Archive for August, 2009
The World War 2 Generation came back from their how-to-be a good doggy training with the conviction that they were AMERICANS ONLY. There was no white, there was no black, there were no Southerners and no Northerners. As to self-interest, there was only Sacrifice.
That is precisely the kind of Wordist attitude that the Constitution could not operate in. The Constitution uses a system of checks and balances where personal preferences are allowed because the different branches of government will keep each other in check. The final appeal was to the people.
But when the WWII Generation took power, there was no “people.” They were all Americans. The people did not have any existence except as Good AMERICANS. So they had to appeal to a Federal Branch to tell them what Good Americans were.
Whereas the Tenth Amendment made it specific that the final appeal would be to the people or the states, Good Americans do not see any separate entities of this kind.
So the World War II Generation’s Final Appeal is to the Federal Courts.
People asked Ben Franklin what the Constitutional Convention had given them and Ben is supposed to have replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.” There used to be a slogan, “This is a republic, not a democracy, let’s keep it that way.”
Actually, like most conservative statements, this is simply no longer true. The same Supreme Court that made the holy decision to strike down all state laws against interracial marriage which no conservative dares question also decided that the United States is NOT a republic.
The only phrase in the Constitution that gives the Feds the right to interfere with the FORM of state government is the one which requires that all states must maintain “a republican form of government.” Since the outset every state allowed one senator per county, regardless of its size, just as states were allowed equal Senate representation regardless of their population.
This is, in fact, the only part of the Constitution which cannot be changed by amendment.
The Holy Court of Miscegenation ruled that this provision in in all but one (unicameral) state legislature in the fifty states was unconstitutional. The Holy Court ruled that if a state is not a democracy, it is not a republic, so all legislative bodies must be based on population.
Except the Federal one. So the Federal Government is not, and cannot be, a republic.
I worked for a while in two prisons. As someone has pointed out, if you took all the things I mention here and made a biography out of it, I have lived a couple of hundred years.
One thing I really learned while in those prisons was that crime is a business. Not just organized crime, but crime in general. It is the way certain people make their living.
Besides, if you are in prison, what does everybody around KNOW about? At a medical convention people talk about medicine. In a prison, they talk about crime.
Like all my observations this one seems obvious, so you nod and go on worrying about what is in the paper or who is in People Magazine.
I was reading in an independent give-away yuppie newspaper about a guy who got beat up by a gang in Five Points. Five Points is Columbia’s yuppie and college student bar area.
So if you go back to People Magazine after reading my observation, you will miss why this yuppie area that recently was so safe is now dangerous.
One of the things prisoners discuss a LOT is guns. Contrary to the Heroic Criminal Myth, criminals are no more fond of facing a weapon than anyone else. No, it is NOT routine for a criminal to take the gun away from a cringing, drooling person and shoot him with it.
In fact, there are likely far more incidents of crime victims taking the fun away from the robber than vice-versa.
In the real world. But cases where someone who is not in a police costume stopping crime is not reported. And the judges are a lot more anxious to imprison someone for stopping crime than for committing it.
You see, the criminal knows who to call and what to say. This is experience average people do not have, so the cops love to trap them.
But back to the specific case of talking about crime. In any prison inmates about where citizens have guns in exactly the same way builders talk about potential accidents. Citizens out of costume are a major occupational hazard outside of states with what prisoners consider good, solid gun laws.
Back to Five Points. I mentioned before that a black guy marched into the recovery club with a gun and demanded money from everybody. Poor bastard was from New York.
Wrong state. One of those terrified unconsumed people in the club pulled out his gun and killed him on the spot.
It happens that that club is in Five Points. But it is RECOVERY club.
Five Points has become a gathering place for muggers because it is gun free. If a citizen has a gun permit, he cannot go into a place where alcohol is served. Five Points is full of bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, so it is the one place muggers and gangs are safe.
So if you just nod at my obvious observation, you will not understand why Five Points is a gathering place for criminals and why the guy got shot dead in that particular club.
There is a rule that anyone who makes a living off of history or social commentary has to provide his tithe to our established religion of PC. BBC documentaries end with a sermon in which everything that has been said is jammed into the PC world review.
When I see that this particular book is the one in which the author pays his tithe, I close it and return it. Each author must give excuses for minority behavior. In one case a historical fiction writer was declaring that the Gypsies were regular exploited WORKERS just like everybody else, like illegal aliens in America.
Meanwhile Piers was explaining that Gypsies stole babies and other property because they did not recognize property rights. So presumably if Gypsies were appearing in your town and you gabbed one of THEIR kids, they would think nothing of it.
So Gypsies are hard workers for their due wage and don’t recognize there is such a thing as a due wage.
Blacks don’t commit more crimes — or one would be justified in suspecting them of crime more than people with white skin — and every writer must know the list of reasons WHY blacks have a RIGHT to commit more crime.
Democrats spend hundreds of millions getting out the minority vote, but if you say non-whites are likely to vote Democratic in the wrong context, you are a Nazi.
No one mentions it, but there has been a gigantic improvement in the reaction to crime on television. When I was young and snakes had feet, you would regularly see a family whose child had been brutally murdered tearfully talking about the poor murderer.
Granted a lot of parents weren’t that forgiving, but only the ones who were got on TV.
In the 1960s when the dog-trained, dog-faced WWII Generation was middle aged and at its height of power, anyone who protected himself with a gun was condemned. The few times when someone was shown resisting attack in any way, especially by having a gun, the whole reporting process stopped for a lecture on how only a guy in a police costume should resist violence.
In fact, like the families loving the killer of their child or daughter the standard fare of TV reporting would be astounding today. The police, in their costumes the WWII Generation worshiped, had a standard lecture that sounded like this: If a robber wants anything, give it to him. Grovel and grovel and grovel. Ask him to come home with you and rape your daughter.
The cops have UNIFORMS on. Only they are Magic.
Today they even suggest that, instead of giving your wallet to an armed robber, you should throw it under something so he has to dig for it while you get away. For TV in the 1960s this would have been pure heresy.
“Be NICE. Let the COPS handle violence against you. It’s none of your business.”
This is an area in which America and Europe are on opposite tracks. In Europe every year more judges and legislatures pass more laws making it clear that the citizen cannot object, cannot defend himself, cannot have a weapon.
The History Channel is advertising a program with the words “All humans are 99.9% identical.” They are also 99.5% identical in other articles, equally Politically Correct.
Bill Clinton said 99.99%, and he wouldn’t lie.
This is the latest One Sentence Truth about race. Fifty years ago, I read in a COMIC BOOK that “scientists have proven that all races are equal in inherited abilities.” The illustration showed an Oriental, a white and a black breaking the tape in a FOOT RACE at the same moment. Now that we have SEEN other races in action the idea that all races run at the same speed would get you institutionalized.
But the One Sentence Truth changes from month to month:
All races have equal innate IQ.
Race is a myth.
Race is a social construct.
All races are 99.9999% identical.
All of which means the white race should disappear.
Please note that the History Channels One Sentence Truth says that ALL PEOPLE are 99.9% identical. This means geniuses, idiots, dwarfs, giants, ugly and beautiful, healthy and congenitally doomed to die as children.
If you think about it’s not a very comforting thought. But nobody ever THINKS about One Sentence Truth. You can get arrested for doing that.
Sherwood Forest is gone. All the giant forests of Medieval England are either gone or are midget versions of their former selves. What saved the forests was coal and oil.
If we had not progressed beyond the use of wood for every new industry every tree would have been sacrificed. That is what happened on Easter Island, what became the Sahara Desert, in Central America and in thousands of other places.
In other words, as usual, the Guilt People have it dead wrong. We all took it for granted that a stagnant world destroys itself. As you run out of one resource like wood or oil you develop new ones. But this is not done by stagnation in a world planned for stagnation by some Wordist priest.
The environmentalist establishment today is exactly like the priests who said masses to stop the Plague. We cannot deal with any of the crises they make their living on by shouting out guilt about technology and breeding Ethiopian children. The last people in the world who could deal with global warming are Ethiopians.
Dave’s article below shows the fundamental difference between life-thinking and death thinking. On the one side there stands the Guilty Man, whose only aim is to be sterile and miserable. On the other hand is the man who demands human beauty, fecundity, and a march to the stars and beyond.
It is hard to believe that a generation ago we were talking about space colonization and comparing the economic growth rates of country. Today all the talk is about how we can make up for our sins by going back to the stone age. Our ideal today is the non-carbon producing, Ethiopian, almost the only group on earth who are actually managing to STARVE.
Our ideal today is the man who “lives with nature,” which is code for being an animal himself. There is absolutely no difference between the loving praise heaped on stagnant stone-age men today and that heaped on animals.
This was called socialism, now it is called environmentalism, but it used to be called Christianity.
There were two versions of the story of Faust. One was the Medieval on in which Faust wanted more knowledge and sold his soul for it. It ends with him torn to pieces and his soul screaming in Hell.
Goethe’s Faust has Faust bound for Hell after his search for knowledge and one moment’s happiness, two things that Medieval “Christianity” hated. At the last moment the angels come and chorus, “A man who tries his best, him can we save:”
“Der der strebend sich bemueht, den koennen wir erloesen.”
In other words a German saw Faust’s desperate pursuit of happiness and of knowledge to be good, the opposite of damnable.
The Mantra goes with a general attitude of good, of humanness. Its opponents is at best Medieval and fundamentally stone age.
Race mixing looks ugly and has bad results. These are the two things the Guilty Man loves. As Dave says, the Guilty Man Mantra is Sacrifice. It is giving your neighbors and future generations permanent sterility and changelessness. It is evil.
A columnist for National Review, of all places, is worried to death about the demographic collapse of Europe. In the last issue, he noted that a mainline British scientific group had made it official: it recommended that Europeans have NO children. The column writer said it was astonishing that official sources were now stating the inevitable logic they had been moving toward for so long. Sterility is now official policy.
The Zero Population Growth of the 1970s, of which Soylent Green was a symptom, is now Zero Population. That specific report pointed out that an Ethiopian child would produce less than one half percent of the carbon emissions that a first world child would. Third worlders, said the report, should be left to produce the children.
Like the Mantra, this is a matter of something becoming so obvious writers cannot help but write about it. Like the Mantra, respectable conservatives will do anything to dance around the actual basis of these all-too-obvious facts, these elephants in the living room.
The obvious fact is that in order to remove the white man’s consciousness of race which ruled in the 1930s, social engineering had to declare total war. Total war means incidental destruction. In a seventy-year campaign to get white men to cheer when a pygmy marries a beautiful blond, the whole of his nature had to be attacked. The whole business of producing children is based on a prejudice deep in our animal soul: the desire to procreate and perpetuate our own kind.
The whole desire to procreate our own kind is now a Hitlerite obsession, not a natural drive. Conservative Catholics loved the attack on this his instinct when it just said that one should ignore reproducing one’s own kind and consider all marriages holy if a pedophile in a dress the right words in a dead language. But you can’t attack anything this basic drive without turning off the drive to produce one’s own kind without striking at the basis of life itself.
The favorite word of the Establishment, brought up on WW II movies, is “sacrifice”.
Thank God we’re not Chinese where “sacrifice” is regularly (and actually) in operation as the main pillar of the culture. Here in America, we just pretend.
During the Chinese war years, the local militia would round up a village to clear land mines by marching them through the mine fields. The commander would exclaim to the villagers, “Good news! Today you get to die for the Motherland. “
Later he would catch some old fellow crawling along on his belly banging the ground ahead of him with a stick. He would pull the geezer up by the scruff of the neck and exclaim, “No cheating! Get out there and die and don’t dally about it!”
This trait of the Chinese is the main reason Respectable Conservatives are so impressed with them and why they think it is awful America isn’t more “China like”.
They are ashamed that America isn’t more patriotic. Secretly, they love the idea of the draft, but know that in today’s America putting a draft into operation, no matter what the circumstances, is impossible.
The young boys all want to get paid great wages, have the latest muscle cars, get to wear Damascus gloves and cool shades, and be fabulous Kelmar Knights, supported by the latest IT enhanced weapons’ exotica.
They are real Americans and like the rest of the real America they are absolutely opposed to dying. And to the dismay of our dumb ass politicians, they (and the rest of the real America) hate “sacrifice”.
Not everything is bad about (the real) America.
Episode nine has been released for your auditory pleasure.
It won’t do for a literate adult to be endlessly surprised that people who preach Love most are the haters, that those who preach Mercy most are the torturers.
We have just watched several incidents where thousands of people were financially ruined because they did no understand the basic truth that absolute trust means absolute betrayal. Japan’s national economy was almost destroyed by that.
Come on! How many times must people breathlessly state that the merciless talk endless about mercy and so forth before we stop being astonished by it? We all knew the Inquisition preached Mercy and Communism preached Brotherhood by the time we were ten years old.
It is true that “Freedom is the right to say that two plus two is four.” But it is retarded to be constantly AMAZED by arithmetic!
Obviously those who spend endless effort denouncing Hate consider it very natural, as Joe Sobran points out. Nobody hates like an anti-Hater. But by now a moderately intelligent person should realize that in every area.
Those who preach Diversity want white countries to have no serious differences in opinions or culture and they want the population to be a uniform brown.
But this conclusion should be gotten, not by a deep analysis, but by the first words out of their mouths.
Non-whites could not live in northern latitudes because they could not get the sun. They died for lack of the “sunshine vitamin” D. White science discovered this and now they can.
Our numbers have dropped largely due to the use of The Pill. Abortion if not nearly so fatal with white science as it was in any other place or any other time. We also know what we are doing. They used to have all sorts of ridiculous formula for ending pregnancy, few of which had anything to do with doing the job.
In 1900 Indians were known as the Vanishing Americans. Black deaths doubled with the end of slavery and the relative number of blacks to whites was dropping steadily. America was becoming “inevitably” whiter.
One of the most surprisingly consistent numbers in the last couple of millennia has been that a fifth of the human race has been in China. When the Chinese adopted ;the aquatic rice developed by Aryan India about the time of the blue-eyed Buddha, their passive nature was perfect for the rice paddies which brought their numbers rapidly upward to the one-fifth level.
The last thing anyone suspects today is that Orientals are likely to do away with themselves. But such is the case. Japan copied Western technology to an extent that wowed the world. By the same token, Japan has taken birth control to the point where its population crash is outdoing that of Western Europe.
Like all disasters, Communism can make this one worse. China imposed birth control the way it did the rice paddy culture, on everybody at once from the center. Their population crash is going to make Japan’s look amateurish.
I met hundreds of Russians, and the only one I ever heard who had a good word to say for non-white immigration was an old-line Stalinist about 2002. He wanted those “hard-working Chinese” to be brought in. It is difficult to state how opposed all other Russians are to non-white immigration.
But to the old-line Stalinist, his brothers are not Russians but those who espouse his creed. Russia made up of Chinese, his Soul Brothers in Communism, would be HIS country. A Wordist Communist land.
So you can see all my seemingly distant observations coming together. Professional futurists declared Japan The Land of the Future in the 1980s. That sounded plausible from the news headlines of the time so those predictions got financed and published.
The same Futurologists who made their reputations in the 1980s have adapted their predictions to the latest headlines after Japan’s financial catastrophes. Nobody asks them
About their former Inevitable Future. It is tacitly admitted that their salaries have been a total waste in actually predicting, just as doctors were a total waste and worse in earlier ages.
Pat Buchanan looked at present demographic figures and said that, according to those, two-thirds of the world’s population would be in sub-Saharan Africa in a century.
If you look at things racially, the demographic bust among Orientals is no surprise. Anything we have done for over two thousand years they have done more of. Chinese history talks a lot about the division of the Empire of Chin from time to time, but Europe has never once even approached the unity that China takes as its baseline. Japan’s unity in one form or another has been amazingly consistent.
The unity of a population even the size of Japan’s was a terrific singularity in Europeans history. That of China never happened once. As one writer pointed out, what we call stereotypes are usually just inconvenient truths. Orientals are more obedient and more tractable, and they are not inventive, though they can take improvements and go with them with an orderliness whites can only gasp at.
If a Chinese found or invented something in the right place at the right time, it flourished and then dies. This is true of printing. This is true of black powder. This is true of the huge iron works the Emperor sponsored. In China, all novelty dies.
This is the stereotype. This is the truth.
I get so SICK of discussions about THE races!
Whenever anyone discusses race relations, they are not talking about what should be done in “the world.” ALL talk about immigration and integration applies only to WHITE countries. So “assimilation” only means integration INSIDE white countries.
And no one, NO ONE, ever SAYS that. When we put this point in Pat Buchanan’s discussions, it gets wiped, much less anybody else’s.
We are, in fact, dealing entirely with the destruction of the white race, which is what nobody in respectable life dares say out loud.
So it is our moral duty to say it out loud. But don’t use familiar language, use the Mantra.
The reason the Mantra is so effective today is because we can SEE its reality. In the 1950s when integration was aimed by its promoters at the ultimate end of white existence, it seems to be alarmism. But now it is OBVIOUS. Which is why it cannot be mentioned. Its discussion was allowed when it could be pooh-poohed. But today it is so obvious it must be suppressed, ONCE IT IS MENTIONED.
I don’t believe in conspiracies per se. That is partly because when people think exactly alike it is natural to think they are in cahoots. But every college graduate has been indoctrinated so that he understands exactly how he is to react in every case. A graduate of the Sorbonne and a graduate of Harvard will appear to be in a conspiracy, but they are much more like zombies. And leftist zombies create rightist zombies. Liberal reaction to any EFFECTIVE dissent is to declare the person making that dissent “unrespectable.”
So, if one is to make a LIVING at being a RESPECTABLE conservative, one does not need to be part of a conspiracy. He knows what will not be tolerated, or he would not be a professional.
If you don’t use the Mantra, you are respectable, Which is worse than a crime. You are worse than a Communist. You are what makes absurdity and evil POSSIBLE.
One of our commenters said he was talking to a top professors who says racial IQ is different. He asked him about testing originality and the professor replied, “You can test anything.”
Actually, you an test anything you know the answer to. That rules out originality. Which is the bind people get into when they forget that IQ difference is just a sign of racial difference. This particular professor thinks Orientals are the master race.
In fact, that least “scientific” of qualities — skin color — tells you which fallen civilizations will stay fallen forever. Orientals are certainly superior to races besides ours because other races cannot even absorb what we teach them, what we originate. But they do it so well we often think of them as The Wise Ones and the Smart Ones.
Testing originality is an oxymoron.
Dave keeps making the point that non-whites enjoy what they could not create.
If you look at every single society that has fallen, you will see that it turned brown. Northern Europe stayed white and continued the process from Roman organization to modern Western society. But the areas of the Roman Empire that turned brown in skin color stayed at the bottom.
I know a lot of geography and most people don’t. Scientific observation consists of looking at a fact which does not fit the pattern, and NOT explaining it away for the sake of your present beliefs.
There is a fact here. Regardless of their totally different histories, brown-skinned people are universally poor and stagnant. Anyone who points this out is a modern Galileo. This CANNOT be true, so it is not true.
But it IS true. Like the child in The Emperor’s Clothes or Galileo, we see reality.
In the America of respectable conservatives, the term “undocumented worker” is perfectly accurate. In a paper country, why should one person be allowed to work on one side of the border and another not? To respectable conservatives, there is nothing racial or inherited or even cultural about Americans. To conservatives, being an America is entirely a matter of paperwork.
Why should one Julio get five times the wages of another Julio because he has papers?
When the Immigration and Naturalization Acts were passed in 1921 and 1923, it was decided that America was made up of a certain people, and immigration would keep that identity. Calling something illegal immigration made sense, since those laws followed a racial and cultural policy.
But for a melting pot, where the choice of citizens is openly random, no one can really take the word “illegal” seriously. In terms of American policy today, nothing about you matters except the papers.
The term “undocumented worker” should be “undocumented citizen.” A bumper sticker ought to say, “I’m not a citizen, I’m just documented.”
Our borders are collapsing because we have declared they no longer make any sense.
A melting pot cannot be selective.
A commenter pointed out some time ago that wordist institutions are vampires. Like other vampires the only life an institution has is what it can take from people. Loyalties that nature intended to be used for the perpetuation of a people are used for the institution. The loyalty and dedication of a monk is a distortion of the natural dives that were intended for the survival of his kind, but they are used to cause him to dedicate himself perpetuating something that has no life.
In Latin countries the declared ideal is racial assimilation. Portugal and France declared their colonies to be part of their European countries. All that one needs to be French is to speak French.
Yet Stormfronters keep insisting the Jews invented this!
The ideal of EVERY wordist institution is interracial marriage. The ideal is that a family have nothing in common except the institution. If a family is started by two people married by the Church who have absolutely nothing in common racially or culturally, its identity is nothing but Catholic. The identity that nature intended to perpetuate the race is dedicated entirely to loyalty to the Wordist Church.
The Melting Pot has always been the ideal of every kind of Wordism. This is OLD. Alexander the Great sought to unite his empire by intermarrying easterners and westerners. Lately the Reverend Moon conducted massive interracial marriages.
If you accept that the Inquisition never did physical damage to Jews, you can accept that the priesthood of the temple did nothing to Jesus. But the converse is true. If you overlook the responsibility of the Inquisition that crucified Jesus you must hold the Inquisition guiltless.
One could say that both the Inquisition and the Crucifixion were terrible mistakes in the millennia-long history of Jews and of the Church of Rome. They cannot be blamed on MODERN Catholics or Jews.
But there is a huge difference here. The Catholic Church has admitted it did wrong. The Pope has gone to Israel and groveled at the Jews’ feet for the Inquisition. He has rolled and puked and peed in his robes over the Evil the Church did to Jews.
In other words, the Church admits it was wrong and separates modern Catholics from the errors of their predecessors. The only problem is that, like other white gentiles, the Church keeps on groveling to a sickening extent.
Jewish reaction to Mel Gibson’s perfectly accurate portrayal of the Crucifixion was the exact opposite. The Jews said that if the Temple Priesthood back then did an evil thing, then that evil is still part of Judaism. This is odd, but that IS the logic..
If you insist that admitting a 2000 year old error by Jews is anti-Semitic, you are agreeing with the anti-Semites.
By the same token, Jews who insist that any attempt to save the white race is Nazi are agreeing with Hitler. They are saying that Jews and Aryans cannot survive in the same world.
When I was coming up, “modern” meant industrial. One writer said, “It is as modern as Marx, as up-to-date as the Webbs.” Fifty years later, I have to explain that the latter were the upper class founders of the old British Labor Party.
Back then, the whole world was going to live in the middle of big cities because that was where the jobs would be. People would live where they work.
In fact, millions of blacks and PRs went downtown as workers moved to the suburbs to get welfare. In the next New Age, people moved to where they could NOT WORK most profitably. When the suburban and inner city trends became “inevitable,” of course, THAT pattern broke down.
As a religion, Political Correctness has to have its own Inevitable Future, its good god called “Change” or “Progress” and its Hell and Devils residing in “reaction” or racism. Political Correctness is derived from our other religions, so this follows naturally. The problem is that other religions were able to make promises in the afterlife. You believe, you pay for the church, you obey rules set, and you avoid Hell. But Hell is always put off into the unprovable period after you are dead, where no one can PROVE it one way or another.
The Western conflict between science and religion was absolutely unique in history. No other society had produced a science separate from its established religion. Even then, had the church stuck to its doctrine of punishment or reward after death. there would have been no conflict. But the church claimed Genesis as scientific truth. One thing the church had to be taught, over and over, was not to stick its doctrines in areas where they are subject to proof or disproof or they would be chopped off with a lot of pain to the church.
Evangelical Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds when it, unlike the Modern churches, kept its serious religion for the afterlife. Now that it is pushing anti-evolution and a fertilized egg should be allowed to vote, its growth has stopped in the first world.
Marxism and its product Political Correctness put EVERYTHING into this world. It is based on the Inevitables of History, and every inevitable Marx and his followers came up with has turned out, over and over and over and over, to be sillier than the Church versus Galileo.
You can’t see this if you look for complications. Like Genesis, the failures of Marxism are with where you START not where you finish. Stalin used Lysenko to declare that, since Marxism will remake the world entirely by planning the world, the laws of genetics did not apply. The result for Soviet agriculture were what those who did not share the Communist religion would have expected. You can’t make summer wheat into winter wheat by freezing it.
As with the Mantra, Political Correctness deals with SIMPLY insanity for a while by complicating it: “You are just being simplistic by labeling Comrade Lysenko’s doctrines that way,” and then, like the Catholic Church with Galileo, just never mentioning it again.
The process is the same as any other church. First you bring forward your Authorities. A lot of people go to huge pain and face oppression to overthrow the Doctrine. Then it denies that Political Correctness said such a thing. Anyone who brings up Lysenko or Galileo is being “simplistic” and “insulting.”
Established religion is allowed to make the same mistake over and over because no one reminds them of the earlier ones. Respectable conservatives have made an industry of forgetting that Marxism is just SILLY. Making a tame opposition part of the establishment. It was a coalition of Sadducees and Philistines and so forth who crucified Jesus.
Our job is not a new one. It is the old one that those who valued truth over the establishment has always had. It now and ever shall be as long as Authority is used against reality.
I was in the University of South Carolina Student Senate, the student council, in 1962 when Saint John the Kennedy sent the Army in to enforce integration at the University of Mississippi. I wanted to introduce a resolution giving our backing to Mississippi, but for once I couldn’t decide, aka, I didn’t have the guts.
So we are not all as brave as the commenters on Brian’s article on professorial genocide seem to think we are. Some of us wouldn’t find it easy to be ALONE in class against the professor and her thugs.
It takes infinitely more moral courage to fight it out with a professor for our cause than it does for a hundred thousand men to hit the beach at Normandy WITH EACH OTHER.
Contrary to every Wordist dogma, we are a hardwired social animal. You can’t just make us over by writing a book.
As a former prof, let me assure you that there is nothing easier than being a bully from the front of the class. No student EVER wins a debate with a prof. A few of you have put the Mantra in newsgroups and you see how easy it is to cut it or change the subject or just declare the subject is closed.
It takes guts to face a roomful of people. It takes super guts to face a ROOMFUL of hostile people.
A question for you, What happens when the Mantra
exposes an explicit White Genocide group of Whites, Jews and Faithful Colored Companions? White genocide has been implied for the most part but once we expose it it will be left to the hard core white haters and then what do we say and do?
Pain happened to have the exact answer to this in his comment today:
“When we do argue with creeps, it is for the anyone that may overhear us.”
When open anti-whites, especially if they are white, say so out loud, encourage them. They will agree with the Mantra. Repeat it, and be sure as many people as possible HEAR them agreeing with you. Remember it for when the next person says, “But nobody is anti-white” or “How can a white person be anti-white?”
Much as they may cheer him in public, everybody despises a self-hater. As Pain points out, you are not there to win an argument, you are there to make OUR point.
In Bob’s last book, he wanted one thing from college students and that was to start giving their professors a hard time.
I have an English composition professor straight out of the murky bowels of California, and to call this woman anything less than fanatically PC would be the understatement of the century. Lately she has been using her bully pulpit to make comments disparaging of those who don’t fall in line with her PC group think.
The past week we were reading pieces of literature with the theme of race. On our final piece we assembled into groups of five and lazily mulled over the material. About twenty or so minutes wasted we discuss what conclusions our group has come to. This time she made a comment saying that there won’t be world peace until everyone hurries up and intermixes.
I piped up and told her that was genocide. She tried to backstep out of that by saying that by saying genocide is a violent. I countered by quoting article 2 sections C and D of the ’48 conventions on genocide.
The other two white males in the class became her fiercest defenders. We went though many points and the following are the most memorable; Rome fell because it turned inwards, cultures need outside influences to survive, the founders designed the constitution so it could be modified to include everyone, the propositional state, that EVERYONE who was inside a colony was included in “for ourselves and our posterity,” race is a social construct, and finally what are white people anyway?
The professor looking frustrated tried to end the conversation but, I refused to give it up. However, when she stood before the class and admitted that she was for genocide, I stared at her slack jawed and allowed class to move on.
While I felt as if I had failed since I had gone off the genocide point, the greatest achievement was having the professor admit to supporting genocide. Go forth chaps and give academia the trouncing they deserve!
The following is an essay that I submitted in my English Composition class. It is my sincerest hope that you will enjoy reading it as much as I did writing it.
The Affects of Organized Religion on American Society:
A Perspective of Loyalty
There are two types of loyalty that one can subscribe to; loyalty to the book, wordism, or loyalty to kin. Wordism is Universalist; they claim to have the words to unite mankind. Wordist loyalty is divided into millions of factions, each proclaiming that they and they alone have the proper set of words. A Marxist can be just as wordist as an extreme muslim who is just as wordist as the televangelist, who says to the poor folks in Appalachia, Jesus wants you to adopt a starving colored boy, AMEN!
Organized Religion is one arm of wordism. The members have devoted their loyalty to what is contained in the book or the official decrees from the lords. These decrees and interpretations have a way of changing. An interpretation one way, may change tomorrow and what was righteous, holy, and morally sound yesterday, may as well be the fecal material of Lucifer today. However these sudden changes in loyalty are dangerous to anyone who is in the business of loyalty, because said wordists will justify their stabbing of you in the back with some obscure misinterpreted passage in their book.
When these states were united in confederation, there existed anti-miscegenation laws on the books of every state. While the anti-miscegenation case of Loving V. Virginia, 1967 was before the supreme court, the churches took the time to say to the congregation “that it matters not what color they are but as long as they are members of the faith.” It doesn’t matter what the kid is going to look like or how he feels, all that matters is that the parents were “in love” and united by the right words. The Supreme Court called the anti-miscegenation laws “unconstitutional.” This display of wordism supported judicial activism and paved the groundwork for the now infamous case called Roe V. Wade, 1973 and they wonder just WHERE the court attained such a power! Suddenly, because it crossed THEIR book, judicial activism was Lucifer’s poop.
In the 1980’s when in vitro fertilization was a hot topic, the professional Pro-Lifers argued that it should be banned because it destroyed a few embryos in the process. They claimed that the life of the embryo was as precious as a human’s and that it was morally wrong and damming its soul to hell because it would die unbaptized, and that it was irresponsible when you could adopt a starving colored boy. However it was the infertile woman’s duty to keep trying and losing the fertilized embryos by natural means. The difference? It was the lab. Today there are over one-hundred-thousand people alive in the US due to in vitro fertilization. All of which were wanted, which cannot be said about random birth.
Today the issue is embryonic stem cells. They say the same things they said about in vitro. However, the parity of life between a blob of cells and a human who is suffering always goes to the suffering human. They insist that every moment of human life is infinitely precious. They care not that you actually live with any quality of life, but that your heart beats. These people are hardly Pro-Life, they are pro-heart thump! This is what their wordism requires of them at the moment.
When wordism claims to unite society in a Universalist doctrine, it brings few if any positives to society. Wordism destroys freedom of speech and thought, for at the moment you disagree with what the book of the wordists says, you don’t just disagree, you are a HERETIC, and Heretics were traditionally punished with execution.