Archive for January, 2010
The Mantra is LEGAL!
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 01/15/2010
As you know the Canadian Government seized my last book, held it for two months, and decided it did not violate their stringent Hate Laws. One of its major themes is the Mantra. The big review of that book by the BNP emphasized that “It’s LEGAL!”
I cannot get anybody to REALIZE that I am a PROFESSIONAL at this business. I spent decades riding on the edge of a professional ruin for racism that would be worse than a year or two in a prison. I danced the dance with some success.
BoardAd has just notified me that a nationalist site in Europe that rivals Stormfront. And, bitch as I might about SF, it is BIG and it is scares the enemy. SF also gives Europeans an outlet they cannot get there. They can be anonymous, hard-core and legal on SF.
The reason I am writing this is that BoardAd just informed me there is a LEGAL WN website in Europe which is HUGE. It might seem wimpish compared to SF, but it HAS to be. So what does it need?
It needs something hard core that is NOT illegal.
And if by this time you don’t realize what is hard-core AND legal, put down the cocaine and have some liquor to cool you back down to earth.
A commenter and I exchanged examples of experiences where you deal with white nationalists, get them on track, and an hour later they’re right back to the same old s***. I keep quoting Kipling, who dealt with it a century ago, The Three Certainties:
“The bitch returns to her vomit,
The sow returns to her mire
And the burnt fool’s bandaged finger
Goes wabbling back to the fire.”
And the Fourth Certainty is that white nationalists go wabbling back to despair and tomes.
The Mantra is critical only of whites. It points out that no black man would be so insane or immoral as to allow his own people’s “idealists” and the rest of the world to target EVERY black country and ONLY black countries for immigration and assimilation. This and “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews,” which always gets a laugh, a laugh AT our enemies, are removed in the shorter versions.
The authorities grit their teeth, but they see no case can be made against an attack on an ideology rather than a race.
Everybody sees how good he Mantra is except US.
“The burnt fool’s bandaged finger keeps wabbling back to the fire.”
Group Dynamics and other comments
Posted by BoardAd in Coaching Session on 01/15/2010
In an effort to increase our traffic, the owner of www.altermedia.info has graciously allowed us to post Bob’s articles on his website. He has two rules; the first is no racial slurs, the second is no holocaust denial. If you have any articles to suggest, please let me know.
I wanted to talk about the stories that Bob and I had shared with each other. After many drafts and delays to this article, much to my editors’ annoyance, I kept finding myself without the right words to part with my lesson. In every story we had to share there were repeatable and observable events that are important to the blog. These events occurred with such frequency with groups I dealt with that one can consider them to be fundamental group dynamics of white nationalism.
The longer a collective group of individuals is together, the more the opinions of members of the group matter to others within the group. Those with contact but not within the direct sphere of influence of the group who make statements which are viewed as disrespectful or incorrect by just one group member are thus mercilessly chastised by the whole group, even if the individuals opinion was asked for or was given in an appropriate manner.
Overall group conduct will achieve commonality with the least behaved member present. Those within the direct sphere of influence are free to insult and impugn members with no accountability. However other members are reprimanded for divisive behavior when responding to the attacks of privileged members and calls for decent conduct are rejected as moderation from those who consider the image they present highly important.
When the proposition of message standardization on common beliefs is presented to the group, one is met first with kneejerk refusal, ideological testing to their leaders and tomes, and finally the rejection of the idea. Conversation then moves into an all consuming fantasy about when the S*** will hit the fan, and their intended actions of preparation for once it does.
As Bob says me tough! Me do nothing.
Keeping these events in mind, when talking with groups of WN’s you are able to quickly separate potential BUGS people from the people who will reject you within a few conversations.
Forget Those Who Will Be Forgotten
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 01/14/2010
Mantra Thinking has a lot of things IN it, but what is most unique about it is what it leaves OUT:
Ego, justifications, conversational twaddle, personalities, fixing blame,
all the things that make up over ninety percent of the wasted go of standard and packaged “thought” today.
Like the Greeks and Romans who made the transition from war by howling charging mobs to units and discipline to beat superior numbers, we are learning to fight the new warfare in an age when there is so much information that the less said the better has become absolutely essential.
Our enemies have control of The Media. They are used to throwing away two solid hours of movie time in drooling over some Social Message. They are used to having so much time on TV that they can totally fog any attempt on the part of the audience to get back to reality.
They are in fact a great deal like the Oriental armies the Greeks and Romans faced, rich, numerous, and used to scaring off all opposition with their seemingly unassailable power.
Later the Spanish fleet won a history-changing victory over the Middle Eastern fleet at Lepanto, but the Armada could not handle the smaller, faster fleet of Elizabethan ships that concentrated on guns, on firepower that hit them at the water line and, when the shots had been fired, simply pulled away and reloaded for shots that COUNTED.
Mantra is not Bob Whitaker thinking. It is a way of thinking whose time has come. I read your comments. More important, I THINK about out your stuff. I LEARN from it. I am doing a good of what I urge YOU to do.
But I am not Mantra Thinking. I keep urging BoardAd to take over more. I keep urging you to get in there and duke it out, not to spread MY message, but to take over this new intellectual strategy, to develop it.
This is the strategy of our AGE, not of me. The Armada of Political Correctness cannot deal with out little boats slipping among them and hitting and then getting the hell out. They have, literally, trillions to spend and a complete domination of what seems to be reality, just as the Orientals had their endless screaming hoards and wealth beyond the imagination of rocky Greece.
Our little boats seem like a joke beside their giant Armada, but we jump in and make holes at the waterline and then go on to others to make more holes at the waterline. When the Armada crushes someone, you see it. But the inches wide holes that destroys them is almost a matter of faith. You fire, you pull back, and the Armada looks exactly as invincible as it did before you fired.
Persia, trained to victory and strategy in the Middle East, smiled to itself when a band of three hundred Spartans was all that the disorganized Greeks could put in their way. The Spartans did not look at the Reality any sane person would have seen. They did not use the excuse that the rest of Greece had left them in the field alone. They did not weigh the possibility that Greece would NEVER get into the field.
Like the Alamo, the Spartans knew one thing: they were the only ones in the field. If there was to be any hope at all, they had to throw all they had into it while those who should have been at their sides were squabbling and trying to placate their enemies.
The three hundred Spartans and the Alamo are only two examples of a continuing theme in the West: the few who fight for no reward, who see what the fight is all about, while their brethren act like the free, disorganized people they are, with all the warts on. It is easy to fight in a World War II, when everybody is with you. It is hard to fight in Viet Nam, where all the most fashionable voices in your own country are denouncing you and in fact carrying the enemy’s flags in the streets. But the Alamo and the three hundred were far, far harder than Nam.
But another untranslated French quote in National Review, another shriek about Jews in SF, are of no importance at all. What is important is what went on in the pass in Greece, what the sleep-starved men at the Alamo were doing.
The Alamo and the three hundred constitute a total of less than half a thousand men. But reality neither knows nor cares what all the respectable conservatives and Big Names of their time were doing. We don’t even KNOW the Big Names of the time.
But hundreds and thousands of years later, we live in the world the Spartans and the Alamo made possible.
Harry Reid’s Fortunate Blunder
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 01/13/2010
Reid was quoted in a book using “Negro.” Whether congress is ruled by 1960s Democrats called “Republicans” or “neoconservatives” or by 2010 Democrats, I do not give a damn. I HATE the word “Negro” and it is now officially racist according to respectable conservatives, who constitute the most dedicated lynch mob against pro-whites.
For decades “Negro” was the official term for a reason that had nothing to do with blacks. Every Southerner who worked for the other side has to pronounce the full term, Knee-Grow. In those days there were practically no blacks in the integration leadership. The first black president of the NAACP was elected in an all-out rebellion in the mid-60s, when the organization was sixty years old.
All that time, the Negro Rights Movement had no concerns about real live blacks. It was an expression of hatred for white gentiles, and above all for the very symbol of white gentiles, White Southerners.
For person with a Southern accent to pronounce Knee Grow as a single word sounded like he was licking the ground, which he was. There is no other word in the entire English language with two hard vowels like that. In the soft SOUTHERN language it was totally alien, totally artificial, totally groveling.
Yankees LOVED it.
In fact, the term “black” was jammed down the Yankee’s throats for that very reason. There is only one group for whom the word Knee Grow is as unnatural as it is for Southerners, and that is the group Yankees wanted to sit in the corner while Jews took care of them, the Knee Grows themselves. As long as it made things hard for the hated white Southerners, it honestly never occurred to the Jewish and Yankee Champions that how blacks spoke made the slightest bit of difference.
So it was the founder of the Black Panthers who stated that “Negro” was a piece of s*** and he was a BLACK. He was Stokely Carmichael, who told my press man he liked ME and who was the only black “leader” who actually went to REAL Africa to help REAL blacks and died doing it.
He was also the black leader who said, “If I hear six million Jews one more time, I’m gonna PUKE!”
Now if you like “Negro” you have to say Reid’s remarks were not racist.
Respectable conservatives have to hate the South or be out with their heroes, the 1960s Democrats. South-hating is a major theme at National Review. Now they have to condemn the word they have come to love the most.
Only George Will, the media’s favorite Groveling Conservative, is trying to hole the fort.
Poor babies!
The Production of Information — Again
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session on 01/12/2010
If you need a minute to think in a discussion, you can always tell a truth:
“Yes, what you said is the standard line.”
It might be a standard liberal line or the standard Hannity line: “I don’t see a mixed couple. I see two Children of God.”
But it will be a standard line. And that REALLY sets them off. You can have a time out just explaining who all says that all the time and why or just why.
It’s amazing how WN standard tome quoting stays popular while the simple truth drives them NUTS.
This gets us back to what I keep emphasizing. One cannot search for truth until he has learned to automatically consider why the words he hears are produced. It’s exactly like discussing highways without mentioning CARS.
What brought this up is that I was watching a documentary on the gigantic Wisdom of society that is extinct. They supposedly predicted that 2012 would be the End of Days. If they were so prophetic, why are they extinct?
A guy was saying what I have heard all my life: “If you just read the papers you can see the world is headed for a crisis.”
That’s true. The fact is it was ALWAYS true. If you are reporter who reports exclusively on realistic minor threats, you had better have your application out for another job. You know you are in real trouble when they assign you to the “the sewers are breaking down” desk. Or the local flower show.
Most of my life was lived when a slip could literally have caused a nuclear war. Even the professional Doomsday crowd put its clock back 8 pm when the Cold War ended. But the bigger the catastrophe the more people want to hear about it.
Everybody KNOWS that. But nobody does any Mantra Thinking about it. Mantra thinking is so simple it’s never done. If predictions of disaster are hits in a newspaper or documentary, the newspapers and documentaries will be full of predictions of disaster.
Ancient Wisdom, Mantra Style
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History on 01/11/2010
A commenter sent me a link about another South American ancient civilization that has been found by flyover photos.
I am not sure I can define mantra thinking, but what occurred to me was another example of it. We keep finding dead civilizations. We keep studying each one in detail to find out What It Has To Teach Us. We never do the Mantra-like thing: We don’t step back, look at all those discoveries as trees, and see the forest.
And the forest, the big idea, the Occam’s Razor, is this:
How do we PREVENT ourselves from BECOMING a civilization whose CORPSE must be found by a uniquely advanced one in some indefinite and unlikely future? That is what dead “civilizations” have to teach us first of all.
We are actually digging around in the ruins of an old “civilization’s” corpse to find predictions of what will happen to US in 2012 A.D. It has not occurred to ONE PERSON fascinated by this to wonder why this Great Wisdom had not one word to say about the period of that civilization’s OWN TOTAL DESTRUCTION, which happened long ago.
Before he drools in awe over the Ancient Wisdom of dead societies, the Mantra Thinker asks first WHY THEY ARE DEAD.
All dead civilizations have brown skins. That is what is called an observation. Observation is he basis of Western thought.
I want to know WHY this is. Those who study the Great Dead Wisdom talk exclusively about the Wisdom, never about the Dead part.
BBG’s Point
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 01/10/2010
Backbaygrouch’s comment on “No Finger Pointing” deserves to be our article for today:
America has a unique legal doctrine, sometimes called purity of the temple. If the police or the prosecutor violate laws in gathering evidence, the criminal walks. Everywhere else the evidence is allowed and the officials are punished for their acts. In America the public is punished by allowing criminals to walk while the officials seldom face any censure.
The reasoning given is that the inability of the officials to prosecute will discourage wrongful actions. This reasoning escapes the rest of the world where punishment is seen as a greater prod towards adherence to correct methods than immunity for public payroll malefactors. They see no reason to let a criminal walk whenever evidence, rightfully or wrongfully gathered, proves guilt.
In brief in the United States the court system is operated for the benefit of those who run it rather than the public in a way no other nation tolerates, at least in theory. This is illustrative of Bob’s argument. It is so ingrained that most Americans do not even notice it or ever question the manifest stupidity of the situation.




Solid Advice From Simmons
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Comment Responses on 01/10/2010
Simmons’ comment on the debate I asked you to read is solidly professional:
I read the responses. Some were good. Some quibbled the details with a pet monkey.
How about you query the publishers for a rebuttal to this anti-white propaganda they are responsible for putting on the web (there is that word again).
Remember writing basics 101, the intro must actually introduce what you mean to prove. That means within a few sentences the phrase or “anti-racism is nothing but anti-white”, or something real close to that must appear.
1 Comment