Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Political Correctness Versus Reality

Posted by Bob on August 6th, 2009 under Coaching Session, Mantra, Political Correctness


When I was coming up, “modern” meant industrial. One writer said, “It is as modern as Marx, as up-to-date as the Webbs.” Fifty years later, I have to explain that the latter were the upper class founders of the old British Labor Party.

Back then, the whole world was going to live in the middle of big cities because that was where the jobs would be. People would live where they work.

In fact, millions of blacks and PRs went downtown as workers moved to the suburbs to get welfare. In the next New Age, people moved to where they could NOT WORK most profitably. When the suburban and inner city trends became “inevitable,” of course, THAT pattern broke down.

As a religion, Political Correctness has to have its own Inevitable Future, its good god called “Change” or “Progress” and its Hell and Devils residing in “reaction” or racism. Political Correctness is derived from our other religions, so this follows naturally. The problem is that other religions were able to make promises in the afterlife. You believe, you pay for the church, you obey rules set, and you avoid Hell. But Hell is always put off into the unprovable period after you are dead, where no one can PROVE it one way or another.

The Western conflict between science and religion was absolutely unique in history. No other society had produced a science separate from its established religion. Even then, had the church stuck to its doctrine of punishment or reward after death. there would have been no conflict. But the church claimed Genesis as scientific truth. One thing the church had to be taught, over and over, was not to stick its doctrines in areas where they are subject to proof or disproof or they would be chopped off with a lot of pain to the church.

Evangelical Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds when it, unlike the Modern churches, kept its serious religion for the afterlife. Now that it is pushing anti-evolution and a fertilized egg should be allowed to vote, its growth has stopped in the first world.

Marxism and its product Political Correctness put EVERYTHING into this world. It is based on the Inevitables of History, and every inevitable Marx and his followers came up with has turned out, over and over and over and over, to be sillier than the Church versus Galileo.

You can’t see this if you look for complications. Like Genesis, the failures of Marxism are with where you START not where you finish. Stalin used Lysenko to declare that, since Marxism will remake the world entirely by planning the world, the laws of genetics did not apply. The result for Soviet agriculture were what those who did not share the Communist religion would have expected. You can’t make summer wheat into winter wheat by freezing it.

As with the Mantra, Political Correctness deals with SIMPLY insanity for a while by complicating it: “You are just being simplistic by labeling Comrade Lysenko’s doctrines that way,” and then, like the Catholic Church with Galileo, just never mentioning it again.

The process is the same as any other church. First you bring forward your Authorities. A lot of people go to huge pain and face oppression to overthrow the Doctrine. Then it denies that Political Correctness said such a thing. Anyone who brings up Lysenko or Galileo is being “simplistic” and “insulting.”

Established religion is allowed to make the same mistake over and over because no one reminds them of the earlier ones. Respectable conservatives have made an industry of forgetting that Marxism is just SILLY. Making a tame opposition part of the establishment. It was a coalition of Sadducees and Philistines and so forth who crucified Jesus.

Our job is not a new one. It is the old one that those who valued truth over the establishment has always had. It now and ever shall be as long as Authority is used against reality.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by shari on 08/06/2009 - 5:51 pm

    I think you mean Sadducees and Pharisees don’t you? I don’t there ever was a coalition of Sadducees and Philistines?

  2. #2 by Bob on 08/06/2009 - 6:31 pm

    I am saying that, like libs and cons, the priests who lynched Jesus were divided into sects. and Thank you shari, for looking at my stuff.

    love from the Old One

  3. #3 by Bob on 08/06/2009 - 8:30 pm

    Shari dear, does your HUSBAND know that you and I are talking about SECTS?

  4. #4 by shari on 08/06/2009 - 8:45 pm

    No, but I’ll tell him. lol

  5. #5 by Dave on 08/07/2009 - 11:38 am

    This is great guidance for the world we actually live in.

    This is a world where the slaves that inhabit the island of Cuba gather to sing of their freedom at the feet of their master.

    This is a world we are becoming increasingly familiar with in Obamastan.

    Follow the logic. It is airtight.

  6. #6 by Simmons on 08/08/2009 - 1:27 pm

    Cults are authoritarian in nature, its followers are textbook authoritarians.

    I’m going to dial this down to individual levels something a stupid wordist never would do since it invalidates their anti-human beliefs.

    Imagine someone shows up and abuses you by invoking a distant or absent authority, what is the normal response? Mainly we are conditioned to argue the abstract in our quest for right or wrong, a mistake.

    That person in front of you must be held accountable they must not ever be allowed to hide behind the authority, ever. We have all heard of Alinksy this was part of his method, never allow the painless invocation of authority by any of his opponents.

    In the great novel “Gulag Archepeligo” the author wrote one bit that has stuck with me all these years, he avvered that all the madness could have been stopped if one time when the minions of authority came at night to steal another human they were met with hammer and tongs ferocity in the hallways and stairs. Then and there responsibility would have been meted out and wordist authority found to have been much less than what was first thought.

    The anti-whites need to be held responsible, meaning it needs to be personalized, they can no longer hide behind “authority.”

Comments are closed.