Archive for March, 2009
The Shari Rule
The Shari Rule is this: “The better Shari’s comment the more she apologizes for it.” I have fussed at Shari for this, but she doesn’t take me anymore seriously than other women do.
Oh, well, this time there was a slight deviation in that Shari apologized up front instead of at the end:
“For what it’s worth, I’m getting some positive replies. “
This is a report from the front, which is what I am really looking for. Naturally while others run on endlessly, when Shari has exactly what is important here, she gives it half a sentence. But at least it IS a report from the field.
Way to GO, Brian!
I see BUGS as something special. But when I write about that, it tends to bore readers. Readers like my pronouncements on the state of the world better. This discouraged me, because we already have plenty of urls dedicated to how the world should be.
When I simply bugged out, so to speak, Brian, unasked by me, used his tech powers to go ahead without me. First he started putting in comments in the main section, and then he started something entirely new: the Skype get-togethers.
And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the kind of taking charge all my boring discussions about the nature of a SEMINAR were all about. I keep repeating that BUGS is not about the Final Truth of Professor-Leader Whitaker. It is about showing you how to get into the fight from someone who has spent his life BEING SUCCESSFUL in it.
BUGS is not about hammering out The Only True Faith inside BUGS, but how to win the battle out there. If you read some of our comments from Lord Nelson or Prometheus or Simmons, you will see that someone who not part of BUGS would not understand it at all. Those are real BUGS comments, the ones dedicated to how we fight the actual battle OUT THERE.
There is no reason for me to dedicate my limited energy to one more forum about the ideal world.
Brian is my new inspiration.
Thanks, man!
Tim: Where is the revolution?
Where is the revolution?
Before last night, I had never been asked this question. But then again I don’t have frequent conversations with folks sitting on the front porch waiting for a Torch Light parade. I assumed the person asking the question was NOT being a smart arse. And I still do not know what his intentions were. It is easy to misread people online. That is a question for someone who is either blind or being a smart arse. I think the better of our race. So I assumed he was blind.
Five hundred years ago all hope was lost because this country was full of Indians. Of course, we would never be able to do anything about all the Indians. Opportunity to deal with the Indian situation would never present itself?
There was never going to be an American Revolution in Colonial America. White folks were going to take shite till the end of the world. All hope was lost. There were too many loyalist in the suburbs and these Indians had us outnumbered. They are coming to take all our muskets!!! oh no …all hope is lost.
When it comes to our race. One of these “all hope is lost” scenarios presents itself with frightening regularity. In fact, BUGS could author a General Theory of History based Aryans saying “All Hope is Lost”………and that is how we got to top of the food chain over the last 4000 years. We could deduce it down to an equation: Aryan = Perpetual Crisis = Aryan.
In the late 90’s, I got online for the first time and read about the Jews. All hope was lost against them. No one would ever stop the Jews. I believe there is a clear pattern that has developed with our folks. A rather obvious pattern. This week I goaded my liberal friends on the Jewish Question. The Liberals sound identical to the White Nationalist ten years ago. The whole planet talks about the Jews everyday. An Antisemite in 1975 could only see 2009 in his wildest dreams. Now it is happening in front of our faces. Bob called the moment in 2001 after September 11th: “the next holocaust has started”. He was right.
Aryans are sitting/straddling the whole top of the planet at 10% or so of the worlds population. We have weapons our ancestors could only dream about. And we have a fanatical core that has been created by the good ole fashioned lady……..mother nature. We have the most revolutionary communication technology the world has ever seen. Thomas Pain could only dream of something like this internet. But for us, there will never be any big openings anywhere. We will all brown out. All hope is lost. The jews will get all of us first. Oh my. An obvious pattern? Probably.
So where is the revolution?
This last week. I was watching the nightly news. I saw Tom Metzger on my nightly news talking about all the young radical racists he sees daily. I have seen the likes of him on the history channel discussing the Klan etc. But not on the midwest nightly news discussing the fanaticism of white youth…….and they were taking him seriously. They did not sit and rip the man down. This was a new scene. They were listening as he described what he was seeing every day among the white folk.
But of course it’s the end of world for us. All hope is lost.
Our race is full of technological ability. No one on earth doubts this. Unfortunately, we have not invented an Alarm Clock that gives out loud Jungle Calls at the starting point of the Revolutionary Gunfire. And unfortunately the Swiss have not come up with Cukoo clock that sings Tannenbaum at the start of the Torchlight Parade.
So where IS the revolution?
It’s right here.
And it is starting right in front of our faces. The whole system that holds up the status quo is collapsing.
Skype
A few members of BUGS are having conference call on the mantra and other topics at 4pm EST today.
If you would like to join in please contact Mustang303L over skype. If you do not have skype, you can download it here.
Edit: I’m sorry that we couldn’t bring you in Joe. We’re still adjusting to the interface and technical problems kept appearing.
We had a great time tonight and we’re looking forward to doing it again next week Sunday at 3pm EST. Make your arrangements now to be included in the next chat.
BUGS is a Gyroscope
When I dropped out for weeks, Brian filled the hole with selected comments from BUGS people. In other words, MY people don’t sit around bleating to each other, “What we do when The Leader is no longer with us?”
You see that Prometheus’ “Keep It Personal” has been inserted twice. Brian and I did it separately and so close together we coincided. I asked him to leave BOTH in, because it demonstrates a critical point about us.
Prometheus, Brian and me: We all see the basics.
That is precisely what our enemies try desperately to get us off of. BUGS is a Gyroscope.
Prometheus Makes a Critical Point: Keep It PERSONAL
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 3/18/2009
Another important point, KEEP IT PERSONAL!
Don’t argue as if you are discussing whether dropping interest rates further is going to ease the Global Financial Crisis or some other detached activity. You are NOT discussing political issues, you are discussing your OWN race and demanding self preservation. Your opponent is saying your race must go, do not make it a political issue or an economic one.
Don’t divorce yourself from your race and don’t be ‘objective’. Anti-whites in my experience have trouble arguing when its PERSONAL, because every argument they have against whites is detached and impersonal. It relates to the ‘white race’ in general, but never specifically to you, or to the young white child.
Prometheus
Posted by Brian in Comment Responses on 3/18/2009
Another important point, KEEP IT PERSONAL!
Don’t argue as if you are discussing whether dropping interest rates further is going to ease the Global Financial Crisis or some other detached activity. You are NOT discussing political issues, you are discussing your OWN race and demanding self preservation. your opponent is saying your race must go, do not make it a political issue or an economic one.
Don’t divorce yourself from your race and don’t be ‘objective’. Anti-whites in my experience have trouble arguing when its PERSONAL, because every argument they have against whites is detached and impersonal. It relates to the ‘white race’ in general, but never specifically to you, or to the young white child.
Dave
Posted by Brian in Comment Responses on 3/16/2009
I read Sterling’s article, and though he gets the Mantra, I can’t help but be disappointed.
Specific proposals shouldn’t be made or argued. Sterling suffers just as Tancredo does of not understanding the real underlying issue, and that is resistance to the climate of bullying that is has been and is forever our dominating political condition.
Simmons and Pain got it right that most of our anti-white white opponents (the talking doll variety) do not understand their own arguments. For the most part, the hordes of useful idiots are people with low street smarts. They are victims of a climate of bullying they do not understand, turnips on the back of a truck, having no options and without the intelligence to assess a means of escape.
But ironically, that is Sterling’s problem also. If he really understood the street, he would not bother with making specific proposals about “what ought to be done”. “What ought to be done” isn’t the issue. The issue is bullying.
Our opponents need to be convinced of this attitude, an attitude long on memory and long on commitment to severely punishing each and every offense offered.
This sweeps argument off the table and replaces it with a fist committed to being painted by blood.
The bullies get set to rights and suddenly they know they are no longer dealing with fools, flummoxing the anti-white whites (who suddenly apprehend a probable price for their treason), and forcing a requirement of respect from the anti-white nonwhites immediately.
Pain
Posted by Brian in Comment Responses on 3/16/2009
Tim, nice, but you are making two big mistakes:
(1) You are arguing defensively, which means that the idiot you are arguing with might have a point;
(2) You are wrong that the idiot actually believes what she is saying is true.
In other words, you are not dealing with a serious or sincere argument; it is just something she was told to say in a summer camp she enrolled in that was run by neomarxists.
So instead:
(1) Keep your reply very brief;
(2) Rather than defend yourself (”No, race is real”), come after them;
(3) Call them a genocider.
You might say something like this:
Is that something you are parroting from a Marxist book you read? Don’t you know that Marxism is long dead and long out of date? If you spend your life parroting things you don’t even believe yourself, aren’t you just an artificial construct?
The fact is, all that this old Marxist stuff means is that all whites should be genocided.
Why do you want to exterminate an entire race of humanity?
What would your mom and dad say about you?
Then follow up with the Mantra.
E-Mail Me, IF…
Despite what I keep telling them, some people think you’re smart. From time to time I get requests from them to put me in contact with certain of “my people.”
You are here for BUGS, not as ”my people.” No way I will freely identify you to anybody.
Somewhere on my board, your e-mail address appears. But I think you know me well enough to realize it would never occur to me to use it or give it out.
So I have to ask you to do something else for me.
Send me an e-mail if you are WILLING FOR ME TO CONTACT YOU that way. I can then tell you directly who wants to get in touch with us and why. I will NOT send your e-mail address to them. I will send THEIR e-mail address to you with an explanation TO YOU.
Then if you like you can contact them.
Waiting for Digestion
Posted by Bob in Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 3/1/2009
Brian did a great job in posting Adelheim’s excellent piece. The comments on it made me happy, because they showed you got a lot of the point I have made, even beyond the ones Adelheim put together.
That is, after all, what I am here for, to start ideas rolling. But they have started some of my concepts rolling about as much as I am able to make them. BUGS should keep going.
But, as you have made very clear to me, if I want things done, I must do them. In fact, my interest has shifted to doing them myself, as you directed.
The ideas will circulate from you, because they are useful for party talk. Don’t ever underestimate the importance of party talking moving the world. But outside of the things I see Prometheus and Lord Nelson doing and the actual reports with links from Shari and Pain, I assume that BUGS is a bunch of people talking about doing.
Before you get outraged, remember where I’m coming from.
Like many professors, I used to tell my students that they are unlikely to come up with any cop-outs that I haven’t already used. As a boss, as a staffer, I learned one rule: If you haven’t heard back, it hasn’t been DONE.
Work is the only thing people lie about more than sex. Lying about work is so common it is not called a “lie.” It is called an “excuse.” In fact, one of the commonly used tactics for getting someone off the subject of whether you have actually done anything is to say, “Are you calling me a LIAR?!”
I haven’t ever sunk to that one, since it requires throwing away one’s personal honor to justify an “excuse,” but I am VERY familiar with it. I fired one person for using it. They were in fact lying. They had raised the stakes from an “excuse” to a lie, and I was justified in firing someone who LIED to me.
I haven’t counted, but I have asked BUGS some twenty times if you would please do a couple of things for me. Usually there is no reply at all. When put in my usual hopeless request that you put my BUGS articles into Stormfront where relevant, it was as usual ignored. So I do it myself, which really looks GREAT. People are really going to listen to somebody who has to quote himself.
But this time I asked someone to WRITE Pat Buchanan so this time I DID get replies. They amounted to, “Shove it, Bob.” This was better than the usual “Shove it’s that you didn’t bother to write down.
Anyone who has ever been a boss, and even more anyone who has been a prof, notices how much WORK people are happy to put into excuses. People who will not write a short note for you will go on at great length about why they do NOTHING for you. It is not unusual for students to write really idealistic, effort-filled themes on why they didn’t just write the shorter theme you assigned them.
As I said above, it is hard to come up with an excuse I don’t know well.
As I said above, I don’t believe anyone is doing anything unless it comes back to me. You can’t survive in power politics unless you go by that rule. Pain and Shari have sent in links where they have actually done things. I have SEEN Prometheus and Lord Nelson come through on Stormfront.
I am not the only person in BUGS who assume that those who just talk here are just talking here.
If you are acquainted with Married With Children you know that Kelly tended to “get full” mentally. I quickly learned as a professor that students got full fast. So I have ceased to go on into other subjects. I have settled for talking about almost nothing but the Mantra and introducing nothing else.
I squish anti-whites on SF like, well, bugs. People keep sending me rep points but nobody USES the short, simple lines. It took me YEARS to get some people to use the Mantra with me. They watch me squash the anti-whites, but they have no interest at all in throwing in the simple points I do it with.
So I stick to the Mantra and ONLY the Mantra.
The other stuff I do myself instead of bringing in distractions.
For the moment I am stymied.
You’re FULL.
You’re FULL.
-
You are currently browsing the archives for March, 2009
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976 
A PLAGUE ON BOTH YOUR HOUSES
Bob's second book - 1982 
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERS
Bob's deadliest book - 2004 
Why Johnny Can't Think
America's
Professor-Priesthood
Revolution/Evolution: The BIG Catch-22
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 3/25/2009
On the subject of revolution covered by Tim below, anti-whites a fatal Catch-22 situation.
To begin with, the whole question of whether there will be evolution or a revolution is historically up to those who are in power. My first book, A Plague on Both Your Houses, discussed that matter at length. Any establishment which cannot adjust rationally ends up being overthrown at a huge cost to those who make it up. The British Monarchy adjusted to a parliamentary system and the Czar’s family is dead.
France’s Bourbons were famed for “Forgetting nothing and learning nothing.” So France remains a republic.
The critical problem is that our PC establishment CANNOT be reasonable about race. I have repeated the reason many times here, but the IMPLICATIONS have not been noticed. On Opposing Views on Stormfront, anti-whites are constantly saying that they have no objection to whites associating only with whites. Nobody but me EVER calls them on that because no one else recognizes this as their FATAL Catch-22.
Back to the original point: revolutions occur where the establishment cannot be reasonable. But anti-whites cannot be reasonable. Why? Because the Diversity myth is simply a myth. White people will, after a time, gravitate to any spot ON EARTH where whites are allowed to have their own communities.
The Diversity myth is so ridiculous that anti-whites cannot allow that myth to be DISCUSSED freely anywhere on earth. Debate diversity inside the US and you lost your career. Discuss it outside the US and you go to prison.
Repeat the above paragraph in any respectable publication and you are in deep, deep, trouble.
The mistake made on Stormfront is a discussion of evolution or revolution as if it were OUR choice. Pushing the race question to a matter of prison leads to revolution. But that is not because it is OUR choice. It is because the Diversity Myth is so ridiculous it can only be imposed by unremitting force.
15 Comments