Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Children of the Obedient Generation

Posted by Bob on December 22nd, 2009 under Coaching Session


Like Edison’s utter crap about genius=perspiration, another piece of Common Wisdom needs to be despised: “The Sixties generation was just spoiled. They hadn’t been through the War and the DEPRESSION like we were.”

Bullshit. When you wonder about what the new generation is coming to, you look first to where it is coming FROM. But the WWII Generation, which talked about how one has to take responsibility for his own actions like they did in WORLD WAR II and the Depression, completely disowned any responsibility for their own children.

The Sixties Generation was the last to live on a higher level than its predecessors. So you could say that EVERY generation of Americans was “spoiled.” While the Greatest Generation says the Depression, “taught them something,” then, at the height of the Depression they were spoiled rotten compared to EVERY generation of Asians. Asians would have given anything back then if there were a soup kitchen or if they could ask, “Brother can you spare a dime.” That was a 1932 dime, a dollar or two now, and just for asking!

In Asia you were lucky if anybody dragged your starved corpse away because the ravenous dogs or pigs got it.

The people responsible for the next generation is the last generation. But the Greatest Generation disowned the least responsibility for the children who despised them by the old standby that got them coddled for decades: “We SUFFERED!”

The people who know you best in terms of what they can do are your own children. Children and prisoners have nothing to do except observe their keepers. A guard will spend his time worrying about his family or his politics, but prisoners do nothing all day but try to beat the system. They know all about every guard.

Respectable conservatives absolutely worship the Greatest Generation and absolutely despise its children. And nobody talks more endlessly about how you are RESPONSIBLE for your actions than Respectable conservatives. No one will ever ask them why their Heroes were not responsible for their own children.

In fact, you can only understand why America’s population bust and runaway drug use began in the sixties by looking at the generation that caused. No, the Sixties Generation was no more “spoiled” than any other generation. You have to look at the group that produced them.

No one dares do that.

The Sixties Generation, which I knew well, knew, first of all, that their parents were WIMPS. For the first time in American history, children knew their parents would not defend them. On the Bell Curve, when people will not stand for things, there will be some lynching. The WWII Generation never had one lynching, they also did not have a lot of other things that are a lot farther in on the American Bell Curve.

In any generation before the Greatest, a drug dealer in a high school would have been shot by a parent, and the prosecutor who brought a case against that parent would never be elected to public office again. Until the Obedience Trained Puppies of WWII no jury would even have considered a case against a parent who shot somebody who was trying to push drugs on his children.

No previous generation of Americans would have allowed their children to be used in sociological experiments like integration, much less busing his kids into a ghetto. Not the Greatest. I remember my nausea in the 1960s as the parents of one murdered child after another got on TV to proclaim how they
Did not blame the murderer and would appeal for mercy for them.

That happened all the time, gang.

Earlier Americans always said, “If he breaks into my house, he’s PAID for.” It never occurred to them to argue about the right of a man to protect his family. But the revolutionary change was when the WWII Generation actually sat on juries that send people to prison for life when the prosecutor appealed to their Obedience.

The Sixties Generation was rotten because, quite rightly, it despised the Obedient Generation. As children will, they allowed their dedication to Rebellion to be harnessed and used by the real establishment. The last people who would oppose this would be Obedient Generation.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Dave on 12/22/2009 - 5:37 pm

    The election of a black President is a marker for the white race in America. The long drawn out process of the surrender of rights that began in earnest with Greatest Generation is now coming to conclusion.

    The draft was an abomination far more destructive to the Greatest Generation than history will ever admit. I believe the draft will never be tolerated again in America for the terrible price that was paid.

    And we white people are at the end of our tether. All the rights that can be surrendered have been surrendered.

    Now, a reckoning waits. May God have mercy on those that oppose it.

  2. #2 by shari on 12/22/2009 - 5:58 pm

    “May God have mercy on those that oppose it,”is exactly right. Goes right along with Horus’s iron guestion. “Are you pro-white or are you pro white genocide?”

  3. #3 by shari on 12/22/2009 - 9:27 pm

    I have thought a lot, how nobody seems to care about their kids.

  4. #4 by backbaygrouch4 on 12/23/2009 - 6:37 am

    “The WWII Generation never had one lynching…” may strike you as advocacy for violent anarchy. It is not. Don’t be shocked by Bob’s complaint. The following is a description from wikipedia of a lynching:

    A group calling itself the “Knights of Mary Phagan” began openlylynching_openly_organized_28-0 class=reference>[29] organizing a plan to kidnap Frank from the state prison farm and take him to Marietta, 240 miles (386 km) away, to lynch him. They recruited between 25 and 28 men with the necessary skills. The ringleaders were:

    Joseph Mackey Brown, (d. 1932) the former governor who had threatened lynching during the clemency hearings
    Judge Newton (Newt) Morris
    Eugene Herbert Clay, (d. 1923) son of a U.S. senator, Alexander S. Clay, and former mayor of Marietta
    John Tucker Dorsey, a lawyer and state legislator
    Fred Morris, a lawyer
    Bolan Glover Brumby, owner of a furniture factory Among the participants in Frank’s lynching, the Washington Post reported, “Herbert Clay, son of a U.S. senator,… was perhaps the most prominent person on the list. He was identified as one of the lynching’s ‘planners,’ as were Moultrie McKinney Sessions, a lawyer and banker, and John Tucker Dorsey, a Georgia legislator and prosecutor. Others named as among the lynchers were Gordon Baxter Gann, later mayor of Marietta and a state legislator; … In all, 26 names were on the list, some of whom may never be adequately identified.

    Newspaper article after the lynching.

    In addition to these leaders, the group also included a doctor, another lawyer, and the former sheriff of Cobb County. John Tucker Dorsey was also the solicitor general for the Blue Ridge Circuit and would theoretically have been in charge of prosecuting the lynchers, none of whom were indicted.
    On August 17, the Knights of Mary Phagan kidnapped Frank from the prison farm. The kidnapping was highly organized. They forced their way into the prison with a display of their weapons, and took Frank. The lynching site at Frey’s Gin, two miles (3 km) east of Marietta, had already been prepared, complete with a rope and table supplied by conspirator Sheriff William Frey. Frank’s only requests were that they allow him to write a note to his wife, that they return his wedding ring to her, and that they cover his lower body before hanging him, since he was wearing nothing but a nightshirt. Frank’s last words were, “I think more of my wife and my mother than I do of my own life.”

    Frank’s body was eventually transferred to an undertaker and buried in the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Glendale

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Lynching was a response to the lawlessness of the Reconstruction regime. Note that it was public, well organized, supported by substantial community leaders and not prosecuted by the authorities. This was no howling mob baying after an innocent man incited by the real villian. This was not Hollywood, it was nongovernmental justice in place of nonexistent governmental justice.

    Today the justice system does not function. One can only hope that it does not become so bad that this sort of retribution again becomes necessary.

    Aside, last week I came across a murder case while searching my roots. It happened in a wee farming community when my mother was 13. It was horrific enough to make the NYTimes which does not heavily cover rural backwoods Nova Scotia. It was the first I ever heard of it though all the principles, murderer, victim and witnesses are close relatives. But that is not my point. The death certificate for the killer read as cause: hanging; underlying condition: by legal execution; date: November 24, 1922. The crime happened on August 29, 1922. Justice ran its course in 87 days. His kinsmen, my kinsmen, had to claim the corpse. It was buried at 2 a.m.

    Here in Boston earlier this year there was a terrible killing, the Craigslist Murder, which you may have heard of. It has been 8 months since the crime. The evidence is clear and undisputed and has been trial ready for 8 months. The trial will not take place for another 6 months minimum. Where is justice? When is justice? Our ancestors were not the wimps we are. They would not have tolerated such an unresponsive, irresponsible government. Lynching was their answer. Don’t be shocked.

  5. #5 by Simmons on 12/23/2009 - 10:08 am

    http://wcbstv.com/local/gang.attack.honor.2.1386340.html#comments

    With all the talk of the obedient generation I thought I would give you all a present. Skip the article and go read the comments before they are all pulled. It sounds like I imagine South Carolinans would post if they had the web in 1912. I am not kidding, hurry or someone save the pages, its priceless.

  6. #6 by backbaygrouch4 on 12/24/2009 - 4:13 am

    Re: Simmons. Could not locate any comments, but they might be there. I’m a Lowe Tech drop out.

    Note that the first punch thrower was Hispanic and the rest were “diverse”. Does this include Whites? No. Asians? No. God’s Chosen? No. These PC nitwits just defined “diversity” as Negroes. In the media accuracy is unintentional.

  7. #7 by Simmons on 12/24/2009 - 12:04 pm

    Within an hour of my post the CBS station pulled the comments. Lawrence Aster saved them or some of them for his blog, google his name.

    They were rolling in 600+ and they were choice, ripping “niggers”, the libs who patronize and encourage them and cover for them and they ripped PC as much.

    Now I’ve seen such comments before no suprise, but the volume of posts and the virulence towards PC shocked my socks off, it was almost viral as if whites in large numbers sit with the mouse in hand ready to pounce on poor ol” PC.

    Best of all some of the commentars were using the word “Responsible” which is toxic to the PC congregation. “I was only following orders”

  8. #8 by Dave on 12/24/2009 - 1:27 pm

    Backbaygrouch,

    Your post on lynching was pointedly excellent. This is exactly what so few understand.

    Tryanny operates on the “any plausible lie will do” model. The “justice system” offers synthetic justice, not real justice.

    IT MUST DENY REAL JUSTICE for that is the seat of its power. It can’t offer real justice. It must either deny real justice or go out of business.

    This is the heart of Political Correctness. It is about power and nothing but power and because of that it is absolutely necessary that real justice be prevented in every instance, without exception.

    That is why it is so easy to predict the outcome of controversies and cases in court.

    All you need to ask, what can plausibly happen to outrage real justice the most? That will be the result.

    Outside of the judicial arena, Clinton operated on this principle and it guided his every decision. Regardless of the issue and the politics, he always asked himself a basic question: How can I influence events so as to make probable the greatest damage to the most people?

    He then undertook that decision. He knew instinctively it would be the most popular.

    And it worked, it worked marvelously. It was why Clinton was so successful.

    The judiciary does the same thing. Its approach is to inflict the greatest amount of damage possible to everybody involved. That is how the judiciary maintains its power.

    What it comes to the judiciary, it is not possible to be too cynical.

You must be logged in to post a comment.