Archive for November, 2008
BW hit the target with remarkable precision in his comment about Screwtape and complexity.
But for the most part the circulation of misunderstanding is not motivated. Words replace understanding on account of ignorance. And there is a lot of ignorance that cannot be addressed. It is baked-in-the-cake.
But what I have learned from BUGS is this: If you don’t have a clear-cut understanding of the goal, you can’t make sense.
And the goal should be the ditching of words that circulate misunderstanding. There is so much hard study and oceans of effort expended on account of the want of the right word or the right phrase.
The right word or the right phrase clears everything up in an instant. I will give you an example: What is the goal of Central Banking? Answer: To get a quart of wine from a pint bottle.
I just summed the entire message of the Austrian school of economics that complains wrongly of the unfairness of not having whole academic departments devoted to it.
Thank God it doesn’t. The fact that nobody is willing to spend money on promoting Austrian economics is its very salvation.
Ditto, for little intellectual groups such as us.
Like everything else I keep hammering on, this concept is so simple it is ignored. Everybody uses it all the time, but they don’t THINK about it.
It is fully understood that a person who does not see the difference between an advertisement and any other information needs adult diapers. Any sane adult knows why an advertiser says what he says.
But it stops there.
It was the same with supply and demand. For as long as we have had records merchants have looked for shortages of particular goods in one place and an abundance f the same goods in another place. But for thousands of years those in economic looked for a Natural Price.
The rice system is not perfect. Well HOOP-DE-DOO! Supply and demand is BASIC, and if you ignore it you end like the Soviet Empire. The Chinese economy is impressing everyone with it growth. Actually China was at starvation levels when it ignored supply and demand. As they get away from that disease, they show a LOT of FAST improvement.
If you have pneumonia penicillin will make you better fast. But that does not mean that anti-biotics are the key to perfect health. China has not discovered the key to economic development. It has begun to use a cure for a disease.
But once again, the world cannot see that, anymore than it could see that supply and demand, which was basic to all trade, had further implications.
“Why do people say things?” is a rule that is as important and universal as supply and demand. If I can supply a motive for your saying what you say, the chances are that what you say is not true. Like supply and demand or any other rule of human action, this is not A Final Truth.
It is possible that what you say can be explained accurately as what you NEED to say, and that it is still true. This is coincidence. It is the same thing as saying that a broken clock is right twice a day.
Sane people want a clock that TICKS.
I will make a report from the front lines. I have not done that in a while.
Since the election, I have noticed something different around whites. Even in ‘multicultural’-’multiracial’ settings. Many folks are saying outright they are racist. About a half dozen times since the election, I have heard people say things and not care that someone calls them racist. Saying flippant things afterward like “so what I am racist–all whites are racist to you idiots”.
They usually smile at me afterwords for me to acknowledge their bravery. I tell them —it is about time you stopped acting like a SHWA (self hating white animal).
I used to demand someone define racism. Over the last few months since I have noticed a change. I am taking a different approach off top and it has been working very well. I say:”In your OPINION, he is racist—you are just saying that cuz he’s white—-antiracism is a just a code word for antiwhite”. After this, they have been shutting up quickly. Shutting up a liberal SHWA off the top is a big event. I have been shocked once or twice. Even before I demand that they define racism and go nuclear with a Mantra (one of my shortened off the cuff versions or Bobs). They have been shutting up quickly. Very weird.
This reminds me of watching someone get conned by a good conman. At first the party that has been conned is in deep denial. They don’t want to admit they have been conned because they are embarrassed. Then they come to except they have been conned. Then the final step…..ANGER…
I think some liberals (and dare I say –even some so-called conservatives) are realizing they have been conned. This is a big step. I am starting to notice this. Maybe others are as well. And it is about damn time they realize something.
I have more hope for the liberals than the so-called conservatives. In a communist system, the most dangerous people to the system are former members who are disillusioned and pissed off.
I’ve gone to seminary. (This will give me lots of opportunity to stay up with BUGS.) Much of the decision, oddly(?), is because of you, so either you borrow more from your Christian boyhood than you thought, or you are somehow a closet Christian that needs to let go and let his faith blossom. But either way, it’s between you and your Maker. Anyway thanks for your clear thinking which has helped me out in more ways than you would have thought.
You are the best online. Any true leader recognizes that, and since there are always fewer chiefs than Injuns, it may be that your audience appeal has reached the ones it should, whether every reader comments here or not.
By the way, the book that led me to racial thinking is the Bible, especially the Old Testament, when I was in middle school.
Given my reputation as a bomb-thrower it is fun to be called a “closet” anything. I have made it very clear where I think of myself as Christian. My whole family was studded with preachers back to Alexander Whitaker and he was merely a continuation.
It is far easier for me to be a Christian than it is for any professional clergyman because he must satisfy some version of the Wordist institutions that have used his name. It is a hell of lot easier to be sincere in politics if you aren’t working for anybody.
Of necessity I was a political pimp. Any professional clergyman has to make the same kind of deal, “all things to all men.” If I had not made that deal in my field I would not have had access to the audience. A clergyman must do the same to have access to that group. “IN the world but not OF the world.”
It is not accidental that I quote the most obvious and basic statements. Jesus’ last instruction puzzled the Apostles: “Feed my sheep.” To me this is plain enough. As one who is charged with the care of his people, your job is to do what is best for them.
I have never believed that “The Road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions” because Satan has none of that building material. I tend to believe that the road to hell is paved with something Satan has PLENTY of: Complexity.
“.. for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven.” He was not talking about Gnostics and theologians – much the same thing – but about children. How many light years are there between a Pope or a Calvin and childhood as a virtue?
“Feed my sheep” was very puzzling to Disciples who had had the truth spoon fed to them. But they were now apostles, and the decisions were THEIRS. This involves moral courage.
You are going into seminary as I went into politics, as way to do the right thing IN THIS WORLD. That careful distinction was stated long ago. As CS Lewis said, Christianity is no danger to Screwtape so long as the person doesn’t DO anything about it.
But the doing has to be dedicated to the simple rules laid by Jesus and not to satisfying the rules of a Wordist institution. This is so simple it is hard to understand. I USED politics. You must USE the church. So as not to get obsessed with self-righteousness, I just all it “pimping” and proceed on. We must operate IN the world. To a rigid conscience this involves pimping.
So Pure Religion became isolation and self-torture, as one writer put it,”Taking heaven by storm.” It was a very painful way of avoiding feeding the sheep. It was a way to do nothing. Self-immolation fed no sheep.
You must feed his sheep, and you must do it in this world.
As you say, I find no problem with this because I was raised with it.
These distinctions are simple. They are NOT easy.
In his comment on the article below, AFKAN addresses my points specifically and logically. Prometheus then makes the point that needs to be made on using the Mantra.
Prometheus speaks from experience.
What AFKAN did give me was his first partial report from the front. He says he is going out into evangelical churches. But the who what where and when is entirely missing. How does he approach it? Does he get results?
BUGS is unique because we 1) take into account where we actually are right now and 2) How to get out the message we need to get out now.
AFKAN seems to be putting in length pieces about how the Prophet Covington says the world should be. BUGS is more about identifying Step I and how to go about it.
To me AFKAN often sounds like General Washington sitting at Valley Forge and spending his thought on what the final peace treaty with Britain should look like. Mantra Thinking by contrast is about we can keep the war going with the resources at our disposal.
Can we effectively use our slender forces to sneak attack the Hessians at Christmas? How can we hit them, not at Philadelphia with their enormous forces, but in a way that goes around their defended positions and gets attention to OUR message?
Stormfront tells us all about the fine points of how the world should look after the torchlight parade or our Yorktown. Stormfront can tell us all about arguments that SHOULD work. They never notice that they DON’T work.
Stormfront tells us about Alternatives. But those Alternatives are all about attacking the enemy in their PREPARED positions. Certainly I wish that Covington’s White Family helped BUGS do OUR job. AFKAN largely uses BUGS to sell Covington.
Out of courtesy, if nothing else, AFKAN needs to use our seminar to discuss what WE are trying to do. For US, his mere mention of evangelicals, his ACTION, needs the kind of attention he devotes to Covington’s New Order at such length.
AFKAN says he had taken care of the Mantra. He tells us he just says “Fight white genocide.”
Those who work up front know very well how absurd this is. In real action, you don’t get two chances. The other guy just laughs and says, “I’m not for genocide.”
Because he is not on the front like Prometheus and Lord Nelson and other BUGS people AFKAN doesn’t deal with this. And THAT, boys and girls, is why I am always looking for comments like those of Simmons when he discusses in passing what he has DONE lately.
AFKAN is pure theory, and he has some very good insights. But he keeps repeating the same thing to convince US while we are out there doing the WORK of converting the world.
Anyone who is completely on the side of our race is good people. But BUGS is about PRACTICE. Stormfront is about how the world should be. What I have to offer that is unique is forty years of PRACTICE.
My stuff WORKS.
Anybody using today’s political logic in 1868 would have concluded that Reconstruction in the South was permanent. Absolutely every kind of arithmetic and political logic said so.
A major portion of the Southern white male population was dead. All its natural leadership, consisting of men who had held the rank of Colonel or above in the Confederate Army, was disfranchised. In the Deep South, blacks were a majority before the decimation of the white males in the War. In other Southern states the mountain vote was Republican.
And as today a huge segment of the white population was anti-white.
Now let us add the “practical” considerations. Federal occupation secured the entire Southern vote for the Republicans who ruled in Washington.
What in the HELL could change all that?
Logically, nothing could.
The Soviet Empire simply could not just vanish. Nothing was less likely in 1981.
What happened to the USSR was simply that it existed on force. What happened to Reconstruction was that it existed on force.
The Soviet Empire was a constant effort. Reconstruction was a constant effort. Our rule in Iraq is a constant effort. Robert Ardrey pointed out in the 1970s that, for some reason, occupations do not last.
Most people are deeply impressed by the all-out effort, the vast dedication, and the forces that are dedicated to multiracialism.
To me that sheer effort is the sure sign that it is doomed.
We have been this way before.
BoardAd would not rest until he found the missing portions of Whitaker Online and put them in.
I am obsessive myself, but there is nothing that an obsessive appreciates like BoardAd who decides to obsess on my own writings. That made an old man’s decade. It was the compliment of compliments.
WhitakerOnline was ten years old in September of this year. Unlike other media BoardAd, SysOps and I make no attempt to do a 1984 Orwellian cleanup of what I thought at any given stage.
I was wrong a LOT! I was absurd a lot. We present it with warts on.
Which is good. I guess.
I don’t blame my techs for not having the kind of reverence for me that Soviets working for Stalin had for him. Anyone familiar with Soviet history has seen the doctored photographs where Stalin had had his arm around a Party official who was later liquidated. The later photo showed Stalin standing there alone with a rare imitation of the same arm hanging free.
Anything Stalin said that was absurd was cut out or edited by his loyal subordinates.
Do you think BoardAd and SysOps did that for ME?
Every single dumbass and inaccurate statement I made over the years is obsessively preserved by them.
They are wonderful people. They are honest people.
Honesty can be a pain the ass.
I love them anyway.
Dave says in his latest comment, “Don’t you see that that is what Bob Whitaker is trying to say?”
After what seems like a million years in this game what I say is very profound precisely because it is, IN RETROSPECT, so obvious. Let’s take hammering the Mantra in as an example.
The Mantra strategy goes right back to the oldest rule discovered and used by Western military strategists. Giant Eastern armies used hordes of soldiers whipped into frenzy to frighten their enemies into panic. From the Greek Hoplites to the Romans, Westerners developed an anti-terror approach.
In other words, facing terror tactics from the East, they developed a discipline to counter it. The Hoplites were a disciplined group standing sh9uld to shoulder against the screaming masses of Eastern forces.
Roman soldiers developed this further. In direct contrast to the screaming hordes of their enemies they learned to ignore the shrieks of their enemies and to stand shoulder-to-should in a line that did not pay any attention to the emotion and sheer number of the forces against them. They dealt directly with only one thing: the part of the enemy forces that was actually coming up against them.
The numbers of emotion of the forces that were COMING at them was ignored. They stood shoulder to shoulder and killed the disorganized, emotionally charge forces that actually REACHED them.
When you do that, the overwhelming masses and screams that were such a part of war in the East became irrelevant. No matter how they yell, the only ones who matter are the ones who actually reach your lines. And the ones who actually reach your lines from the screaming masses are disorganized pushovers.
Flash forward to the famous British Thin Red Line. If they had thought about what those Zulus would DO to them if they lost they WOULD have lost. But their whole approach was to ignore that and:
“Stay in Formation! Load! Aim! FIRE!”
I am not impressed that non-whites can get a hundred thousand demonstrators at with a snap of their fingers. It is the same old equation whites have always faced. Non-whites were always infinitely more impressive. And they always lost.
There is an old adage of Western military strategy: “One native can beat one civilized – white – soldier.” “In a battle between ten savages and ten white soldiers, the outcome is a tossup.”
“But when there are a hundred disciplined white soldiers, the savages, a thousand or a million, are doomed.”
The reason for this is old and obvious. There may a million of them, but only a limited number can reach your front line. If you stand and blast THOSE out of existence, the next wave is climbing over bodes, and it is even more vulnerable.
Stand shoulder to shoulder, and fire at the ones in front of you.
Thousands of times, from the Hoplites to the Thin Red Line, through millennia, soldiers felt suffocated by this conformity: “Our enemies are using variation and psychological warfare. Shouldn’t we be flexible and adopt some of that?”
The answer was, “Why? Do you see any sign that their crap is WORKING?”
Hit them with the Mantra. No matter what their numbers at their rallies, hit the ones who you actually reach with the Mantra.
As the thousands smashed against the Roman line or the Thin Red Line, anyone looking at the battlefield would have seen only the thousands coming on. But in the end the thousands were slaughtered.
Don’t tell me about News and Jews.
Stay in formation.
Load. Aim. Fire.
When it comes to negotiating for whites there is a reality:
Which, again, is so obvious that no one mentions it.
Everybody WANTS to be white.
That is why libertarians get short shrift. They argue that whites should have the same right to all-white communities that other races do their own communities. This never sells but that never stops them.
This nice-sounding argument is dismissed for a reason everyone knows but no one mentions. It is assumed that, if whites are allowed to separate, there wouldn’t be any whites who would choose to live outside their own communities.
Exactly that happened when busing was at its peak. There were not enough whites left after white flight to racially balance schools. In one famous faux pas, a black government official said that, “White children are a precious resource which must be distributed carefully.”
I don’t think I need to tell you about the storm that THAT piece of bare reality caused. It was the whole basis of busing, but it was also NEVER to be mentioned.
Bill O’Reilly with his education degree states the whole basis of the respectable position:
“There can be no all-white ANYTHING in America.” This assumes that all non-whites want to be white, and every non-white negotiator goes in with that assumption.
Once again, this is so obvious no one says it, exactly like the Mantra. Everything here interrelates, and this interrelates with the Mantra. There can be no white escapees AND WE ALL KNOW WHY.
It is very important to me when one of you adresses exactly what I was saying and extends on it.
That is the intellecual HELP I keep begging for.
Your missing BW’s point here entirely. The Mexicans have not taken over.
I live in a community full of Mexicans. Rest assured by direct observation, they don’t have a pot to piss in. Literally.
That’s why they are camping out in our parks.
The message is balkanization. Look at it from the successful politicians perspective. Do you really think that our politicians aren’t aware that there is no public?
Concealing that fact is one of their greatest challenges. Go out and run for office. Find out for yourself.
Nobody has anything in common. Political dialog is fabricated by those paid to fabricate it.
Obama’s public coalition goes away the minute his paid volunteers leave their posts to await the next election cycle. It never really existed. It was an event hosted by the establishment. That means they paid for it. If the money didn’t flow nothing would have happened.
Our advantage lies in the fact that the establishment primarily public employee unions in one guise or another (and highly compensated executives) can’t buy what they really need.
This is the establishment’s primary problem.
Sarah Palin can’t hire BW to write the Mantra.
The Mantra doesn’t come into existence for pay.
All those posts I have compiled on NationalSalvation.net cannot come into existence for pay. That intellectual gold mine only exists on a volunteer basis, entirely unmotivated by electoral politics.
But goldmines like that determine the future.
They contain the seeds of what is really needed.
One of the outstanding characteristics of BUGS is that we do not keep flopping back into the past.
Prometheus and other commenters from yesterday made me think about this. It is almost impossible to get anybody to think in terms of what is developing NOW rather than trying to make everything today into a reconstruction of the past.
You know what I mean. No matter how much lip service others give to modern technology and how the world is different, the moment they relax they start talking about The Book That Will Change History.
Another example is how nobody but us lives in the age we are in. They keep rushing to the borders to keep the Mexicans out.
The Mexicans are HERE, gang!
Others are still living in an age when whites were the top group preserving its unique position. That keeps them on the defensive. As long as whites maintain this STRATEGIC view, they will face a united front of all other groups against them. Everybody tacitly accepts this view that whites have it and others want it, which was accurate enough in 1950.
So in 1950 pro-whites were conservative. As usual, my explanation is so obvious that everyone knows where I am going and agrees with it. Then they go right back to talking in old terms. This is a painful tome because I need you to go WITH me to the NEXT stage.
I need your intellectual HELP.
When I talk about “spokesmen for white people” it is an entirely different concept from what others mean. When I say “spokesmen for white people” I am NOT speaking of helping the white race as on the defensive in white-oriented society.
This conservative approach to speaking for the white race is Republicanism, and we all know where THAT is going. It sees the world as a two-sided battle between whites and their values in power and “the others.”
The Mexicans are HERE, gang! In a two-sided battle between whites and non-whites, simple arithmetic tells us the whites will lose. That is the story of politics today. We all see it, but I feel as if I’m the only political strategist who DEALS with it.
While Pat Buchanan, God bless his courageous soul, is stating the facts about political demography, Republicans, who are wailing about “the minority vote,” are saying exactly the same thing.
Here is my point which, as usual, is very obvious and absolutely impossible for anybody to stay with consistently, is this:
Republicanism deals with a world where there are two sides, conservative whites and “others.” Their whole hopeless emphasis is on converting some “others.” They do not divide the world racially, but by those who stand for “their” values and others.
Let me repeat: this is a TWO-SIDED fight. It is a two-sided fight that arithmetic tells EVERYBODY that Republicans will lose.
I will have to repeat this hundreds of times while people loll back into some version of the two-sided fight:
In a two-sided fight whites are weak and getting weaker. BUT WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
WHEN IT BECOMES A MULTI-SIDED FIGHT WHITE SPOKESMEN ARE IN AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT POSITION.
When I talk about “white spokesmen” I am NOT talking about a future in which the fight is two-sided. As the group holding out in a citadel against the rest of the world, Republicans are in a hopeless position.
As spokesmen concerned with the survival of our RACE, one is in the position of speaking for what is still infinitely the most powerful group in a MULTI-SIDED struggle.
Everybody sees that the arithmetic is fatal, but nobody has any idea of changing the arithmetic itself.
The bottom line is this: If you go representing Values everybody sees it is a two-sided battle you will lose. If you go into a real world with different races unapologetically representing their own, the white spokesman can be enormously powerful.
Does anybody GET this? Is anybody capable of KEEPING that outlook?
We are yet to see the real spokespeople for white people come forth, but soon some whites will start asking for one.
White Nationalists have it all wrong. The Stormfront view is that you’ve got to rally, and rally real hard to get white people to want to protect their interests. Self preservation wasn’t bred out of us, it’s just a lot of crap has gotten in the way.
The mantra cuts the crap.
People who engage in self-destructive vices will still fight for their life when the choice between life and death is stark. The mantra brings out the stark reality of PC, of “anti-racism” and tolerance.
Dave’s discussion of the tool we need causes me once more to refer to an oft-repeated theme I keep pushing:
The power of the future will be with those who become spokesmen FOR the white race. And by this I mean Mantra spokesmen. On the respectable right, the spokesman for the white race is a black man married to white woman who keeps being lauded by National Review for sponsoring Civil Rights Initiatives which outlaw affirmative action.
In the Movement there are many professional spokesmen who are AGAINST Jews or illegal aliens.
Both the respectable conservatives and the professional spokesmen in the Movement just keep losing. But they consider themselves legitimate spokesmen for whites against what they perceive as the attack on whites. They cannot take over white intellectual leadership because of their limitations, and their limitations go back to the basic point: “Why do people SAY things?”
As BUGS people WHO ARE DOING THEIR JOB know from EXPERIENCE the Mantra is a whole ‘nother animal. It separates us form respectable conservatives because we are talking about racial survival, not just safe attacks on targets that retain one’s respectability.
The Mantra uses another theme I keep hammering at: Saying something so obvious that no one notices it.
Movement professionals face the same problem Kennedy Assassination hype deals with. It is simply impossible for the average person to accept that a single Communist ex-military sharpshooter changed history. To LITERALLY sell it, you need for the story of the Big Event to be as massive as the event.
There was money in the conspiracy movie JFK. No one has ever even THOUGHT of making a movie about Lee Harvey Oswald’s life.
So no Movement Leader is going to settle for hitting the obvious fact that we are facing genocide. They have to have a complete Evil Scenario, a “JFK” of their own.
They have to sell BOOKS.
On the contrary, we at BUGS spend a lot of time trying to boil the short Mantra down even more. This sets us entirely aside from respectables who make their livings by never criticizing that fundamental tenet of our established religion, interracial marriage, and from professionals in the Movements who must sell BOOKS.
I am not criticizing our professionals. They did what they had to do to fight for our race. I made my living and my retirement by being a conservative pimp. Now that I am financially secure, I am doing what needs to be done THROUGH YOU. But a lifelong professional conservative pimp in no position to preach at David Duke or Jared Taylor on MORAL grounds. This is strictly strategy. It is a strategy I can NOW follow.
Once again, EVERYTHING HERE INTERRELATES. This goes back to one of the many short, OBVIOUS points I keep hammering you with, in this case, “Why do people SAY things?”
We have a special tool no official leader can afford. We don’t NEED to sell an exciting book and we don’t need respectability to make a living.
The Race Issue just took first place, in all realms of development, and no one – publicly – outside this blog seems to even both to care, much less try to understand.”
Nevertheless, the race issue shall remain in first place regardless.
There is great power that can be picked up fairly simply by ditching the kinds of words and phrases that circulate misunderstanding.
But saying this is no different than all those wanna be talents that have vision without the capability to execute at a practical level. For that a tool is needed and after all, tools are repositories of congealed intelligence. They are way of propagating intelligence while bypassing instruction.
So the future becomes a linear extrapolation simply because no one can imagine the tools that are destined to actually create it. It is a leap from the telegraph to the modern PC. With hindsight, the leap is perfectly logical. But no one in 1865 saw it.
In my work, I need a capability to animate the behavior of fluids in 3D in a structure of connected pipes and reservoirs and I am frustrated that the tool I want doesn’t exist (pragmatically speaking).
Now, if I were a genius in playing chess, perhaps I would not require this.
Tools are a whole lot more important than geniuses, geniuses being flat out hard to come by, and lacking the right tools and geniuses are the real reason the people who rule us continually screw up.
But nonwhites, generally and genetically speaking, cannot create the tool.