Each socierty has its own calendar. As the West ascended, the Christian calendar was used more and more. There was “Anno Domini,” which included the implicit assumperion that Jesus is God.
But there was also a date that Islam uses, a date Chinese New Year is based on, and so forth.
So AD and BC made it clear that, if you were a Moslem or an atheist, you were using this dating for convenience. There was no COMMITMENT to it.
In its desperation to get rid of the name of Christ, Political Correctness destroyed this obvious accomodation. It is now The Common Era, BCE and CE, the dating EVERYBODY must use. This is supposed to make the Moslems and the Chinse, etc., feel better.
Actually it makes them feel no way at all. Nobody but people who get paid for it take PC seriously in such nitpicking situations. But this declaration that AD and BC are the absolute standard for all is a curious way to make others feels empowered.
It is like the total assumptionof white supremacy that everybody takes for granted when they blame white people for everything.
#1 by Pain on 01/29/2008 - 2:41 pm
This is a formula. This is why we read Bob. This is everything boiled down inside a nutshell.
This is the fruit of the “sweat” and “hard work” Bob talks about. Even so, I am not always sure Bob knows how good this is.
Bob is best when Bob isn’t all about Bob; Bob is best when Bob is about the future of white folks.
We are each of us biggest when we are committed to something greater than ourselves. That means that racial love is a parable we enact that leads us to a clearer understanding of the Creator. Race is bigger than any one of us, and so is the One who made our white race — the least corrupted on earth.
Bob’s formulae are exemplars of just such purity in thought, the detritus filtered away.
#2 by shari on 01/29/2008 - 3:51 pm
It’s pretty obvious there is a connection between getting rid of whites and getting rid of CHRIST. I think that we have a calling, and had better not neglect it. It’s not world wide oppression. P.C. is phony humility.
#3 by danerebor on 01/29/2008 - 4:59 pm
Things like this remind me that our fight should be against Political Correctness and ONLY against Political Correctness. Once whites are allowed to do what non-whites are allowed to do, then game over, we win. Our own lands, our own organizations, our own governments. The anti-whites know this.
In fact, the whole idea of Political Correctness is based on preventing white ascedancy, like Bob points out, which the anti-whites feel is inevitable unless marxist intervention occurs. “White priviledge” is really the white gene code, though the PC crowd will never admit to such heresy.
No one I know likes Political Correctness. Instead, they FEAR the consequences of not being Politically Correct. They fear being ostracized, but they fear losing their jobs even more. When they lose their job in this upcoming deep recession, what will they have to fear? What will they have to LOSE?
We have a Weimar opportunity staring us in the face.
#4 by Prometheus on 01/29/2008 - 8:16 pm
They were so desperate to remove the reference to Christ, that they didn’t think of much else.
#5 by richard on 01/30/2008 - 8:33 am
Many ‘carers’ are actually more dependent on the people they care for than vice versa. It’s quite common for a wife to look after her ill husband and feel a sense of power and authority that they’ve never felt before. Then the husband gets better and they get divorced, because she can’t cope with the loss of her position.
In the same way, white liberals have been the ‘carers’ of minorities for a long time, and now the patient is gaining strength and the carer isn’t needed any more.
The drive for power with moral superiority is very strong in many whites. Where will their children find a sense of superiority now? Where will they get that warm fuzzy feeling inside?
There will be only one persecuted minority for them to help in the future. Their own.
#6 by Simmons on 01/30/2008 - 10:33 am
Well our side bitches and does a great job at being ineffective. But I’ll relate two stories written by libs that shows they are doing more to protect themselves and advance whites than Stormfront. It deals with Montana college football and the efforts of degenerates to import crazed Africans into the bastions of hippie dropout land. The one you will be able to access today is in TAC, the other is in a month’s old Sports Illustrated. The TAC is written by hippy psychobabbler who has gotten a taste of Africa and is not happy, the other more interesting one is written by an attractive twenty something who explicity states that Montana college football is to be for the white kids who staff the ranches and farms of that state to the exclusion of Africans. Both are libs, but both broke taboo and asked questions that Stormfronters would only shriek about like the Apes in 2001. PC is a shell concocted by child like fools, its Santa Clause for the squalor and stagnation set.
#7 by shari on 01/30/2008 - 12:17 pm
Simmons, If the twenty something who wrote in Sports Illustrated is who I think it is, she got called a racist and did a 180. She even loves to shop at wal-mart as there is more diversity there. lol! It was funny.
#8 by Bob on 01/30/2008 - 12:37 pm
Shari, heretics often recanted when they faced the fire. But within decades of the time that the printing press got into use, the heresy of Wycliffe and Huss and legions before could not be suppressed when Luther PUBLISHED it.
The points are 1) the heresy is there, 2) ever newer mass communications like the one we are using here are exploding out.
#9 by Simmons on 01/30/2008 - 1:08 pm
Well Shari I spoke too soon, but her piece was explicit and correct. Still this behooves yet another question, is “racist” a demand that whites be submissive?
#10 by shari on 01/30/2008 - 2:38 pm
I know who that gal is. She is not a real taboo breaker. She did so inadvertently, like breaking through the ice, and hollering ITS COLD. But, who cares where the truth is told? Yes, “racist” is a demand that whites be submissive.