Shari: I have noticed that any movie that shows men as men, and women as women, are very popular. Those stupid prizes don’t mean anything.

Mantra Thinking:

That is one reason why competition and technological advance is so good for us. When network TV ruled the networks could afford to devote enormous amounts of time to pure propaganda, CBS was at the top with all ten top shows. But at New York cocktail parties, they were ridiculed as “The Country Network.” So they CANCELLED their top shows like “The Beverly Hillbillies” and “Green Acres.” It cost them a fortune, but they could afford it.

When the market was at an all-time high, Ted Turner gave the UN bureaucracy a billion dollars.

I was happy to hear a line on “Married With Children:” “as dead as network TV.”

I never openly advocate breaking the law, but I have the same attitude many Americans had during Prohibition: I am all for the bootleggers. Hollywood is our ENEMY. Anyone who bootlegs their copyrights has my complete approval.

Mantra Thinking:

This is war. Step back and figure out who your enemy is. Anything that hurts him or threatens to hurt him is good. The enemy does not react to your reason, but he does react to shots fired.

But don’t mistake those last two words. I do not mean the kind of shooting that makes you look Manly and Heroic. I shot at the enemy’s minions, but not because THAT was my purpose. The shots I fired that mattered were at the enemy’s politics, in a coat and tie, not fatigues.

Hit where it HURTS, not where it makes you look good. No leftist network cares how many Commie guerrillas you kill. The supply is unlimited.

p

For those of you who might think I’m acting the role of a “tough guy,” trying to blame women — that is wrong. It’s the emotive, childish instant-gratification-culture I take issue with. I watched one of the worst movies ever last night, “Superbad.” As best I can describe it as a Jewish coming-of-age movie, no laughs whatsoever. That the jewish critics fawned over this is evidence enough that Israel is finished (two countries, one system). It was literally 116 minutes of loathsome behavior of the worst kind, with two minutes of semi-responsible actions — barely. All I can say is that in a world of children, the Men will be kings.

— Simmons

Simmons reminds me of the wild orgy of prize-giving and praise for the Jewish Western “The Unforgiven,” made by blond goy Eastwood. Every white person in it was a craven coward and a nincompoop. Everybody was a coward and a bully except Eastwood’s black chosen companion, the martyr.

New York Jews keep trying to prove that the Alamo was a myth, that NO goy would die at his post like that. All of their movies depict a panicked, shrieking set of passengers while the guys in airline costumes are calm and steady. Flight 93, the real thing, showed, for the thousandth time, that Americans react well to emergencies.

In the case of old Americans, the ones who panicked died before reproducing.

In fact, real Americans in real situations behave like the Westerners they believe in, despite Jewish Weserns. You know, the ones who won a continent for the Jews to come to?

All we hear about earlier Americans now, besides insults, is that when the ancestors of today’s New York Jews poured into the land made safe for them by Aryans, they were uncomfortable in the ships.

Those Jews instantly began to scream about how everybody was out to get them and how horrible these goyim had been to take the land from the Indians, their fellow oppressees.

I wonder why everybody despises Jews?

p

Stormfront exchange:

Kahalachan: I am talking about succinct biological differences, not subjective personal methods of differentiation.

I find it odd that the Irish were once treated as a different race by the English for the same reasons and with the same justifications as WNs treat different races.

This is due to being able to distinguish the subtle differences between Irish and English that have been learned as a result of exposure.

You could trace one’s ancestry to Irish, but does that mean Irish and English are deserving of seperate classifications?

I ask the same to you WNs, what biological basis do you have to classify and distinguish races and what reason are the specific geological origins and time frames chosen?

You are a religious fanatic, of the established religion of Political Correctness. A thing must fit into your theory before it can be real.

You begin with the theory, not the observation. We see what happens, and then find out why it happens. We do not say something has to have a theoretical justification before we admit it is real.

The fact is that brown countries are uniformly poor. The fact is that everybody knows what race is — or you would not be bitching about discrimination. But none of this is approved by Mommy Professor, or in his role as a priest of our established religion, “Father Professor.” This is the WORLD to you, but it means nothing to us.

You are a religious anti-white. So you call on Mommy Professors’ verbiage as Holy Writ. You deny what everybody else can see. This was true when the church condemned Galileo: Galileo’s observation was right; the theory was silly.

Which is why scientists are under your new Inquisition today. Like you, they want to ignore obvious reality and explain how reality does not fit into theory.

It is true now with PC, and in both cases the verbiage sounds learned. But it is time WE grew out of this nonsense and left you in your Church of Mommy Professor.

You say we ignore your old crap, but you never address THIS:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org
http://www.nationalsalvation.net

p

Thank you (Simmons) for the consideration, as Shari has noted. No apologies needed. People don’t know what a masculine mindset IS! Let’s hear some Mantra thinking on THAT!
Feminine is the inferior, looking up to the superior… as in privates looking up to sergeants. It’s not competence necessarily, it’s rank order. It doesn’t matter if feminine agrees or not. It just is. It is satisfying to watch when men understand how to “prove that.” Bob understood even in the brick plant as a youngster.
— SysOps

Thanks, SysOps. It is true that women especially like a man to perform his role. It is easy to forget that throughout history women were busy producing the number of children it took to keep the population stable and undergoing birth pains that would make the average Greatest Generation braggart run like a rabbit.

The casualty rate in childbirth, taken for granted, was a lot higher than a WWII battle.

So women do appreciate it MORE when a man takes up his job.

But it is critical for men to remember that not only women need compliments, which a Real Man is supposed to deny. You talk about my brick plant years. The uneducated white men deeply appreciated my taking over the leadership role.

All those poor white men followed OUR aristocracy into battle in the Civil War precisely because they were used to LEADERSHIP.

I despise Tough Guys. A Tough Guy with no sense of humor is almost invariably one who has not really been through a lot. I remember the “Greatest Generation” when it came back from the war, and it was nothing like the old spoiled clowns they are today. They talked very little about their experiences and they didn’t say they fought the war for race mixing, etc.

Now they were all John Wayne in battle and Martin Luther King in politics. They have been spoiled rotten.

In reaction by the sixties there was a lot of talk about a man “showing his emotions,” In the sixties it was long hair and flowers. In the eighties many a woman in recovery talked about how sick she was of having men blubbering at them and expecting sex for it.

If you have really been through hell, you know how to ask for emotional support. You have a sense of humor. Or you end up on the Funny Farm. But, as in all things dealing with real life, you have to tell for yourself who is being a Flower Child or blubbering in your lap for fashion or something else and who is asking for help.

In other words, men try to read the magazines and learn the fashions and emote accordingly, just the way women do. They do it differently, but it is still up to the opposite sex, EITHER opposite sex, to figure them out.

Liberals are loyal to mommy professor and to what mommy professors say. They know how to behave like an attack dog, striking at targets their masters don’t like. Mommy professor is their master, progressivism their ideal, their hero. That are the attack dogs trained to attack their kin, their own mother at their masters behest. They prove their loyalty to mommy professor, by acts of treason against their race and country.

Anti’s always make a big deal about their disloyalty. They always make a point to mention that they are WHITE with a coloured partner, or mixed race kids. They are always the ones who make a point to mention how they would accept a black over a white, based upon certain credentials. They are the ones who applaud whites becoming a minority. These are acts to prove their faith, and devotion to mommy professor.

This treason, to them, is a virtue.

I will have more to say about this, but let me give you an example.

Sometimes, when I talk about the white race, a white respectable conservative will refer to “YOUR race,” to show he has no loyalty at all to MY race.

I often reply, “You know, I’m as loyal to YOUR country as it is to MY race.”

From that, good seminar members will probably be able to say a lot of what I was going to say about Free Rider Loyalty.

Let’s have some Mantra Thinking, gang!