Comnmenting on my reply to her in “Shari,” below, the lady herself points out:

“Okay, I understand that we are not amoebae. But to make a case with most people, you have to say something about children and grandchildren, not just an abstract sounding genetic decision. That still sounds pretty “utopian” to most I think. If I can say “well, your little grandchildren and my little grandson will be a minority EVERYWHERE in the world and the acceptance of misegenation will destroy us” it seems to make some sense, I think.”

Can the world survive without Staten Island? Rome could not have survived without the port of Ostia, but Ostia is now dry land. Rome has a bigger population now than it did then.

Saint Augustine was Bishop of Hippo. If you want to visit the Saint’s old diocese, take scuba gear.

Global Warming documentaries shout that where tens of millions of people live is going to be underwater in fifty or a hundred years. My first reaction is that, sometime in the next decades, they’ll have to move.

For half a century enormous efforts were made to end America’s dependence on Southeast Asian rubber plantation. As I said, Henry Ford lost tens of millions of gold-exchangeable currency trying to set up rubber plantations in Brazil. His was only one of these prescient attempts.

Then all the Asian rubber was cut off in World War II and America had a one or two year crisis and developed synthetic rubber.

The best thing that ever happened to German ECONOMY was the Urban Renewal of World War II.

The most destruction thing in our world is the Problems that are used by “intellectuals” to justify more Programs. A real crisis, on the other hand, ends up being good for a white economy.