The only thing that props up the Left is the Right, the respectables have put everything into this charade. There is nothing to the Left it is as faulty as the USSR 1990. It is the mere observance of the religion of PC and its feminine notions of civility that props up the charade. If you cannot make it past the mods on a board try Dave’s tactic that he outlined several weeks ago and perhaps he needs to post again, polite as heck, deadly as sin.

Every sentence here needs to be chewed on by commenters. It is about the best exercise in pure Mantra Thought I have seen.

Peter Hitchens is a big time respectable conservative here in the UK. And the Daily Mail is one of our biggest national papers. –LN

Peter Hitchens is the brother of Christopher Hitchens, an open Marxist. Today we would find Chrsitopher Hitchens a LOT easier to talk to. But Chris is an interesting phenomenon who fits into this ongoing discussion of REAL racial and sexual attitudes.

Julie Andrews was brought over the pond to be the first white woman to kiss a black on TV. Pierce Brosnan was chosen to make the breakthrough in making love to his black heroine. This is a clear pattern no one has noticed but me — sigh!

This is NOT a brag. This is a cry for sanity, for Mantra Thinking. It used to be called seeing the forest instead of tripping over the undergrowth.

Christopher Hitchens is another example of this pattern. The reason the media misses the Sixties Generation so much is that back then it was common for “American” — largely Jewish — spokesmen to be OPENLY outright Marxists. By 1980 if an American whop did that he would not be taken seriously. So they did what they did with Julie Andrews and Brosnan, they imported an Englishman to do it — Christopher Hitchens.

He became a multimillionaire selling documentaries to PBS.

But Chris also became a thorn in the establishment’s side. He told the truth about Clinton from deep in the left. Unlike his brother, he is free to say what he wants to. The American left now hates him.

Pete has to toe the line at lynching pro-whites as only a respectable conservative must. Nothing has changed in the old attitudes, liberals are right about that. Non-whites are looked upon as inferiors — not least by themselves, as are women. “We are all the same as me” translates to, “We are inferior to white males, but not MUCH, because really we are just like them.”

In order for white man or white woman to make the breakthrough in genociding whites, the man or woman must be WHITE. But if they are English, they are still foreign. As we should all realize, Americans regard foreigners as inferior. Europe worries itself to death about what we think of them, but we don’t really worry about what they think of us, just as blacks live or die by your opinion of them, but quoting screaming hatred for whites by blacks makes no impression at all.

So Chris came in and took the line no American could take without getting laughed at, and the sex battier was “broken” by an English man and an English woman. Actually the psychological barrier is still there. But the English used to do it made respectable conservatives able to shout Hosannah and once again wail pathetically, that they are NOT RACISTS,

There is more to this, but I leave it to you.

Women’s libbers are so worried that women MIGHT be inferior to men, they do everything within their power to try and prove equality. The left fears that ‘minority’ groups may be inferior. That is their fear, not ours.

– Prometheus

This is good Mantra thinking: stepping back from the immediate squabble and taking a look at the whole picture. In other words, seeing what is BASICALLY wrong with sick thinking, what they are REALLY saying, what their world view is.

C.S. Lewis’s Screwtape, Senior Tempter in Hell, put it perfectly:

“The first advantage of “equality” is that it is based on a good, sound, resounding LIE. The pretty woman woman never claims that she is “equal” in looks to a plain woman. The intelligent man does not claim “equality” of intellect with a stupid one.”

When you STEP BACK AND LOOK AT IT, womens’ libbers do not claim that women, all things considered, are equal to men and minorities do not claim that, on balance, they are equal to whites.

Minority leaders claim that their people ARE whites. Women’s libbers claim that women ARE men. Their mutual cry is:

“We are all the SAME.”

The subtext, which no one seems to step back and look at, is that ANY difference from men makes a woman inferior, any difference from white is inferiority. That is as white racist and male chauvinistic as you can GET.

“No member of the “Greatest Generation” walking through the Rhineland in the dead of moonless winter night ever had a row to hoe that even remotely approaches the call upon courage, personal will, and fortitude faced by these kids. They seem to exist only for the purpose of being kicked.”

in reply to a point Bob made:

you wrote:

AFKAN, physical confrontation is not what it used to be.

in reply:
I know this, all too well.

My concerns belong in a framework of needing to recover Masculinity.

I believe our sons are being gelded, while our daughters are being masculinized, and this subtle process is wreaking havoc among the rituals that comprise the foundation of normal relationships between the sexes, particularly during adolescence.

That is the context in which my comments concerning my nephews needs to be placed.

What makes Dave’s analysis of HOW to deal with the slow-moving street-level predator effective is the ability to project the SECOND part of his response – the certainty of physical retribution – as an absolute certainty.

The predators – at all levels of society – are always looking for prey, and always seek to neutralize, immobilize, capture and dominate their prey.

The power of Wordism to do just this continue to amaze me.

Thus, they NEED something that can give them access to the power of Will needed to move forward, in directions THEY choose, regardless of how rational and soothing the predator’s Wordist attack seems to be.

THAT is what I am working on.

How much of my life was wasted trying to be rational with the irrational…

My nephews, my Posterity, the part of my Family, my Race, and my Nation, I can help develop, should not accept the artificial limits, the de facto gelding, that was imposed on me, and all of my situation.

And they damn well WON’T!

Dave talks about streets smarts and AFKAN talks about confrontation. I will not repeat READ THE COMMENTS, but it is interesting to me how our thoughts all come more and more into OBVIOUS interrelation.

When I was in drug treatment, one fellow had the others, they were mostly teenagers, scared to death. He was an ex-con on parole. One day he went over the line and I looked him in the eye and said, “Don’t mess with us old farts. You don’t know where we’ve been.”

This did not have the dramatic effect of terrifying him. He just looked at me and decided I made sense. Every person who lives a life of confrontation makes a calculation. If he goes after everybody he’s dead before he reaches age twenty. I was just somebody he knew not to push.

Now let me make a really wild leap. In my graduate school, two of my professors LATER got Nobel Prizes in an area called Cost-Benefit Analysis. Both of those professors were kicked out of the University of Virginia because cost-benefit analysis was considered too esoteric and came to the wrong conclusions.

But every psychopath like the one I dealt with there and the white trash I dealt with in my youth practiced cost-benefit analysis all the time.

I have been around an awfully lot, so I can be very friendly to people I meet on the street, the kind of people I am used to dealing with in drug rehab, and then look them in the eye when they ask for something and say “No.”

Others should follow Dave’s advice EXACTLY.

But it really sounds wild to say that the person I am confronting is practicing cost-benefit analysis. He looks at me and decides it isn’t worth it.

So Dave talks about street smarts and AFKAN keeps going into confrontation. I talk about Nobel Prize level discussion and facing a psychopath.

All I ask is that you understand the UNITY of THOUGHT here.

The reason I keep putting Dave up here is because Dave WRITES for the Blog. He is doing exactly what every senior staffer on Capitol Hill does:

Dave studies my direction and the length of what I say and, above all, the LOGIC of what I say and writes accordingly. This is what every writer has to learn to get published: He reads the publication, thinks in those terms, and WRITES in those terms. This is a critical lesson in all areas of writing.

So Dave says,

“This stuff so basic and so important.

It’s street smarts. It like when you are accosted by a hustler on the street, the only way to stop a play dead in its tracks is immediately address the motive.

I don’t care what the hustler’s gambit is: I turn to an aggressive stance, put up my hand and forcefully reply, “Stop! I didn’t give you permission to talk to me.”

This addresses the hustler’s motive up front. Then, if the hustler continues (Wordist camouflage) I respond with the threat, “Make your play, I’m ready!”

This escalates the hustler’s play to physical confrontation right away.

It works wonderfully because it ruins the hustler’s main tool, which is his subconsciously received intimidation. Instead, his intimidation is surfaced without delay and forcefully confronted. This lets the hustler know that he has chosen the wrong target.

I wish I had a nickel for every time I have watched someone get hustled because they fear confrontation.

This has been the plight of white people for far too long.

The real question is, when do we finally and definitively wake up to the fact that we have been hustled? That’s when we will get serious about recovering our sovereignty.

When it happens, it will be no secret.”

It is the intention we are focusing on, not the events. Others say that there is no way that EVERY white person will disappear, therefore we are wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. The mantra’s power I think comes from the fact it attacks the intention, the motive behind liberals and anti-racists rather than just raw data.

No liberal would argue that the Nazi’s are innocent, because their plan of genocide didn’t include every living Jew. No, they were damned because they tried and the degree of success they had is irrelevant. You cant even discuss numbers without getting past what they wanted.

Same with liberals. We KNOW what they want, their actions and words give them away with frightening regularity. It is the very existance of this agenda against whites which is the issue. The implementation of their program is a matter of details and the fact there might be similarities elsewhere in the world, again, is trivial.

Any one who thinks that ALL and ONLY white nations should become multiracial melting pots is anti-white and sick in the head.

When engaging in debate, I always ask myself, “is this person saying what they are saying, as a means of justifying something that threatens my race?”

Shari was worried that Chinese workers heading for Africa contradicted the Mantra. Someone else wrote that they were finding “contradictions” to the Mantra. As I told Shari, she gave up before READING the Mantra again. Some Chinese workers do not mean that anyone is DEMANDING that Africa take in Chinese. This has absolutely nothing to do with genocide, unless EVERY Black Country ON EARTH faces a DEAMAND for it.

Yet I had to point this out to Shari. I had to point out to the “exceptions” person that no one else had run into these “exceptions” and he himself did not give a single instance of one.

Shari and the commenter are on OUR side. So why do they find themselves shaken so easily? Because no matter how much we reassure each other, it is not easy to believe how fundamentally right we are and how absolutely and sickly wrong the other side is. Except for Jews, it is the definition of insanity to think you are right and the rest of the world is wrong.

It would be the definition of insanity to believe that we are SO right and the rest of the world so SICKLY, wrong. I repeat, no mater how confident you may sound to others you always have a doubt because you are sane.

I left sanity behind decades ago. It took me many, many years. As I said in my last book, I laughed when I heard the Preamble to the Soviet Constitution of 1936. I was eighteen years old, but to say “The Soviet Union is a nation of workers, peasants, soldiers and INTELLECTUALS” was such an obvious fraud that I laughed at it out loud in class. They did indeed think I was insane, students and professor.

As I said, if a group of ten-year-olds were being organized and one said, “I’ll organize us. Tom, you be the worker in the factory. Jim, you be the peasant and get out there and slog all day in the fields. Billy, you go our and get your leg shot off in the army.”

So the other kids asked this kid what he will be, He answers, as Lenin or Trotsky or Stalin did, “I’ll be the Intellectual. I’ll sit and tell you guys what to do.” No ten-year old would take crap like that seriously, but there I sat in a classroom full of college students and a professor who thought anybody who did NOT take it seriously was CRAZY!

I listened to professors saying that all Norsemen ever did with runes was a few writings on rock. I looked around to see if no one found anything odd about this. Not one person did, except for me.

Those writings on rock were not only all PERFECT, but highly complex and wound round and round. But, according to what the prof said and everybody accepted, it was the only effort the writer made. Perfection from the word go. Not used anywhere else.

It took me YEARS to REALIZE, not just KNOW but REALIZE, how mindless the people around me were. It took THOUSANDS of confrontations. I told you about how, by the time I was in grad school at UVA, it was an annual ritual for me to stand there and cut each new student or professor down on race in a matter of minutes.

Yes, the sheer desperation of the establishment to stop any discussion at all is a dead giveaway, but it is STILL hard for Shari or even me sometimes to face the fact that there IS no exception. There WILL NOT BE an exception. But you have to discipline yourself. You have to stop being nervous and realize EXACTLY what you are saying, not how you may be wrong.

AND THAT IS WHY YOU SHOULDN’T SCREW WITH THE MANTRA. If you get sloppy and start talking about numbers of immigrants or some other detail or off-trail, you will open yourself up for that doubt that is festering in you.

We face GENOCIDE and SICK MINDS. If someone starts to talk about colonization or some other reason for the present policy, all you have to say is, “You are JUSTIFYING genocide.” That is the point. You are so nervous about our message that you bobble the ball and answer this argument rather than condemning it and saying that it means the other guy is in favor of genocide, since he is giving reasons for it.

But the whole point of SEMINAR is that you won’t NEED me to do this thinking for you.

By now, if someone gives you pause, you can deal with it. For now, you can come to me to bail you out. But I will not be here forever, gang.

The reason you don’t hear much about the mantra from me, is because what I do is puny and poor, but I am constantly thinking of it and send it whenever I see an obvious opportunity. The response I get is usually none and sometimes stupid. For instance, our accountant, { who is very overpaid to keep us from sinking under the IRS} says, “my response is very different, I don’t care about race, but our own teenagers don’t know the constitution as well as immigrants do.”

I agree with Pain, that white genocide is the GREAT SIN of our age. What I think is the sin of whites as a race, is not counting our inheritance as the precious thing it is, instead selling our birthright for a mess of gruel. It’s NOT oppressing the world.

I also have a question. Sailor at v-dare has a piece on Chinese farmers moving to Africa. Now I don’t imagine they would have any intention of miscegenation with Africans, but what would this do to the pilium?

And thank you for the pat on the back!

– Shari

1) READ the Mantra. Nobody is demanding that Chinese workers be accepted in Africa;

2) Ask your accountant why he expects kids to have a natural feeling for their country but none for their race.

I’ve come to see whites as striving for excellence. Asians instead seek perfection. It’s a subtle but important difference. Whites invent the World of Warcraft game, China has to make laws to ban Asians from playing it too much.

I wonder if whites in the past were as unfocused as they are now under the receding power of political correctness.

– danebor

Inventiveness is human. Perfection is with the animal kingdom.

As Carleton Putnam said to those who talk about black excellence in sports and entertainment: “The lark sings beautifully, apes lift more than any human can, and every year a HORSE wins the Kentucky Derby.”

This is obvious in the case of Africans, but we do not apply it to Orientals as you have done. I have graded thousands of test papers, and students who make it to the Ivy League with their straight A’s are good at answering each point just as it is supposed to be answered. They do not THINK about it.

That is why vanishingly few new ideas ever come OUT of Harvard or Yale.

But having set that example of what we call excellence, we are in awe of Orientals, who can learn what is already there with a discipline no Harvard WASP or even Jew can match. Jews have been bred to recite back the Torah and so forth, but even they are helpless against the Orientals.

Reciting what is already there is as animal a talent as throwing a basketball into a hoop.

Good THINKING, danebor!

Shari says: Unfocused is the right thing when it comes to sticking your head in every hole in the universe, but, when it comes to saving the white race, we need focus and we need leaders, a lot of them, who are convinced that the only thing that can destroy us is an ACCEPTANCE of miscegenation. Most whites are not doing that in real life, not like TV, but the schools and the churches are sweetly and not so sweetly encouraging that.

I don’t understand how proposed policies get implemented either, but it’s not that I’m uninterested. Right now, I would like to see a LOT more coming in here, instead of not hearing from some who used to be here. I definitely need to hear some mantra stories. I don’t have a large platform. I sent to seven yesterday, but it feels like trying to plant a million carrot seeds, one at a time

When my brother-in-law e-mailed news, last week, of 1000 Somalis imported to his town, on top of the Mexicans who have overrun it, I threw the pilum to the whole family, but I felt I couldn’t say more because their lives are in such a hole.

“We need leaders. a lot of them, who are convinced that the only thing that can destroy us is an ACCEPTANCE of miscegenation.”

Lord, that is SO perfectly put. The ACCEPTANCE of miscegenation is the KEY!

The ACCEPTANCE of miscegenation is the bottom of EVERYTHING our enemies do. The ACCEPTANCE of miscegenation is what EVERY person has to put forward to be “respectable.” Buchanan has never had the guts to condemn it. When Dershowitz demanded more whites and blacks kissing on television, Buchanan said not a WORD.

That is a GREAT statement! Now for something completely different:

“I definitely need to hear some mantra stories.”

YES!!! THANK YOU!!!

Shari, I didn’t know YOU were working so hard at the mantra. You see, YOU had few or no mantra experience stories.

See, Simmons, I don’t just “criticize” you. Nor do I consider this criticism. This is what I am here for. I have expressed my gratitude repeatedly and I say things I think need saying.

The fact is that I don’t quote anybody up here in front unless they are WORTH it. The critical thing here is that Shari brought up the NEED for mantra stories.

A major reason so many of us come off so depressed is because, after a certain amount of time in action, we have to defend OURSELVES against disappointment. The whole point of the enemy strategy is to make us feel isolated and hopeless, so when people don’t come through, which is the nature of the human animal not just inside THIS movement, we are in more danger than others of being discouraged.

In my case, unless you TELL me REGULARLY you are in action, I have from lifetime of experience come to expect that you are not doing anything. This may not be fair to YOU, but it is necessary to preserve MY sanity. I am absolutely certain that I am not alone in this. You can’t keep on fighting if you leave yourself too open to disappointment, so you expect very, very little.

You notice how repeatedly grateful I am when somebody comes through? I don’t EXPECT it. It’s like General Washington when he said that every morning witnessed a miracle: No matter how horribly they were treated by their country, his men appeared every day at muster. I know what a fanatic I am. I would and HAVE appeared all alone at muster.

But I am still amazed that others do.

We NEED stories of ACTION. One mantra posting is worth more than a hundred lives given in battle. In fact a few lives given in battle mean NOTHING in terms of history. I am not above BEGGING for action on your part.

Way to go, Shari. Way to go, Simmons.

How being “unfocused” relates to being white:

An actor faces three levels of development in skill. In the first, he need not concern himself with dialog. His role is to act as a prop to support a narrative. He is instructed accordingly, and need only to faithfully follow his instruction. He need not concern himself with any oral utterances, as his acting involves only motions of the body.

In the second level, he must recite a piece of dialog. But it is structured dialog in that he is not reciting dialog intending to mimic real conversation. Rather, it is the dialog of a structured transaction, inserted only as a prop to support a larger narrative. He needs only to utter it according to a precise instruction. Therefore, his first level acting is enhanced solely by the requirement that he multitask, nothing more.

But the third level of acting is an order of difficulty quite above levels 1 and 2. This is because the actor must engage in conversations that mimic the fluid extemporaneous world. This involves calling upon emotions that are unruly in their ebb and flow, and mastery over unpredictable cadences and rhythms. To mimic real life, the actor must pretend that there is an absence of a governor on reality, a reality where stimuli and responses irrepressibly usher forth in unforeseeable chains of reactive surprises. Accordingly the actor must fool the audience into believing he does not have foreknowledge of these surprises (i.e. that tomorrow he will be clobbered).

To live real life in level 3 is hard because you have to confront the fact that reality is ungovernable. You have to count on being surprised. AND IT IS SO MUCH EASIER TO BE “PROPERLY FOCUSED” IN LEVEL’S 1 AND 2. It just takes a lot less skill.

But level 3 is precisely where white people thrive. Nonwhite people are never comfortable there because they simply cannot deal with the intellectual and emotional challenge of having to extemporaneously deal with the unknown and unknowable. Their worldview never admits to the ungovernable larger truth. To contrary, their worldview is an attempt to a priori harness the ungovernable larger truth.

This is why all the Islamists are so completely convinced they have a handle on things. It is why Asians are so completely obsessed with “face”. And no black person is even able to peer into level 3. They are just incapable of comprehending its existence in a non-magical way.

None of the nonwhite races can understand why white people insist on sticking their head into every hole in the universe without preconception. It just doesn’t make sense to them.

And if there is any race that is “unfocused”, it is the white race.