Archive for November 22nd, 2008
Anybody using today’s political logic in 1868 would have concluded that Reconstruction in the South was permanent. Absolutely every kind of arithmetic and political logic said so.
A major portion of the Southern white male population was dead. All its natural leadership, consisting of men who had held the rank of Colonel or above in the Confederate Army, was disfranchised. In the Deep South, blacks were a majority before the decimation of the white males in the War. In other Southern states the mountain vote was Republican.
And as today a huge segment of the white population was anti-white.
Now let us add the “practical” considerations. Federal occupation secured the entire Southern vote for the Republicans who ruled in Washington.
What in the HELL could change all that?
Logically, nothing could.
The Soviet Empire simply could not just vanish. Nothing was less likely in 1981.
What happened to the USSR was simply that it existed on force. What happened to Reconstruction was that it existed on force.
The Soviet Empire was a constant effort. Reconstruction was a constant effort. Our rule in Iraq is a constant effort. Robert Ardrey pointed out in the 1970s that, for some reason, occupations do not last.
Most people are deeply impressed by the all-out effort, the vast dedication, and the forces that are dedicated to multiracialism.
To me that sheer effort is the sure sign that it is doomed.
We have been this way before.
Brian would not rest until he found the missing portions of Whitaker Online and put them in.
I am obsessive myself, but there is nothing that an obsessive appreciates like Brian who decides to obsess on my own writings. That made an old man’s decade. It was the compliment of compliments.
WhitakerOnline was ten years old in September of this year. Unlike other media Brain, SysOps and I make no attempt to do a 1984 Orwellian cleanup of what I thought at any given stage.
I was wrong a LOT! I was absurd a lot. We present it with warts on.
Which is good. I guess.
I don’t blame my techs for not having the kind of reverence for me that Soviets working for Stalin had for him. Anyone familiar with Soviet history has seen the doctored photographs where Stalin had had his arm around a Party official who was later liquidated. The later photo showed Stalin standing there alone with a rare imitation of the same arm hanging free.
Anything Stalin said that was absurd was cut out or edited by his loyal subordinates.
Do you think Brian and SysOps did that for ME?
Every single dumbass and inaccurate statement I made over the years is obsessively preserved by them.
They are wonderful people. They are honest people.
Honesty can be a pain the ass.
I love them anyway.
Dave says in his latest comment, “Don’t you see that that is what Bob Whitaker is trying to say?”
After what seems like a million years in this game what I say is very profound precisely because it is, IN RETROSPECT, so obvious. Let’s take hammering the Mantra in as an example.
The Mantra strategy goes right back to the oldest rule discovered and used by Western military strategists. Giant Eastern armies used hordes of soldiers whipped into frenzy to frighten their enemies into panic. From the Greek Hoplites to the Romans, Westerners developed an anti-terror approach.
In other words, facing terror tactics from the East, they developed a discipline to counter it. The Hoplites were a disciplined group standing sh9uld to shoulder against the screaming masses of Eastern forces.
Roman soldiers developed this further. In direct contrast to the screaming hordes of their enemies they learned to ignore the shrieks of their enemies and to stand shoulder-to-should in a line that did not pay any attention to the emotion and sheer number of the forces against them. They dealt directly with only one thing: the part of the enemy forces that was actually coming up against them.
The numbers of emotion of the forces that were COMING at them was ignored. They stood shoulder to shoulder and killed the disorganized, emotionally charge forces that actually REACHED them.
When you do that, the overwhelming masses and screams that were such a part of war in the East became irrelevant. No matter how they yell, the only ones who matter are the ones who actually reach your lines. And the ones who actually reach your lines from the screaming masses are disorganized pushovers.
Flash forward to the famous British Thin Red Line. If they had thought about what those Zulus would DO to them if they lost they WOULD have lost. But their whole approach was to ignore that and:
“Stay in Formation! Load! Aim! FIRE!”
I am not impressed that non-whites can get a hundred thousand demonstrators at with a snap of their fingers. It is the same old equation whites have always faced. Non-whites were always infinitely more impressive. And they always lost.
There is an old adage of Western military strategy: “One native can beat one civilized – white – soldier.” “In a battle between ten savages and ten white soldiers, the outcome is a tossup.”
“But when there are a hundred disciplined white soldiers, the savages, a thousand or a million, are doomed.”
The reason for this is old and obvious. There may a million of them, but only a limited number can reach your front line. If you stand and blast THOSE out of existence, the next wave is climbing over bodes, and it is even more vulnerable.
Stand shoulder to shoulder, and fire at the ones in front of you.
Thousands of times, from the Hoplites to the Thin Red Line, through millennia, soldiers felt suffocated by this conformity: “Our enemies are using variation and psychological warfare. Shouldn’t we be flexible and adopt some of that?”
The answer was, “Why? Do you see any sign that their crap is WORKING?”
Hit them with the Mantra. No matter what their numbers at their rallies, hit the ones who you actually reach with the Mantra.
As the thousands smashed against the Roman line or the Thin Red Line, anyone looking at the battlefield would have seen only the thousands coming on. But in the end the thousands were slaughtered.
Don’t tell me about News and Jews.
Stay in formation.
Load. Aim. Fire.
When it comes to negotiating for whites there is a reality:
Which, again, is so obvious that no one mentions it.
Everybody WANTS to be white.
That is why libertarians get short shrift. They argue that whites should have the same right to all-white communities that other races do their own communities. This never sells but that never stops them.
This nice-sounding argument is dismissed for a reason everyone knows but no one mentions. It is assumed that, if whites are allowed to separate, there wouldn’t be any whites who would choose to live outside their own communities.
Exactly that happened when busing was at its peak. There were not enough whites left after white flight to racially balance schools. In one famous faux pas, a black government official said that, “White children are a precious resource which must be distributed carefully.”
I don’t think I need to tell you about the storm that THAT piece of bare reality caused. It was the whole basis of busing, but it was also NEVER to be mentioned.
Bill O’Reilly with his education degree states the whole basis of the respectable position:
“There can be no all-white ANYTHING in America.” This assumes that all non-whites want to be white, and every non-white negotiator goes in with that assumption.
Once again, this is so obvious no one says it, exactly like the Mantra. Everything here interrelates, and this interrelates with the Mantra. There can be no white escapees AND WE ALL KNOW WHY.
It is very important to me when one of you adresses exactly what I was saying and extends on it.
That is the intellecual HELP I keep begging for.
Your missing BW’s point here entirely. The Mexicans have not taken over.
I live in a community full of Mexicans. Rest assured by direct observation, they don’t have a pot to piss in. Literally.
That’s why they are camping out in our parks.
The message is balkanization. Look at it from the successful politicians perspective. Do you really think that our politicians aren’t aware that there is no public?
Concealing that fact is one of their greatest challenges. Go out and run for office. Find out for yourself.
Nobody has anything in common. Political dialog is fabricated by those paid to fabricate it.
Obama’s public coalition goes away the minute his paid volunteers leave their posts to await the next election cycle. It never really existed. It was an event hosted by the establishment. That means they paid for it. If the money didn’t flow nothing would have happened.
Our advantage lies in the fact that the establishment primarily public employee unions in one guise or another (and highly compensated executives) can’t buy what they really need.
This is the establishment’s primary problem.
Sarah Palin can’t hire BW to write the Mantra.
The Mantra doesn’t come into existence for pay.
All those posts I have compiled on NationalSalvation.net cannot come into existence for pay. That intellectual gold mine only exists on a volunteer basis, entirely unmotivated by electoral politics.
But goldmines like that determine the future.
They contain the seeds of what is really needed.