On a Monty Python episode they showed some English gangsters threatening a military base. They talked to the base commander and said, “You have some nice Tanks, etc. here, be shame if anything happened to them…” and so forth.

I was really interested in how the British military COULD handle such a problem, but the skit was interrupted because it was “too silly.”

We just had a case at Fort Hood where twelve soldiers were killed and over thirty injured because there was a single shooter and the military had no weapons. They let themselves be shot down like school kids.

I remember numerous occasions when US Navy ships let Russian ships shove them out of the way, when one Soviet sailor jumped on the American ship and claimed asylum, they gave him back for prison.

The US military cannot protect American borders.

So what WOULD a British commander do if his base were threatened?

Call the unarmed Local Constabulary. We all know from Gitmo and illegal aliens that everybody is entitled to constitutional protection. When someone comes in with a REAL gun no one wonders why soldiers are as helpless as high school students. We all take it for granted.

What if the gangsters don’t WANT to go with the Local Constabulary?

In short, how would the skit have gone if they had tried to finish it?

With friends like Tiger Woods, PC doesn’t need people like me.

“The Babe Ruth of Golf” was shown with his blond Scandinavian wife as often as possible. He was even as tall as she was. Here was a True Love Match “which happened to be interracial” or, as Hannity puts it, “two Children of God.”

Then the black guy got too horny and decided he had to have a blond mistress, too.

But I REALLY couldn’t believe it when a female commentator on CNN said that this was the “usual problem with successful black athletes, they have to get themselves a blond, trophy wife.” I could not believe that the moderator didn’t explode into blood and guts right there.

The guy’s commentarial was a really novel thought. He said, “It has nothing to do with race!” Gosh, THERE’S a novel line! But this time it notably lacked the Required Rage.

When he had the wreck out with his blond mistress, Tiger instantly offered his wife what all black guys offer their white women: Money and lots of it. He offered her millions above their pre-nup, which already made her a millionairess, not to divorce him. There hasn’t been a less True Love couple “who happened to be of different races” since OJ.

Tiger’s father determined to have nothing to do with black women but in his time all he could get was an Oriental woman. Black men on television will say that they don’t date black women. This is a brag.

It pisses some black women off, but I have yet to see those “precious feelings” be of the slightest concern to Women’s Lib or any other part of PC. So the black guy sits there and talks black to black women about black women in a way that no white would be allowed to talk for one minute.

But I don’t think the Thought Police reacted properly this time. The white woman who said this was a habit of successful black athletes should have been instantly called down and suppressed if the priests of the PC faith were going at full throttle.

The problem is that the media don’t know how to react when someone is as honest as Tiger Woods. His father made it clear that they were trying to breed the n****** out of them. Tiger was no less honest about it: he bought himself as unNegroid a wife as he could find on the market.

The script calls for the WHITE WOMAN to say it’s all True Love. Black male are often OPENLY proud they got a white woman. PC is in the position Doublethink often puts one in: “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” so they assume that a black male who marries a white woman, this doing the one thing most important to PC. That that black male is their friend.

But PC and the black male have absolutely different reasons for their actions. The PC priesthood wants to show it is EASY for a black man to get a white woman, that it is no different from any other match.

This is a great deal like telling blacks in new white Mercedes that it is EASY to get a Mercedes. From the propaganda natural to the PC priesthood, Tiger’s ability to buy himself a brand-new Scandinavian beauty queen wife was only True Love. They were ASTONISHED, astonished to the point of letting the Thought Police miss some open heresy, when his first act was put the lie to that.

How could Tiger have betrayed PC by making, as his first move, an offer of MILLIONS of Dollars to his trophy wife? Because Tiger does not think like they do. It never OCCURRED to him to push the idea that ANY black man could buy something like that.

Tiger can do this because he is a huge success. He can have a white wife, he can buy a Mercedes.

If his Mercedes gets destroyed, Tiger will get it fixed because he has the money. If the Trophy Wife he bought might leave him, he puts up money. Black males simply do not think in terms of PC orthodoxy.

Like the Bourbons, the PC priesthood forgets nothing and learns nothing. Which is the reason that today most people don’t know who “the Bourbons.” were.

In relation to Anglo-Saxon Law I mentioned recently how different a person is who was raised in a community. In a community a person who testified to anything was taking a life-time risk, and the higher his rank in society the greater the risk he was taking. Everything depended on your WORD in those times.

I was just watching a program on the History Channel that said that more and more scientists are agreeing that global warning is man’s fault and the Intellectuals need to take over the world to save us. In a traditional community, “more and more scientists are agreeing” would be instant death to any documentary.

When our established religion no longer allows any questioning of a very shaky thesis, they ALWAYS jump to the “growing consensus among scientists’” bit which is the same as the Modern Thought bit, which is the same as the cocktail party “They found out that…”

In a community someone made a general declaration that a whole field of neutral experts had taken a particular point of view, it was a major undertaking. A trusted figure in the community who misused his trust once would be remembered for it. The second time he did it he would be totally discredited. If SANE people trusted to you to blatantly misspeak in such a way ONCE, your credibility would be gone forever. The second time you would not be believed. You would be laughed at the third time you tried it.

All my life “Modern Thought,” “a growing consensus of scientists,” and “They found out that …” has almost always been WRONG. Respectable conservatives protect commentators from any discussion of past errors and treat the latest nonsense with greater respect than they the last load of manure they delivered.

Contrast this Advanced and Scientific approach to the old Saxon Law. A psychiatrist who is known to have seen all crime as society’s fault and has helped free murderers before states, for the hundredth time, that this particular psychopath is really good and was molested as a child and if you pay enough money to psychiatrists he can be cured.

His earlier testimony — if you have a good attorney — is only used to demonstrate that “He has expertise and experience in this kind of case.”

Actually the defendant has such experience, too, but to my knowledge no attorney has called the defendant as an expert witness

YET.

But the only reason you would NOT call the defendant as an expert witness in his own case is that juries have a modicum of sense left. They still pay SOME attention to the old Anglo-Saxon “Who sez?”

But not much.

Simmons says he may have committed BUGS heresy by just saying something is anti-white garbage and then stomping out. I don’t know anything about heresy, my specialty is human proclivities. Nothing is more human than intellectual laziness.

It was a major step forward when commentators stopped telling each other what the latest news gambit was and started talking about HOW TO MAKE OUR POINT. Just SAYING “anti-white” is step forward, but like all points it can get out of hand. Pretty soon you can end up are just saying something cute and walking out.

Which is how respectable conservatives make their living. And nobody gives Simmons more of a shiver than an rcon.

In the discussion Simmons talks about the only person there who knows WHY statements are anti-white is Simmons. Making the point of the Mantra is very, very hard, and any normal human being would prefer to say something and walk away.

I don’t think Horus is just giving an excuse for the least effort. But I know PEOPLE, and what he says can END UP being used that way.

We are in a unique position because we have to THINK about what we say. That is why so many BUGS comments are off track. No Jehovah’s Witness has to THINK about how to present his statement, neither does any disciple of Political Correctness. What we must do has already been done for them. So our task is VERY hard to understand. But ours is the most important part of ANY movement.

I have been in thousands or tens of thousands of face-to-face confrontations. I learned to ask myself: “What did I DO?” Bill Rusher wrote a book called “How to Win an Argument.” As you well know, that is precisely what I do NOT have in mind. A victory for me is usually when I leave the discussion and the subject of that particular debate is forgotten by everybody but my point is not.

If Simmons just leaves the concept that one can be anti-white, he has done SOMETHING. But if he stops there in most cases, it is useless. Our point today is that we have only two options: pro-white and anti-white. Anti-white is called anti-racist, but it leads to the disappearance of one race and only one race. It is genocide.

You don’t have to tell ME how hard this point is to get across. But it is seldom that the first shot sinks a ship. Very often a shot across the bow won the ARGUMENT.

But that, gentlemen, is not war.