Shari gave us this some time ago in General Comments:
It looks like Obama running for president is revealing what Bob said about the liberals’ faithful colored companions. I’m wondering if this will result in the consolidated government breaking up? If whites, at that point, might say something like what was in that stele on the Nile. “No Nubian shall pass this point except to obtain supplies and return.” I know you don’t think that whites have to be a majority, but it seems that some definite lines have to be drawn, and blacks, unlike Mexicans don’t really have else where to go. Just thinking too far ahead.
“I’m wondering if this will result in the consolidated government breaking up?”
I don’t think that the FORM of consolidated government will break up. The absolute monopoly of the major media in the 1960s has not broken up. Those networks are still there, and their monopoly of broadcast television is largely intact. It has not been destroyed, it has been superceded.
The British Monarchy is still there, but the threat of absolutism that led to their Civil War and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 is, to say the least, no longer front page news.
I get my jollies in funny ways. I get a kick out of it when old Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite types sit around and grouse to each other about the “death of REAL journalism.” On THEIR side, that is EXACTLY the same thing as Stormfronters moaning, “All is Lost!”
The Internet and cable and the whole storm of technology have KILLED “real journalism” when network rulers controlled all media information from New York City. I seem to be the only person alive who celebrates OUR victories.
But unless you read BUGS, all you see is SFers meaning all is lost and you miss the fun of watching THEM saying the same thing.
No, the consolidated government is not likely to disappear. It is going the way of the British Monarchy and network television. It ceases to MATTER.
What we say here interrelates.
What we say here interrelates.
What we say here interrelates.
So Shari brought in the second cataract inscription. Obviously that inscription did not refer to the Nubian slaves up in Egypt.
Where there are Nubians, there are Nubian slaves.
Including today.
We bought them from Nubians. We BUY them from Nubians. More than one political candidate has been humiliated by the slaves he has had.
What we say here interrelates.
The piece I wrote just before SysOps and BoardAd had to save us again, “History IS Bunk” is completely different from what you normally find people writing. It is not just the usual screed about how historians distort things. It is a PRACTICAL look at the future of history.
My question in that piece is, “What will we replace today’s history WITH?” Above, I talked about how consolidated government and network television aren’t going to vanish on some Great Future Day of the Great Torchlight Parade.
What we say here interrelates. The Great Rulers To Whom All is Lost like Rather’s successors are slipping and sliding in a morass of change they can’t understand or deal with, just like us mere mortals. Historians face a PRACTICAL problem. If they were REAL historians they would understand that history has to change almost every day now. But no one is less prepared for that than the “historians” whose world is set in a smooth flow from Ancient Egypt to the Modern History of Modern Humankind.
In a time of Genome projects and carbon dating and documentaries flowing in with the latest discoveries on cable, not filtered through broadcast TV, history is as much a matter of news items as anything else. So what does a modern history class have?
Books. Tens of billions of dollars worth of books rehashing how the whole world came from Pharaohs.
What we say here interrelates.
When I pointed out that the most important thing about this election is that it doesn’t matter, I doubt it meant much to most, even here.
There was a time not long ago when national elections were CRITICAL. A LOT hinged on whether Goldwater or Johnson won in 1964. Today neither side will make anything but adjustments at the edges. Our national policy is FIXED.
Network television reaches more homes today than it did in 1964. But it doesn’t DETERMINE things any more. It is a fixed quantity. Likewise, the government is a fixed quantity. When the Democrats talk endless about CHANGE is a sure sign that no change is going to come from this election.
To look to the future, you have to look at things that will make the difference, not fixed quantities. The Crown in Britain today probably has a greater REAL budget than it did in Henry VIII’s time. In modern society, the average merely sizable corporation would dwarf the Crown’s 1510 budget.
What we say here interrelates.
The future will NOT mirror the past. If you are looking in the same old places you are staring at a brick wall.
#1 by Dave on 02/24/2008 - 1:13 pm
Hardly anyone understands there is no “consolidated government”. There are only “governments” and there countless 10,000’s of them in America. The fiction of “consolidated government” is an artifact of the legitimacy procurement system called “elections”.
There is no state legislature and certainly not Congress capable of exercising real power within our system of thousand’s of governments. For them to do that, the state legislatures and Congress would have to be able to control expenditure and taxation, two items they have no control over except in the fictions of the MSM and the empty rhetoric of politicians.
People need to get it through their heads that we do not live in a “free society”. BW said it and it is true: Multiracial societies cannot be free. Period.
What Obama’s success really means is more of the same: I just amazes me how politicians universally have endless faith, and it is a faith, that their corrupt USE OF INCOME will automatically generate SOURCES OF INCOME within the larger global economy.
They really believe this.
In fact, government is a big generator of SOURCES OF INCOME. It does this when it engages in well-chosen highway and transportation projects, water, sewer, and utility projects, power generation projects, basic research, and the like.
Darkies like Obama are incapable of perceiving this. I have never met a black person in all my life that had the slightest notion of where economic sustenance comes from. Obama is no exception. But it is hard to find any white politician that has the slightest notion of it either.
They can only see, and salivate over what government mostly does, and that is mostly USE INCOME.
Lyndon Baines Johnson was so convinced that government’s USE OF INCOME directly generated SOURCES OF INCOME in the global private economy that it was an unquestioned article of faith with him.
George Hebert Walker Bush is a carbon copy of LBJ.
Obama is just another up and coming pilgrim of this very same faith.
Except that Obama is spinning the “bringing the Wall Street criminals to justice” theme. Can’t be done. No prosecutor’s office in the country has even remotely the resources to comply with the criminal compliant standards of the courts and actually succeed in bringing anything other than a “show trial”. We would have to have martial law to rein the Wall Street criminals in, something the Wall Street criminals are completely aware of.
But after 80 years of Wall Street corruption and this faith that out of control government is actually beneficial, our society is finally being driven to the end of the consumer system. Our consumer society is dying. It will never return. Hardly anyone really notices this. Certainly not Obama.
White people will flourish in post-consumer society, as they are martial creatures at heart, something non-whites are completely blind to. I have never meant a non-white who has any inkling of the white man’s obsession with weapons, leading edge tools, surveillance, and intelligence.
The “consumer society” system has done white people no good at all. It has always been inconsistent with who white people really are.
80 years was about how long the Soviet Union lasted.
#2 by Tim on 02/24/2008 - 5:47 pm
Shari has made an interesting point about the “Tontos and Lone Rangers”. I have had a certifiable Lone Ranger tell me just recently that we are correct. He talked about the South Africa disaster and that modern liberal democracies seemed to be incompatible with non-European groups. He likes Socialism and non-Europeans have yet to run a Socialist country like his beloved Sweden. He talked about when he first went to Sweden and it was perfectly run and all European and how his side thought this could be duplicated with all human beings. He admitted he was wrong…….and Obama has been the equivalent of “tanks rolling down the streets” for commie sympathizers (refer to our resident Bugs samizdat youtube videos with Comrade) and now true information is coming through loud and clear.
So Shari had a point. If the above Lone Ranger has had a breakdown more are on the way. I just let the older liberal talk. My response was—it is ok partner—u now realize what group your with on the bus with and it is about time. I never told him he was forgiven. But it was rare treat to hear a die hard Lone Ranger Liberal SHWM—say “I am Wrong”—you are correct. I was kinda shocked and immediately looked around thinking Baby Jesus was somewhere near.
Someone said (maybe it was me?) that Obama would be GREAT for us. Well in my recent experience —it has been. Nothing like tanks rolling down the street to wake up folks. Now I got to back to the White Nationalists and listen to “all hope is lost” –Obama is the antichrist etc etc etc. LOL. Such is a BUGS life.
Oh and how ya guys like all those Obama’s militant black wife columns! LOL. We could not even write a better script. Of course, this is happening sooner and faster than I thought…….
#3 by shari on 02/25/2008 - 9:31 am
Well, the form might hold for this election, although I’m not even sure about that. Britain might still have a monarchy, but it’s totally useless, like the greatest generation, senile. Hollow forms cannot maintain. Yep, the whole world is groaning in travail right now. Being a woman, I know about that. What you WANT to happen is starting, but you have to get through this little hard part first. That’s how I look at it. I don’t know what they will do with all those books. Begin to get rid of them, I suppose.
#4 by Simmons on 02/25/2008 - 11:30 am
We elected the last American president in 1980, everything after that was an election to reaffirm the entitlement empire, for the welfare loads, the sarges, and Halliburton. No big deal, those railroad tracks were laid down long before I was born, and I hope to have enough sense to leap from the train before it hits the rickety bridge coming up. Ygg helped prepare my mindset for this fiasco with his generalities about personal finance and how to be prepared to be flexible in the era of the Diversity Dollar.
Now a good many potential allies are in deep funk over Obama since their mental boot camp involves having a white male authority figure barking out orders, so we should be thankful that the WMAF is insane. So if this election cycle means anything at least it is going to be fun to watch, and beneficial to our side when it clarifies the race issue.
And put me on record for admiring Obama, while so many of our people are shrieking and shouting about jews this Nubian sails past the obelisk and splits the creepy zionist jews from the liberal jew. You don’t get past dog catcher status if you cannot bow before ZOG, and Obama just did it unless Hillary has pictures of him with white women in bondage.
So put me in the camp that says this election matters to some degree. Bob says its about our usefulness to predict the future so let me try. Obama gets elected this puts the jews on edge that the great American teat is going to go dry, and they go into their looting mode get it while you can thinking. This becomes explicitly noticed by the gentiles left holding the dirty Wall St. laundry while hooky skates off to Israel our indispensable ally. This is gonna be fun.