While people here whine about how the Mantra is too complicated or something, one anti over on SF is sobbing that it’s all too obvious and all too effective. In fact, we have to quit it becuase Lord Nelson hitting him with it over and over is like a KGB interrogation.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php/traitors-denazification-approach-431285p8.html
#77

TECHS: Why doesn’t this show as a LINK? When I copy and paste it on my address bar it goes right there. Thanks for pointing this out, Z!

Way to go, LN!

Commenters, please TRY the Mantra before you say how it doesn’t work.

ME:

I LOVE it when the truth is put into minimum space CLEARLY.

Alan has put a critical rule PERFECTLY:

“COMPLEXITY BLURS THE OBVIOUS.”

PRENOTE FROM ME”

In The Dispossessed Majority, “Wilmot Robertson” points out that the oil industry is particularly unpopular because it was, at his time of writing, the only industry in America not controlled by “minorities.’

When I was on the Hill, the oil lobyists were the only ones who felt strong rnough to use the term “sand niggers.”

ON TO DAVE:

Simmons,

Let me say first that if there were any group elites more aware of the fact that nonwhites “no can do” it is oil industry insiders. You have no idea of how thoroughly the politics of the oil industry revolves around that very issue. Accordingly, they see the world very realistically.

What passes for public debate all over the world is truly ridiculous. Only the uninformed respond emotionally to these debates.

But elites ARE FORCED to respond to these ridiculous debates if they are in any way dependent about public perceptions regarding the sale of their products, or reactions to their development activities. Accordingly, as heavily white dominated as the oil industry is, it takes care not to offend nonwhites for nonwhites purchase gasoline and live in neighborhoods close to their refineries. They also have international diplomacy issues to consider.

So now I have given you a specimen outline of the sensitivities involved for the oil giants. But let us leave aside the oil industry elites, for they are already quite solidly on Robert Whitaker’s page already, and go to other types of “elites”, say for example, “local command” types.

Now what I have actually done on several occasions is that I hold up my hand and say, “Challenge”. (I get them to agree to take on a “challenge”.) Then I say, “Let us consider this from a standpoint that in our current environment is strictly forbidden and considered pure heresy, that is let us consider this from a PURELY RACIAL standpoint.”

Then I say, “Mexico is a very resource rich country, why are Mexicans so poor?” (The response is the usual bullshit). Then I say, “But what if the real cause of Mexican poverty is the Mexicans themselves, that they are simply genetically incapable of self-directed progress and of being equal to white people?” (The response is the usual bullshit).

Then I say, “Why should the directional flow of population be from Mexico and Latin America into our country? What makes that logical?” (There my respondents tend to stumble a bit). Then I quickly insert, “The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan and Taiwan, but nobody is demanding that those countries be integrated with mass immigration. What is going on? Don’t white people have a right to exist?” (Here my respondents have tended to say, “You are indeed speaking heretically”).

And my response back is, “Yes, I am speaking heretically. I told you my challenge was to look at this from a strictly forbidden standpoint.

Then the discourse usually gets to where the respondent makes some heartfelt statement about his or her belief that everybody is inherently equal and that whites aren’t really threatened. But so what? That’s throwaway bullshit and what I have really done is leave in my wake an educated person who I have deeply impressed without stumbling into disciplinary violations of organizational standards (because I forewarned them about the nature of the discourse in advance and disciplinary standards regarding speech cannot be invoked in private conversations outside of formal organizational settings in any event).

We do live in a country where free speech is permitted (outside of formal organizational venues) although there are many bad actors that would like to abolish it.

I notice the response in their hearts. The mouth says one thing and the heart says another.

Life is like that, isn’t it?

Racial loyalty does exist, but it is disconcerting to be hit with the Mantra for the Mantra is evidence of the mounting crises the most aware white people know is transpiring and dread.