In Bob’s last book, he wanted one thing from college students and that was to start giving their professors a hard time.
I have an English composition professor straight out of the murky bowels of California, and to call this woman anything less than fanatically PC would be the understatement of the century. Lately she has been using her bully pulpit to make comments disparaging of those who don’t fall in line with her PC group think.
The past week we were reading pieces of literature with the theme of race. On our final piece we assembled into groups of five and lazily mulled over the material. About twenty or so minutes wasted we discuss what conclusions our group has come to. This time she made a comment saying that there won’t be world peace until everyone hurries up and intermixes.
I piped up and told her that was genocide. She tried to backstep out of that by saying that by saying genocide is a violent. I countered by quoting article 2 sections C and D of the ’48 conventions on genocide.
The other two white males in the class became her fiercest defenders. We went though many points and the following are the most memorable; Rome fell because it turned inwards, cultures need outside influences to survive, the founders designed the constitution so it could be modified to include everyone, the propositional state, that EVERYONE who was inside a colony was included in “for ourselves and our posterity,” race is a social construct, and finally what are white people anyway?
The professor looking frustrated tried to end the conversation but, I refused to give it up. However, when she stood before the class and admitted that she was for genocide, I stared at her slack jawed and allowed class to move on.
While I felt as if I had failed since I had gone off the genocide point, the greatest achievement was having the professor admit to supporting genocide. Go forth chaps and give academia the trouncing they deserve!
#1 by Simmons on 8/3/2009 - 12:11 pm
I’ll hazard a WAG, you personally destroyed her, she might show up a spew her crap for a few dollars or whatever, but deep inside her psyche the feel good gland got its artery cut. To go forth with her ideas now is to go the way of Stalin and Mao and PolPot, bloody short lived tyranny. Good job, and your efforts go beyond her, because she most likely will fly back to her hive with the mantra infection within her.
#2 by shari on 8/3/2009 - 1:40 pm
With everything that is happening,I really hope you get a chance to remind her,that she is FOR GENOCIDE,before you are finished with that class.
#3 by 1Reader on 8/3/2009 - 11:50 pm
Ive had similiar experiences, when people realize they cant deny it for what it is, some of them just admit they dont care if Europeans die. I dont know if at that point they really mean, or if its just because they cant admit their fallacy and thus in desperation go to such lengths to be PC. At the very least, it usually creates a reaction from other people who then get it.
Next time you might ask her about the point with this given that sooner or later new differentiations would be created, and new subgroups. With the only difference that current ones never had a chance, with their qualities literally gone from the face of the earth forever. Would she so want to outlaw further differentiation? Ha.
Or why not just ask her why she hates diversity. Ehm, diversity involving Whites of course. Because that is what it boils down to.
I bet she is a universalist wordist.
If she wonders what White people are, you should advice her to visit the optician, to begin with.
#4 by Simmons on 8/4/2009 - 11:16 am
The priests of PC wordism surely pray on the feminine mind. These genociders hate Evolution, just hate natural selection because it falls outside of their cacoon of PC fantasy.
#5 by 1Reader on 8/5/2009 - 1:05 am
I dont remember if it was Bob or Brian, but it has been posted on this blog earlier, how it surprised someone when asked about what Whites are, and getting the answer “My people”.
These PC wordists insist that race “doesnt matter”. Yet but everything they do is about race. You had this discussion about race. Why, if it does not matter?
There is affirmative action, it is not based on class, income, education. It is based on RACE. Why, again, if “race does not matter”?
There is forced integration. Again, based on RACE.
They want to have the cake and eat it to. It is inevitable that more Whites, especially in the US, will understand that the race/sub-species/whatever-taxonomy-you-want-to-use is the defining factor for their people.
The antis are just as anti-reality as the ones who threatened Galileo.
#6 by 1Reader on 8/5/2009 - 1:07 am
Simmons:
Dont say that. There are plenty of Women in the movement.
#7 by Simmons on 8/5/2009 - 9:34 am
God bless em, but my assertion still stands wordism preys on the emotive.
Brian, a couple years ago I asked Bob what to say once I got a genocider to admit to wanting genocide, and Bob wrote, “make them repeat it.”
#8 by Brian on 8/5/2009 - 9:36 am
Thanks for reminding us of that Simmons. Let me see if I can dig that up.
#9 by Lord Nelson on 8/8/2009 - 5:44 am
Bravo Brian. Great Job Well Done!
If you get into that situation again. Try (innocently) asking the professor, if she believes that all Blacks in Africa must be mixed with Chinese and Indian people. In order to create world peace. And before she can answer. Let everyone know that you think she is racists against Blacks if she does.
The response should be a lot of fun