I don’t really present ARGUMENTS. I present ways of saying the truth in such a way as to leave the other side looking ridiculous. That is exactly what you cannot do and be declared respectable in the media.
They have given up trying to argue with me precisely because my method is so EFFECTIVE.
For example I was looking at an editorial which shows that the children of Mexicans who come to the US end up a lot like Mexicans who stay down there. This is avoided by libertarians because they believe in magic. They say that the border is magic, and if the population of Mexico comes over it they will magically produce a society as productive as whites.
But there is another point here. All the explanations for Mexican failure are predictable. Nothing is their doing. We all know why that is, but we don’t SAY it. The article is to be published. Regardless of the truth — WHICHEVER WAY IT GOES — every word in that article can be explained by the audience, not by the facts.
It is unlikely, to say the least, that one would say for the sake of tact happens to be also the truth.
This goes back to the Middle East history I have been talking about. There is an enormous coincidence here, too. By a miraculous coincidence, all those people who had been scouring the Holy Land for a thousand years suddenly discovered that they only had to go about a hundred miles in either direction to be historians instead of theologians.
It reminds me of the old Mutt and Jeff cartoon when Jeff found Mutt searching under a street lamp. “What are you doing?”
“I dropped my watch a hundred feet over that way.”
”The why are you searching HERE?”
“This is where the LIGHT is.”
It reminds me of the anthropologist some years back. He lived in Kenya. He “found the earliest man.” Guess where?
The first thing you do is find out WHY someone says something. If it is exactly what he would say or do for some other reason, the chances are it isn’t true.
Only a fool takes an advertisement as truth. Only a fool accepts what one would say for the sake of tact as reflecting reality.
#1 by Dave on 11/15/2009 - 11:42 am
It is a marker of a troubled person to ignore what is obvious.
It is a marker of a troubled society to ignore what is obvious.
A troubled society will prohibit the pointing out of what is obvious.
Troubled societies are run on the bully system.
The essence of bully systems is whatever is not prohibited is compulsory.
Could I describe America today any better?
#2 by shari on 11/15/2009 - 1:36 pm
I’m reminded of what, I think, is an appropriate Proverb. Wisdom cries in the streets…How long, you simple ones will you love simplicity? And the scoffers delight in their scoffing,and fools hate knowledge? I guess as long as there is a phony SYSTEM to be upheld. There is SO MUCH, just waiting to come out,once old gatekeeping, mommy professor is laid to rest. NOBODY wants her old ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT.
#3 by Simmons on 11/16/2009 - 9:38 am
Extrapolating the personal to the societal level; We are dealing with the crazy lady that we all fear having a public meltdown once her precious safety blanket is torn asunder.
Its like being told to watch what you say when crazy aunt Sally shows up for a family get together, your mom says its just for a few hours that you have to placate the deranged so the family function is not ruined by a nut case having a meltdown.
That is PC, a safety blanket for those who fail and still want to dominate. Horus’ practical politics and the Mantra are fusion technics meant once and for all to put crazy aunt Sally in her place; submissive and quiet with a new much more submissive role in society.
#4 by AFKANNow on 11/18/2009 - 9:35 am
Good points.
I think a major, systemic mistake Our Side has made is to be rational with the irrational, to treat issues that are decided by Others on the basis of their “feelings’ – all too easily manipulated “feelings,” particularly in a Group context.
I have seen the discussion quickly go from a third-person type discussion of the issues to a first-person emotional war with amazing speed, once you address the substantive underlying Reality.
One thing you must say for the Imploding Economy, with a Synthetic Overlay – Pain is a great motivator to discover the Truth.
My informal indicators as to the inevitable collapse of Political Correctness is the parking lot at Wal-Mart. At night, I count the number of cars/vans/rv’s with people sleeping in them.
A more sensitive indicator is Wal-Mart’s new policy of opening ALL of its stores for twenty-four hours on the first of the month, because that’s when the debit cards for food stamps and “public assistance” are credited with the new monthly payment.
A corollary of the major flaw is this:
We have written long, accurate, intelligent analyses of the Race Issue, focusing on such areas as culture, genetics, and intelligence.
We have spoken to the Head, while our Enemies have spoken to the Heart.
The Heart controls activity.
I am seeing too many men, and women, with nice clothes, looking like beaten dogs, with their heads literally bowed, with a deeply submissive posture, entering Wal-Mart on the first of the month.
They have to get mad, blinding damn angry, before they can get anywhere.
I think major efforts in the gelding of society, begun under the Progressives, have redefined the New Normal by centering the Bell Curve to the left, towards feminine, and away from the masculine.
Lots of opportunities there for us.
Tact?
Truth?
I have repeatedly played for new Nephews – and Young Miss Scarlett – the Great Speech that tells the unspoken truth about the battle known a Life, seen in the World of Battle called Business.
It is Alec Baldwin’s Speech from the movie, “Glengarry Glen Ross.” It’s on YouTube.
LOOK at the look of the Beaten Dog in the eyes, the submissive body language, of the Losers he is epaking to.
LISTEN when he shouts, in anger, “Get MAD, you sons of bitches, Get MAD!”
My Nephews like to test me; they’ll start with a phrase from The Speech, and I will finish it.
Soon, THEY will finish it.
And they will prevail.
#5 by DeepfriedElvis on 11/18/2009 - 11:55 am
Words are very important and never underestimate the value of a little humor. Comedy is a form of passive-aggressive violence and it’s no cooincidence that it is a virtually all male proffession. Women commedians just aren’t funny. They generaly lack both the aggressive imagination and the delivery technique to deliver what in essence is a verbal form of social disruption contrary to maternal instict for group harmony. Do note there are a small number of lesbians who have attempted to fill a niche in comedy for an audience of primarily other lesbians.(and they aren’t very funny)
The Rockefeller Republicans have tried to make the word “PROTECTIONISM” into something bad to justify their decimation of white peoples jobs. Since when is protecting something bad? Well I have turned that around upon them and always manage to generate ridicule and scorn by refering to their policies as “UNPROTECTED TRADE.” This takes the language of political correctness and turns it against the elites by conjuring up images of the dirtiest practices and associating it with their anti-white economic policies. It does more than simply argue, it makes them look ridiculous.
#6 by shari on 11/18/2009 - 6:13 pm
Yes, an anger that is illuminating and focused.
#7 by Frank on 11/19/2009 - 11:13 am
We are approaching the season when groups who fight against crosses and creches being seen on public property will begin erecting giant stainless steel menorahs on public property all over the country.
These events are often noted in local newspapers, and there are attached Topix comment streams. How can the Mantra and the Talking Points of Horus be crafted to address these situations? What sort of “sound” should be emitted that will bring down this wall of Jericho? Or is there even anything to be said?
Should one just let the event go by w/o comment?
Or should one say something like:
“People who don’t like religious symbols on public property are erecting a religious symbol on public property. Are there two sets of rules and I just haven’t heard about the second set?” or
“People who say they don’t like religious symbols on public property are erecting a religious symbol on public property. Are some animals in the barnyard more equal than others?”
or …… Can the folks here unpack this one and give some suggestions. How to address this annual event in terms of creating dissonance within the PC religion and demoralizing the demoralizers. Or is this not even a proper topic to address?
#8 by Frank on 11/19/2009 - 12:21 pm
Anne Coulter vindicates Bob, Horus & ya’ll in the link below. Here’s a clip:
“We should start making up other nonsense mantras along the lines of “diversity is a strength” and mindlessly repeating them until they catch on, too.
Next time you’re at a cocktail party, just start saying, “Chocolate pudding is dramatic irony” from time to time. Eventually other people will start saying it, without anyone bothering to consider whether it makes sense. Then we’ll do another one: “Nicolas Cage is a two-cycle engine.”
Before you know it, liberals will react to news of a mass murder by muttering, “Well, you know what they say: Nicolas Cage is a two-cycle engine,” while everyone nods in agreement.
Too funny! She’s twisted it a bit, but she seems to understand how it works.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34484