Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

2008 in Historical Context

Posted by Bob on July 6th, 2009 under History, Musings about Life


I knew a whole cadre of young people who loved Reagan because he ended the political exhaustion of the 1970s. They are never mentioned in the press or by conservatives.

A person coming of age in the 1970s was raised on the idea that his world would see no growth. The Environmental Protection Agency and conservation were the focus of attention. No one but me seems to know where this left a young person.

He had nothing to look forward to. He was superfluous, particularly if he was a white male looking for a job.

In other words, it was just like today.

Back then the big political buzz on the right was that conservatives and conservationists should make common cause.

And, of course, the conservative buzz was also the old “to go after the minority vote.”

I have been this way before.

By definition, the buzz is set up by the establishment and its conservative tagalongs.

One of the most critical signs of 1980 end of the old buzz is, AS ALWAYS, the least remembered. Reporters were climbing all over Washington trying to find conservative contacts.

They didn’t **KNOW** any of us, and they said so. PBS even had ME do a couple of shows for them in the process of trying to find tame conservatives. What if the press in 1932 simply did not KNOW any liberal Democrats?

They would have been laughed at. The 1932 media was conservative, but they were also professionals. The 1980 failure was a professional humiliation, so no one mentions it now.

The 1980 media had been trapped in its own buzz, and “Republican spokesmen,” right up to Election Day, meant moderates.

The reality of the 2008 election is totally opaque to anyone who keeps up with the political buzz, which means anyone who makes his living commenting on today’s politics. If he worried about anything else he wouldn’t be published. This is not a conspiracy. It is just that every editor knows what people want to read about, and that is things like criticism or praise of Obama. They are publishing for today’s
audience, not for accuracy about the future.

Political reality is that the Democratic rank and file, which is hard left, almost always chooses someone who is too far left for political practicality. Nixon was very unpopular in 1972, but they chose MCGOVERN to oppose him.

It was HILARIOUS to watch Democrats nominate one MASSACHUSETTS lefty after another and get crushed at the polls. In 1988 Bush Sr. was so far behind Dukakis in the polls that National Review declared Dukakis’ election absolutely inevitable.

I said, “He’s a Massachusetts liberal. He’ll lose.”

Whitaker Basics again. Simplism.

The Democrats who do the nominating did not like Carter’s image and they did not Clinton’s image. They wanted a New England liberal. This time they hit jackpot.

McCain, like Obama, was incidental to the BUZZ Process. McCain was the Republican who had made himself beloved by the Buzzers. What astonished me during the campaign was that the media actually REMEMBERED they had once loved McCain.

Usually that sort of thing is simply forgotten by everybody, but a number of commentators actually DID mention that the McCain the entire media was damning had recently been beloved of them as the perfect liberal’s conservative.

The present administration is a return to the 1970’s abandonment of any real future. I came up with the certainty that space exploration and new technology would lead into an unimaginably exciting future. Older people were jealous of the great things in store for the young. Precious few older people are jealous of the young ones now.

The buzz has replaced the old time future of a Heaven of Progress and space colonization has been completely displaced by a lifetime dedicated to avoiding the Hell of the Moment. You are now a Carbon Emitter, an Earth Destroyer. If you are young, your life must be devoted to sacrifices to make up for your Original Sin of being human.

We are back in the 1970s.

So Where do we go from here?

When the 70s came, I had spent a lot of years getting ready for it. I had my fifteen minutes of fame getting Reagan elected.

I am more ready for today than anybody else, so I will START addressing that next.

A hint: the 70s malaise came from the politics of self-hatred. We’re back to that.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Simmons on 07/06/2009 - 5:37 pm

    A quibble, it will be hatred of whites and nothing else, if it were “self-hatred” then the faithful colored companions would claim racism, and the white/jew libs would faint.

    The Democratic party the political party of cults would not withstand a self hatred session like they give to white undergrads at college orientation.

    As for this conservation shtick it is one of the few cults that actually have smart people to showcase and hence not embarrasing to actually showcase the demographic. The rest of liberalism is of ugly minorities and money grubbing overpaid union hacks with no work jobs, not the kind of people that TV hostest hotties want to interview or even acknowledge exist.

    Other than that I agree with you. I hope the Mantra is water-cooled because it is going to be worked and worked hard. I’ll even make a bet that with one year from now even Limbaugh will be using a version. (ftr he is pretty close now)

  2. #2 by Dave on 07/06/2009 - 10:20 pm

    The politics of self-hatred has run its course. It is all just too intolerable.

    There is a “carrying capacity” for lies in life too, just like the carrying capacity of the biological world.

    All the lies that can be carried have been carried. Accordingly, it is resentment’s turn to drive the bus. And resentment gets you to what is authentic quick.

    I am in line with my thumb out like so many others, trying to hitch a ride in a car driven by hatred.

    And those that are settled and secure, and this whole vile Establishment that think they have just got it made, cannot imagine the reality of the punishments that await them.

    There is far too many of my kind out and about. Something that makes OUR time in the here and now far far different than the 1970s.

  3. #3 by shari on 07/08/2009 - 12:53 pm

    It seems to have been a breath holding stage. The storm is plainly rolling in. I’m anxious to hear what you will address next. I also think that T.F. called you a con-man without naming names. But, I can see that he is fighting a CONSERVATIVE battle, which can’t win. It’s the “conservative” gates of hell that will not prevail.

  4. #4 by Simmons on 07/08/2009 - 2:22 pm

    If anyone needs evidence of a cult gone bad, look at the black cult today between the Jackson non-saga and the professional negroes who glommed to him, or the spree violence in which very low IQ blacks are being spurred onto violence by the slightly higher IQ blacks and which PC can barely gloss over, it is all going bad on them, but they don’t realize it. see Dave’s thread for the results.

    As for white allies the blacks are down to the white guilt ridden sociopaths (and they seem to be bailing for the green movement, much safer)and the true psychopaths such as the jews whose parents ought to be arrested for creating such monsters both physically and psychologically.

    Never mind the professional care takers of blacks, I’m pretty sure California is making no exceptions for them with their IOU payments, so scratch them from the list of black allies. It just don’t pay no more, literally. Never mind Hillary and Bill lurking in the background and I have no doubt they would “nigger up” this election cycle to boot the Zero back to Kenya.

  5. #5 by Simmons on 07/08/2009 - 2:28 pm

    For the pontificating by myself above this I conclude; PC is an advanced degenerate religion its lies worn and literally unprofitable, a joke being an apt descriptor. That is why today does not exactly rhyme with 1970.

  6. #6 by Tim on 07/08/2009 - 7:49 pm

    Simmons is correct. PC will not go out with a bang but with an economic collapse.

    All these failed groups are too damn expensive for the elites to keep around. They got spoiled dealing with Whites for 100’s of years.

    I agree with the Hillary and Bill comment. I could imagine Hillary doing anything to take over. Under Horus’s “me a white rabbit –you a white rabbit” she’s a white rabbit. She’d be ok with me if she played that game –“KICK THE KENYAN OUT”. Hell, Hillary has to be more racist than Johny Mccain and the so-called conservatives. She has never adopted a Guatemalan baby!

You must be logged in to post a comment.