In our world, you can get away with it because unemployed lefty arts students who promote liberalism don’t literally take food away from your childrens mouth. We can support PC ideals like a diverse neighbourhood because there are (were) neighbourhoods which were all white where we could live and preach from.

The Australian government is actually considering LOWERING immigration due to the economic downturn. When push comes to shove, the vast majority of sheep will move away from PC, just as people are moving away from minorities and taking their children out of ‘diverse’ schools.

PC says this doesn’t happen, so if we believe that white people don’t do this, then we can explain away the few known occurences due to some abberation, ie, “racist whites”.

But there is one useful thing that knowledge and ‘mantra style thinking’ gives you. It’s the same advantage that good scientific theory gives. The ability to predict.

That was a wonderful post. You captured Wordism perfectly. Wordists believe that it is our ideas and the sentiments attached to them that determine outcomes.

To them the word “cat” comes first. To hell with that four legged furry product of nature over there. That creature just gets in the way of the word “cat” and its orthodoxy preventing the advent of a perfect world, and so must be” educated” to rid it of its error of actually being a “cat”, a flesh and blood reality that cannot be captured or described by words and sentiments.

Kurt Vonnegut very successfully promoted this nonsense as the foundational paradigm of his ethics, so popular with the “anti-war” crowd, today hugely influential. His basic idea was “ideas are all that matter”.

This pretty much describes public education today.

We ‘racists’ dont play the game. The fact we dont go along spoils the illusion.

Interesting when I used to talk to socialists how much they would disparage ‘facts’ and ‘knowledge’, as if factual information was NOT a means of determining the nature of existance. It didn’t matter if something was true. Thought was judged not on accuracy, but adherence to PC dogma.

PC should thank god it has respectables to furnish the cover it needs to be seen as legitimate.

The inconsistency of Political Correctness goes far beyond its inconsistent ideological patter.

For example, Israel devotes most of its funding for martial purposes, but Israel is not a martial culture. That is Political Correctness.

In contrast Japan devotes hardly any funding for military purposes, but Japan is a marital culture. Furthermore, Japan officially outlaws military funding, the exact opposite of its real culture. That too, is Political Correctness.

Don’t hold your breath looking for consistency.

If it were Japanese troops (let us suppose they could have been hired in) that were ordered to make frontal infantry assaults on Hezbollah positions in Lebanon in the summer of 2006, even today’s generation of Japanese youth would have fought to their death right down to the last man (kid), no questions asked. In contrast, Israeli youth disobeyed explicit orders to attack Hezbollah positions and cut and ran rabbit instead. That again, is Political Correctness.

This is just another way of saying that Political Correctness veils the conflict between culture and funded institutions (who pretend a culture).

And culture trumps funding (the funded institution) every time. And the inconsistency between culture and funding is Political Correctness.

The Mantra is seed corn for (real) culture. And you can only find consistency in (real) culture.

Outside of real culture (not pretended culture), you will never find consistency.

That is why the very foundation of Political Correctness is to veil what cannot be reconciled.

That is what makes the Mantra important. It is seen corn for real culture and culture trumps funding (and the veil of Political Correctness) every time.