Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Ron Paul anti-Racism Essay

Posted by Bob on November 26th, 2007 under Politics


This Ron Paul Racism essay against Racism is

  1. good practical politics and
  2. why we must avoid seeing any national conservative as a friend.

I have written dozens of speeches for congressmen, etc. which said race was not the issue. Some of you may guess that I really didn’t mean it. In fact, in practical high-level politics, constantly denying that something is an issue is a sure sign that it IS the issue.

I drove a hundred miles each way and stayed in a motel overnight to hear Nick Griffin’s speech at Clemson. Nick said in his public blog that I was “an old friend” he was glad to have there in support.

One example was that when the TV camera rolled, he called me over to talk with him in front of it. I am used to it. Most people get a bit nervous in front of a TV camera and don’t know how to handle it. It’s sometimes useful to have an old pro around, often for reasons one wouldn’t immediately think of.

Nick spoke at Clemson about the takeover of Europe by militant Islam. He made the standard statement about how this wasn’t about race. Why?

I am proud to point out that Nick said that this speech, in my native state, was the first time he had EVER been allowed to speak at that “Citadel of Free Speech,” a university. He was received politely while leftists slavered at the riot they planned when he spoke in Michigan.

In order to speak on campus in a PART of a country which still takes free speech seriously, he had to have a group sponsor him. So those young people at the Young Americans for Freedom — some of the few holdouts of YAF who still take the word “Freedom” seriously — were putting their futures on the line.

Now how exactly would Nick have looked if he declared that it WAS about race?

Nick, on his web page, declared ME an “old friend.” I have been on the national media talking race repeatedly. Nick made his point there and made the pint he HAD to make for the brave YAF youngsters.

It is easy to beat your chest on SF, but in practical politics, it is both stupid and often cruel and ungrateful to do so. Nick has no problem with MY approach to race. It is the Mantra ***, which I freely repeat in front of any member of any minority group. I am a white man worried about my race. That is as racist as Nick will get and that is as racist as Nick IS.

It is more than I would ask of a respectable conservative like Ron Paul.

It is quite possible that Ron Paul, as a wordist libertarian, has no feeling for his race at all.

Frankly a person who is genuinely loyal to a set of principles out of a book and a slab of ground called the United States of America but has no feeling at all about his own genetic types is more alien to me than E.T. But Kelso and some Stormfronters have convinced me that Paul is a step forward, so I will support him.

If I though Paul had chance of winning. I would reevaluate my position.

But I would cheerfully support E.T. for any office if it helped OUR cause.

But a respectable conservative or a Marine who REALLY has normal loyalties otherwise but TRULY has no feeling for our race makes my stomach turned a lot more than a Jew who just plain hates us.

They give me the CREEPS. But a lot of people in politics turn my stomach, so the choice must be made on a practical basis.

*** AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Lord Nelson on 11/26/2007 - 5:49 pm

    You may know that as I wright this Nick and David Irvine are in a debate at oxford university. And reports on the news are saying there are riots outside. If you Google “bbc world service” you can pick up the radio stream and listen over the net.

    There is a debate about this on this chat forum (see link)

    http://www.oxfordmail.net/news/headlines/display.var.1857427.0.0.php

    The mantra has been posted there and you can see the influence of this blog being used by our side.

  2. #2 by Tim on 11/26/2007 - 6:34 pm

    I always assumed that Ron Paul was just another SHWM. But I have read a handful entries quoting him and claiming he is a
    racistnaziwhoisgoingtokill6000000jews

    After reading his actual quotes, I kinda like the guy. Here is some reading for the blog. I would suggest googling ‘Ron Paul racist’. I was pleasantly surprised by his quotes. Very Amren-ish. No one can accuse him of being a Neocon.

    http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/ron_paul_racist_anti_semite/

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740

    I would suggest that any Bugs reader –read his quotes. It is interesting to note something about his campaign. The far left and the far right are coming together for the first time in a long time.

    Didn’t uncle Bob tells us something about this? This happened in another country about a century ago and usually precedes some kind of change. BIG CHANGE. Of course, Bugs readers already see all that.

  3. #3 by Tim on 11/26/2007 - 6:36 pm

    ok here is another must read

    they are pulling out all the stops……hell evertime I read his quotes …..I like him more.

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_michael__071122_ron_paul_s_history_o.htm

    Bugs teaser:

    “We now know that we are under assault from thugs and revolutionaries who hate Euro-American civilization and everything it stands for: private property, material success for those who earn it, and Christian morality.”

  4. #4 by Dave on 11/26/2007 - 8:44 pm

    While I suspect that Ron Paul genuinely believes in racial equality, I also suspect that Bill and Hillary Clinton do not.

    That’s just my suspects.

    But I do know this: Ron Paul does not believe that white men should require nonwhite men to abide by their agreements. Ron Paul definitely has a bias regarding that. He believes that white men are subject to one standard and nonwhites to another.

    Though he believes in racial equality, he does not believe nonwhites should be held to their word. In that, he is a solid supporter of the doctrine of political correctness in racial matters.

    The proof of this is that he thinks that Mid-Eastern and Central Asian military bases established by white men at great cost and bloodshed specifically for the purpose of requiring nonwhite men to abide by their agreements should be arbitrarily abandoned and that white men should apologize and surrender to the nonwhite men in these areas and nations in contrition for the idea that the agreements that nonwhite men enter into with white men should be enforced.

    It’s racist, of course, to require a nonwhite man to honor his word. That is Ron Paul basic operational view.

    He also believes that Japan’s, China’s, and the Gulf States huge US T- Bond portfolios have been foisted upon them by greedy white men trying to cheat nonwhites out of their property, labor, and resources.

    Accordingly, the similarity Ron Paul has with Chavez and Castro in characterizing the global deployment of US financial assets is quite evident.

    I see it a little differently. I see these huge foreign portfolios of US T-Bonds as the winnings of corrupt nonwhite elites profiting off the American people by clinging onto the back of America like desperate swimmers hanging on for dear life to the strong swimmer in a rip tide.

    Foreign holders gains on their US T- Bond portfolios have been quite handsome ever since the beginning of the big bond bull market in 1982, quite outpacing any US dollar devaluation they have suffered. But Ron Paul never mentions this as it conflicts with his ideology that white men are basically evil in their monetary dealings with nonwhites.

    He likes to talk about the Chinese elites as being rubes who foolishly take mere “paper” from corrupt white men in exchange for real products, resources, and services (at the expense of American workers, of course).

    White men cannot be benefactors according to Ron Paul’s ideology for they are basically selfish and evil, quite like our standard brand Marxists have it. Instead, white men always owe nonwhite men something in his view, quite substantial somethings, such as surrender, apology, military bases, other property, honor, you name it.

    As long as white men are crawling, surrendering, paying damages, and apologizing, that’s all that matters to Ron Paul. For all of this, white men will get a tax break and be shielded from some currency depreciation in Ron Paul’s world.

    Accordingly, his high opinion of white men is evident: White men will sell anything there is to sell for a few nickels. After all, a comfortable retirement is all that matters to white men. And they will sell anything and engage in any treason to get it. Ron Paul likes to call this, “believing in the free market and honest banking”.

    And specifically forget the idea that nonwhite nations have to be forced to behave. In Ron Paul’s world, the only people that should be forced to behave are white people and white nations.

    Everybody else gets a pass.

    These are the real ideas of Ron Paul.

  5. #5 by unjew on 11/27/2007 - 4:08 am

    No one could truly know what’s going on inside Ron Paul’s head, but one thing is for sure – he is anti-izzy, no one can deny that. “Get out of the Middle-East” means “Leave izrael to fight it’s wars alone”. That’s as far as a mainstream politico could go. But the jews know WHAT he means. That’s why they’re calling him a nazi.

    Talking about race would only give the media kikes ammunition, and they are waiting for such a chance. Then it would put off the potential Paul voters – and that is anti-war leftists. Misguided as they are, they are the only ones that feel strongly about anything. He can’t count on any support from the “right”, because so-called conservatives have been thoroughly castrated after 50 years of jew-conditioning. This is practical politics.

    Does he really believe races are equal? It is immaterial for any practical purpose, but how could anyone who’s seen or worked with an AA nigger really believe “races are equal??

    I come from a country in which, until 20 years ago, one of the first things you learned in school was to think “white” and speak “black” with a straight face. Oh wait, you’re in such a country too. So what’s unclear?

    On a side note – Ron Paul president would be a bad thing in the long run. He would pull the American army out of every shithole on the planet and stabilize the US. That would be bad for Whites everywhere. The US is a nuclear bomb in the hands of a demented nigger taking orders from a hate crazed jew. It must go. So the rest of us could have a fighting chance.

  6. #6 by Z on 11/28/2007 - 2:36 am

    “On a side note – Ron Paul president would be a bad thing in the long run. It must go. So the rest of us could have a fighting chance.”

    I agree. If Paul became President, a major amount of steam would be let out. This steam is needed in the long run. Even if Paul became President, I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t be able to reinstate the right to free association. I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t be able to stop Affirmative Action, or stop racial quotas. I don’t even think he could totally shut down illegal immigration?

    No, a Paul victory would be harmful. Which is why I, the man known as Z, today, will announce my support for Black Obama.

    Obama would be helpful for a couple reasons. The first, is that North America is getting merged into one. The sleepy White masses need to see a black face during this unionization. Obviously he’s not reason for this unionzation but the masses are so stupid that they would probably think that he was behind it. This is similar to people thinking that Bush was responsible for the war in Iraq. Next, an Obama victory would increase the scale of uppityness among minorities. This will make White people face, and think about their future. Last, Obama is a member of a Black Supremacist church. His pastor has met with Kadafi, and is close with the Nation of Islam. Some people would be surprised about this but its important to remember that to blacks, race come first. White people have a lot of trouble understanding this.

    So, that’s about it. Make sure to vote Obama in 2008!!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.