It is natural for children to be highly aware of genetic endowments (as they notice differences right off the bat), only to be tossed into a public school culture that is on a relentless full court attempt to pacify the issue.

Of course the reality is the system is as obsessed with the issue of genetic endowments and the child naturally is. It is just that Political Correctness expresses this obsession inversely. Were it not so, there would be no need for so much Political Correctness on the issue.

You can’t dispose of the awareness of genetic traits because you can’t dispossess of narcissism and desire, even where millions of innocent children are gleefully thrown into the meat grinder of officially sanctioned dereliction and suffer horrendous damage there, including relentless pain which quickly morphs (for many) into self-inflicted and permanently disabling injuries and ruin (usually through drug and alcohol abuse and related accidents and criminal acts).

The medical profession and pharmaceutical industry leap about in bacchanalian ecstasy on account of their profit in the carnage, carnage they make every effort to expand and worsen (along with the justice system which likes the carnage for the same reasons).

Hoffer was obsessed with the subject of genetic endowment because he was sure owing to family history that he would die around the age of 30. When this failed to happen, he realized that transmission of genetic traits is far trickier subject than he had supposed.

There is a fraud in esthetics that goes like this: “Nothing hath beauty that does not have some strangeness of proportion”. Swindlers and the deluded of every age love that one. It should be tattooed on Hillary Clinton’s butt (there’s certainly plenty of room) as the defining motto for everything she represents.

Of course, the opposite is true: The very essence of beauty lies precisely in the lack of strangeness of proportion.

That’s why the genetic husbandry of man will triumph. It lies in a narcissism that no matter what must be endured, cannot be defrauded.

That is also why there is more to Orwell’s maxim, “Freedom is being able to say two plus two equals four” than its literal meaning.

What is beautiful is beautiful and what is ugly is ugly.

No amount of deceit and crime can change that fact.

There are endless histories of the Plague. The Great Plague killed a third to a half of Europe. Later plagues killed smaller numbers until the disease largely died out. There are endless explanations of this.

The popular one when I was young was that brown rats replaced black rats. It turns out that that, like so many other explanations, didn’t work. Social scientists, including medical scientists, used to say there was no such thing as genetics and that anyone who mentioned genes was a Nazi. I grew up in that age. There were no genes so it was just as good to adopt children from dysfunctional and third world families as to have intelligent white children.

I REMEMBER that anyone who mentioned that was talking genetics and therefore Nazism. We see the results of that catastrophe, which we predicted, today. Even Eric Hoffer mentioned in the early 1970s that “There seems to be a conspiracy against the birth of intelligent children.”

The group that calls itself The Greatest Generation had its Baby Boom and its social security. The Boomer crowd decided to slide through on the popular cult. The only way it can get enough servants to pay for its social security is third world immigration.

By the 1980s even social scientists had to admit that, with the Double Helix, both discoverers of which were screamed at for their genetically heretical ideas, and with the un challengeable differences in IQ among races and the obvious athletic differences between these “nonexistent” entities and with the fining of gene after gene responsible for one thing after anther that social scientists had declared purely environmental and the exact sameness of identical twins raised in totally different environments Political Correctness began to make the standard statement that genes were very important and then go on to pretend they didn’t exist. “Intellectuals” now say heredity and environment are BOTH important.

But not one single discussion in any classroom on social science ever MENTIONS any genes at all.

The Plague died out because the PEOPLE who were vulnerable to the Plague died out. Like wave after wave of disease in Europe, diseases killed vast numbers and then the genes survived which resisted them. So Eskimos were almost wiped out by the common cold. Europeans had had thousands of years of culling of those who would die of that. Indians died of alcoholism, though social science can’t make up its mind about that. They say there is no special Indian susceptibility to alcohol and then say there is, depending on the Party Line where they are.

We knew very well that where white mean went, the Indians died like flies. The diseases whites were used to dealing with destroyed whole masses of Indians, making it easy for us to move in. “Intellectuals” make this a point of White Evil, but they also cannot admit that we settled America easily because our ancestors had long since paid the high price of culling out the vulnerable. So it depends on the Party Line of the moment whether this is specified.

But no one points this out. Everybody is too busy talking about *** JEWS *** or some other old knee-jerk bit. Their frontal lobe is dead.

Hitting on the obvious destroys them. Another diatribe about Jews or some other tired old line is something they have developed immunity to.

I am a documentary junkie because, in the midst of all the same old crap and before the last five minutes, when they sum up by jamming all the square facts into the round hole of Political correctness, they sometimes make a brief statement that no one else notices but which jumps out at me.

That just happened to me. In the midst of an hour-long discussion of the development of PC’s cookie-cutter Modern Man, a single sentence made a point I have been driving at her for a while now. That one sentence pointed out that about two hundred thousand years go, there was a sure sign of humanity when:

They made a technological innovation which they did not NEED.

Then I watched the aged Bill Moyer going over the same old theme: the income gap between the rich and the poor is growing. That reminds me of the Mongolian economic growth rate. All through the 50s, 70s and into the 80s Bulgaria told the UN of double-digit economic growth each year. These UN statistics on Centrally Planned Economics used to be a standard joke among conservative economists and were never mentioned by liberals.

You see, if you grow 15% per year, that means you double each five years. At that rate, Mongolian would have outstripped the US long since, but they were still riding along on horses herding scrawny cattle and suffering from malnutrition. The Marxist economy concentrated on planning for necessities while liberals like Galbraith were attacking America for its consumption society, its frivolousness, and its lack of Intellectuals to Solve Its Problems.

The same sort of arithmetic applies to over a half century that Bill Moyer has been moaning about the income gap getting wider. In the concentration camp he wants society to be, there would be damned little income disparity. Everybody would be starving more or less equally.

No one has ever asked Moyer to do any arithmetic. If, as he has been saying for fifty or sixty years, the disparity in income has been growing exponentially, by now five people would have every dime there is, and everybody else in the West would be starving. Meanwhile on Planet Earth nobody in America dies of starvation but millions die of too MUCH food. This is a problem that is absolutely unique in history.

We did not get too much food because Bill Moyer and Galbraith planned a Workers’ Paradise. We didn’t get too much food because of a vast internal OXFAM project. We got too much food because productive people LIKE TO EAT.

While Ukraine went from the bread bowl of Europe to the hunger of the 1980s, Marxist Intellectuals were solving the problems of Peace, Land and Bread. Americans were chasing a chicken in every pot, which turned chickens from a Sunday Treat to the cheapest meat. There were no breathless documentaries on The Chicken Shortage to Come.

Chicken went from treat to cheap meat because people LIKED to eat fried chicken and chicken soup and so other people produced it. At every stage the Intellectuals got paid for moaning. Chickens were no longer raised out in the yard but in mass production. Oh, God!

People got disease from eating tainted chicken, like that never happened before a few years ago. Oh, God!

In the meantime, while our spoiled children at the universities were getting paid big bucks fro professional moaning, their ideals, the Soviets, were bragging each year that they had made yet more giant strides in catching up with the United States, unhappy chickens and all.

They weren’t.

The Y2K Problem is typical. While the Intellectuals screamed and moaned, it got quietly solved the same way the different strains of wheat bacilli evolving get solved:

Routinely.

You can go back through the years and look at documentaries, each of which shows us another World Problem. If we had done what they wanted us to in the 50s or the 60s or the 70s or the 80s, it would have been a disaster. Hollywood goyim are leftist largely because drama is the basis of Political Correctness. Political Correctness is for panicky kids.

I have been revisiting the entire White Nationalist constellation, past and present, such as it has been, in an attempt to explain to my nephews why what seems patently obvious to them – NOW – has had such a difficult time gaining traction in the body politic.

Essentially, we have been working backwards, from a Theory of They Are Wrong For Many Reasons, instead of a Theory of Positive Racism.

Two Kinds Of “Anti-White”

I have had the privilege over the last few weeks of attending some events with the BNP here in London. Standing around Anti-Whites who could see I did not share their religion has been an eye opening experience.
And I have seen that they fall into two categories:

1. Anti-Whites who are so hopelessly brainwashed by their TVs. They believe that any White person who is against White GENOCIDE, must be a weak little coward of low intelligence who will run away if confronted.

2. The establishment Anti-Whites, who know the truth about the ideology they have been a part of. And they are terrified of being found out for the sick little fools they are.

You can spot the first group by the look of shock and bewilderment on their faces, when we do not conform or behave in a way that the electronic box in their living room told them we would.

And the second group by the look of terror. And their inability to look us in the eyes. As if we are mirrors who reflect back to them the true state of their own souls.

I cant stress enough how much this recent experience has taught me just how crucial Bobs work here, and our part in it really is.

“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

Richard says Bugs regulars may be interested to know that, according to an article I read recently on the trade in bodily organs, the most valuable body parts on the world market are the eggs of a “northern European woman”.

Prometheus says, Anti-whites know this too, just as well as anyone else.

Could you imagine the reaction to a Pakistani woman was boasting about how her children wouldn’t be Pakistani but mixed? She has nothing to boast about! I think most anti’s would just ignore such a boast, wondering what the big deal is. Unlike the stereotypical white woman, particularly nordic, who can BOAST about not continuing her phenotype.

You see, if you break a $2 melamine vase for a cause, no one cares, but if you break a $20,000 ming vase, thats a different matter entirely.

On Stormfront there is a thread about how bad it is for Stormfronters to support Obama. I kept asking why it was worse to support Obama than a white race traitor. This question was largely ignored. We are USED to race traitors. We SHOULD NOT BE.

We belong to a race that was known for dying loyally around the body of their chief. The race of the Alamo and the 300 Spartans, none of whom probably had the jet-black hair depicted in the movie on all of them. Yet now a traitor is considered the norm.

Pat Buchanan wrote a piece about the disappearance of the white race and asked “Does it Matter?” But he didn’t answer the question. He didn’t answer the question because he would have had to address the issue I just brought up.

If it were a question of CATHOLICS disappearing from the globe, Buchanan would naturally say, “Yes, it matters, because I am a Catholic.” If it had been the disappearance of blacks or Chinese a black or Chinese would naturally have said, “Yes, it matters because I am black (or Chinese).”

We all know no white man is allowed to say that and remain respectable, but since when did it apply to those of us who do not claim to be respectable? Yet we endorse this by saying that there is nothing special about a white traitor, but a black candidate is very, very important to us.

We think like respectables, and that has got to STOP!

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

After all those years of answering libertarians who said the Mexican border wall is the same thing as the Berlin Wall, it wasn’t until YESSTERDAY that the perfect simple answer finally occurred to me:

“If you have to build a wall to keep someone IN, you’re doing something wrong. If you have to build a wall to keep people OUT, you’re doing something RIGHT.”

Sounds simple, right?

I was the only person who answered this crap. I talked about the DC jail having walls to keep people in, like the Berlin Wall, and the same wall keeps people OUT. Try getting INTO a jail without a good excuse. I used that argument in the Washington Times, when the Moonies who run it made the old statement about immigration controls being the same as the Berlin Wall.

I had to do the whole New Right Papers to make my point about Societal Property Rights, but I am still working on the BASIC answer, as stated above. When I answered the Southern Partisan as a Senior Editor in 1982, I did not yet have the Mantra. Hammering things down to BASICS requires decades of work. It then sounds so obvious people think, “That’s CUTE!”

On the subject we have been discussing just now, catastrophes and Problems as addressed by Experts, what I am saying is equally basic. An elephant matriarch is the ultimate Expert. She KNOWS about Problems, like where the food is now and how to dig around a dried-up waterhole for water.

Human beings special adaptation is NOT the ability to address obvious Problems. It is to innovate. If Marx had been given his dreams in 1848, the best we cold have had would have been an 1848-level egalitarian economy, which is what environmentalists want today.

This Marxist-environmentalist economy would, under the leadership of Idealists and Intellectuals coincidental similar to those who run the environmentalist and Marxist movement, take care of Inequality, the waste a free economy creates when competitors do the same thing, population as numbers and not quality, pollution, and so forth.

That’s the theory. Actual planned economies took care of none of these things.

Actually, the HUMAN way to deal with The Shortage Problem is for the economy to move on. An 1848 Marxist economy would still be rationing coal.

China and Africa never move on. The Chinese paddy culture, based on aquatic rice developed in White India, would have lasted much longer than others because the Hwang Ho and Yang Tzu Valleys are regularly replenished by the rivers, as is the Nile Valley. But climate changes, and some day there will be no Nile Valley, much less the two main Chinese rivers.

Whites do not so much solve Problems as they keep on the MOVE. They developed coal because their forests were running out, but this was only partly a result of the Wood Shortage. They simply found that coal is a better way, so they did not have to face The Problem.

The ultimate Chinese genius is an elephant matriarch.

On position:

Americans hate authority but worship status and don’t know the difference. This is exactly the other way around from how Americans were in 1776 and Southerners in 1861, who respected authority but disdained status and knew the difference between authority and status. This used to be the defining difference between Americans and Europeans, who spent their lives trying to earn titles and status to strut around with.

Or should I say “position?” Is there a difference that matters between status and position?

Although he would deny it loudly, Bob is an authority. He might say he has been fighting authority his whole life, but he hasn’t, he has been fighting words and people with status they don’t merit. Bob may have little formal position right now, but he does have power derived from his authority.

BUGs regulars may be interested to know that, according to an article I read recently on the trade in bodily organs, the most valuable body parts on the world market are the eggs of a “northern European woman”.

I assume that doesn’t mean the daughter of Pakistani immigrants living in Denmark.

Comnmenting on my reply to her in “Shari,” below, the lady herself points out:

“Okay, I understand that we are not amoebae. But to make a case with most people, you have to say something about children and grandchildren, not just an abstract sounding genetic decision. That still sounds pretty “utopian” to most I think. If I can say “well, your little grandchildren and my little grandson will be a minority EVERYWHERE in the world and the acceptance of misegenation will destroy us” it seems to make some sense, I think.”

Can the world survive without Staten Island? Rome could not have survived without the port of Ostia, but Ostia is now dry land. Rome has a bigger population now than it did then.

Saint Augustine was Bishop of Hippo. If you want to visit the Saint’s old diocese, take scuba gear.

Global Warming documentaries shout that where tens of millions of people live is going to be underwater in fifty or a hundred years. My first reaction is that, sometime in the next decades, they’ll have to move.

For half a century enormous efforts were made to end America’s dependence on Southeast Asian rubber plantation. As I said, Henry Ford lost tens of millions of gold-exchangeable currency trying to set up rubber plantations in Brazil. His was only one of these prescient attempts.

Then all the Asian rubber was cut off in World War II and America had a one or two year crisis and developed synthetic rubber.

The best thing that ever happened to German ECONOMY was the Urban Renewal of World War II.

The most destruction thing in our world is the Problems that are used by “intellectuals” to justify more Programs. A real crisis, on the other hand, ends up being good for a white economy.