Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

A Shorter Mantra Thanks to Pat Buchanan?

Posted by Bob on August 29th, 2008 under General, Mantra

When I wrote the long Mantra, it was in a vacuum on white genocide. Now that Pat Buchanan has written Death of the West and editorials on the end of the white race, it may be that a lot of people are sufficiently familiar with the concept that the following short Mantra might be useful:



The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

This is not about culture, this is about RACE.

Repeat: “ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white.

Reperat, all this immigration and intermarriage is for “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries ”


The reason there is a question mark up there in the title is that I am ASKING you about this.

You are well on your way to becoming pros, so I don’t have to warn you about fiddling with something that WORKS.

On other hand, I am desperate to improve what we have. This is serious business, and and I need your input.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by woundednietzsche on 08/29/2008 - 7:47 pm

    I like it and will give it a go.

    One small suggestion:

    Repeat: This is happening to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

  2. #2 by Prometheus on 08/29/2008 - 8:33 pm

    I like the way it says “the words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are used…” This is important. This is one of the points I need to repeatedly make AFTER using the mantra. Anything you need to say everytime after the mantra, should be within it.

    woundednietzsche, what about “This solution is for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries”

    or perhaps “This so called solution is for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries”

    or if you wanted to draw parallels “This final solution to the race problem is for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries”. After all, we were told “assimilation” wouldn’t just solve problems causing current racial friction, but put and end to racism. Period.

  3. #3 by Dave on 08/29/2008 - 9:14 pm

    Our people have suffered four generations of propaganda.

    It doesn’t matter one iota what Pat Buchanan has said or not said.

    The phrase “AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!” works because on an emotional level I am not the only one who notices the dwindling numbers of whites in America.

    Knowing the hypnotist’s secret is crucial for controlling the outcome: There is no such thing as the hypnotic state. Not only that, the hypnotist needs his subject to believe that because that’s how the subject performs the service of focusing his or her own attention and the hypnotist needs focused attention. That’s how you get a hook onto a thread, and from a thread to a string, and from a string to a rope, and with the rope you hang the subject.

  4. #4 by Pain on 08/30/2008 - 5:15 pm

    This short version gets to the point much more quickly. I think both version should be used.

    Since it is boiled down even further, it calls more attention to assimilation, which every respectable conservative pretends is the solution to the invasion problem. By making assimilation stand out more quickly, would-be conservatives are clearly in full of support of genocide.

    This puts phony “paleo-conservatives” in an indefensible stance. Thus self-aggrandizing phonies such as Tommy Fleming are clearly dangerous traitors when they say,

    Indians … and the descendants of former slaves, become naturalized and accept the basic myths and premises of America’s European founding, can be fairly described as “real Americans” … I cannot think of an historic people that has not accepted and absorbed immigrants who are willing to be adopted and accept the mythology and social/moral code of the host…

    How can any conservative such as, Clyde Wilson, Patrick Buchanan, Joseph Sobran, or Paul Craig Roberts continue to associate with such people who are working against them?

  5. #5 by Dave on 08/30/2008 - 11:57 pm

    The most important thing to remember about the Mantra is that it refers to what is in reality very serious crimes.

    The most serious crimes are not against the law. It flummoxes me how few people realize what a huge issue this is in life.

    We need to separate out what we are doing with the Mantra.

    It can’t be about winning an argument, because the subject matter is far too serious for that. The Mantra isn’t meat for a debating society. It is about the most serious crimes being committed against the white race.

    And if it is about fighting, keep in mind that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. The real issue is when to fight.

    If you know how to win fights, then your posture must be forbearance, forbearance, forbearance. Never run after a combat, for the result you seek will most assuredly run away. But if you wait (and wait and wait and wait) the right opportunity for attack may present itself in way where there is no question that the right time has arrived to attack.

    I think of this as natural cadence.

    The American military could never comprehend what I just said. When you structure yourself for a combat, it is imperative that you abandon that structure for actual combat. That’s because winning a fight involves the most elementary form of intelligence. You miss this intelligence if you do not understand that you must not do what you are structured to do because what you are structured to do is an Achilles heel.

    The American military screws up again, again, and again on this count. It is so dependent on its Lincoln Log House structure for combat that it can only carry the combat it is structured to carry out. That’s a formula for defeat if there ever was one, no matter how small or large the scale of operation. This is as true for police operations and military operations as it is for gang fighting and ordinary street fighting too.

    It is a universal principle that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. People who don’t know how to fight never understand this. That is why the martial arts are so big. The worst thing is the world you can do is pretending that fighting is a martial art. If you think that, you don’t understand anything.

    Winning fights involves only the most elementary form of intelligence.

    The Mantra is about serious crimes. Keep that in mind.

Comments are closed.