<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordism Won&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/</link>
	<description>BUGS - Fighting Racist Genocide - White Genocide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: backbaygrouch4</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-44549</link>
		<dc:creator>backbaygrouch4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=4605#comment-44549</guid>
		<description>I am very happy that you are back and in good form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very happy that you are back and in good form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-44546</link>
		<dc:creator>Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=4605#comment-44546</guid>
		<description>LN you could have gone respectable and talked about &quot;equality&quot; and then been laughed off the stage like any old fool (McCain comes to mind).

Or the AR strategy of IQ and nothing but IQ.  

The &quot;social construct&quot; argument is about dead no matter how hard the semi-respectables try and keep it alive.  I think the Ricci case is waking them up to the fact that the left is dead serious about defining race in &quot;real&quot; terms as to who or whom gets what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LN you could have gone respectable and talked about &#8220;equality&#8221; and then been laughed off the stage like any old fool (McCain comes to mind).</p>
<p>Or the AR strategy of IQ and nothing but IQ.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;social construct&#8221; argument is about dead no matter how hard the semi-respectables try and keep it alive.  I think the Ricci case is waking them up to the fact that the left is dead serious about defining race in &#8220;real&#8221; terms as to who or whom gets what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-44545</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=4605#comment-44545</guid>
		<description>A few months ago I was invited to a debate with a rabid Anti-White. 

She kicked off the debate by telling everyone how much she felt compelled to stand to &#039;racists&#039; like me, especially because she had two White kids.

So I had some fun demanding that this Anti-White give reasons as to why her own children should be replaced with the children of North African Muslims, as the new majority population of the UK.

I kept threatening to call HER a racist if she did not comply. 

And so when she did betray her own kids, with talk about how &#039;we all bleed red&#039; and &#039;the White race is just a social construct&#039; etc. etc. I then switched it around. And demanded to know if she would use those same arguments to justify the replacement of Black children in African countries. And that I would think she was racist against Black Africans if she did.

She could not go there. And she had to admit it was only her own she was using this logic to against.

At this point GAME OVER! She lost all credibility and became a bit of a laughing stock to all who were there.

(Trust me, you had to be there) It woke up everyone who witnessed our little debate.

The point is, That&#039;s Mantra Thinking! If I had talked about &#039;Black crime stats&#039; &#039;scheming Jews&#039; and &#039;our beautiful White race&#039; I would still be there now. Being used like everyone&#039;s favorite   verbal punch bag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago I was invited to a debate with a rabid Anti-White. </p>
<p>She kicked off the debate by telling everyone how much she felt compelled to stand to &#8216;racists&#8217; like me, especially because she had two White kids.</p>
<p>So I had some fun demanding that this Anti-White give reasons as to why her own children should be replaced with the children of North African Muslims, as the new majority population of the UK.</p>
<p>I kept threatening to call HER a racist if she did not comply. </p>
<p>And so when she did betray her own kids, with talk about how &#8216;we all bleed red&#8217; and &#8216;the White race is just a social construct&#8217; etc. etc. I then switched it around. And demanded to know if she would use those same arguments to justify the replacement of Black children in African countries. And that I would think she was racist against Black Africans if she did.</p>
<p>She could not go there. And she had to admit it was only her own she was using this logic to against.</p>
<p>At this point GAME OVER! She lost all credibility and became a bit of a laughing stock to all who were there.</p>
<p>(Trust me, you had to be there) It woke up everyone who witnessed our little debate.</p>
<p>The point is, That&#8217;s Mantra Thinking! If I had talked about &#8216;Black crime stats&#8217; &#8216;scheming Jews&#8217; and &#8216;our beautiful White race&#8217; I would still be there now. Being used like everyone&#8217;s favorite   verbal punch bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shari</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2009/07/03/wordism-wont-work/comment-page-1/#comment-44542</link>
		<dc:creator>shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=4605#comment-44542</guid>
		<description>Wordism not only doesn&#039;t work, it gotten to the point,it won&#039;t even APPEAR to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordism not only doesn&#8217;t work, it gotten to the point,it won&#8217;t even APPEAR to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
