Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Black is White

Posted by Bob on October 6th, 2008 under General


I mentioned Jane Goodall going ape, excuse the expression, when the fact that chimps patrol their borders and kill intruders was brought to its logical conclusion. They said that borders and fighting, which everybody thought until the 1980s was purely human, was in the nature of social animals in general. Her logical reply was that “It CAN’T be!”

I was watching yet another documentary trying to make Politically Correct sense out of those 4000 year old mummies in China. They are largely blond and they look like a Northern European population. Other documentaries praised the probability that those whites disappeared into the local population and look like everybody else now, which is the goal of Diversity,

This documentary took the Goodall Approach: “They CAN”T be!” It said the mummies were not white, but part of the Melting Pot. They called in some DNA folks to testify for them. The same genes were found in populations as far away as Siberia and India.

In other words, where each wave of Aryan movement had long since come these Aryan genes were also found. So they were a melting pot population, not whites.

As in the Mantra, where whites go is a Melting Pot area. One documentary traced the only probable origin of the Clovis Point to Europe. They concluded that America was therefore a Melting Pot country from the word go. This is the new Party Line: Where whites obviously brought in the inventions, like the wheel, the area is declared to have been a Melting Pot from the first.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Simmons on 10/06/2008 - 8:19 pm

    Instead of a PHD disertation just ask them if white genes then are a plus or a negative in this “melting pot?” Then when they say yes tell them they should ask the locals what they think about white genes contributing to their sucesses.

  2. #2 by shari on 10/06/2008 - 9:06 pm

    The university, the same as politicians, are now outright lying. Our local one, just recently had Jane Goodall, with a younger picture, looking very saintly. Not too long ago, they had Michael Bellesiles. This was AFTER he had been exposed as a fraud. Didn’t matter! I see what you mean about ancient history too! This is exciting.

  3. #3 by Dave on 10/07/2008 - 12:32 am

    Cults are traffickers in our innate desire to be relieved of the burden of our selfhood and it is our desire to be relieved of the burden of selfhood that drives our susceptibility to suggestion.

    It is a mistake to simply decry and criticize this. Because to do so is to miss the enormous role this susceptibility plays in life.

    Those that are blind to it are blind to the way power is really exercised. And in politics it is not what is true that matters, but rather what is subliminally NOTICED.

    There is a reason attractive white females have become the face of white nationalism, whether Alessandra Mussolini and Brigitte Bardot in Europe or Sarah Palin in America.

    The attractive white female cannot be parried by the forces of Political Correctness for the simple reason there is no way to parry the greater attractiveness of the attractive white female as compared to any attractive nonwhite female. You can’t get rid of the attractive white female’s superior attractiveness.

    To the mass of people, this is like the hypnotist grabbing them collectively by the nape of the neck.

    Now let us suppose Obama is elected. We already have a high interest rate environment which in itself changes the tone of society profoundly. On top of that, in the advent of an Obama Presidency the right wing gets to take its gloves off, finally freed from the tyranny of the neo-conservatives.

    But think of the psychology: As there is no way the attractiveness of the attractive white female can be parried, there is also no way the physical ugliness of Obama and his ugly wife can be parried. To make it worse, you know that they are going to try to mimic Jack and Jacqueline Kennedy!

    It will be ghastly.

    Now the only thing that worries me about female leaders is that I have never encountered a skilled female hypnotist, so the ability of a female to skillfully lever the public’s susceptibility to suggestion is a real question.

    One of the greatest mass seducers ever was Marilyn Monroe. But she was a seducer, not a hypnotist.

    Adolph Hitler was a great hypnotist in the 19th century style. He probably learned his skills on the battlefield no different than many other notable men, less infamous, learned their leadership skills. He must have noticed that leadership on the battlefield was simply a matter of the ability to get the men around him to relax, remain centered, and forget their selfhood.

    Any truly good military leader is like that. Men want to be around them, to feel good and forgot their selfhood.

    Those fiery (but rhythmic) speeches Hilter gave after he acquired power were designed to wring the anxiety and sense of selfhood out of his audience for the purpose of levering their susceptibility to suggestion. It was all very deliberate, a technique of inducing mass relaxation, the opposite of what is commonly assumed.

    Women are very bad at getting people to relax in mass settings. On the contrary, they tend to be shrill. That was Hillary’s problem, very unlike her husband.

    The name of the game in levering an audience’s susceptibility to suggestion is inducing people to relax.

    It would be great if an attractive white female like Sarah Palin could prove an exception to females being unable to master the arts of mass hypnosis, because it is obvious that an attractive white female is our best choice for breaking the mass of people out of the trance of Political Correctness.

    Now I admit what I just stated is a contradiction. But it is only a contradiction if you fail to understand how profoundly susceptible people are to suggestion and the huge role that plays in our lives.

    The proof is the extraordinary focus on white female leaders at the present time.

  4. #4 by Marwinsing on 10/07/2008 - 7:23 am

    Joan of Arc, Hanna Reitsch, where are you two when we most need you? – oh they came back reincarnated as Mother Theresa and Princess Di.

    Damn, the Kumbahjah Brigade again.

    I fear Palin will be a let-down.

  5. #5 by Simmons on 10/07/2008 - 11:03 am

    “Melting Pot?” more like a melt down, once white genes are no longer recognizable in the population its backwards they go. Egypt, Amerinds of North America (the ones in Central America were waiting for the white man to come back to lead), China burning its ships content to stagnate for centuries. Still liberals will be liberals and we must question them at every step. “How did that ‘Melting Pot’ work out?”

  6. #6 by shari on 10/07/2008 - 11:27 am

    http://shopping.discovery.com/product-59637.html Haven’t seen this,but the preveiw clip looks good!

  7. #7 by Sys Op on 10/07/2008 - 11:54 am

    I’ve seen it and have a couple copies. If you want one, you can Paypal the shipping money and I’ll send it to you. It is FAR too light on any real science that I was expecting. It’s largely a “days in the life of” reenactment of what it might have been like back in the last European/US ice age — but very little science or facts about why they think it. From other really well document books which only deal with current science and facts we have our hands on (the great stuff is the Anarctic) I don’t buy into most of the make-believe flick.

  8. #8 by shari on 10/07/2008 - 6:50 pm

    Sysop, I replied to you, but something happened to it. Been having trouble with this site today. Is anybody else?

  9. #9 by Tim on 10/07/2008 - 9:09 pm

    I saw this documentary as well! Yeah it was a diversity is our strength –we are all mixed nonsense. It was true only in a sense that Siberia, India and China has a population that actually has some white genes. Yeah they are mixed —-but how does that benefit us? We are supposed celebrate our mixed future in India or China! LOL. They all want to live with us!

  10. #10 by shari on 10/07/2008 - 9:34 pm

    Sysop, this is what I said earlier. I appreciate your overveiw and think that it sounds like an acurate one. I have been very disgusted with paypal as they knock off sites for the generic bs of being a “hate site.” No explainations. They did this to The Political Cesspool and The Last Ditch that I know of. I ordered The Fingerprints of the Gods. It was supposed to come by today, but it didn’t, so I hope it will show up.

  11. #11 by Simmons on 10/08/2008 - 10:57 am

    Sigh It seems a good many posters fall into the trap of liberal authority. Remember these “good” liberals all claim Evolution as their “It.” Yet these same clowns deny Evolution with melting pot theory, now one of those theories is closer to the truth.

    One theory puts all the animals in a pen to melt together to create whatever. The other theory has the animals running loose choosing to breed and seperate and create new lines in the species. So which is it? Have these all so brilliant PHDs ever been asked this?

    When a lib shrieks at you that he believes in Evolution ask them if they believe in Genetic selection (you will notice fear in his eyes for he is beyond the cult and in a scary place). You are dealing with cultists here, and Dave pretty much sums them up, up thread.

    And for entertainment rent Shamalayan’s “The Village”

  12. #12 by Simmons on 10/08/2008 - 11:07 am

    And it is why Bob invented the Mantra so people wouldn’t wander off and come under the spell of an academic shaman.

  13. #13 by Bob on 10/09/2008 - 3:23 pm

    Tim, there was no mixed blood in those mummies. They simply went to the places where Aryan dispersals had occurred andc said that since those areas are nolonger white, the mummies must have been mixed.

    You can get away with anything if the “opposition” is a bunch of cowards.

Comments are closed.