serious right-wingers. Teddy Kennedy had to ltierally kill somebody before his out-of-control antics were even mentioned.

One percent of that would have made one of us literally front-page news long before she drowned.

The exception really proves the rule. We finally got a couple of BAD scandals. Two fo our congressmen were not only queer, but went overboard. But the press id NOT do its job with them. The media could not “out” a homo. So we didn’t know. Anything else like that on the part of hard-right congressmen would have been, literally, front page news. Try to imagine Reagan getting away with one percent of Clinton’s hetero stuff!

In fact, we depended so much on the media to bare any scandals that we got caught with our pants down — Gee, what an unfortunate turn of phrase! — on the queer stuff. Otherwise the mdedia allowed us the luxury of assuming that everybody on our side was throughly vetted across the board.