I wonder if there isn’t an increasing panic because how DOES a jew resign? Conversion or hidden identity doesn’t do it. Maybe becoming a mixture of negro would help. I’m not trying to be funny. I think they have a real problem.

Shari

1) Name change, 2) nose job, 3) Episcopalian.

I wonder how many secret nose jobs were performed under the Third Reich?

Another proof this is that so many Jews are resigning from being Jews, or a taking great care not to mention it publicly.

It is a terrible thing psychologically to be despised when your identity is ostracized genuinely.

The whole thing is a vicious circle. This drives their contempt and the same time they just want to escape from it all. Do you know how many Israeli kids run away to other countries and change their identities? Jewish kids in New York do this to.

Their whole identity is just too conflicted and rent with extremes. There is a viscous and ruthless status game going on among Jews where you have these cocky and hard barked winners (lawyers, bankers, real estate and business tycoons, etc.) prancing around reminding the majority of losers how intolerable their lives are.

Then they try to dispose of that issue by wrapping it up in a Jewish identity the whole world has dripping contempt for.

Then there is the long-standing association of Jews with the suffering and horrible plight the mangiest group of Egyptian Arabs in the world, the Gaza Palestinians. Americans don’t realize how mangy the Egyptians are in general. In a world of sad bunches they are one of the saddest bunch anywhere on earth. I live on the West Coast and I swear I can smell the stench of Cairo even here. Why anyone goes there as a tourist is beyond me. Eqypt is a stinking loss beyond any kind of repair ever. In Gaza, Egyptian stench and ruin sits in microcosm under the glare of the world media. The Israelis deal with the situation by intermittent butchery that is almost always captured on film for worldwide consumption.

Meanwhile, young men, soldiers from around the world, press down upon the Israelis, each and every one of them a shining hero in their own eyes.

If you see the world as a place of cadences, Jews could not be more out of rhythm. I fully understand why so many of them want to resign from being Jews.

“Jews are in the same boat. In the wake of Iraq, the media are turning against them, too.”

A demurral. The jews are the media. The erosion of the media by technology, that is, the Internet, may help turn the tide but the cancer of jewry is very persistent and lethal.

— backbaygrouch

This is a combination of the standard “All is STILL lost” and the “Jews are the All-Knowing Enemy” bit.

This term “Jews” refers to a group which is presently doing a better job of destroying itself than Hitler ever imagined. The crash in Jewish birthrates makes them jealous of JAPAN. Alan Dershowitz is almost as desperate about Jewish disappearance as he is about getting rid of whites.

What backbaygrouch is talking about is the one thing we associate with the word “Jews,” a millennial hatred of whites. He is NOT talking about what I call pigtail Jews, REAL Jews like the Hassidim.

His Judaism consists entirely of self-pity and hatred. That makes sense, since that is what concerns US. But I was not referring to that definition. I was talking about JEWS, not the only legacy Jews are going to leave.

In their desperate drive against whites, Jews have fouled every nest they have. When Europe loved them dearly and paid them money after WWII, they turned it into a Moslem continent to which they can never return. Their Communist revenge cost hem Eastern Europe. Their Israel made enemies in the entire third world.

In fact, the only country Jews have left is the USA. And here their friends, the left, is turning against them in the wake of Iraq, as I said.

If this is success, it is the kind of success I wish all our enemies.

In the wake of the Hillary debacle, the group that calls itself “the women’s movement” is suffering shell-shock. Yesterday everybody loved them, now they are abandoned. They are so lost in Mommy Professor’s verbiage they genuinely don’t know what happened.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, what happened is obvious.

The “women’s movement and the Youth Counter Culture of the 1960s and the gay movement were popular with the media because of what they were AGAINST. They were white people joining the movement AGAINST whites.

Until THIS YEAR each group of useful idiots was assured that the media loved them for THEMSELVES. Suddenly, when anti-whites have real blacks and Hispanics to go for, the gays and “youth” and “women” are tossed out like a mistress when a man goes back to his beloved wife.

Jews are in the same boat. In the wake of Iraq, the media are turning against them, too.

Useful idiots have been treated that way since Lenin coined the term.

It was, in fact, the way every country in the Soviet Empire was acquired, including Russia. The Communist Party formed a coalition with other Left parties in each country and kicked the other parties out of Parliament. They then formed a smaller coalition and kicked some of THOSE parties out. Finally the Communists were a majority of the rump parliament and threw out their last allies. The last party in Russia Lenin treated that way was the Social revolutionary Party. A WOMAN in that party finally SHOT him.

That was almost ninety years ago. Nine decades later the “women’s movement” can’t understand what hit them.

The Simmons-mderpelding-Dave colloquy on English leads me to some thoughts.

When I was an air negotiator, I was amused by the fact that an Air France pilot flying into Orly Airport in Paris from Marseilles had to speak in ENGLISH. That infuriated them. But nothing could be done about it.

When you are getting air traffic controller instructions there simply is no room for a melting pot. You can’t have one pilot speaking Swahili and another communicating in Urdu. Passengers on an air line include first class VIPs and they are not about to risk their lives on linguistic affirmative action.

At medical schools in Moscow, the first three years are offered in English. That is language all entries from the third world take. In those three years they have to learn Russian.

The kicker is that they also have to take a course in Latin to understand medical terms.

To us, having to learn Latin is quaint. If you are an eighteen-year-old Thai student who has spent TWELVE YEARS mastering the recognized international language which is utterly foreign to you, it is bad enough that you cannot get into a Thai school or a school where they teach in English. It is punishment enough to have to learn Russian.

Then, for no reason you can understand, you are hit with having to learn a dead tongue, plus lots of ancient Greek. All the time you are trying to learn really fluent Russian and make it in medical school.

I can’t say it in Thai, but their comment, roughly translated, is “What in the HELL is this all ABOUT!?”

First class passengers trying to stay alive in air traffic won’t put up with that crap.

I put the discussion below in three fora, BUGS, Sustaining Members and Opposing Views.

The result was two entries about Hillary.

Oh, well, you can lead a horse to water..

I put this article in Sustaining Members and on OV.

Most of the Sustaining Member comments were on the Hillary example, not on my general point.

So I tried again:

Maybe I can get the conversation on the track I have in mind by putting in an answer I gave an anti-white on this same subject in OV. You know what she said, straight Mommy Professor stuff about how White Nationalism wasn’t the way and it divided people instead of uniting them.

I tried to introduce her to the new world and the new world view.

I said,

In the real world Black Nationalism is not an ideology, it is a reality. Blacks have nations and they are not ABOUT to hand them out to others the way you want to do with white countries. Oriental nationalism is also a fact. Neither China nor Japan has even THOUGHT of letting the rest of the world have their countries.

Opposing what you call “White Nationalism” simply means handing out white lands to whoever wants them. It’s fun for you while it lasts, but it only lasts as long as you have something to give away.

Over the years people like you have played the Lady Bountiful to all the grateful colored folk who poured in. More blacks have come to America since 1965 than in the entire slave trade previously. But you no longer have anything for the Faithful Colored Companions to love you about.

They are beginning to wonder what the hell you are doing here on THEIR lands anyway. They are beginning to tolerate YOU. If you say anything about affirmative action, blacks are going to unite AGAINST you. Hispanics will vote against any attempt to limit Hispanic immigration. At the World Series, Hispanics who happened to be born inside the United States greeted, “Our Hispanic Brothers.”

Your Lady Bountiful days are over. They don’t need you. We don’t need you. You have given all you have to give, and what other use ARE you to anybody?

Now that the giving is over, what exactly IS your function in the new world?

Nationalism in other races is not a theory. It is a FACT.

What have YOU got to OFFER anybody? Now that you’ve run out of things to give away, how are you going to be part of the real world power politics bargaining process?

Your entire discussion here is about what you are NOT.

What ARE you? Who do you belong to as a bargaining group?

Giveaway is yesterday. It’s already been given away. The Clintons enjoyed the last of that phase of history.

__________________
My aim is to be a coach for Stormfront, I want to tell you what I have learned about playing this ga[me.]

p

I keep repeating FORGOTTEN things.

One of the things precious few people remember is the “It’s not Israel” media blitz right after 9/11. A poll right after 9/11 showed that OVER TWO-THIRDS of Americans were demanding a complete reassessment of our backing for Israel.

For a month, every Moslem interviewed pointed to Israel as their cause for 9/11. In the same month, every single discussion of 9/11 included a statement that it had nothing to do with 9/11. That two-thirds number dropped steadily.

Wikipedia now has an entry on a newly-developed compressed air car.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_air_car

It includes the standard and packaged statement that it is The Evil Oil Companies that are keeping it from being developed in the US. Like most safe statements, it avoids a critical truth.

The US could get all the oil it needs from Russia. But if we did that, it would leave our only REAL interest in the Middle East, Israel, naked. How do you think the most powerful lobby in Washington, AIPAC, would feel about that?

No one ever mentions that.

Who would DARE mention that?

Simmons is keeping up a drumbeat of comments largely BASED ON ACTION.

He keeps referring to battles he is fighting in AR and Talkmag, but I can’t find the links.

Simmons, please repeat them.

Simmons challenged Mderpelding to USE an approach. This is no criticism of Drpelding. The point here is that Simmons is not just theorizing. He is reporting from the field.

I LOVE that!

We DO need to hammer out our world view here, so theory is ESSENTIAL. Simmons does his share of that, too, and I expect our people to READ THE COMMENTS.

But we always have to keep in mind the attitude that separates Aryans from Chinese Philosophers:

One experiment is worth a hundred Authorities.

TRY IT OUR on people you talk to and anywhere you can get past the censors who are living proof of their fear of us.

And REPORT BACK TO US what WORKS and, just as important, WHAT DOESN’T WORK.

The Internet has put the kibosh on the culture of mastery of texts as the differentiator in the “I am more educated than you are game”.

This has been very hard on Mommy Professor. Academic journals, peer review, and all those credentials just aren’t as cool as they used to be.

But what people don’t get is that mastery of texts has been replaced with mastery of English because that’s the most valuable language on the Internet and where global commerce is conducted.

Bilingualism is a sideshow. English has meaning because the whole nonwhite world wants to master it.

This was true before the advent of the Internet, but the Internet turbocharged the whole process.

What is unseen is that the demise of texts as a means of uniting disparate races and ethnicities into national polities has not only overthrown Mommy Professor, it has demolished the national identities of the 20th century multiracial and nonwhite societies in general, and left them only with the differentiator of the English language as the marker of educational attainment.

Supreme irony. At the very moment white nations are ceasing to exist, the white man’s culture is being elevated to the skies. The entire world is literally tumbling into it at breakneck speed.

Nothing is left but race because there is no uniter other than English in the educational arena. Texts are no longer relevant. And the white man is left without a country in a world that has elevated him beyond anything pre-PC 19th white men could imagine.

p

One of the “insenstive” remarks Hillary made was that Obama couldn’t have beat her if he wasn’t black. The media reports that fact every time it quotes the huge black Obama vote and she said the same thing.

Why did she think she could say that just because it was TRUE?

When it comes to “sensitivity,” no one should know better than a Clinton that the truth is no defense.

It’s funny how, when affirmative action keeps HER out of the job she wants, Hillary is against it.

You should look up “The Fifth Step” in our excellent blog Search function as background to what I am about to say. A lot of people have told me what a relief it is to talk to me about themselves.

The reason may be that it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to find anyone ELSE you can talk to about YOURSELF.

People you are trying to talk to are not listening to YOU. The psychiatrist or counselor is listening to his TRAINING with you are a SUBJECT. He is trying to see where this particular patient fits into his textbooks.

Wordism again.

With the influence of magazines and “How to Win Friends and Influence People” and “good vibes” stuff, the old function of having a friend to talk to has simply disappeared.

Wordism again.

Even before the present age, it was a rare person you could find who you could really talk to. I’ll give you one example and you can think of a dozen:

Any time I tried to talk to my father, he turned it into a chance to show how he was a Tough, Realistic Man and how I, his youngest child, was a callow wimp. He would rather have walked around with his zipper open than admitted that I had anything HE might want to think about.

This is part of a more general problem. When you get around to wanting to level with somebody it is because you are trying to work something out.

Something complicated.

You need for them to listen CAREFULLY. But the person “listening,” being human, has his own agenda. My father was listening to what I said for an opportunity to show me how he was a hero and to give me standard Meaty Man advice.

I try to find out from a computer expert kin of mine about buying a new, cheap desktop, and the conversation always ends up about the laptop he wants me to buy.

This is a normal problem. This is why it is so hard to find someone to listen to YOU.

Some people want to use what you say to show how great they are or to explain “what they have been trying to tell all this time.” Others are Wordist programmed, and no matter what you say, their Book is what you are going to get back.

The fifth step is good practice in listening. But so many people came to ME for it because I had ALREADY disciplined myself to LISTEN to THEM.

p

I really NOTICE things, which you should take as a compliment.

I answered someone in Stormfront who made the reply below to my “Jews and Moslems, HIspanics and Blacks” but it applies to AFKAN here, too.

He said,

Hopefully it doesn’t backfire against us afterward, Bob….

I replied,

You finished with a “…” by which you are trying look profound. But it actually shows you are not addressing your point.

p

There have been more blacks come into the US from Africa since 1965 than were ever imported in slavery.

Keep that in mind when you are looking at the black population in America. What is the relevance of “the slavery story” to these recent immigrants? Just what is the black population in America today?

Look at Obama’s bio.

The demographic arithmetic is just plain out of kilter with backward looking PC. But it is the anti-white whites who get this the least.

– Dave

A critical development is going on everywhere in the West that is so obvious it is ignored.

I grew up with two groups declaring loudly that THEY were “oppressed minorities,” a coalition of blacks and Jews.

Today everyone concentrates on Obama without noticing that he may be undercut by Hispanics. It is taken for granted that, as historically Faithful Colored Companions, Hispanics are showing less inclination to vote for Obama than they have for the traditional white Anglo-Saxon turncoats like Clinton.

The Jewish place is being taken by Muslims throughout the Western world.

In prisons, where black used to unite against whites, the few whites now stand aside while Hispanics slaughter blacks. The Hispanic prison population is now so huge and militant that they are divided into South Mexicans and North Mexicans.

It is clear that Muslims HATE Jews. Hispanic spokesmen do not openly hate blacks. But I did note that in a Los Angeles gang war, one group had to get rid of its black members.

The barrios want what the ghettos HAVE. Anti-white whites, who used to speak for both groups, are becoming irrelevant at an astounding rate. Look at what happened to the Clintons in the last year.

This is the kind of trend that is important. This is the sort of trend that, with the guidance of the Latest News, is entirely ignored.

p

After returning from a visit to the White House, the president of Red China said, “If Americans oppose our retaking of Taiwan they should take down every picture and statue of Abraham Lincoln in Washington, DC.”

This comment got very, very little coverage.

Because it was TRUE.

Just before the first Iraq War, the press reported that, when Hussein told an American diplomat that Iraq regarded Kuwait as an integral part of Iraq that must be reclaimed, the American told him that that was exactly how Lincoln had looked at it!

The media reaction to this past incident was interesting. At first it was shouted out as showing how dumb the Bush Administration was. But then they realize that it put their whole Lincoln Doctrine into question, and we have not heard of it since.

When Yugoslavia used force to keep ITS Union in one piece, they talked endlessly about The Lincoln Doctrine.

p

Early in the season the leftist media creates a myth about the latest liberal messiah. This creates a positive view among the public for pollsters. Then the other side of the story gets told and the balloon gets pricked. Clinton, the smart one, Bill, thinks Obama is going to be a disaster for the Democrats once the story slips from the hands of the NYC/DC media cabal. The Internet should accelerate and enhance this. And never, in my lifetime, has there ever been a less deserving recipient of this than today’s neoconned GOP.

– backbaygrouch

The Perot phenomenon demonstrated this rule.

It is hard for us today to look at history and understand why no one saw the French and Russian Revolutions coming. I compared the March on Rome to Perot.

Every revolution is preceded by a wide, gaping hole in the political landscape which anybody should have seen but nobody does. Every time there are several elephants stamping around in the living room.

Today, as I also pointed out, you can see the hole because everybody who gets paid for talking agrees it isn’t there.

What is frustrating to me is that everybody sees this in retrospect, but they have the same attitude that existed before every major turning-point in history. So while others whine about our being excluded from the dialogue, the fact that we are so desperately excluded is the same as if the establishment said: “These people are the future.”

For years I have been pointing out that the traitors whites are not going to have anywhere to GO. Now Obama just knocked off Hillary and Bill has nowhere to go.

Instead of seeing where I am going, people whine about a black president and insist on being astonished. Please read back over what I have been predicting. Are we going to keep yelling to each other about our helpless tatted and how bad they are until somebody else comes along and fills the political hole?

The reason that white men tolerated mommy professor telling them that they were the oppressors of the whole world, including their own women, was world wars I and II. All that senseless slaughter, took the heart out of them. Those who should have lead, gave over to those who had no business leading. The disgusting part, was that many just pretended.

You ask if we will win. That’s in the realm of faith, but I think that white men are absolutely bound to take over again and white women will stop being foolish and get behind them. I’m sure there will be a ton of tears between now and then as the cost of throwing away, what’s most valuable, becomes more and more apparant. I think that a lesson will have been learned that will not be easily or quickly forgotten.

– Shari

This is the first presidential election since 1960 in which neither an incumbent president or vice president is running. The last time the Democrats elected a president from outside the Old Confederacy was also 1960. And that is the one election in which all political experts agree Democrats could not have won is they had not Lyndon Johnson of Texas to concentrate on the South.

In 1988 even National Review agreed that Dukakis was hopelessly ahead of Bush, Sr. in the polls. Through all the noise, I predicted Bush would win. I had already seen the Democrats slide in election after election between their high at the convention and defeat in November, always with another Northern liberal.

Please don’t tell ME, of all people, that nothing is inevitable in politics. But it is critical both in politics and the stock market to pay attention to the basics in the midst of all the noise and Latest News.

I am just reminding you of some political history.

Thinking about Helms got me to thinking about my Capitol Hill days.

One day, when the staff team was getting ready to do something, one of the team said, “We’ll have Bob do that. Bob can get ANYTHING out of the secretaries.”

I had been on the Hill for years, and I honestly didn’t know I had that reputation.

I treated the “secretaries” as colleagues. The very fact the guy referred to the lady in question as a “secretary” explained the reason he could not understand why I seemed to have this Great Strategy I was not aware of.

Congressmen and Senators almost all had a male Big Wampus called the Administrative Assistant, the guy who ran the office staff and was so often In With the Boss. Each congressman and senator normally had a woman who held the Key to the Kingdom, the one the AA CALLED when HE wanted to See the Boss.

She was NOT a secretary. To the male staff, 1) the female receptionist who had just gotten out of college, the female case workers, a title which took some time and experience, not to mention not getting fired in the meantime, to obtain, and the office manager who sat with a typewriter and decided who saw the Boss, were all “secretaries.”

This combined rudeness and ignorance with stupidity, and that was a sore point with me. I had had quite enough of this combination in decades of dealing with moderate Republicans.

What always got me about Republican moderates was not only that they kept selling us out, which one expects in hardball politics, but that they were STUPID about it. It’s like the saying about Nixon, what bothered a pro was not that he was tricky — he got the PRESIDENCY that way — but that he got CAUGHT at it.

Moderate Republicans kept saying they sold out because it was PRACTICAL, but it WASN’T even PRACTICAL! As long as moderates ruled the Party, it was a minority. EVERY TIME they got hard-core they WON! Then they went back to Jerry Ford’s mantra “The votes are in the middle of the road.”

I kept pointing out that not only did Republicans win when they went hardcore, but a list of congressmen IN CONGRESS would show that the congressional voting records showed that people who GOT elected and STAYED elected were on the right or the left, NOT IN THE CENTER.

They would then repeat the Jerry Ford maxim: “The votes are in the middle of the road.”

I got paid to be very practical about politics. I also had very strong principles. When people violated principle to do something stupid it was a double whammy to me.

Now back to my Machiavellian genius with “the secretaries.” It would never have occurred to me to call the office manager a secretary. It was one 1) a screaming declaration of ignorance, 2) bad manners – it takes YEARS to go from receptionist through case worker to Office Manager and very few make it. And 3) it was STUPID.

My principles are courtesy and respect, but it never occurred to me this was Bob’s Genius at Work. You are talking about the woman into whose hand the Boss has handed the Keys to His Kingdom. If you don’t deal with her as such, you might as well go and throw some coffee into the face of the Big Boss himself.

Please understand I am making two simultaneous points here. First, I am a gentleman and a TEAM WORKER on principle. I was as courteous with the receptionist as with the office manager.

This was not a reaction to feminism. I would have done this is in my teens.

It never occurred to me that any sane man on the Hill didn’t have the same “strategy.”

Until the guy said I had “strategy with the ‘secretaries,’’’ I was genuinely unaware of it. I thought any sane man on Capitol Hill would do what I did.

Yes, the office managers liked me better. Does this surprise anybody?

Again, what really ticked me off about this, though I didn’t make much comment on it at the time, was that this lack of principle – the principle of courtesy among others – was STUPID, and my reaction to it was the same double whammy I had about Moderate Republicanism. Combining stupidity with lack of principle was already a thorn in my side, so my reaction was the same.

What I should have thought of, according to Goodthink, was how offended these women were by this male staff insensitivity. Instead I thought about my OWN sore point, “Oh, my God! Not only are they rude and ignorant, it is STUPID to be rude and ignorant in this case!”

I had had enough of that. That, not Politically Correct sensitivity, was what froze MY gizzard.

If you wish, I’ll tell you later what I DID about it. Right now I am just hammering on how far people go out of their way to be STUPID, which was one of MY pet peeves.

Brian was kind enough to offer me condolences on the death of Jesse Helms. It is another case where Brian shows a remarkable understanding of me personally.

I knew Strom much better personally, of course, but I worked with Helms’ office. When we stopped racial quotas imposed on private schools with the Ashbrook-Dornan Amendments, which I initiated alone and we stopped with a 4-1 majority on the House Floor, Helms took over on the Senate side. Many times I would find that Helms had reprinted speeches I had written for AshBROOK and proposals I had initiated for AshBROOK.

In the late 1970s East was elected as Helms’ junior Senator from North Carolina. East was openly and proudly a Helms man. Right after the election, the lead man for moving East onto Capitol Hill, an old friend of mine, called and said “Senator East wants you to know that you are the first person on the Hill we contacted.”

Helms and East had talked about me at length. I had never been in Helms’ office, much less seen the man, but we had had a long and close relationship as fellow warriors.

People usually want to know how many times I SAW Reagan or had cocktails with the big guys. They are always disappointed when I give a vague answer. I almost never spoke with anyone on the Senate side personally, much less the Senator himself.

ANY Senator.

There is an old military saying, “Never send a man where a bullet can go.”

My rule is MORE important, because it deals with more than a skirmish in a battle that, if Congress had done its work right, would never had happened. That my rule of senior staff that is as rigid as the soldier’s rule cited above:

“Never go to a busy, literate man’s office when you can send him a memo.”

I didn’t call the bosses in until I had done ALL the groundwork and no more could be done without them.

Then I thought things out and wrote an excellent, SHORT memo. That’s why they hired a professional writer. If the man in the front office needed more, he would call me. They seldom needed to see me, and I considered it a bit of a defeat when they did.

I felt very close to Helms, although we almost never saw each other. As you can see from the example of Senator East above, he worked very closely with me. I just lost a friend and hero.

Thanks, Brian.