When I got into international aviation negotiations I wrote Carleton Putnam about it. We had corresponded ten years earlier and he knew who I was. Putnam was founder of Delta Airlines. He never once mentioned that he could help me in the industry.
This is what one expects of our side. They won’t even force their HEIRS to take out side. I have talked about the fact that Communist Party members would routinely rob banks and marry heiresses to get the Party money.
If whites do it it’s called discrimination. When Politically Correct people do it it’s called networking. We used to say that the fashion industry was “run by queers.” Mommy Professor denied this vehemently and it was denounced as Hitlerism.
Until AIDS hit. Then the media mourned the death of practically the entire personnel of the fashion industry.
Then Barbara Walters had a gushy piece wondering why gay men were such great designers. Try to imagine if she had has a program about why white male were naturally such great executives. After all, it hasn’t been long since almost all big executives were white males.
Mommy Professor would immediately point out that whites only got big jobs because they were white and male. But gays have some preternatural genetic gift for designing clothes. Well, maybe it is true that a few more gays are hired because gays are hiring them, but that’s just networking.
The one vocation that depends most on the luck of the draw is acting. Every successful actor is the result of a series of lucky breaks. Even DeNiro, who seems to appear in every movie, will not claim uniqueness in his talent.
And actors just happen to have the political diversity of the Harvard faculty.
So far, I have sounded a lot like a respectable conservative, and my stomach is getting queasy. So let me quote a guy on Ventura’s “Conspiracy Theory” when Ventura asked, how we let then get away with all this. The man replied:
“They’re smarter than we are.”
Jesse did NOT pursue that naked truth.
No one would expect Putnam to help me by networking. He would do it for his son’s Jewish buddy, I’m sure, but not for politics. It is critical to Political Correctness to keep this mentality, actually this lack of mentality, among respectable conservatives. It is a critical weapon in keeping celebrities far left.
Since it works and is smart, it is principle among the kept opposition to declare NOT doing it for their side a matter of Freedom, personal independence, objectivity, and, of course, Christianity.
#1 by shari on 12/21/2009 - 12:42 pm
Years ago I saw Pat Buchanan and Nadine Strossen on Crossfire. They were argueing about a plague of the ten commanments on the wall in an Alabama courtroom. Pat Buchanan said that they did not offend anyone’s religion. She said she thought that Muslims would be offended. I actually thought that Pat Buchanan would say something like,would JEWS be offended? She perhaps thought of that as well, because she did get a funny look on her face as the words left her mouth. But he didn’t say anything. At the time I just thought he missed it. Now I suspect that he missed it on purpose.
#2 by Dave on 12/21/2009 - 2:05 pm
Mommy Professor loves her “networks”:
Try to find someone with the slightest notion of the power of legislative counsel. Somebody has to keep track of the lies, which is why lobbyists do not write legislation. Specialists are required to translate Mommy Professor’s lies into tomorrow’s “law”.
Also, it seems Mommy Professor’s world is very consistent as to who is merely “networking”, and who is “criminally conspiring” or “terrorizing”.
That prosecutors in America have a conviction rate that would make Joe Stalin envious is somehow connected to all to this and why if they brand you a “corporate agent” you will get the rights Stalin gave you and if you are branded a “terrorist”, you become a special class of a special class of persons undeserving of rights.
Meanwhile, no one even notices the judiciary never gets investigated, rights being an ad hoc event, valid today and invalid tomorrow and valid again the day after that and so on.
#3 by Simmons on 12/21/2009 - 6:27 pm
Liberal and respectable conservative networking can be described with two words “circle” and “jerk.”
Fjordman just got posted over at Freakistan with his review of Avatar (mostly a cliched bore of a movie), and his review dealt with the movie being anti-white, certainly a legitimate viewpoint. Lo and behold the wordist show up and claim that race has nothing to do with a liberal’s movie, them respectables move quick to cover for their libs overstepping.
My point being that the empire those networkers serve is dying and any networking they do will only bury them further. Race stalks them and they do not know it, they are uninterested in race but race is very interested in them.
They only survive by our ineptitude and our fear of the shadows of the the supposedly omnipotent foes (at least that is what our PHDs say)
We are as big a self parody as the Soviets were by 1985 (remember the Soviet fashion show Burger King commercial).
#4 by Simmons on 12/21/2009 - 6:46 pm
We (the American empire, NWO. whatever its called) are at the point that the Soviet bloc was in about 1987 into its self destructive self parody.
Of course our PHDs warned us of their omnipotence, all balderdash meant to empower the PHDs of both sides into perpetuity. This allowed the Soviets to linger a bit longer than needed.
We could have collapsed the Wall rather quickly with a few simple acts, one being as simple as photographing a border guard(s) and then mounting a campaign of terror against that person(s) and his officers of them being responsible for murder amongst other charges.
The key here is the word RESPONSIBILITY of the individual for crimes commited or conspired to commit. But in order to seem intellectual the only tool we had at our disposal was debate over abstract BS, like we were rabbis. Only Reagan’s speech about tearing down the wall directed at one man specifically had any effect. (I bet Buckley at first hated that speech)
That is why people join cults no personal responsibility, from the Jim Jones to the Nazi cult they join to avoid. Those cults are then deconstructed the moment that responsibility is brought to bear. See any Nazis in June 1945? More importantly will we see any anti-whites within a decade?
All that big networking will serve to be is a papertrail. Who is gonna respect our “elite’s” credentials, the Chinese” Hah! We won’t.
#5 by Simmons on 12/21/2009 - 7:21 pm
What does the Mantra say to the “networkers?”
You are responsible for our genocide. Simple as that.
Its the basics folks.
#6 by The Dude on 12/21/2009 - 7:51 pm
Bob, there was a time in America when white people were in total control and unapologetic for being it. Putnam, although aware of race, was never the less still of that mind set and being white wasn’t an issue, it was just a given. White people helped friends and family all the time. Just look at the railraod and other father and son jobs.
Eventually white power and control became the focal point of the kosher crowds civil rights movement and the rest was history. The contempt for “whitey” has been embedded deeply in to our own people to the point where most whites don’t even think in terms of race. They think in terms of political affiliations. They also suffer from white guilt.
That’s a problem.
I believe that we have to network, but the trick is finding people who are aware of their race, are unapologetic for that awareness and most importantly trustworthy. We are out here, but here’s the catch, we are unorganized, leaderless and overly cautious with our actions and beliefs.
You said the communists would rob banks for their cause. How many of us would do that? None.
How many of us view this as life or death? Few, because if we did, you would know me by name and face, not as a pseudonym. We would be networking constantly.
Anyway, we have to come out of the closet and united or else we will be resolved to a remnant or a pathetic debating society longing for “by-gone” days.
#7 by Dave on 12/21/2009 - 8:23 pm
Simmons,
You make excellent points. That’s really the way to analyze trends is to see how people are increasingly restrained in their nonsense.
An increasing restraint is exactly what is happening to Political Correctness.
The irony is that so many politicians don’t see it and make plays that are offsides. A big piece of the Establishment is pretending it is yesterday.
We see weird stuff, like the wholesale collapse of the global warming fraud. Sex pervert ideologues try to keep the bizarre homos thing going, long after it is dead as a door nail.
Next year, the UC system will raise tuition 40% again and still pretend the system hasn’t died.
And the clubs for evading responsbility get fewer and fewer members.
#8 by Simmons on 12/21/2009 - 9:05 pm
I got my latest shtick from a post you made a couple of years ago about Mussolini and his Facist party’s downfall.
One day after a long trail of idiot mistakes on Duces’ part he lost his moral authority and joined the ranks of stupid criminals, and the commies wrenched up the guts to hold him and his cult responsible. As you said all in one day the Facists ceased to be Facists.
Now if I could get Duce Obama to recite some of Bill Ayers anti-white prose in his state of the disunion speech.