Archive for April, 2008
This is another of BWs gems in very important basics if you want to understand the trajectory of political semantics for a long time to come.
Millennial promises are a required form of political semantics for nonwhites. It sustains them and it is all they require. If you don’t believe that, look at Cuba for crying out loud.
And we have a future that continues to be mired in racial conflict. That is certain.
And because the semantic domain of political rhetoric must be millennial in character, as it must evoke anthem style emotions, the defining characteristic of white political rhetoric is becoming its very absence.
This is what nobody sees: WE HAVE EVOLVED. Accordingly, whites will not have any political semantics of their own whatsoever.
This is already endlessly puzzling and confounding nonwhites. They are unable to come to terms with it.
In fact, it is a defining characteristic of the current political cycle. And the least interested segment of the population is the white segment, which is logical once you understand why.
Simmons just said it in his comment on “Finishing the sentences of liberals”. Once you quit finishing those sentences, you have won the game. It’s called “being effective”.
That is our future.
And make no mistake it will be a future of heavy conflict. There will be no “perfection” there at all
You might enjoy a good laugh from this website Bob, it’s sketches of utopian futures from the past. Every single one of them is wrong by leaps and bounds.
It goes well with your points on futurologists too.
Whites have the only society that does not aim for Perfection. That is so basic it’s hard to explain.
Oriental philosophy always aims for a final perfect society. They went straight from that to Marxism, which is the same thing. A planned economy is part of a planned society which in turn assumes that all the Intellectuals have to do is to tell us what Perfection is and plan for it.
Like children, Wordists spend all their time bitching about inequalities of income and so forth which make us less than perfect. They tell us THEY have the Solutions to “problems.” But our society is unique precisely because we do not just solve problems our Prophets of Wisdom see. The greatest things we have today came as total surprises. The fact that we were too hot in the summer was not seen as a PROBLEM. No Intellectual saw air conditioning as a solution to a problem.
All the societies that considered hunger a PROBLEM failed to foresee the solution to it in unimaginable advances in food productivity. They saw it in terms of a static, planned population and a static utopian society. Like children, they saw only what was in front of them.
Only whites show any sign of being at home in reality. We expect endless change, and we try to make things BETTER. BETTER, unlike Utopia, has no limits. But it also means no one can PLAN for Perfection. So I go for the best genes in order for white future generations to make things BETTER.
My concept of the future is what WORKS, not some IDEAL. I cannot see any end to what my approach will do. Right now Wordists are destroying everything that is good for their particular Utopias. To me those Utopias are stagnant ant colonies like the much-worshipped Ancient Egypt or the equally defunct USSR.
All I offer is white people with better genes. The glory of it is the opposite of Utopian. I have no idea what the society whites with better genes will produce will look like. If I did, I would be a Wordist offering Utopia.
In other words, I would be childish and should not be trying to Porch Talk.
I do not know what the society whites with better genes would build would will be like. I do know I would like to live in it: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is still the best maxim I can imagine.
Shari says we all want teh future to be both our genotypes AND our descendants. That is true, but we can’t always have what we want. But Shari is taking the steps that ensures she CAN have both. She has children and is fighting for our race.
Shari, the ultimate expression of having our own descendatns is the Chinese concept of ancestor worship. We do not want to degenerate into that. Ten generations from today, your genes will be about one in one thousand of those of your direct descendants. We are here influecning what the other 999 parts will be like.
I seem to detect an idea here that you and I are going to have posterity consisting entirely of US. Only an amoeba can do that. The genotype we fight for has more to do to with racial decisionsgenes than any Family Values. Those who obsess on Family Values are right now marynig their daughters to nice colored boys.
A good many semi-respectables have done yeoman work, even the AR types with their IQ fixations. But the real work is done by those who face the cultists and peel the cult back to its core. People like Putnam and those like him did great and interesting work, but they made the mistake of trying to finish the sentences of liberals. Hence they got lost in the cult, it would have been like standing outside of Jonestown with a sign that said “We too believe in peace” or some such nonsense.
Excellent BASIC thinking. “Finishing liberals’ sentences for them” is the best descriptionof respectable conservative I have ever read!
Al Parker says that I outline a future “and another possible future in India of people who, besides their shared Varna, will not even be our descendants.”
A very useful basis for discussion.
I was wondering when someone was going to bring this specific example up: We need a Just-So Future in which OUR descendants are the white people. My aim is the most basic one in nature: the survival of my phenotype.
If this “Posterity” bit worked I wouldn’t be necessary.
An Indian child with its non-Aryan genes erased will be as kin to me as a Russian. Russians are not my descendants. Culturally India is rapidly westernizing, but Japan is doing it faster. We have been trained to believe that culture is all that matters. A society with our books but not our GENES will be just fine.
I say the opposite. Everybody can be culturally western, Orientals can catch up. But only whites can advance the West itself.
Al Parker, would you really put a pure Aryan child of Indians who wanted pure Aryan children in the same immigration category with brown Indians? I would rather have them than any rot-minded anti-white Whitakers from England.
You should look for what I am giving examples OF.
The problem is that, instead of taking every example I give as the Inevitable Bleak Things to Come, which is what our entire excuse for education has taught us, you should look for what I am giving examples OF.
The hole card for anti-whites Inevitability has always been Asia. They insist that the world is mostly Boasian “minorities” and therefore wildly pro-integration. So I gave the example of the weakness of that idea in Asia. Now I am told everybody is going to be an Indian.
It is terribly important for you to separate what I am giving EXAMPLES OF from the usual hard and fast Politically Correct Inevitabilities. We are ready to ride waves in a new age while they are desperately trying to jam everything into a hopelessly outdated framework.
When attacking the white race, the mantra of our enemies is, “This too shall pass.” But it never occurs to them that THEY, too will pass. And their cult will pass a lot faster than a race will disappear.
But I will not give you a Just-So FUTURE to replace THEIR Just-So Future.
POINT TWO refers to the fact that I am attacking the very Inevitables that our depressive defeatists find so overwhelming.
Their real weakness of our cult is that it has a rigid framework. EVERYTHING hits it as an unwelcome surprise. From the Internet to genetic engineering to settling the moon and space colonization to advances in ways to find out the actual truth in any area, everything militates against their rigid framework.
But only so long as WE are NOT in a rigid framework.
Bob’s blog doesn’t seem very inspiring to make people dedicate their lives to this cause.
Bob lays out a possible future of gated, prison-like communities for whites (when we once had nation-states) — and another possible future in India of people who, besides their shared varna, will not even be our descendants.
It not only fails to inspire someone who hasn’t yet become 100% dedicated, it makes one want to forget everything he’s learned here and find a nice hobby to take up. What’s the point of working for something now if change will happen naturally 50 or 100 years from now?
But I understand this is a straight-talking, no-nonsense blog so you get an answer when you ask for one and I’m grateful for that.
– Al Parker
As you say, I am not a Marxist or an integrationist. I don’t make up reality to look like our inevitable victory or to make you feel good.
As you indicate in your last grudging line, I do not tool my examples to make us seem like some Inevitable Flow of History. The essential media line today, as in all ages, is that what IS now leads to an INEVITABLE future.
THEIR future. I am saying all is in flux.
I’m a depressive myself, and if you choose to dwell on the example I gave to reach your depressive goal you will get there with or without me. Certainly that is what the current media want you to do with ALL present reality. I gave you an example I can see from my apartment window. A REAL one. A Marxist would have mad it more upbeat, but that is the kind of thinking BUGS does not engage in.
That is the sort of thinking you see on BBC documentaries. You get all but the last five minutes of interesting stuff. Then comes the last five minutes devoted tot he Politically Correct Summation. This tells how all that has been said fits into current Politically Correctness.
A dinosaurs documentary wind-up: See! look how long they lasted, but if we don’t ratify Kyoto, we can disappear, too;
2) technological history, whoever they were talking about, including Aussie Abos, are incredibly advance despite our looking upon them as “primitive, showing that a truly assimilated society can use their genius as much as it can whites.
Everywhere here can give other examples.
Your comment is very useful. For example, I have to explain something in more detail: My optimism comes from my own experience. It was awful back then because nobody would believe that the white race was going anywhere. Now the Mantra is its own explanation. The Mantra would have made people laugh back in 1960 with the Baby Boom and national origin immigration quotas. That is the milieu in which the present immigration policy was made law in 1965.
You cannot change a world people see as frozen in s\aspic. I LIVED in a world like that.
I sound immodest, but the fact is that now I have the reality coming at us and only I know what it is like. All those people in Minnesota and Iceland to whom non-whites were whites with painted faces now have their faces jammed into their Colored Brothers’ armpits. The security system you wail about is a symptom of this, not a guide to an Inevitable Future. A Norman Rockwell cover showing a brave little “Negro” girl being protected by troops is no longer all someone in Sweden likes to think of on race.
The second I give one example, you see a future of inevitable gated communities and such “Alas and Alack” crap. I see it as simply proving that there is no inevitable future. Thought Crime Laws always make it clear that the ruling group is lost. They cannot allow discussion beaus we real discussion today will NEVER lead in the direction of our Politically Correct Future as laid down in 1960.
Despite desperate efforts, the Boasian world, the world of no genetics, is DEAD. In order to preserve a rule based on Mankind Middle Eastern History, into which our present rule is hardwired, you have to suffocate all objection. That means it’s doomed.
In 1960 all over the world a PREFERENCE for the survival of white people was called Nazism everywhere but in the some parts of the South. Even a SOUTH AFRICAN wrote that, with our ten percent black population, integration was a solution for US, but not for them.
Back then the argument was that you had to have a Nazi regime to do anything about genetics. Genetics will soon be a matter of preference, and it has happened far enough after Hitler that all those shrieks are now seen as part of a profit-making industry.
Now genetics will be a matter of PREFERENCE, and the whole world, not just the South, has had a good deep lungful of what mixed children look like and how their intelligence is not equal and is not the same. We have made huge progress in that direction from a time when Carleton Putnam argued in Race and Reason that IQ was different and was suppressed by all universities to today when everybody knows it is true. Now they have to keep anybody from SAYING it, which is the last ditch.
We are in a position to influence PREFERENCE, while the media and the fundamentalists are in a coalition to stop genetic research in its tracks.
Breaking down the “all races are the same” anti-Nazi Absolute was a hell of a job, but it has been done. That was the first push to get the car rolling. If you think we are marginalized now, you should have been with us back then.
But all I see is that we are going to have to be part of the formation of the future, instead of sitting around taking bets on some Inevitable. That leads to optimism or pessimism, but so do drugs.
As you have said before, and I won’t mince words, all history is self serving bullshit. What we envision as history today is nothing more than a collection of accumulated facts from contemporary sources coupled with some sort of self-serving metaphysical poppycock that the current crop of house intellectuals wish to con the gullible with.
I read tons of so called “histories”. Or maybe I should say “have read tons’ of histories”. In any event, what I have found is that in all cases the so-called “major events” have always been totally unexpected by their temporal contemporaries.
The “Historian” is like a Paleontologist,or a Jamaican Rastafarian. Or a Catholic Bishop.
To make an unexpected event the result of some cause that will give them power.
I have a question.There are about 30 million black savages in the U.S.A. at this time. More and more enter our country every day. Our military actively recruits third worlders to serve as soldiers with the promise of citizenship for potential fighters and their kin.
What are you going to do?
Allow them to establish a giant Haiti with indefensible borders AKA ethnic separatism?
Good question, short and to the point.
My answer, of course, is what I think may be useful rather than a Prophecy From On High. I can’t give you an exact answer because I do not know the future.
But THERE is the point I want to make. I am sitting here in front of a computer the way I sat in front of a telegraph key on a ham radio fifty years ago. Practically nothing means the same thing it did then. Then, genetics was hard and dried. Nobody could do anything about it in the short term. Population was booming. I feared a hundreds-year-long gradual integration and “assimilation.” Outside the South, no one cared about something that would take centuries.
Young people assume that that was more comfortable for me, with segregation and the South fighting on the race issue. It wasn’t, because I was worried about the survival of my race and Southerners really just wanted things put off a generation or so.
In short, I was even more alone than I am now. Separation was a solution to THEIR problem, but not to mine. Every copy of Jet Magazine had a mixed couple on the cover. Blacks wanted their white women NOW. But outside of Jet, no one talked about that goal openly.
EVERYTHING has changed. I can use the Mantra now to express dangers that were barely theoretical back then.
The point of this is that we must stop looking to the old world. Any specific solution I come up with right now will make no sense fifty years from now. Questions of genetics today have no relation to what they were then. Our genes will be what we WANT them to be. It is critical to keep reminding people that, all the bullshit aside, blond is beautiful, not black.
To keep up with whitey, many blacks try to say they want the preservation of their race, too, but it isn’t true. There is nothing about black that anyone wants to preserve. You can SAY that now and there are a hundred thousand places to say it. The giant networks and magazines that dominated all information then are gone with the wind today.
What people revered back then as “sophisticated” is laughed at routinely now. Everybody knows that the media will say.
Even the example given shows a certain nostalgic flavor. In our prisons, blacks are more and more outnumbered and terrified by Hispanics.
I am sitting here on the tenth floor looking straight at some black houses. They are about two hundred yards away. We have closed circuit TV, locked stairways, and modern devices that make that two hundred yards more impenetrable than two miles would have been some years back.
As technology changes, the world changes.
NOTHING is the same. On the apparently self-sufficient farms of the Midwest, farmers have to buy new seed every few years, sort of like the annual flu vaccine we take, because the parasites change and adapt and would destroy their crops.
I am not interested as much in the safety problem but only in the genetic long-term. But BOTH have changed completely. It is old but true. The important thing is to ask the right QUESTION. Black savages and black genes are now two different questions.
News is made by those who say, “X said this today.”
History is made by those who keep repeating,. “This basic assumption is wrong. This basic assumption is evil.”
I rather enjoy an encounter with an anti-white who is impressed by his own intellectual acumen.
“You’re an intelligent person and you fall for that crap? You’re not serious, are you? You’re just pulling my leg. A 12-year old of average intelligence can see through that.”
This is what is needed to deal with the Big Lie: a SHORT, CUTTING truth that destroys the absolute self-confidence which is the only support for a Big Lie.
PLEASE keep up the good work!
I get bored when someone starts bitching about the word “black.” That was one point on which me and the black militants were on the same page.
Tolerate this old guy while he gives a quick soliloquy on language:
The Episcopal, Catholic, and Orthodox Churches each claim to be episcopal, meaning rued by bishops; all three claim to represent orthodoxy; and all three claim to be catholic, meaning universal.
Religious discussion would be a real pain in the donkey if I had to say, “Episcopal, but I don’t mean that Catholics and Orthodox are not episcopal too,” or “Catholic, but I don’t mean to imply that Orthodox and Episcopalians are not universalist , too.” It would bore you to death!
Likewise, I get bored when “black” gets all this nit-picking criticism. No, it does not refer to people who are pure black. It refers to people who have black blood and, when push comes to shove, these people identify with blacks. That reflects the actual situation in our actual world, which is what language is USED to do.
Black is easily pronounceable. It is now accepted by all but diddlers. It does not make a Spanish-speaking black baseball player into an American the way African-American does. In short the word “black” performs the function for which language EXISTS.
Leave it to the anti-whites to play with words and try to get off the subject with definitions. Black is a perfectly good word, and I use it consistently.
I discussed Sanator Sam, Dave describes Dwayne. Dave’s piece is more entertaining and is original:
What children see, that most adults forget, is the ridiculousness of adult narcissism.
I remember my 8-year-old school mate Dwayne, who was uncommonly ugly and had a tendency to slobber (even though we all liked him): He like to say this about his ugliness, “When you are born ugly, you are going to be ugly the rest of your life so you might as well get used to it.”
Adults have a REAL HARD TIME with that one. Accordingly, we know where liberalism comes from.
The last time we had a real leftie in the Governor’s chair in the State of Washington was Mike Lowry, a former US Congressman, who represented the district that included the University of Washington in Seattle.
Like Dwayne, Mike Lowry is uncommonly ugly. It is a marvel how somebody so ugly could actually get elected to Congress, but when you are running from a university district, go figure.
As Governor, his department heads were so ugly, all died-in-the-wool lefties, that I could only look at them by peeking through my fingers.
No wonder these lefties are so deeply into the “we are all equal” mantra. You have to hang your hat on something.
Later, the Governor disappointed his constituents by paying out $90K (out of his own pocket) to settle a sexual harassment claim (copping feels) by one of his female aids. That ended his political career, but it was all so very logical.
Dwayne never had any such problems. He was into self-acceptance and realism at a very early age. Today, he is a died-in-the-wool right-winger, with a stash of gold, a pickup truck, a mean dog, a Browning 1911, and an ugly wife and an ugly kid.
Like I said, we always liked Dwayne.
I’m trying my damnedest, but cannot find where you said that when someone told you they “weren’t a “racist”(?), your response would be telling them you wouldn’t brag to be a “traitor/coward”.
(Your email:firstname.lastname@example.org bounced back as well).
Odd request, perhaps, but sorry for the bother, and I thank you for your time!
“Anti-Racist” IS anti-White!!!
I mention you on my page today…
I have said that at least twenty times in the OV section.
The point here is not that you are criticizing me unjustly. I would rather that this ground be covered a hundred times than that my thin skin be pierced. This is a critical point, and my skin is not noticably thin.
In fact, you reminded me of something. A couple of years ago anti-whites in SF OV would constantly say that they couldn’t be anti-white because they were white.
I haven’t seen that “I can’t be anti-white because I’m white”line in YEARS, and if you hadn’t said this I wouldn’t have noticed. This is a direct result of repeating he Mantra at least two hundred times. Prometheus slams away at it as constantly as I do.
WE didn’t even notice this until you highlighted it. Your comment causes me to congratulatee Prometheus and me on what we have done.
News is made by those who say, “X said this today.”
History is made by those who keep repeating,. “This basic assumption is wrong. This basic assumption is evil.”
A lot of people have objected to my pretending to be a hick. By age sixteen I had reached a level of sophistication where I DESPISED self-styled “intellectuals” with the same vehemence that they despised “hicks.”
In the case of nut cases like me and Senator Samuel Ervin of North Carolina, claiming to be “hicks” is pure egomania.
I am a “hick” in the sense that I can tell when something is simply SILLY. “Intellectuals” talk pure crap. Respectable conservatives answer this pure crap as if it were Serious Thought. By the time one gets through debating this crap as if it were real logic one has entered into their delusions. Entering into the delusions of a crazy person is one of the things one is taught to avoid in dealing with the mentally ill.
Senator Sam .acted like he was representing the hicks. “Intellectuals” thought he was laughing at the “hicks,” the way the Kennedys were laughing at the Boston Southies who supported them slavishly.
It never occurred to the “intellectuals” that Senator Sam was laughing at THEM.
One brag I have made here is that I was an Honorary Boston Southie, that West Virginia coal miners said that “Whitaker speaks for us.”
Hence my Proud Hickdom. That is what I read into Jesus’s words about the Scribes and the Pharisees. He said that Evil with a PhD is Doctor Evil.
Senator Sam was not Jesus. I am not Jesus. For us, this attitude is unapologetic egomania.
In Washington, it was easy. I put on my deepest Southern accent, like Senator Sam Ervin with his “I’m just a country lawyer from North Carolina.” People who knew that Senator Sam was a MAGNA Cum Laude graduate of the Harvard Law School found his claiming to be a hick DISGUSTING.
Senator Sam never deviated from that hick image because it WORKED. He (and I) found that Yankees in Washington, DC are absolutely INCURABLE. They are suffering from a form of hypnosis. No matter how many times they told themselves, “Senator Ervin is a brilliant man, he is a DANGEROUS man.” they still fell under the spell of their entire life training about Southern accents.
No one without a Southern “accent” (WE don’t HAVE an accent, YOU do) can get away with asking basic questions, over and over. But we Southerners are considered to be children. We can ask and ask and ask, demanding an answer the way a child does.
That made it hilarious for me to watch Senator Sam in action. You really have to be able to talk your ass off to make a career criminal seem like a victim of circumstances. Only Senator Sam could get away with repeating, “But isn’t this guy just an evil person?”
To a Kennedy, the idea that someone is just “a bad person” is unthinking, judgmental, uncompassionate, anti-intellectual and so forth.
But even a Kennedy has to deal with the children. You have to answer the children who simply won’t shut up.
I don’t know how may of you have had the ego-deflating experience of trying to answer the insistent questions of a small child. You have a choice. You can 1) decide that the kid really is too young to understand the High Sophistication of what you are saying or 2) You can rethink what you are saying to the extent that some of it just doesn’t make sense.
What protects Political Correctness is that no one has the guts to be seen as a child. Senator Sam enjoyed the game. I think I am so much smarter than self-styled “intellectuals’ that I would be embarrassed at being accused of competing with them.