Twain was anti-colonial. He said one thing that has an entirely different meaning today:

“There’s invasion, immigration, and colonization. Invasion is military. Immigration is voluntary and peaceful. Colonization is genocide. Colonization can result from EITHER invasion OR immigration. In the end, it’s the same result, though.”

While I suspect that Ron Paul genuinely believes in racial equality, I also suspect that Bill and Hillary Clinton do not.

That’s just my suspects.

But I do know this: Ron Paul does not believe that white men should require nonwhite men to abide by their agreements. Ron Paul definitely has a bias regarding that. He believes that white men are subject to one standard and nonwhites to another.

Though he believes in racial equality, he does not believe nonwhites should be held to their word. In that, he is a solid supporter of the doctrine of political correctness in racial matters.

The proof of this is that he thinks that Mid-Eastern and Central Asian military bases established by white men at great cost and bloodshed specifically for the purpose of requiring nonwhite men to abide by their agreements should be arbitrarily abandoned and that white men should apologize and surrender to the nonwhite men in these areas and nations in contrition for the idea that the agreements that nonwhite men enter into with white men should be enforced.

It’s racist, of course, to require a nonwhite man to honor his word. That is Ron Paul basic operational view.

He also believes that Japan’s, China’s, and the Gulf States huge US T- Bond portfolios have been foisted upon them by greedy white men trying to cheat nonwhites out of their property, labor, and resources.

Accordingly, the similarity Ron Paul has with Chavez and Castro in characterizing the global deployment of US financial assets is quite evident.

I see it a little differently. I see these huge foreign portfolios of US T-Bonds as the winnings of corrupt nonwhite elites profiting off the American people by clinging onto the back of America like desperate swimmers hanging on for dear life to the strong swimmer in a rip tide.

Foreign holders gains on their US T- Bond portfolios have been quite handsome ever since the beginning of the big bond bull market in 1982, quite outpacing any US dollar devaluation they have suffered. But Ron Paul never mentions this as it conflicts with his ideology that white men are basically evil in their monetary dealings with nonwhites.

He likes to talk about the Chinese elites as being rubes who foolishly take mere “paper” from corrupt white men in exchange for real products, resources, and services (at the expense of American workers, of course).

White men cannot be benefactors according to Ron Paul’s ideology for they are basically selfish and evil, quite like our standard brand Marxists have it. Instead, white men always owe nonwhite men something in his view, quite substantial somethings, such as surrender, apology, military bases, other property, honor, you name it.

As long as white men are crawling, surrendering, paying damages, and apologizing, that’s all that matters to Ron Paul. For all of this, white men will get a tax break and be shielded from some currency depreciation in Ron Paul’s world.

Accordingly, his high opinion of white men is evident: White men will sell anything there is to sell for a few nickels. After all, a comfortable retirement is all that matters to white men. And they will sell anything and engage in any treason to get it. Ron Paul likes to call this, “believing in the free market and honest banking”.

And specifically forget the idea that nonwhite nations have to be forced to behave. In Ron Paul’s world, the only people that should be forced to behave are white people and white nations.

Everybody else gets a pass.

These are the real ideas of Ron Paul.

The American left is leading the assault on the undeniable exposure of race difference and on Israeli control of our foreign policy. The right is obsessed with cleansing itself of the Thought Crimes the right committed in denying MLK sainthood and limiting integrationist power.

No major American leftist goy has endorsed Europe’s Thought Crime laws. William Buckley has.

Dave makes it clear, again, that respectable conservatives are our real enemies today.

– IGNUNCE

If a semi-literate black man disagrees with you on race, he will say, “You IGNUNT!” Antis who have never had to debate the subject before always begin by saying we are ignorant.

At first, this is puzzling to us, like saying that we are filled with some undefined Hate. But this Ignorance and Hate have nothing to do with actual ignorance or hatred. We must understand and EXPLAIN each on its own terms.

You are lost if you begin by thinking of real hatred and real ignorance. They do not know it, but antis are referring to CAPITALIZED Hate and Ignorance. We are dealing with a religion. Our established religion is Political Correctness, with its liberal seminaries run by Mommy Professors, a.k.a., universities. You cannot argue with disciples of this faith until you recognize that it IS a faith.

When used by antis, “ignunce” or Ignorance is precisely what the Catholic Church means by the Doctrine of Invincible Ignorance. Invincible Ignorance does not require real ignorance, that is, one can KNOW the doctrine of the Church. Invincible Ignorance is the inability to BELIEVE the True Faith, however much you know about it.

Every religious fanatic, be he Politically Correct, Christian, Islamic, Marxist, Americanist or Libertarian, feels that no one who truly KNOWS his True Faith can reject. So he sincerely believes that if you don’t BELIEVE, you simply do not Truly Understand it.

Mommy Professor is also Father Professor.