Shari brings a report from the front!
Shari: These “immigrants” are in Norway as part of an ongoing program of White Genicide. The same push for pouring the non-white hoards is going on in EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries. This is nothing less than an effort to genocide the White race, my race. Nothing else. There is no push for non-Chinese pouring into China,or non-Japaese into Japan. There is no push to invade EVERY Black country and ONLY Black countries. Anti-racism is ANTI-WHITE.
This is what I wrote in response to Randall Burns posting on rape in Norway.
#1 by Pain on 04/21/2009 - 8:05 pm
This is a good example of fitting the Mantra into websites online! Sometimes the full version just sounds like an irrelevant advertisement, so you can alter it a little bit. Thanks for the good example!
Since Bob wants us to keep moving with this, let me say that of course we do not forget to post the full version wherever we can, also. Sometimes I’m just browsing around and I see the topic is related so I cut and paste the Mantra. Actually, pasting the whole thing takes less times than figuring out how to reword it.
I usually don’t even follow it up; it figure it’s done the job and I move on elsewhere.
It’s only in a heavily censored website or personal conversation that I’ll give an abbreviated version, tailored to how timid the person is. You are only talking to one person, so it’s not as important as the web, where the audience may have millions.
By the way, this whole are is hot potatoes; this is what people are thinking. This is why Google must censor its results so tightly on all things surrounding the ongoing white genocide. For example, for more than a year (a while back), the number one search result for Jew, was an anti-genocide site — until Google censored it.
It’s the same with every other topic around white genocide. I am sure each of us has noticed more than a websites that used to come up at the top of Google, until it suddenly disappeared unless you typed in the actual site name.
Genocide is THE issues of the age, which is why it must be suppressed.
As it becomes a natural part of casual conversation, you will find yourself slipping it in and people nodding in agreement.
#2 by shari on 04/21/2009 - 8:29 pm
Pain, This was not an exsisting conversation. What I have been doing is responding to pieces that have been posted. But this is an example of what I say. I always stick to the mantra. But usually I don’t repeat it entirely word for word. However , I don’t ask questions, I always point out GENOCIDE.
#3 by Pain on 04/21/2009 - 8:51 pm
Well, it’s very good technique!
#4 by AFKANNow on 04/21/2009 - 9:58 pm
in reply to RJB’s comments:
RJB wrote:
in reply:
The Tibetans and the Chinese in Tibet are not the issue here; the demographic battle between “Tibet,” and “China,” has gone on for millenia.
I suspect the train link to Lhasa, allowing China to import Mongolians in numbers that are the nightmare of Tibetans, will settle the issue in a very final manner.
Funny, though, that the all-too-numerous and all-too-vocal “anti-racist” groups seem remarkably quiet about the demographic battle over “Tibet,” that the Middle Kingdom will win.
Funny how they don’t define the issue in “Race-based” terms, at all.
I’m sure the Tibetans would disagree, but, not for long.
Of course, I don’t give a damn about the Tibetans, or their Race.
I am intensely concerned about my own Race, which is as it should be.
RJB wrote:
in reply:
Again, the issue is Racial Genocide.
The “indigenous peoples” – Third Worlders, one and all – are being displaced by economics and demography, just as the American Aboriginals were.
The “genocide,” in their case, is an entirely incidental byproduct of the economic forces at work.
The genocide in OUR case is the PRIMARY intent of our Racial Enemies.
you wrote:
in reply:
Japanese racial cohesion has forced the Japanese businesses to innovate at the level of technology, rather than labor arbitrage, displacement, and replacement.
If they need cheap labor, they can automate the process as much as possible, and have it done in China. This seems to work for Toyota, and other Japanese companies.
Control – particularly, control of the economic value-added function – remains on the Home Islands.
you wrote:
in reply:
Then why do the import quotas – “QUOTAS” – work in America to deliberately discriminate against the Race that Created America?
Why do the import QUOTAS favor aboriginal savages over European physicists?
Worse, why do the attempts at wholesale displacement and replacement immigration – the de facto legalization of the illegals from Mexico, for example – seem like quite a “conscious plan,” wth the common theme of the soft murder – genocide – of the White Race?
And, the “global elite” – many of whom seem to have a common *ahem* “Racial heritage” – who certainly have a strong Racial cohesion, whereas we are all too tolerant of those who should rightfully be called Race Traitors.
you wrote:
in reply:
And what is the source, the common thread, for this stunning reversal in demographic fortune?
The adoption of the values of….?
you wrote:
in reply:
I think you are missing a few terms here.
WHAT was “the 1960’s immigration expansion?”
Why, it was the reversal, of Racial quotas, followed by virtually unlimited immigration of low quality, low value-added people; aboriginals over White physicists, for instance.
If ever there was a path to Racial genocide, there it is.
you wrote:
in reply:
This is a common misunderstanding that so many have, that “a lot of wealthy people are in denial about what the real effects of immigration are…”
No, not at all.
Not in the least.
They know EXACTLY what they are doing, and why.
If more of US knew EXACTLY what they are doing, and why, we would realize the importance of Race as a principle of social organization.
It works well for our Racial Enemies, and it will work extremely well, for us, once we get used to the idea.
I use the words “White GENOCIDE,” without apology, in casual conversation, and am amazed at how people’s heads literally snap back as they hear the concept stated for the FIRST TIME EVER.
It won’t be the last, if we have anything to say about it.
#5 by Pain on 04/22/2009 - 6:38 pm
I like Shari’s technique, because it is simple and to the point. It gives the reader something easy to remember.
You can’t miss it. It’s like a billboard.
Besides, the Tibetan argument helps our argument, I’ve used it myself in the past. Another reason to keep it simple is that the objections are not sincere: if you say the sky is blue and somebody else says that you’re wrong because yesterday the sky was grey, you know you’re in for a long, fruitless night.
Of course sometimes a long dissertation like AFKAN’s can round things out for anyone that might read it.
Just two different ways of saying the same one thing.
#6 by AFKANNow on 04/22/2009 - 11:26 pm
in reply to Pain:
Thanks for the kind words, but my focus as on showing how Those Who Are Opposed To Us will start by shifting the topic to issues that they are much more comfortable discussing, rather than Race.
Thus, each of RJB’s attempts to shift the topic away from Race, and trivialize a discussion of Race, was met by me with a rebuttal that drew the topic back to Race as the First and Foremost Principle of Social Organization.
Race is the CONTEXT he is always trying to avoid, and it is the only context that MUST be addressed; without it, all other issues are moot.
Those who speak of, and then gloss over, “the real effects of immigration,” are really afraid of those of us who define all issues – including “the real effects of immigration” – in terms of a Positive Theory of Race.
#7 by Pain on 04/23/2009 - 12:01 pm
Afkan-
Thanks, especially for all the hard work!