The problem, in part, is due to the tremendous shift in values of the Children of the Sixties.

They have no Cultural view past themselves, right NOW!

They do not see themselves as having obligations to anything more than being “themselves,” such as that is.

This lack of an intergenerational focus guarantees they will always fall into the ditch.

They like that part about “take no thought for the morrow,” because it provides Biblical approval for what they want to do.

The problem is, they never really READ the Bible, or they would see the Old Testament – the Ten Commandments, in particular (”adultery” meant RACIAL “adultery”), all move in the direction of a de facto cultural and personal program of flat-out Eugenics.

They like to talk about how the Bible condemns abortion.

In fact, it MANDATES it, in the case of Racial Purification – see Numbers 5: 24,25, where the woman who is married and has a child by a man other than her husband is MANDATED to have an abortion, given by the “priest,” “until the curse does come.”

This is what the contemporary practice of “Christianity” has done; it reduced all of Christianity to a sorely misunderstood message of “Love,” meaning either God’s is offering his unconditional approval, or His unconditional forgiveness.

No.

The entire meaning of “Love” is love of God, and demonstrating that love by doing what God wants you to do, regardless of what the social controllers want you to do.

Your Duty to your Race made it into the Ten Commandments.

AS I told one person, “If this God of Love is so forgiving, why did He wipe out Sodom AND Gomorrah – everything – people, plants, pets – EVERYTHING?”

The answer is obvious.

He chose us, placed us in the Spiritual Framework of a particular Race, and expected us to work within that Race, to make the Race a better tool for God, and the members of that Race.

– AFKAN

Because of his black vote bit, I never liked Charlie Wilson, though we went all out on his support for the Afghan rebels. When I saw the trailer for the movie which showed his telling the incumbent that the blacks had thrown him out of office, I didn’t want to see the film.

To me, watching one of the Southern traitors in action in the 40s and 50s is just too much to ask. I finally forced myself to watch a documentary on him and I wish I had done it back then. It turns out he got the blacks out to vote as a teenager because the incumbent bastard he put out of office had murdered his dog in an agonizing way. Wilson then found the blacks were useful and used them to get his congressional seat.

In the interviews with him he never once bragged about helping create a New South and being in tune with the Future. His only concession was that blacks were underdogs, like the Afghan rebels.

I could easily have become his drinking companion through our common fight and my buddy Congressman Ken Holland. Because of my proven populist talent, a lot of Democrats wanted me in their offices. It’s just as well I didn’t become Wilson’s buddy::

1) I would have been among all those beautiful women Wilson was famous for hiring;

2) My wife was a Judo expert..

One thing the documentary talked about was something I have told you for years about the Intelligence Community. All the regular CIA people fought us all the way. What saved it was one holdout.

I have pointed out at length that the Ivy League culture of the CIA had one serious problem:

Sometimes they had to go around the professional bureaucrats and use somebody who was unreservedly on OUR side agasinst the Reds.

As I said, us rednecks and Micks and Cubans HAD to be used sometimes, but they held us at arm’s length with one limb and held their noses with the other.

Actually, it’s a lot like the Idea Chain I use here. Respectable conservatives use my ideas after they have cleaned them up and I take it for granted that it will be a cold day in Hell before they let it be known it came from me.

In the few cases where they are AWARE of it.

I don’t WANT this to be known. It would DESTOY the Idea Chain if this stuff was traced back to me.

Likewise, the Micks and Whitakers and Cubanos did things and they found somebody in the CIA culture to take credit for them.

It was real shock when, a quarter century after the fact, this very reality became a major theme of the documentary on Charlie Wilson’s War. The CIA man who threw himself against the CIA culture and onto the side of aiding the Afghan rebels was a “working class” son of Greek-Americans.

He gave us what we needed. CIA Ivy Leaguers considered him a mole who snuck in under false colors and turned out to be one of THEM, the Micks, etc. Boy, did the documentary EVER make that clear!

Once aid to Afghan rebels had gotten out of their control, the CIA, “smelling victory,” assigned this Greek guy to a location out of the fight and took credit to their Ivy Leaguers. The documentary SAID that! It was a decade before the whole thing got so public he had to be given a CIA award.

Racial PC is profitable for some whites who have learned to sell off their destiny piece by piece. Take the Uber “Respectable” Limbaugh for instance. Decades ago the white man went to the moon and it looked like a linear path for space exploration and as important its spin off tech, but nowadays even the most self important white men want gadgets just like children and savages, meaning toys for Limbaugh to play with like an arrested development adolescent. Even the tech Dave likes to remind us of “supercomputers” will probably be hogged as a database to log porn tastes for the “consumers.”

I don’t think anyone believes racial PC, but of course that question is never asked instead we get shriek and retreat just as we devolve to the level of the savage.

Till the white man puts aside the shriek and retreat our devolution is all but secured. It’s quite frankly so easy to defeat the white/jewish libs and their FCCs that only a respectable could fail to see how. Only the white man asks the Question or conducts the Moot that is our secret. Take Buchanan, he was debating some jew on TV with the usual shriek and retreat but he was being his usual ineffective self when out of frustration he asked the Jew, “Why can’t white men vote their interests as a race?” The Jew, who had never been anything more than a priest of received knowledge, was speechless and subordinate, but I’ll bet Pat being respectable missed that important signal.
Its so easy.

I now check General Comments every time I come here. GC was last used by AFKAN to deliver a lecture on “Movement Past” on June 5. I asked him to expand on that in GC and he promises more.

AFKAN is aware that this is what GC is FOR. I think his writing needs tightening up and a rewrite but his grammar and spelling is fine so he must take some effort with it. He is not getting paid for this so he is doing a good job in the right place.

GC is being tried as one more step in making BUGS go along without me. GC is where you would introduce new INSIGHTS on OUR approach as I try to do here in the first page — I don’t know the technical term–almost daily.

It may be that, since you have learned the game of Staying on Message, you can cover your insights by commenting on what I say and using my statements as a springboard. For a political pro, anything can be turned to those ends. When I put YOUR comments up front here, I get as many responses as I do to my own stuff, which means you are already doing this job.

So GC may be of limited use the way I thought of it. I may use a few of AFKAN’s quotes up here as a Preview of Coming Attractions to get people to look at his full piece.

We’re adaptable. At least GC can be here when you want to delve into something that you cannot or don’t want to go to the effort to get published elsewhere. It won’t be the first time I have found that something I invented for one use turned out to be just the thing for another.

The whole history of science is filled with great ideas that the originator did not realize could be great for an entirely different purpose for the one he envisioned. Ben Franklin insisted to his dying day that electricity was useless.

In our case, WE ARE REINVENTING THE MOOT.

Nobody has DONE what we are doing before, so I can’t tell whether the silence in GC just shows you have learned to play the game so well you don’t need it.

The Ole Perfesser is no more sure EXACTLY how our new electricity should go than anybody else.

Antonio Fini, in his comment today on my “Mussolini and Perot” thread, made a point I want to address:

“You may be aware Bob that Italy is facing such a population crash of native Italians that a few years back they instituted a right of return program. This permits people like myself, born of Italian grandparents on both sides, to gain Italian citizenship.”

When I took my first course in Political Science in 1957, there were a number of ways one could lose his American citizenship, including:

Joining a foreign army. The main test of this was “wearing a foreign uniform.”

Voting in a foreign election.

Taking foreign citizenship.

The title of this piece derives from the fact that those restriction make no distinction between whether you were born here, so your ONLY citizenship is US, or were naturalized and had dual citizenship, a is routine for Canadians, Brits and especially Israelis.

Woodrow Wilson backed a law that allowed Americans to join allied forces in World War I and declared strict neutrality. His main platform in 1916 was “He Kept Us Out of War.” In 1940 while declaring HIS military neutrality Roosevelt also got in a law that allowed Americans to join the Allies.

Jews today are free to join Israeli armed forces, vote in Israeli elections, and carry Israeli passports, after they were born or naturalized in the US..

This is not a big deal to most Americans, but I wanted Rhodesian citizenship BADLY. I didn’t take it because I guessed that what was ignored in the case of Jews would be enforced when it came to ME if it could be used against me later.

In a civilized war, uniforms make the difference whether you go to a POW camp or get hanged. Ask Major Andre. But where I was, in Latin America and especially Africa, I felt no need to wear one. No one on my side went to a POW camp anyway. But the other restrictions were a PAIN.

About 1990 I went to the Law Library and checked the present state of US citizenship law out carefully. Since I’ve WRITTEN laws, I had a pretty good feel for how law worked, and I was right. The one main provision the courts are still enforcing on non-Jews, at least the ones who don’t choose Israel, is banning American BORN citizens like Antonio from taking another citizenship.

So American residents in Mexico and anyone who takes Italy up on their right of return is taking a big risk acquiring citizenship if they have the wrong politics.

And it is hard to imagine anyone whose opinions are “Wronger” than Finis’.

If you want to see the real difference between our steadily progressing seminar in BUGS and where we WERE, look at the response to “Mussolini and Perot” in BGS and what I got back in Sustaining Members on SF.

A major point of “Mussolini and Perot” was that the establishment only concentrates on my examples, in this case what a loon Perot turned out to be. In the five BUGS comments the discussion was entirely about the March on Rome phenomenon and the relationship with the Perot phenomenon, and of the old MSM’s sporadic efforts IN THE LARGER PICTURE.

On SF I got a response talking about what a loon Perot was and a very informative short comment on the present Italian head of state.

BUGS commenters concentrate on the larger picture. BUGS commenters concentrate on the larger picture. SF is essentially an exchange of items of interest that would fit in establishment the media if it were allowed.

Our jobs are different, but it is true that BUGS is moving in a different direction.

Which is why BUGS is here.

Rome just elected a “former fascist,” — Shades of David Duke! — Violently anti-immigration — mayor by a clear majority of 54%. Cities are normally the centers of anti-nationalism. During Hitler’s rise, Berlin was known as “Red Berlin.”

Few who praise 1930s Germans realize how many of them were hard-core Communists.

Rome may BE a holdout. After breakouts of violence against Gypsies a poll found that 68% of the population wanted them all thrown out of Italy.

Like France, Italy now has a head of state who is libertarian and pro-Bush. He takes the usual line, “To hell with Italians (the French!), labor is labor!”

At the beginning of the twenties Italians were so frustrated with the national government THEY HAD ELECTED that they marched on Rome and put Mussolini in power. That was when Germany had its first Jewish, Social Democratic, heads of state (sound familiar!)

The German establishment paid no attention to Italy, and guess who ended up in power THERE?

As I have pointed out before, Mussolini almost missed the March on Rome. He had said in a speech that Italians should march on Rome and throw the bastards out. He was caught completely by surprise when Italians took him up on it.

If MUSSOLINI was caught by surprise, you can imagine how totally unaware of the real world the government and media in ROME were.

This reminds me of Perot, who mentioned on the least watched talk show on cable that he would be willing to be president, and suddenly had a clear plurality over both major party candidates.

Perot was no Mussolini. He quit the race because some people threatened to disrupt his daughter’s wedding. Nobody wanted him handling threats of nuclear war.

But our media, like the government in Rome in the 1920s, just concentrated on what a loon Perot was and forgot the LESSON because they WANTED to.

So do we.

It isn’t so much that whites have been lied to and betrayed as a tide has swept us out to sea.

The very essence of Political Correctness in racial matters is nonwhites laying claim to a destiny that in fact resides within the genes of the white race.

Pain or Simmons or another commenter said this insight: “Nonwhites confuse form and function”, going on to paint the image of a “redskin” obtaining the strength of the buffalo by way of his buffalo robe.

Correspondingly, Cadillac has built some business on its “niggermobile” to service the conceits of inner city coloreds in the drug trade. It never occurs to the criminal driving one that to the white man the Cadillac technology is quite trivial.

I just give this example to point out that the colored man is participating in a destiny not of his own making. And he never sees the irony of his conceits (his claim of equality) from the point of view of the loss of his indigenous (in this case, African) tongue. He can’t, for he has forgotten HIS OWN tongue entirely.

Try understanding how hard this is on nonwhites. That is why they rage against our insensitivity to their pain. And how can they not lay claim to what WE have bestowed upon them? They literally have nowhere to go.

So leave aside the impossibility of it all. OUR destiny is OUR destiny. It isn’t shared, nor could it be. That was never in the cards and it never will be.

– Dave

Ben Franklin became the first American member of the Royal Society by his work on electricity. He invented the terms “battery,” “positive”, “negative” and others we use today.

But the one thing Ben insisted on was that there was no PRACTICAL use for electricity and there never WOULD be. He was a great researcher but he was also a Practical Man. As a man with endless curiosity Ben was the great scientist who discovered the Atlantic currents. As a Practical Man, he was a highly successful businessman and statesman.

But when it comes to the science of the future, the Practical Man is always a fool. As a result he is always making his predictions by using other, opposite fools as straw men. During the Revolution there were repeated panics in England about how Franklin was going to use his inventions to destroy Britain.

Ben laughed at these panics, citing them as evidence that only panicky fools believed his theoretical discoveries would be any use at all. Only bifocals ands Franklin stoves and lightening rod would ever be USEFUL not the electricity silly people were panicking about.

This is the usual double error. When something new comes up there are those who declare that it is the beginning of a Brave New World. Then Practical Men come in and show how the new stuff means nothing by quoting the people who say it means Everything Now. Anyone who takes this “bouncy-wouncy bally” crap seriously is at a total loss about the REAL future.

But what makes this always a good show is that nobody CARES about the REAL future. Take it from one who knows by experience, nothing is less profitable PERSONALLY than being right about the future. The discussions about the future you can SELL are the ones that feature this bouncy wouncy bally bit. It begins and ends with quotes from the Brave New World crowd by Established Authorities.

If anybody ever looks back, which they don’t, the Established Experts look sillier than the Brave New World types.

‘It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds.’ — Sam Adams

A Book called All I Ever Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten pointed out that the basic lessons in civility and common sense we learn in Kindergarten are the ones we really need to use in later life.

In our terms, a college “education” is aimed at destroying those lessons.

I did not receive a Kindergarten education (pity and donations accepted). But I did go to Bible School, where a guy was quoted as saying, “Suffer the little children to come unto me, for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven” He then added a comment that, in our terms, come Judgment Day the Mommy Professors of this world would wish they had never been born.

The main lesson we kept being taught in Bible School was how Jesus could not explain to the Jews that he was not here for their proposed Israeli Kingdom. He could not be their Messiah, they said, because he did not claim he could get rid of the Roman Occupation and lead the Jews to a New Age of Power like the one they never had when Israel was between the superpowers of Egypt and Mesopotamia.

To Israeli nationalists, “My kingdom is not of this earth” and “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” reflected exactly what the Messiah was NOT.

Which makes it particularly funny for me when I watch Pat Robertson and the rest shouting that Christianity is All About Israel. I think it was Robertson who said that Sharon had his stroke because he wanted to compromise on Jewish settlements.

All I REALLY needed to know about Christianity was available to me in Sunday School.

People do things. People make a neighborhood livable and a country great. Smart people do smart things, brave people do brave things.

Good people come up with good ideas and bad people bad ideas. But liberals and libertarians think that ideas fall out of the sky.

In (the Wordists’) world people don’t do things, things happen by accident. So it’s alright with them if you genocide the people. The neighborhood should still be good with the good people gone, and the country great with the great race extinct.

Maybe they just don’t like people.

– Pain

Men either want endless uncritical praise or they don’t want to admit they need any backup at all.

SysOps and Shari will have to judge what I am about to say.

Women know how to back each other up. They know how to ask for moral backup. They also know how to tear each other apart to an extent that leaves men in awe.

Women know how ask each other for moral support when they need it. If I were a good feminist, I could just apply what women take for granted to men.

I can’t do that. God knows I don’t know any more about women than any other straight male, but I do know they are DIFFERENT.

So I can’t just take what applies to women and transfer it to men.

A straight male is handicapped by his hormones from thinking like women, whereas a real homosexual can understand every nuance of a new hairdo at the level of empathy.

If your job is analyzing PEOPLE, this obvious statement, that women know how to ask for moral backup and men don’t, cannot stop at just being a statement. It is a reality you must ANALYZE.

Men do not know how to ask for moral backup. Men either want endless uncritical praise or they don’t want to admit they need any backup at all.

Look at how often I would give Shari a hard time for brilliantly getting to the nub of things and then APOLOGIZING for it.

I make a great analyzer of people in general, but I am a male. I FINALLY realized that Shari wasn’t apologizing, she was asking for moral backup. That is not something an old bull like me will easily pick up.

Shari had the same problem I always did. Reality is so simple one feels a bit odd having to state it. Above all you get a lot of doubts when you are the ONLY one to state it. Shari was stating these doubts in a feminine way. She was saying, “It CAN’T be this simple.”

Her “apology” said, “CAN IT?”

Like a male, I missed her call for moral backup and criticized her “apology.” I do not think this caused Shari any real problem. This tolerance is imprinted in Shari’s genetic inheritance. Females have been raising male babies for millions of years. The ones who killed the brat for acting the way I did not pass on their genes.

We men try to make everybody think we don’t need any backup. I try to act like that and then bitched when you don’t comment on what you agree with.

Men either want endless uncritical praise or they don’t want to admit they need any backup at all. If we get uncritical praise it makes us the Alpha male, a perfectly legitimate ambition for us. But if we don’t seek Alpha, we can’t admit we need any moral backup because we’re afraid it will make us look queer.

In short, the same blind spot I had with Shari is the blind spot I had with myself.

Men and women are DIFFERENT. A woman will tell you what she needs reassurance about. Moral backup to a WHITE male is new to the world and it is complicated.

It’s easy to reassure an alpha male in a gorilla troop or a colored country or a Wordist institution.

Just grovel.

I am two steps removed from a woman’s natural ability to ask for moral backup. I am male AND I am something unique to evolution: I am WHITE.

It’s easy to reassure an alpha male in a gorilla troop or a colored country or a Wordist institution.

Just grovel.

Orientals have a much more sophisticated way of groveling. They sit around the Great Philosopher, take notes, and regurgitate what he says and expand on each precious word. The Great Philosopher thinks his best disciples are the Ultimate Intellectuals.

The Oriental student has replaced Einstein as the picture of the epitome of brilliance. Did you know that many, many Oriental students think this is FUNNY? They do what they always did, they do what they figure the Great Intellectual wants and they give it to him. To them, IQ tests are just another philosopher’s puzzle and they handle it according and ace it.

Then they wonder what the gaijin are raving about.

It doesn’t matter whether the Great Teacher in an Oriental society is a Chinese Great Philosopher or a Marxist or a professor of physics from the West. They can take what he gives them and go with it.

But only so far.
Nothing is more alien to gorillas, colored societies, and even Oriental society than the fundamental institution of Aryan society, the Moot. A moot is, among other things, a call for moral backup by Aryan males. It means that even the leader is out on a limb. The Aryan male is accustomed to making NEW decisions and wanting to be sure he is right.

The Aryan leader’s concept of moral backup is INPUT. This is a brand new concept in all the history of men and animals. In a Wordist society, where the word “moot” simply means that someone in a judge’s robes or a king’s robes or a priest’s robes has NOT YET handed down the Final Truth, the real meaning of the word “moot” is utterly alien.

Prometheus in SF:

“It is strange how the ideas they repeatedly state no one would take seriously, no one would listen to or even want to consider, are the ones they work hardest at suppressing.”

This genius was unnoticed when it appeared in SF.

Repeat THAT a few hundred times and it will have more effect than a thousand tomes.

Would blacks vote for Obama if it would mean the entire country would be run by blacks?

– Prometheus

Yes.

Then when America turned into New Orleans, blacks would try desperately to move to Europe.

Mexicans will pour into America, Mexicanize it, and then than they will try to escape this new Mexico.

Whites escape blacks, then get subsidized housing to make the neighborhood diverse, then escape again.

Libertarians want open borders and third world America because they believe the BORDER and their WORDS are what make America rich.

The reality is RACIAL.

Wordism is Michael Jackson. You can surgery your face off, you can put curtains over your kids’ faces to deny how they really look, but no matter whether you call yourself a Christian or a Catholic, or a libertarian or a Marxist, you are just a nut.

Bob,

You have to tell us how we can have fun with our new President Obama.

You have to admit he was the natural choice years ago when the deals for the next president were sealed. Since he’s a nigga, the Rockefeller’s can pretend he’s for “change” from the unpopular Bush years, and when he does the same thing that Bush and Clinton did, they can call us all racist for daring to criticize him.

That should silence the respectabibble conservatives and confuse the liberals who think that niggas are their pets. It should also confuse the Third World who think the US is evil only because it is white, and another 100 million alien invaders will apply for amnesty.

A nigga is also reliable since he can be counted on to do what he is told. He won’t know any better. There will also be less to make fun of on David Letterman, since he can actually read the speeches written and displayed for him on the teleprompter.

But Bob, you have to be thinking of more important things, things which most people overlook. We have a fun eight years ahead of us.

The NAACP was over sixty years old when, as the result of an inner rebellion, it elected its first BLACK president.

It’s been utterly toothless ever since.

I got excellent comments on “What We Should Ask Ourselves.”

Each commenter stuck to the subject but looked at it from their own personal worldview.

To induce you to READ THEIR COMMENTS, I give you a preview of each one. You can look for yourself to see how each comes out.

You’ll have to make your own popcorn.

Dave:
The way I think about this is the difference between risk and uncertainty. Risk can be managed but uncertainty cannot.

Which is why insurers regularly go broke.

There is no way in hell you can ever get rid of uncertainty.

That’s the reason we have leaders and followers. Everybody just bets that the “leader’s” instincts are better.
But the “goal”, this is what separates the white race out. Nonwhites never understand this.
Only white people are driven, literally driven, by the desire to see. And this is what unites us at BUGS.

Shari:

Chasing goals is an evil of our tired, equalized, overbureaucratised life, not seeing or understanding for its own sake.

AFKAN:
This is the core difference between the Western Soul, whose Prime Symbol is the Infinite Plane, and the Rest.

Mderpelding:
The question of winning or losing seems kind of self indulgent to me.
But fighting for what one believes is true and honorable.

Pain:
Yes, I have noticed that your way of thinking is indebted to Christianity.

I don’t know if I will have to answer for myself on Judgment Day. I DO know I have to answer to my CONSCIENCE all the time. Maybe it is because I was raised a Bible Belter, I see no difference between what my conscience demands and what Jesus said.

The only real difference is that my conscience is much less forgiving.

I have read The Screwtape Letters many times and I spent a career in politics. I cannot imagine two better guides to understanding the nature of real evil and The Mind of the Enemy.

One question my conscience does NOT ask me and for which I will not have to answer on Judgment Days is the one people in the movement seem to spend most of their time worrying about:

“Are we going to WIN?”

Screwtape LOVES that. It seems to come straight from Tempters following his advice.

The real question is the one St, Paul posed

Did you run the race? Did you fight the fight?

That is the ONLY question my conscience FORCES me to answer. That is the ONLY question one will be faced with on Judgment Day.

Because of my participation in BUGS, what has become routine for us is to spot the obvious fallacies.

All you need to do is count what the mainstream really and truly takes for granted.

Things like:

“Youth doesn’t count race as important”

“The emerging markets will dwarf America’s dominance”

“Climate change is our biggest threat”

It just astonishes me that the people mouthing these really believe them.

But I’m convinced they do.

Just like in the markets, you must absolutely be on guard against the unexamined consensus, which is that part of the consensuses both bulls, bears, including the “contrarians” agree on.

That’s how you know what’s wrong.

It never occurs to all but usually a single lone voice in investments matters, that for most part, it is the investment vehicles that everybody agrees on that are wrong. It doesn’t matter whether you won by betting right on the long side, or the short side, from a risk management standpoint, you are wrong.

You need to take your gloves, balls, and bats and leave the game and take an entirely different approach.

This is what hardly anybody sees.