I always took the tack of asking them, “explain in exact detail what you mean.” That is because every devotee or cult member is more or less an idiot, and this includes the PhDs, and most mass cults cannot go into “exact detail”, even the wacky black that Jews are reduced to speaking in tongues only amongst themselves never mind the high priests of PC and their jive.
Bob I think you are using the standard talk back to each other method of debate in which you want to exert dominance over the individual. Myself I want the fool opposing me to hate himself when all is said and done, and that is accomplished by severe mental anxiety caused by having them trying to explain their belief that they cannot explain.
I’m an interrogator. One of my opening questions is, “What is racism?”
Pain would understand: This made my morning!
I am obsessive. Your comments are the first thing I look for. This is from somebody who is obviously not just theorizing, he is out there fighting the fight. That last line is priceless to ME!
There was a reason I did what Simmons disapproves of in this case.
In this case, I even left out one thing I always INSIST on, “anti-WHITE,” in order to make ONE point at ONE time. Then Simmons comes in and makes damned sure I remember what the general strategy is.
Actually, I do not use the “What exactly are YOU talking about?” strategy as much as Simmons does. He is out there slamming away at that one. His actions cannot be overpraised.
There are so damned many holes in this Big Lie that you have to LEARN, as a LAB COURSE, which one is best for YOU. That means you have to get out there and DO it. The anti-white thread is a great place for that, but I have a feeling Simmons is hitting them everywhere he MAKES a shot at it.
I made **A** point. Z notes that I made that point very well.
Simmons reminds us of THE point.
Couldn’t be better.
Thanks! My coffee tastes GOOD this morning.