This is on target Bob, we are here to learn your way of thought and influence the course of history. It only makes sense that we play off each others strengths and weakness.

I’m amazed at the literary prowess of Dave, he speaks with an erudite tongue that can articulate what I’ve experienced and pondered but can never find the words to communicate the thought. I’ll admit expanding on Bob’s concepts is simple, but it is one of the hardest things I have tried to tackle.

We came here as individuals, but it’s time we started acting like a seminar working towards a common goal; dropping whatever personal issues we brought along.

Whenever I put in something like “Team Depth” below, something that is really critical to me, I get a resounding silence.

Silence is hard to READ. It could mean that, after working my butt off for years, I have put a point so well that it needs no elaboration. You’ve said that.

But, dammit, it won’t DO.

You’ve all seen the “dropped call” ads. You know what silence can DO.

I remember that in Animal House the Donald Sullivan professor admitted to his class that studying Milton was absurd, but when the bell rang, he reminded them that they still had to report to him on Milton, “I’m not joking here. This is my JOB!”

What I say in pieces like “Team Depth” is the purpose my LIFE. I need successors to a WAY OF THINKING. I need SysOps and Brians to take control, I need Lord Nelsons and Prometheuses (Promethethii?) to peal off and attack the enemy without me lifting a finger.

Coaching Depth is a BIG DEAL to me.

So you are tired of hearing this. I am tired of repeating it. But on my end it is like the dropped call ads.

I CANNOT READ SILENCE.

— Team Depth

I want DEPTH here. I don’t want just one great pitcher, but a pitching TEAM. I have a tech TEAM. Dave is working hard on giving my writing TEAM some depth.

I want more COACHING depth.

Most people pay almost exclusive attention to the backfield in football, the ones who run for scores. But a pro knows that most of the team is on the LINE. To put it in the locker room terms I heard our coaches use, the greatest quarterback on earth is useless if the defensive line puts him on his ass as soon as the ball is snapped.

You not only need depth in the backfield, you need it in the line as well.

But if people obsess on the backfield, they also obsess even more on the Head Coach. He is about all anybody talks about when it comes to the coaches. Only the real pros pay much attention to the up-and-coming line coaches or the backfield coaches. But a team that only plans for a big-name head coach is on its way to the graveyard.

I want to call attention here to what some of our people are doing in this area. It is an inexpressible relief to me that when I jump on an anti-white on Stormfront, one of my BUGS squadron gets right on their tail and STAYS there. Lord Nelson has no mercy, and he is not alone. He will keep jamming their noses into their genocidal intentions without even thinking of giving them relief by following their desperate maneuvers to change the subject.

Likewise Prometheus.

I get TIRED of repeating the same things over and over. It bores you, too. But the only way to stop it is for YOU to jump in when someone gets off of our WAY OF THINKING here. DON’T LEAVE IT TO ME.

My job will not be done until we have the kind of depth we have in the tech team in our writing, in our coaching team, and in coming up with areas you should not wait for ME to come up with.

Don’t wait for me for the umpteenth time, to correct something. And don’t worry about being wrong. I am proud that I am not afraid to get it wrong and to admit it when I do. “You will never throw the perfect block until you have screwed up a few hundred before,” as the coach would say.

It is all a matter of throwing light to help navigate a very confusing world.

Real knowledge endures. That is why we have Bill Gates chronically using terminology invented by Von Clausewitz. But you have to have studied Von Clausewitz to know that Bill Gates studied Von Clausewitz and finds him useful.

It is not that Von Clausewitz is the “be all or end all” for Bill Gates. It’s just that for people like Bill Gates who are confronted with having to deal with real things in a big way, Von Clausewitz is useful.

Likewise Robert Whitaker. People who study Robert Whitaker are going to come away with a “leg up” on the competition.

Now this is big irony because one can study Robert Whitaker for free or by paying small sums for his books that are easily available through Amazon.

This leads to an important lesson too few Americans understand: The value of things is often not tied to price.

Whitaker thinking will remain and grow in influence for the very reason that it does provide a “leg up” on the competition.

Competitive people will find their way to Whitaker just as they find their way to Von Clausewitz. The two-century gap doesn’t matter.

It is usefulness that matters.

And usefulness is the reason that, at the end of the day, the Internet will doom both secondary and higher education. Both cannot possibility compete in their present forms against the usefulness of the Internet as a low cost platform for the dissemination of the kinds of educational capital that give people competitive advantage.

And when business leaders decry “the disaster of education in America” by condemning the falling graduation rates at both the secondary and higher education levels, I say, “keep it coming”, the less diplomas the better.

“Most non-whites don’t want to live around non-whites either, that’s why they’re always dying to sneak into our land.”

ME:

This last sentence has the Mantra nugget in it that we need to EXPLOIT: “Walking the walk.” For all the BS about equality, the only POLICY recommendations have got do with their moving in on US. We ignore this and talk about the nanny state or such stuff.

In a discussion of Mexican immigration in Charleston, SC, Hispancis were talking about how much better black — the race was not mentioned — areas were after Hispanits moved in.

At long, long last, someone asked, “is the any place in Latin America where you would WANT to live?”

I could never get respectable conservatives to mention the Berlin Wall and the fact that EVERY Communist state would not let people OUT. Buckley types were totally hung up on economic theory and the unChristianity of Communism, not whether mere people wanted to live there or not.

Reagan said Communism was evil becasue it was a PRISON.

Now we equate the collapse of Communism with the end of the Berlin Wall.

Well, DUHH!

The whole concept of integration is based on white supremacy.

Let me repeat the Mantra before the DUHH! Chorus chimes in:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

White Pioneer put this in Stormfront.

It was, of course, largely ignored:

Quote:

A reminder that the Anti-Racism forum is not a place for white people to talk about “racism” against them. I would argue that a progressive discussion board is no place for that either.

bigcitygal volunteer moderator (anti-racism forum)

MY COMMENT:

REPEAT THIS!

Bang their heads with it!

REPEAT THIS, PLEASE!

A reminder that the Anti-Racism forum is not a place for white people to talk about “racism” against them. I would argue that a progressive discussion board is no place for that either.

Shari: I have noticed that any movie that shows men as men, and women as women, are very popular. Those stupid prizes don’t mean anything.

Mantra Thinking:

That is one reason why competition and technological advance is so good for us. When network TV ruled the networks could afford to devote enormous amounts of time to pure propaganda, CBS was at the top with all ten top shows. But at New York cocktail parties, they were ridiculed as “The Country Network.” So they CANCELLED their top shows like “The Beverly Hillbillies” and “Green Acres.” It cost them a fortune, but they could afford it.

When the market was at an all-time high, Ted Turner gave the UN bureaucracy a billion dollars.

I was happy to hear a line on “Married With Children:” “as dead as network TV.”

I never openly advocate breaking the law, but I have the same attitude many Americans had during Prohibition: I am all for the bootleggers. Hollywood is our ENEMY. Anyone who bootlegs their copyrights has my complete approval.

Mantra Thinking:

This is war. Step back and figure out who your enemy is. Anything that hurts him or threatens to hurt him is good. The enemy does not react to your reason, but he does react to shots fired.

But don’t mistake those last two words. I do not mean the kind of shooting that makes you look Manly and Heroic. I shot at the enemy’s minions, but not because THAT was my purpose. The shots I fired that mattered were at the enemy’s politics, in a coat and tie, not fatigues.

Hit where it HURTS, not where it makes you look good. No leftist network cares how many Commie guerrillas you kill. The supply is unlimited.

p

For those of you who might think I’m acting the role of a “tough guy,” trying to blame women — that is wrong. It’s the emotive, childish instant-gratification-culture I take issue with. I watched one of the worst movies ever last night, “Superbad.” As best I can describe it as a Jewish coming-of-age movie, no laughs whatsoever. That the jewish critics fawned over this is evidence enough that Israel is finished (two countries, one system). It was literally 116 minutes of loathsome behavior of the worst kind, with two minutes of semi-responsible actions — barely. All I can say is that in a world of children, the Men will be kings.

– Simmons

Simmons reminds me of the wild orgy of prize-giving and praise for the Jewish Western “The Unforgiven,” made by blond goy Eastwood. Every white person in it was a craven coward and a nincompoop. Everybody was a coward and a bully except Eastwood’s black chosen companion, the martyr.

New York Jews keep trying to prove that the Alamo was a myth, that NO goy would die at his post like that. All of their movies depict a panicked, shrieking set of passengers while the guys in airline costumes are calm and steady. Flight 93, the real thing, showed, for the thousandth time, that Americans react well to emergencies.

In the case of old Americans, the ones who panicked died before reproducing.

In fact, real Americans in real situations behave like the Westerners they believe in, despite Jewish Weserns. You know, the ones who won a continent for the Jews to come to?

All we hear about earlier Americans now, besides insults, is that when the ancestors of today’s New York Jews poured into the land made safe for them by Aryans, they were uncomfortable in the ships.

Those Jews instantly began to scream about how everybody was out to get them and how horrible these goyim had been to take the land from the Indians, their fellow oppressees.

I wonder why everybody despises Jews?

p

Stormfront exchange:

Kahalachan: I am talking about succinct biological differences, not subjective personal methods of differentiation.

I find it odd that the Irish were once treated as a different race by the English for the same reasons and with the same justifications as WNs treat different races.

This is due to being able to distinguish the subtle differences between Irish and English that have been learned as a result of exposure.

You could trace one’s ancestry to Irish, but does that mean Irish and English are deserving of seperate classifications?

I ask the same to you WNs, what biological basis do you have to classify and distinguish races and what reason are the specific geological origins and time frames chosen?

You are a religious fanatic, of the established religion of Political Correctness. A thing must fit into your theory before it can be real.

You begin with the theory, not the observation. We see what happens, and then find out why it happens. We do not say something has to have a theoretical justification before we admit it is real.

The fact is that brown countries are uniformly poor. The fact is that everybody knows what race is — or you would not be bitching about discrimination. But none of this is approved by Mommy Professor, or in his role as a priest of our established religion, “Father Professor.” This is the WORLD to you, but it means nothing to us.

You are a religious anti-white. So you call on Mommy Professors’ verbiage as Holy Writ. You deny what everybody else can see. This was true when the church condemned Galileo: Galileo’s observation was right; the theory was silly.

Which is why scientists are under your new Inquisition today. Like you, they want to ignore obvious reality and explain how reality does not fit into theory.

It is true now with PC, and in both cases the verbiage sounds learned. But it is time WE grew out of this nonsense and left you in your Church of Mommy Professor.

You say we ignore your old crap, but you never address THIS:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net

p

Thank you (Simmons) for the consideration, as Shari has noted. No apologies needed. People don’t know what a masculine mindset IS! Let’s hear some Mantra thinking on THAT!
Feminine is the inferior, looking up to the superior… as in privates looking up to sergeants. It’s not competence necessarily, it’s rank order. It doesn’t matter if feminine agrees or not. It just is. It is satisfying to watch when men understand how to “prove that.” Bob understood even in the brick plant as a youngster.
– SysOps

Thanks, SysOps. It is true that women especially like a man to perform his role. It is easy to forget that throughout history women were busy producing the number of children it took to keep the population stable and undergoing birth pains that would make the average Greatest Generation braggart run like a rabbit.

The casualty rate in childbirth, taken for granted, was a lot higher than a WWII battle.

So women do appreciate it MORE when a man takes up his job.

But it is critical for men to remember that not only women need compliments, which a Real Man is supposed to deny. You talk about my brick plant years. The uneducated white men deeply appreciated my taking over the leadership role.

All those poor white men followed OUR aristocracy into battle in the Civil War precisely because they were used to LEADERSHIP.

I despise Tough Guys. A Tough Guy with no sense of humor is almost invariably one who has not really been through a lot. I remember the “Greatest Generation” when it came back from the war, and it was nothing like the old spoiled clowns they are today. They talked very little about their experiences and they didn’t say they fought the war for race mixing, etc.

Now they were all John Wayne in battle and Martin Luther King in politics. They have been spoiled rotten.

In reaction by the sixties there was a lot of talk about a man “showing his emotions,” In the sixties it was long hair and flowers. In the eighties many a woman in recovery talked about how sick she was of having men blubbering at them and expecting sex for it.

If you have really been through hell, you know how to ask for emotional support. You have a sense of humor. Or you end up on the Funny Farm. But, as in all things dealing with real life, you have to tell for yourself who is being a Flower Child or blubbering in your lap for fashion or something else and who is asking for help.

In other words, men try to read the magazines and learn the fashions and emote accordingly, just the way women do. They do it differently, but it is still up to the opposite sex, EITHER opposite sex, to figure them out.

Liberals are loyal to mommy professor and to what mommy professors say. They know how to behave like an attack dog, striking at targets their masters don’t like. Mommy professor is their master, progressivism their ideal, their hero. That are the attack dogs trained to attack their kin, their own mother at their masters behest. They prove their loyalty to mommy professor, by acts of treason against their race and country.

Anti’s always make a big deal about their disloyalty. They always make a point to mention that they are WHITE with a coloured partner, or mixed race kids. They are always the ones who make a point to mention how they would accept a black over a white, based upon certain credentials. They are the ones who applaud whites becoming a minority. These are acts to prove their faith, and devotion to mommy professor.

This treason, to them, is a virtue.

I will have more to say about this, but let me give you an example.

Sometimes, when I talk about the white race, a white respectable conservative will refer to “YOUR race,” to show he has no loyalty at all to MY race.

I often reply, “You know, I’m as loyal to YOUR country as it is to MY race.”

From that, good seminar members will probably be able to say a lot of what I was going to say about Free Rider Loyalty.

Let’s have some Mantra Thinking, gang!