Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

What Words Can Do, Words Can Undo

Posted by Bob on June 26th, 2008 under General

Utah could not enter the Union until it outlawed polygamy. Right on time, in 1890, a Mormon leader had a Revelation from God. God decided in 1890 that polygamy, which Joseph Smith had forcefully defended as a Key tot eh Kingdom, had to go. This happened to coincide nicely with getting Utah statehood.

Just when Joseph Smith’s prohibition against black bishops became politically untenable, the Lord stepped in and gave the Mormons another Divine Inspiration to decarve that Law from the Sacred Tomes.

Governor David Beasley had his Revelation from God in December 2008, right after he had used the pro-Confederate flag vote get reelected governor, and in the maximum amount of time before the 2000 Republican Convention where he hoped to obtain the vie-presidential nomination.

It must have been a joint Revelation. When the money men turned on the Confederate flag and forced the Citadel to abandon it, Bob Jones IV had a Direct Inspiration to get rid of the flag, too. Also to allow interracial dating.

And the list goes on.

When someone starts saying he is pro-white because of the Bible, I realize that tomorrow he can be ANTI-white because of the same Bible. It happens all the time. The same First Baptist Church in Columbia that hosted the secession convention in 1960 because God was pro-slavery was trying to get affirmative action into its congregation in the 1980s on the basis of the same Bible.

If your loyalty is to words, you can interpret those words into the opposite overnight. “We the People of the United States… and our Posterity” now includes illegal aliens.

What happens when someone who espouses your words is fighting against someone who is of your race?

You get World War II.

I like to level with you. When someone says his feeling for our race is because of the Catholic Church or the Christian faith or a belief in liberty or some other set of words, I back up a little. This is based on lifetime of HARD experience.

I only back off a LITTLE, but I do back off SOME.

As I say, I like to level with you.

  1. #1 by shari on 06/26/2008 - 10:10 am

    I can’t be absolutely be sure,of course, but I do think that all the regulars on this blog know very well, the difference between loyalty to words, and loyalty to their own. And I think that you all HATE bribery.

  2. #2 by Bob on 06/26/2008 - 10:58 am

    The question is not what YOU understand, but what you can make OTHERS understand.

    Shari, much of what I write is for you to USE, not TO you.

    It is VERY haed to explain to people why a loyalty to our race is not the same thing as a loyalty to our race’s institutions when those institutions are used against us. That is, in fact, or enemy’s strngth. Llyalty to America becomes loyalty to all Amerians, regardless of race. It doesn’t matter if he’s a black boy marrying your daughter,if he’s a good CHRISTIAN black boy.

    I spend a lot of time trying to make these distinctions clearer and clearer. We still spend a lot of our time commenting on news events and doing stream-of-thought writing. That is venting, which is legitimate, but it is not hard intellectual WORK.

  3. #3 by Dave on 06/26/2008 - 11:01 am


    Every traitor knows the difference between loyalty to words and loyalty to their own, something to very cynical about.

    That’s why Von Clausewitz (author of On War, a performance evaluation manual for evaluating the job performance of senior military commanders) said the defeating the enemy was part of the problem of command in general (not a specific problem of combat).

    That’s because what soldiers are loyal to is getting paid. (As true in the American Revolution as it is today where the Americans have had no problem recruiting Saddam’s Baathist’s cadres into the American fold.)

    Robert Whitaker’s cynicism is well founded and is something we leaders need to fully comprehend.

    There’s an irony. What you are loyal to has to be something very pragmatic, but this is the same view the traitor takes.

    Get it? See what the real problem is? Those who solve this problem end up ruling the world. That’s the way it works.

    But courage is required when it is required. It is a pass-fail kind of thing.

  4. #4 by Tim on 06/26/2008 - 7:11 pm

    I can only imagine the pope apologizing for talking about Racism in White Countries and ONLY White countries. Personally, I think Christianity has been dealt a death blow in the West by anti-racist gobbledygook.

    However, I can also see Bob’s point to a certain extent. I would most definitely go to the next mass if the Priest announced the mass was only for Europeans. I would have to go…..just to hear what he was going to say.

  5. #5 by AFKANNow on 06/26/2008 - 11:05 pm

    in partial reply to Bob:

    You commented:

    We still spend a lot of our time commenting on news events and doing stream-of-thought writing. That is venting, which is legitimate, but it is not hard intellectual WORK.

    in reply:
    I am slightly guilty of the first, and very guilty of the second.

    While “venting” is a small component of this, it is the larger issue that I am working towards – how do we build Civilization in the face of mandated equalitarianism – that is my driving thrust.

    There is no Book, no Plan, no really clearly defined Model for what I want to do.

    To destroy us, and all we aspire to, is fairly easy; all we have to do is adopt the Words, Terms and Definitions chosen for us by our Racial Enemy.

    In part, I think, the Jews focus on teaching their Elite, their Cultural Guardians, Hebrew, as it helps to FORCE their Minds out of the structures forced on them by the English language.

    Once they are aware of where the Words come from, and can see this from an Alien point of view, it becomes much easier to slip your Mind into “Control the Animals” mode, which Jews do with amazing ease.

    To a degree, my writing is stream of thought, and it has to be, until I have a comprehensive theory that WORKS on how to build the White Nation from where my nephews are.

    The problems are, we have adopted the Values, Terms, and Definitions given to us by our Racial Enemy.

    THIS, as much as anything else, is responsible for the Children of the Sixties performing the equivalent of national – RACIAL – suicide.

    You can pretty much figure out what the default value for their Mindset is in any situation – just look for what is most antagonistic to what made Western Civilization the Model for Achievement by ANY Race, and work – deliberately – to destroy it, and undermine it on all fronts, at all possible opportunities.

    When I said my Model for my house, with my Nephews staying here for the foreseeable future, was that of the Irish monasteries that helped sustain Western Civilization in the midst of the Dark Ages, I was serious.

    Every time they think about Going Back, I tell them to look at what “Back Home” has become.

    THAT inspires them, and it inspires me.

    And, if my comments above “Movement Past” ramble, it’s because the Age of Mass Communications pretty much cut them off at the knees before they got started.

    Hell, I damn near have to go back to Forrest to get working examples that are relevant to our situation.

    In turn, think of what a mockery those who follow Forrest in the next century were, and WHY this mockery was chosen, over much more effective models of organization.

    I am trying desperately to build the Mindset of our Ancestors – who conquered a Continent – into my Nephews, as fast as I can.

    Forrest is an example, and a much better example than many realize.

  6. #6 by shari on 06/29/2008 - 5:13 pm

    Please don’t post this. To Dave and Bob, I’m only just beginning to “get it.” It’s overwhelming. I don’t know what is going to happen. But, if even my ignorance serves a purpose, then it’s alright with me.
    I often think that I should stop this, I’m being silly, but then I don’t, and today I found something that made what you say here make much more sense. It was a by William Dudley Pelley. It made so many things said by Christ along with things, said here, jump out at me.

  7. #7 by mderpelding on 07/03/2008 - 8:49 pm

    The hardest thing to do, and the most important….

    “The question is not what YOU understand, but what you can make OTHERS understand.”

    Of course,to accomplish this, you must have some empathy.
    And you must choose which “OTHERS” to address.

    White nationalists of one stripe or another have been around for a long time. Obviously they have failed to get their points across to enough people. Or at least the right people.

    The potential is there.

    It resides within each white person on this planet.

    We just have to reach enough of them.

Comments are closed.