Archive for November, 2008
BW hit the target with remarkable precision in his comment about Screwtape and complexity.
But for the most part the circulation of misunderstanding is not motivated. Words replace understanding on account of ignorance. And there is a lot of ignorance that cannot be addressed. It is baked-in-the-cake.
But what I have learned from BUGS is this: If you don’t have a clear-cut understanding of the goal, you can’t make sense.
And the goal should be the ditching of words that circulate misunderstanding. There is so much hard study and oceans of effort expended on account of the want of the right word or the right phrase.
The right word or the right phrase clears everything up in an instant. I will give you an example: What is the goal of Central Banking? Answer: To get a quart of wine from a pint bottle.
I just summed the entire message of the Austrian school of economics that complains wrongly of the unfairness of not having whole academic departments devoted to it.
Thank God it doesn’t. The fact that nobody is willing to spend money on promoting Austrian economics is its very salvation.
Ditto, for little intellectual groups such as us.
Like everything else I keep hammering on, this concept is so simple it is ignored. Everybody uses it all the time, but they don’t THINK about it.
It is fully understood that a person who does not see the difference between an advertisement and any other information needs adult diapers. Any sane adult knows why an advertiser says what he says.
But it stops there.
It was the same with supply and demand. For as long as we have had records merchants have looked for shortages of particular goods in one place and an abundance f the same goods in another place. But for thousands of years those in economic looked for a Natural Price.
The rice system is not perfect. Well HOOP-DE-DOO! Supply and demand is BASIC, and if you ignore it you end like the Soviet Empire. The Chinese economy is impressing everyone with it growth. Actually China was at starvation levels when it ignored supply and demand. As they get away from that disease, they show a LOT of FAST improvement.
If you have pneumonia penicillin will make you better fast. But that does not mean that anti-biotics are the key to perfect health. China has not discovered the key to economic development. It has begun to use a cure for a disease.
But once again, the world cannot see that, anymore than it could see that supply and demand, which was basic to all trade, had further implications.
“Why do people say things?” is a rule that is as important and universal as supply and demand. If I can supply a motive for your saying what you say, the chances are that what you say is not true. Like supply and demand or any other rule of human action, this is not A Final Truth.
It is possible that what you say can be explained accurately as what you NEED to say, and that it is still true. This is coincidence. It is the same thing as saying that a broken clock is right twice a day.
Sane people want a clock that TICKS.
I will make a report from the front lines. I have not done that in a while.
Since the election, I have noticed something different around whites. Even in ‘multicultural’-’multiracial’ settings. Many folks are saying outright they are racist. About a half dozen times since the election, I have heard people say things and not care that someone calls them racist. Saying flippant things afterward like “so what I am racist–all whites are racist to you idiots”.
They usually smile at me afterwords for me to acknowledge their bravery. I tell them —it is about time you stopped acting like a SHWA (self hating white animal).
I used to demand someone define racism. Over the last few months since I have noticed a change. I am taking a different approach off top and it has been working very well. I say:”In your OPINION, he is racist—you are just saying that cuz he’s white—-antiracism is a just a code word for antiwhite”. After this, they have been shutting up quickly. Shutting up a liberal SHWA off the top is a big event. I have been shocked once or twice. Even before I demand that they define racism and go nuclear with a Mantra (one of my shortened off the cuff versions or Bobs). They have been shutting up quickly. Very weird.
This reminds me of watching someone get conned by a good conman. At first the party that has been conned is in deep denial. They don’t want to admit they have been conned because they are embarrassed. Then they come to except they have been conned. Then the final step…..ANGER…
I think some liberals (and dare I say –even some so-called conservatives) are realizing they have been conned. This is a big step. I am starting to notice this. Maybe others are as well. And it is about damn time they realize something.
I have more hope for the liberals than the so-called conservatives. In a communist system, the most dangerous people to the system are former members who are disillusioned and pissed off.
I’ve gone to seminary. (This will give me lots of opportunity to stay up with BUGS.) Much of the decision, oddly(?), is because of you, so either you borrow more from your Christian boyhood than you thought, or you are somehow a closet Christian that needs to let go and let his faith blossom. But either way, it’s between you and your Maker. Anyway thanks for your clear thinking which has helped me out in more ways than you would have thought.
You are the best online. Any true leader recognizes that, and since there are always fewer chiefs than Injuns, it may be that your audience appeal has reached the ones it should, whether every reader comments here or not.
By the way, the book that led me to racial thinking is the Bible, especially the Old Testament, when I was in middle school.
Given my reputation as a bomb-thrower it is fun to be called a “closet” anything. I have made it very clear where I think of myself as Christian. My whole family was studded with preachers back to Alexander Whitaker and he was merely a continuation.
It is far easier for me to be a Christian than it is for any professional clergyman because he must satisfy some version of the Wordist institutions that have used his name. It is a hell of lot easier to be sincere in politics if you aren’t working for anybody.
Of necessity I was a political pimp. Any professional clergyman has to make the same kind of deal, “all things to all men.” If I had not made that deal in my field I would not have had access to the audience. A clergyman must do the same to have access to that group. “IN the world but not OF the world.”
It is not accidental that I quote the most obvious and basic statements. Jesus’ last instruction puzzled the Apostles: “Feed my sheep.” To me this is plain enough. As one who is charged with the care of his people, your job is to do what is best for them.
I have never believed that “The Road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions” because Satan has none of that building material. I tend to believe that the road to hell is paved with something Satan has PLENTY of: Complexity.
“.. for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.” He was not talking about Gnostics and theologians – much the same thing – but about children. How many light years are there between a Pope or a Calvin and childhood as a virtue?
“Feed my sheep” was very puzzling to Disciples who had had the truth spoon fed to them. But they were now apostles, and the decisions were THEIRS. This involves moral courage.
You are going into seminary as I went into politics, as way to do the right thing IN THIS WORLD. That careful distinction was stated long ago. As CS Lewis said, Christianity is no danger to Screwtape so long as the person doesn’t DO anything about it.
But the doing has to be dedicated to the simple rules laid by Jesus and not to satisfying the rules of a Wordist institution. This is so simple it is hard to understand. I USED politics. You must USE the church. So as not to get obsessed with self-righteousness, I just all it “pimping” and proceed on. We must operate IN the world. To a rigid conscience this involves pimping.
So Pure Religion became isolation and self-torture, as one writer put it,”Taking heaven by storm.” It was a very painful way of avoiding feeding the sheep. It was a way to do nothing. Self-immolation fed no sheep.
You must feed his sheep, and you must do it in this world.
As you say, I find no problem with this because I was raised with it.
These distinctions are simple. They are NOT easy.
In his comment on the article below, AFKAN addresses my points specifically and logically. Prometheus then makes the point that needs to be made on using the Mantra.
Prometheus speaks from experience.
What AFKAN did give me was his first partial report from the front. He says he is going out into evangelical churches. But the who what where and when is entirely missing. How does he approach it? Does he get results?
BUGS is unique because we 1) take into account where we actually are right now and 2) How to get out the message we need to get out now.
AFKAN seems to be putting in length pieces about how the Prophet Covington says the world should be. BUGS is more about identifying Step I and how to go about it.
To me AFKAN often sounds like General Washington sitting at Valley Forge and spending his thought on what the final peace treaty with Britain should look like. Mantra Thinking by contrast is about we can keep the war going with the resources at our disposal.
Can we effectively use our slender forces to sneak attack the Hessians at Christmas? How can we hit them, not at Philadelphia with their enormous forces, but in a way that goes around their defended positions and gets attention to OUR message?
Stormfront tells us all about the fine points of how the world should look after the torchlight parade or our Yorktown. Stormfront can tell us all about arguments that SHOULD work. They never notice that they DON’T work.
Stormfront tells us about Alternatives. But those Alternatives are all about attacking the enemy in their PREPARED positions. Certainly I wish that Covington’s White Family helped BUGS do OUR job. AFKAN largely uses BUGS to sell Covington.
Out of courtesy, if nothing else, AFKAN needs to use our seminar to discuss what WE are trying to do. For US, his mere mention of evangelicals, his ACTION, needs the kind of attention he devotes to Covington’s New Order at such length.
AFKAN says he had taken care of the Mantra. He tells us he just says “Fight white genocide.”
Those who work up front know very well how absurd this is. In real action, you don’t get two chances. The other guy just laughs and says, “I’m not for genocide.”
Because he is not on the front like Prometheus and Lord Nelson and other BUGS people AFKAN doesn’t deal with this. And THAT, boys and girls, is why I am always looking for comments like those of Simmons when he discusses in passing what he has DONE lately.
AFKAN is pure theory, and he has some very good insights. But he keeps repeating the same thing to convince US while we are out there doing the WORK of converting the world.
Anyone who is completely on the side of our race is good people. But BUGS is about PRACTICE. Stormfront is about how the world should be. What I have to offer that is unique is forty years of PRACTICE.
My stuff WORKS.
Anybody using today’s political logic in 1868 would have concluded that Reconstruction in the South was permanent. Absolutely every kind of arithmetic and political logic said so.
A major portion of the Southern white male population was dead. All its natural leadership, consisting of men who had held the rank of Colonel or above in the Confederate Army, was disfranchised. In the Deep South, blacks were a majority before the decimation of the white males in the War. In other Southern states the mountain vote was Republican.
And as today a huge segment of the white population was anti-white.
Now let us add the “practical” considerations. Federal occupation secured the entire Southern vote for the Republicans who ruled in Washington.
What in the HELL could change all that?
Logically, nothing could.
The Soviet Empire simply could not just vanish. Nothing was less likely in 1981.
What happened to the USSR was simply that it existed on force. What happened to Reconstruction was that it existed on force.
The Soviet Empire was a constant effort. Reconstruction was a constant effort. Our rule in Iraq is a constant effort. Robert Ardrey pointed out in the 1970s that, for some reason, occupations do not last.
Most people are deeply impressed by the all-out effort, the vast dedication, and the forces that are dedicated to multiracialism.
To me that sheer effort is the sure sign that it is doomed.
We have been this way before.
Brian would not rest until he found the missing portions of Whitaker Online and put them in.
I am obsessive myself, but there is nothing that an obsessive appreciates like Brian who decides to obsess on my own writings. That made an old man’s decade. It was the compliment of compliments.
WhitakerOnline was ten years old in September of this year. Unlike other media Brain, SysOps and I make no attempt to do a 1984 Orwellian cleanup of what I thought at any given stage.
I was wrong a LOT! I was absurd a lot. We present it with warts on.
Which is good. I guess.
I don’t blame my techs for not having the kind of reverence for me that Soviets working for Stalin had for him. Anyone familiar with Soviet history has seen the doctored photographs where Stalin had had his arm around a Party official who was later liquidated. The later photo showed Stalin standing there alone with a rare imitation of the same arm hanging free.
Anything Stalin said that was absurd was cut out or edited by his loyal subordinates.
Do you think Brian and SysOps did that for ME?
Every single dumbass and inaccurate statement I made over the years is obsessively preserved by them.
They are wonderful people. They are honest people.
Honesty can be a pain the ass.
I love them anyway.
Dave says in his latest comment, “Don’t you see that that is what Bob Whitaker is trying to say?”
After what seems like a million years in this game what I say is very profound precisely because it is, IN RETROSPECT, so obvious. Let’s take hammering the Mantra in as an example.
The Mantra strategy goes right back to the oldest rule discovered and used by Western military strategists. Giant Eastern armies used hordes of soldiers whipped into frenzy to frighten their enemies into panic. From the Greek Hoplites to the Romans, Westerners developed an anti-terror approach.
In other words, facing terror tactics from the East, they developed a discipline to counter it. The Hoplites were a disciplined group standing sh9uld to shoulder against the screaming masses of Eastern forces.
Roman soldiers developed this further. In direct contrast to the screaming hordes of their enemies they learned to ignore the shrieks of their enemies and to stand shoulder-to-should in a line that did not pay any attention to the emotion and sheer number of the forces against them. They dealt directly with only one thing: the part of the enemy forces that was actually coming up against them.
The numbers of emotion of the forces that were COMING at them was ignored. They stood shoulder to shoulder and killed the disorganized, emotionally charge forces that actually REACHED them.
When you do that, the overwhelming masses and screams that were such a part of war in the East became irrelevant. No matter how they yell, the only ones who matter are the ones who actually reach your lines. And the ones who actually reach your lines from the screaming masses are disorganized pushovers.
Flash forward to the famous British Thin Red Line. If they had thought about what those Zulus would DO to them if they lost they WOULD have lost. But their whole approach was to ignore that and:
“Stay in Formation! Load! Aim! FIRE!”
I am not impressed that non-whites can get a hundred thousand demonstrators at with a snap of their fingers. It is the same old equation whites have always faced. Non-whites were always infinitely more impressive. And they always lost.
There is an old adage of Western military strategy: “One native can beat one civilized – white – soldier.” “In a battle between ten savages and ten white soldiers, the outcome is a tossup.”
“But when there are a hundred disciplined white soldiers, the savages, a thousand or a million, are doomed.”
The reason for this is old and obvious. There may a million of them, but only a limited number can reach your front line. If you stand and blast THOSE out of existence, the next wave is climbing over bodes, and it is even more vulnerable.
Stand shoulder to shoulder, and fire at the ones in front of you.
Thousands of times, from the Hoplites to the Thin Red Line, through millennia, soldiers felt suffocated by this conformity: “Our enemies are using variation and psychological warfare. Shouldn’t we be flexible and adopt some of that?”
The answer was, “Why? Do you see any sign that their crap is WORKING?”
Hit them with the Mantra. No matter what their numbers at their rallies, hit the ones who you actually reach with the Mantra.
As the thousands smashed against the Roman line or the Thin Red Line, anyone looking at the battlefield would have seen only the thousands coming on. But in the end the thousands were slaughtered.
Don’t tell me about News and Jews.
Stay in formation.
Load. Aim. Fire.
When it comes to negotiating for whites there is a reality:
Which, again, is so obvious that no one mentions it.
Everybody WANTS to be white.
That is why libertarians get short shrift. They argue that whites should have the same right to all-white communities that other races do their own communities. This never sells but that never stops them.
This nice-sounding argument is dismissed for a reason everyone knows but no one mentions. It is assumed that, if whites are allowed to separate, there wouldn’t be any whites who would choose to live outside their own communities.
Exactly that happened when busing was at its peak. There were not enough whites left after white flight to racially balance schools. In one famous faux pas, a black government official said that, “White children are a precious resource which must be distributed carefully.”
I don’t think I need to tell you about the storm that THAT piece of bare reality caused. It was the whole basis of busing, but it was also NEVER to be mentioned.
Bill O’Reilly with his education degree states the whole basis of the respectable position:
“There can be no all-white ANYTHING in America.” This assumes that all non-whites want to be white, and every non-white negotiator goes in with that assumption.
Once again, this is so obvious no one says it, exactly like the Mantra. Everything here interrelates, and this interrelates with the Mantra. There can be no white escapees AND WE ALL KNOW WHY.
It is very important to me when one of you adresses exactly what I was saying and extends on it.
That is the intellecual HELP I keep begging for.
Your missing BW’s point here entirely. The Mexicans have not taken over.
I live in a community full of Mexicans. Rest assured by direct observation, they don’t have a pot to piss in. Literally.
That’s why they are camping out in our parks.
The message is balkanization. Look at it from the successful politicians perspective. Do you really think that our politicians aren’t aware that there is no public?
Concealing that fact is one of their greatest challenges. Go out and run for office. Find out for yourself.
Nobody has anything in common. Political dialog is fabricated by those paid to fabricate it.
Obama’s public coalition goes away the minute his paid volunteers leave their posts to await the next election cycle. It never really existed. It was an event hosted by the establishment. That means they paid for it. If the money didn’t flow nothing would have happened.
Our advantage lies in the fact that the establishment primarily public employee unions in one guise or another (and highly compensated executives) can’t buy what they really need.
This is the establishment’s primary problem.
Sarah Palin can’t hire BW to write the Mantra.
The Mantra doesn’t come into existence for pay.
All those posts I have compiled on NationalSalvation.net cannot come into existence for pay. That intellectual gold mine only exists on a volunteer basis, entirely unmotivated by electoral politics.
But goldmines like that determine the future.
They contain the seeds of what is really needed.
One of the outstanding characteristics of BUGS is that we do not keep flopping back into the past.
Prometheus and other commenters from yesterday made me think about this. It is almost impossible to get anybody to think in terms of what is developing NOW rather than trying to make everything today into a reconstruction of the past.
You know what I mean. No matter how much lip service others give to modern technology and how the world is different, the moment they relax they start talking about The Book That Will Change History.
Another example is how nobody but us lives in the age we are in. They keep rushing to the borders to keep the Mexicans out.
The Mexicans are HERE, gang!
Others are still living in an age when whites were the top group preserving its unique position. That keeps them on the defensive. As long as whites maintain this STRATEGIC view, they will face a united front of all other groups against them. Everybody tacitly accepts this view that whites have it and others want it, which was accurate enough in 1950.
So in 1950 pro-whites were conservative. As usual, my explanation is so obvious that everyone knows where I am going and agrees with it. Then they go right back to talking in old terms. This is a painful tome because I need you to go WITH me to the NEXT stage.
I need your intellectual HELP.
When I talk about “spokesmen for white people” it is an entirely different concept from what others mean. When I say “spokesmen for white people” I am NOT speaking of helping the white race as on the defensive in white-oriented society.
This conservative approach to speaking for the white race is Republicanism, and we all know where THAT is going. It sees the world as a two-sided battle between whites and their values in power and “the others.”
The Mexicans are HERE, gang! In a two-sided battle between whites and non-whites, simple arithmetic tells us the whites will lose. That is the story of politics today. We all see it, but I feel as if I’m the only political strategist who DEALS with it.
While Pat Buchanan, God bless his courageous soul, is stating the facts about political demography, Republicans, who are wailing about “the minority vote,” are saying exactly the same thing.
Here is my point which, as usual, is very obvious and absolutely impossible for anybody to stay with consistently, is this:
Republicanism deals with a world where there are two sides, conservative whites and “others.” Their whole hopeless emphasis is on converting some “others.” They do not divide the world racially, but by those who stand for “their” values and others.
Let me repeat: this is a TWO-SIDED fight. It is a two-sided fight that arithmetic tells EVERYBODY that Republicans will lose.
I will have to repeat this hundreds of times while people loll back into some version of the two-sided fight:
In a two-sided fight whites are weak and getting weaker. BUT WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
When I talk about “white spokesmen” I am NOT talking about a future in which the fight is two-sided. As the group holding out in a citadel against the rest of the world, Republicans are in a hopeless position.
As spokesmen concerned with the survival of our RACE, one is in the position of speaking for what is still infinitely the most powerful group in a MULTI-SIDED struggle.
Everybody sees that the arithmetic is fatal, but nobody has any idea of changing the arithmetic itself.
The bottom line is this: If you go representing Values everybody sees it is a two-sided battle you will lose. If you go into a real world with different races unapologetically representing their own, the white spokesman can be enormously powerful.
Does anybody GET this? Is anybody capable of KEEPING that outlook?
We are yet to see the real spokespeople for white people come forth, but soon some whites will start asking for one.
White Nationalists have it all wrong. The Stormfront view is that you’ve got to rally, and rally real hard to get white people to want to protect their interests. Self preservation wasn’t bred out of us, it’s just a lot of crap has gotten in the way.
The mantra cuts the crap.
People who engage in self-destructive vices will still fight for their life when the choice between life and death is stark. The mantra brings out the stark reality of PC, of “anti-racism” and tolerance.
Dave’s discussion of the tool we need causes me once more to refer to an oft-repeated theme I keep pushing:
The power of the future will be with those who become spokesmen FOR the white race. And by this I mean Mantra spokesmen. On the respectable right, the spokesman for the white race is a black man married to white woman who keeps being lauded by National Review for sponsoring Civil Rights Initiatives which outlaw affirmative action.
In the Movement there are many professional spokesmen who are AGAINST Jews or illegal aliens.
Both the respectable conservatives and the professional spokesmen in the Movement just keep losing. But they consider themselves legitimate spokesmen for whites against what they perceive as the attack on whites. They cannot take over white intellectual leadership because of their limitations, and their limitations go back to the basic point: “Why do people SAY things?”
As BUGS people WHO ARE DOING THEIR JOB know from EXPERIENCE the Mantra is a whole ‘nother animal. It separates us form respectable conservatives because we are talking about racial survival, not just safe attacks on targets that retain one’s respectability.
The Mantra uses another theme I keep hammering at: Saying something so obvious that no one notices it.
Movement professionals face the same problem Kennedy Assassination hype deals with. It is simply impossible for the average person to accept that a single Communist ex-military sharpshooter changed history. To LITERALLY sell it, you need for the story of the Big Event to be as massive as the event.
There was money in the conspiracy movie JFK. No one has ever even THOUGHT of making a movie about Lee Harvey Oswald’s life.
So no Movement Leader is going to settle for hitting the obvious fact that we are facing genocide. They have to have a complete Evil Scenario, a “JFK” of their own.
They have to sell BOOKS.
On the contrary, we at BUGS spend a lot of time trying to boil the short Mantra down even more. This sets us entirely aside from respectables who make their livings by never criticizing that fundamental tenet of our established religion, interracial marriage, and from professionals in the Movements who must sell BOOKS.
I am not criticizing our professionals. They did what they had to do to fight for our race. I made my living and my retirement by being a conservative pimp. Now that I am financially secure, I am doing what needs to be done THROUGH YOU. But a lifelong professional conservative pimp in no position to preach at David Duke or Jared Taylor on MORAL grounds. This is strictly strategy. It is a strategy I can NOW follow.
Once again, EVERYTHING HERE INTERRELATES. This goes back to one of the many short, OBVIOUS points I keep hammering you with, in this case, “Why do people SAY things?”
We have a special tool no official leader can afford. We don’t NEED to sell an exciting book and we don’t need respectability to make a living.
The Race Issue just took first place, in all realms of development, and no one – publicly – outside this blog seems to even both to care, much less try to understand.”
Nevertheless, the race issue shall remain in first place regardless.
There is great power that can be picked up fairly simply by ditching the kinds of words and phrases that circulate misunderstanding.
But saying this is no different than all those wanna be talents that have vision without the capability to execute at a practical level. For that a tool is needed and after all, tools are repositories of congealed intelligence. They are way of propagating intelligence while bypassing instruction.
So the future becomes a linear extrapolation simply because no one can imagine the tools that are destined to actually create it. It is a leap from the telegraph to the modern PC. With hindsight, the leap is perfectly logical. But no one in 1865 saw it.
In my work, I need a capability to animate the behavior of fluids in 3D in a structure of connected pipes and reservoirs and I am frustrated that the tool I want doesn’t exist (pragmatically speaking).
Now, if I were a genius in playing chess, perhaps I would not require this.
Tools are a whole lot more important than geniuses, geniuses being flat out hard to come by, and lacking the right tools and geniuses are the real reason the people who rule us continually screw up.
But nonwhites, generally and genetically speaking, cannot create the tool.
I discussed the piece on The Family Guy where the girl used the old hippie, “Only Man has wars,” and Death made an idiot of her, “What are you talking about? Animals kill each other all the time!”
Today the entire audience of Family Guy, including the YUPPIE college grads, know that border wars are routine and merciless among all social animals. It is a ruling theme in the wildly popular meerkat saga.
But in the 1960s, no one had any idea of this. Even the chimpanzee lady in Africa would then have SWORN that chimps did NOT patrol their borders and kill alien chimps who violated them. Now even the most brain-dead college grad knows it.
The problem is that people get only one lesson at a time. This is why a continuing theme here is “obsessing on examples.” Yes, the fact that all the experts were unbelievably wrong about war being only a man-made institution underlay all 1960s thought. Yes, that particular discovery made those particular hippies–Marxists–ideas laughable.
But there is a repeat of an old lesson here, one that no one EVER takes into account. It is more general than an obsession with taking The Latest Thing into account. It is that you must not build your world on ANY Latest Thing.
Which is why I keep hitting “News and Jews.” The lesson here is that there will be another Latest Thing that will make your present Latest Thing yesterday’s news. This is so obvious that no one SEES it.” Another theme I beat to death here.
PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS PREDICTING THE FUTURE BASED ON THE LATEST THING, BUT THEY NEVER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT THERE WILL BE MORE LATEST THINGS.
Back when I was still semi-respectable, I made this obvious point and was listened to. It was a generation ago when the discovery of early man’s predecessors was going full tilt. in reaction to Ardrey’s African Genesis. Each time a new, older predecessor was found, articles would say, “The earliest human ancestor has just been found at X,” and there would be cluster of Expert Opinions based on the Latest Thing fact that all mankind came from Spot X.
Everybody wanted to be The New Ardrey. His concept that man’s advance began with his dining a shinbone as a weapon began the hit movie 2001. It was all the rage. So each time a new discovery was made, it was supposed to rewrite the whole of human evolutionary history.
This happened over and over. It got comical.
Finally I pointed out in Science News that this was silly. After ten articles reporting “the earliest man,” any reasonably intelligent person would cut the crap and write about “the earliest ancestor SO FAR FOUND.”
I was astonished at the result. Those article not only changed in Science News, they changed in Time and US News and World Report! The whole phenomenon STOPPED. That is a lot of power for one person. The reason I exercised that power was that nobody but me even noticed it.
I have utilized this kind of power my whole life. We have this kind of power precisely because it is not a power anyone else WANTS. Outside of BUGS, people do not want power, they want to RECOGNIZED as the person who exercises power.
I have made fundamental changes at the top of the chain of ideas all my life. I have exercised more raw power than ANY expert in ANY field.
I had the field clear to exercise this power precisely because no one NOTICED it. No one but us BUGS types wants REAL power, which is the ability to change to change the ideas that make the world of the future. They do not want this power because it does not lead to fame or a full professorship or even a footnote in anybody’s book.
Which is why I keep repeating, “They can have the titles, they can have the money, they can have the fame. I just want to rule the world.”
I keep emphasizing the general point that all the frontline Movements are based on the Latest Thing, but nobody builds his world view around the fact that there will be NEW insights, NEW developments. No Movement, no professor, has even TRIED to build his world view on this most obvious of realities. If you don’t believe me, go back and look at the cries of articles in the1970s about “the earliest man has been found at …” and the whole New World views that were based on each one until my Science News bit appeared.
To understand this, you have to THINK about another point I keep making, “Why do people SAY things?”
I have been interviewed by a LOT of writers and I know what they want. The one time my picture was on the front page of the New York Times I got it there by practically writing the guys’ article for him. I knew EXACTLY the quotes a working newspaper writer needed and I had them ready. When he left my office, he was practically dancing on air.
With that experience, I can picture a writer doing an article on The Latest Scientific Discovery when I say, “the real lesson here is that MORE new discoveries will be made.” He would be on his way out the door.
This leads directly to another lesson I keep hammering at ’til you are sick of it: “Why do people SAY things?” A writer, whether he is writing for a scientific publication or the National Inquirer, needs quotes that emphasize the IMPORTANCE of the story he is trying to publish about The Latest Thing. Above all, he does NOT want someone putting his rave news into “perspective.”
Unless you understand “Why do people SAY things?” the idea that ten articles in a row said that, “It has just been discovered that man’s earliest ancestor was in…” seems incredible, not just coming from a science writer, but from any adult who is not actually retarded.
No one would have written what I wrote in Science News if he didn’t understand, “Why do people SAY things?” I wrote it because I understand that when people write silly things there is a reason for it, usually a reason that has nothing to do with Jews or some other obsession.
The lesson of “News and Jews” has nothing to do with news, and nothing to do with Jews.
That is the POINT.
The issue of how culture goes to seed in Race – a big issue, for obvious reasons – just got a big kick forward.
In essence, they are defining the actual mechanism of epigenetics – a term that is widely used, and misused.
The genetic component of Human evolution just took a big step forward.
These, and other developments, are happening at a rate undreamt of by our ancestors.
I’ll state this again:
Homo Novus will walk the Earth by the turn of the next century, and just might look at us as we do at house pets.
The Race Issue just took first place, in all realms of development, and no one – publicly – outside this blog seems to even both to care, much less try to understand.
Damn, but I feel like The Gods are looking at the Obama Coronation, and are saying, “Just wait. WE control The Long Game.”
While the exact point AFKAN raises here is worth discussion, there is a more general lesson behind it that is CRITICAL to any accurate vision of the future: WHAT WE DON’T KNOW YET.
I will discuss that in a new article,
The world record for the hundred yard dash the last time I looked was 9.3 seconds.
Have you ever watched an “international” sprint competition? You see nine racers competing, all of them black. The “Swedish” entry is black. The “German” entry is black.
They’re ALL black and nobody expects anything different. But the Genome Project assures us that under the skin we are all “modern humans.”
But if skin color makes no difference, this presents an obvious problem.
There is another race, one which makes infinitely more difference to the future of humanity than a new sprint record. Call it the Standard of Living competition. In this lineup you have white majority countries and brown countries.
Once again, there is no competition. It is entirely a matter of color. In sprints non-blacks are non-starters. Every country with black skin or mulatto skin is a non-starter.
This lesson of the sprints is so obvious no one notices it.
You see, in order for it to be noticed, someone has to POINT IT OUT.
And if the only person pointing it out is a tired old man called Bob, truth is being shortchanged.
What was the actual date you announced the start of the new holocaust? Wasn’t it at the start of the Iraq war?
(I cannot find your post)
Recently, I have heard enough comments about “Jew bankers on Wallstreet” to make Hitler blush. And many of the comments from rich self hating white liberals. I recalled your comment years ago.
Jews should have hired Bob Whitaker as an adviser.
It is ironic that Stormfronters and White Nationalists ALWAYS talk about the blinders that Aryans have on their eyes. They never mention that the Jews are actually in a much more precarious position. We have a counter culture structure. We can take power one way or another, consolidate and rebuild. They cannot. It is all or nothing for the Neocons.
I am sorry but we don’t hold a candle to the Jews. Jews have that same gene that makes the moths fly into the flame…and they fly into the flame every time. Jews are not renegades. They do exactly what the rabbi’s tell them to do……and always end up in a holocaust.
good call Bob
I realized the Mantra about twenty years ago. But when you get a truth that is so obvious it is not noticed you have a serious problem with it. Nobody listens.
BUGS people know this, but that is why you are BUGS people. We understand this so well that it hard for you to fully put yourself in my position BEFORE BUGS. My whole life was spent coming up with devastating, simple effective statements of the truth that no one would USE.
If you listen to my interviews you will see this. You see what I am trying to get across. But the interviewer’s attitude is “That’s good, too, and this is the point I make.” He wants to make many points, I want to make one.
I do not ask that my point be the ONLY one. Far from it. The Mantra clears the way for a person on our side to make his OTHER points. No one can understand that. The other side has a world view that makes us the villains. But as you have noticed, once you make the Mantra clear, once you attack their whole world view with the TRUTH of white genocide, the entire debate changes.
Otherwise the discussion is the same against the same old. If you do NOT start with my point and ram it home, the guy on the other side simply slips into his usual hypnosis. He repeats his stuff and you repeat yours. You must begin by overturning the world view he depends on.
I spent decades trying to explain this and if you listen to any of my interviews you will hear what happened thousands of times during those decades. The person interviewing me says, “That’s a good point. Here are some more good points.”
I was paid as a political advisor. If someone PAYS you they take you seriously. So if I sat down with an elected official and said, “This is the way you use this” he listened carefully.
He listened carefully because, in a real political battle, my advice WORKED. That is why he PAID me. A political advisor lives with the phrase, “what have you done for me LATELY?” What you provide had better work all the time, or you’re out.
The reason Tim joins the Mantra timing with Iraq is because 9/11 coincided generally with the time I was trying to explain the Mantra strategy on Stormfront. I tried broadcasts, I tried speaking at conventions, I put in hundreds of posts, but everybody said that the Important Thing was Iraq.
So I gave up on that and concentrated on what became BUGS. My decades of expertise told me that a handful of people who would LISTEN to the Mantra Strategy and CONCENTRATE on a strategy that WORKS are important. People who want to spend their time repeating the old line for yet another front page obsession are useless.
Not that I disagreed with them. You simply cannot do the same old thing and expect different results.
“You simply cannot do the same old thing and expect different results.” That is the definition of insanity. But what if what you have always said is TRUE? Then obviously you must find a new way to put it that SELLS.
“Then obviously you must find a new way to put it that SELLS.”
And that, boys and girls, is what the Mantra is all about. It is a different way of telling the truth. Try to explain that to people. Or listen to my interviews as I tried to explain it. Or read Stormfront where I tried to explain it.
It takes years to come up with a basic truth. But then you have to get it across to the people on your own side.
Shari READS what I write. She remembered that the last shah who ruled Zoroastrian Iran was a mulatto. Zoroastrian religion was limited to Aryans. The original Olympic Oath included the declaration that the athlete was “of pure Hellenic blood.” The original Sanskrit term for caste meant “color.”
Every former Great Civilization which has gone down and STAYED down, just coincidentally, now consists of people with a brown skin. In other words, each collapsed society consists of people the Greeks and the Zoroastrians and all other Indo-Europeans SPECIFICALLY excluded.
The Party Line is now that Indo-Europeans were just a LANGUAGE group.
It don’t wash.
The religion of Political Correctness now has a mulatto president of the United States. Political Correctness, like late Zoroastrianism, developed from an earlier racist outlook.
Universalism turns society brown, as the Mantra says, and brown skin is fatal.
I don’t think the parallel is exact. But it IS interesting.
Quantum of Solace was Ian Fleming’s one short-story attempt to get out of the James Bond mold.
Why he gave up on it can be seen from the ads for the movie, which start with “James Bond is Back!”
Since everything relates, his message in Quantum of Solace can be applied to the preset day. His theme in this domestic drama as that there is a difference between selfishness and having not a Quantum of concern of the other person. The victimized husband finally reacted totally when the wife showed a merciless which showed not het tiniest bit, a quantum, of concern for him.
The Mantra makes it clear that the establishment has not a quantum of concern for any white feelings for simple survival. In Quantum of Solace, the real story, you ask yourself if there is ANYTHING the man will not and smile while he’s taking it. But when the worm turns is absolutely without mercy.
I was reading an editorial quoted in This Week where the writer pointed out that America’s disasters today come from the fact that American leadership on all sides has no feeling, not a quantum of solace, for other people’s feelings of IDENTITY.
America today GENIUNELY cannot understand how Iraqis feel invaded. America is doing all the Wordist things, Freedom, Democracy, economic betterment, but the ground feeling there is that simply that Iraqis want us OUT.
Absolutely no previous group of humans or of social animal would have any trouble understanding the Iraqi point of view. Like Fleming’s real Quantum of Solace, this is one of those observations that is so obvious it is hard to get. To sell the movie, you forget the point and just yell “James Bond!”
That editorial made the point that American has not a quantum of concern for people’s IDENTITY. It is exactly like the rejection of ALL supply and demand that wrecked the Soviet Union. You cannot be totally blind to a basic reality and run a society.
Or a foreign policy.
This factor is enormously important. We find it impossible to believe that our leadership can have NO concept of loyalty in human beings, the reality that an Arab could reject Love, Brotherhood, Democracy and Prosperity just to be ruled by his OWN prejudices and superstitions of his OWN people.
What is important to BUGS is for us to realize that the new generation is not being tricky. It has a real, a genuine blind spot.
No non-white can hate whites the way Obama’s mother did. To a white traitor, the ultimate virtue in life is hating white people. White anti-whites always say, “I can’t be anti-white because I am white.” That is basic to their world view. Non-whites can be anti-white, but a white can say the same thing and he is just being objective.
Ion white anti-white white gentiles are convinced that when they say the same things about white gentiles that Hitler said about Jews, including that whites have to be removed from the world, it is jut a form o self-sacrifice for Objective Truth.
Even the most rabid anti-white outside the race itself has some limitation on his ABIL:ITY to hate us. Most violent crime is committed by family members for exactly the same reason. A non-white will feel we are DIFFERENT and therefore evil. Anti-white white feels we are Pure Evil.
It scares a lot of people that Obama went to the Rev. Wright’s anti-white church. What they do no realize is that Obama’s mother made Wright look like a wimp. So in this sense I see Obama’s background is far MORE anti-white than the most alarmist think.
But Obama has a saving grace. Like Clinton, Obama is a sociopath. His father was an African, a Kenyan, and I know Africans pretty well. A half-AFRICAN who has a white IQ and truly African outlook is the perfect YUPPIE. He is a sociopath from the word go, and a sociopath from the word is the perfect YUPPIE.
If Obama were white his background would make him would be a true anti-white fanatic. But Obama has no loyalties. What he says is what he is, and, like Clinton, it never occurs to him to believe anything orf tobe truly foror againstanything.
In Africa, the dialogue is perfectly reasonable from both points of view. A white will convince an African that something is TRUE. The African will agree completely. What every European has to learn is that to the African it does not MATTER what is true.
We have the same problem with Germans. They are fanatical about the literal truth to an extent that is often ironic to us. Take that puzzlement to the cube power and you will see how we look to Africans. This is something every European who lives in Africa has to adjust to.
Why do people say things? An African has utterly different goals. He says things for a reason, not because they are true. This is an incomprehensible attitude to us, so we assume it is an unnatural attitude. A good education will “cure” it. Political correctness requires us to believe that all difference in attitudes are a matter of words.
I believe that, in the long run, the different mentalities in Whites, Blacks and Orientals come from the people themselves, not from books. You simply cannot compare the Chinese version of Communism with that of the USSR.
I believe the people create the books. Political correctness believes that the books make the people. This is easy to argue with because of the feedback effect. You can give endless examples of exceptions and complications..
This is exactly what I dealt with in teaching economics. You cannot run an economy without the basic rule of supply and demand. The USSR proved that, and China is adopting the pricing or supply and demand, the “price system” as part of its Communism.
Scientist have noticed that a force is moving the earth off its axis. That is Karl Marx spinning in his grave. He said all value was labor time. His whole pointwas to get rid of the market.
Through the years attacks have been made on supply and demand. Those attacks have plenty of truth in them. But cutting through the crap,. We have learned that you simply cannot run a real-world economy if you IGNORE supply and demand.
Attacks on genetics is all certainly have a point. But you cannot have a rational vied of the world if you adopt the Marx-like outlook of political correctness that genes do not exist. Your societal theories will lead to the same total disaster the USSR’s got from totally denying supply and demand.
For example, without knowing about real Africans, you can’t uinderstand Obama.