AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
I slip sometimes. I thought of a bumper sticker like “Isn’t there enough room on earth for ONE Denmark?” It was the question why there is no room on earth for a white culture. Shari replied, “A bumper sticker should be “AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!”
After all my preaching about staying with the Mantra, I had wandered myself. But I now have people to correct me.
I think the reason I capitalized those words was because it took me YEARS to add them on. I had been saying AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY! for years, and I had been reciting the mantra for years, but I had not put them together. Now I realize that those words summarize the Mantra. I am angry at myself for taking so long to put the two together.
It took me many years to develop the Mantra, and I am hesitant to discuss other people’s versions. So I will go through it, line by line, and try to explain why each line is there.
This very hard, because the words were developed slowly, in debate after debate. Each sentence is designed to keep the puppy’s nose in the poo.
I have been exposed to an awesome number of attempts by the anti-white puppy to get his nose out of said poo but I can’t remember most or all of them. All I know is that the Mantra would be shorter if I could do without a line of it.
When people tell me something will work and tell me the logic I don’t want to SAY that the words I have provided were not developed in my head, but in many, many hours of successful debate. If you haven’t been through all that, you would assume that sane people would get the point without repeating it.
But that is where you trip yourself up. We are not only not dealing with sane people, we are dealing with the most difficult form of insanity, one to which it cannot even occur that it considers itself to be the epitome of mental health.
That is why it took so long to develop what looks, after one has grasped it, to be an obvious truth. We are back to the Semmelweis Rule: Nothing is harder to get across than a simple reality that is being MILITANTLY overlooked.
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”
#1 by Dave on 02/01/2010 - 11:02 am
Our economic problems including the current Depression are entirely due to race and race conflict.
Our economic problems including the current Depression are entirely due to race and race conflict.
Our economic problems including the current Depression are entirely due to race and race conflict.
There is not one economist, with the exception of Robert Whitaker, who knows or is willing to cop to this simple fact. Not one.
And yes, it really is that simple.
#2 by Simmons on 02/01/2010 - 5:11 pm
http://cofcc.org/2010/01/mel-gibson-demonstrates-how-to-stand-up-to-a-leftist/
This should take you to a fine example on how to dominate a tape recorder. Gibson forcefully asks a question, authority figures ask questions. On the same page at CofCC they also have a Breitbart debate with a tape recorder in which he dominates by asking a question and forcing the recorder to answer.
#3 by Wolf on 02/01/2010 - 7:51 pm
I find when I’m arguing things on race that most people don’t have any mental ability to listen for more than a minute and then tune out. So the summary of “AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!” comes in handy more often for me than the full mantra.
I found myself arguing with these people today. To put it in context it’s highly likely my job will be outsourced to India in the next 1-2 years. The IT job I went to University for and have 12 years experience in. The job that I worked long hours for no overtime pay for is going to be given to Indian people who will be paid almost the same as me in India (more in Canada) and will have more people on it making it completely cost ineffective.
Anyway I started “well, I let you all come over to MY country. We moved out to the suburbs so you could have the city that my grandparents helped build. I let you get special rights and privileges so you could get a job that surpasses your IQ. I’ve carried most of you for over ten years because you didn’t have the skills for this job. What more can I do for you? Oh, I see, you need my job now too. You need me to not make a living and not eat. Fine, but I have nothing more to give.”
There’s no arguments only silence. No one can argue a damn thing I say anymore. They know and the white people dismiss it as a joke and the darkies laugh their butts to the bank. How can we be so stupid to hand them the world?
BTW Simmons, I loved that Mel Gibson interview. Especially how all the news people tried to make the idiot fell better once he was done the interview. I couldn’t believe he didn’t understand “Do you have a dog in the fight?” 🙂 I wasn’t aware of the movie and now I’m going to see it this weekend. We should support people like this.
#4 by Dave on 02/01/2010 - 8:42 pm
Simmons,
I am glad you brought up Gibson, because we have to remember the high price Gibson paid to wake up and deal forcefully with psycopaths.
It really is just street smarts. But Gibson didn’t get them until he received a severe beating, a metaphor for what is happening to whites in general.
I am tempted to tatto myself with Robert Whitaker’s reminder of how psychopaths think and who they are:
“You would assume that sane people would get the point without repeating it.”
“But that is where you trip yourself up. We are not only not dealing with sane people, we are dealing with the most difficult form of insanity, one to which it cannot even occur that it considers itself to be the epitome of mental health.”
#5 by backbaygrouch4 on 02/02/2010 - 7:29 am
Mantra bumper sticker. Must be pithy. Played it several ways, including No Amnesty kicker. Being a Lowe Tech drop out makes it hard convey the result in this venue. Here goes
line 1, 14 point font, red, bold – ASIA FOR ASIANS
line 2, 24 point font, blue, bold – WHITE COUNTRIES FOR ALL
line 3, 14 font, red bold – AFRICA FOR AFRICANS
all lines centered
#6 by BGLass on 02/02/2010 - 10:38 am
So true, the opposition is not ‘SANE.’ It’s perceiving through, and filtering all its thoughts through, a completely different paradigm. Breitbart doesn’t even know he’s a dog! He doesn’t know there’s a fight! He’s just a wounded victim who deserves things–whether money or respect or the entire floor in the studio, so we can hear his grand thoughts and when the interview confuses him, his “colleagues” lick his wounds for him–b/c he has Suffered (“as a Jew and a human being,” as he explains to the audience.) He is righteous. Mr. Gibson knows no suffering (in the imagination of Mr. Breitbart.) And anyway, whatever suffering Mr. Gibson has, he says he has other roles he’d like to play in many other movies, lol. The hero here, for instance. That was the whole point of the interview–and Breitbart missed it, the interplay of these two ways of seeing.
#7 by BGLass on 02/02/2010 - 10:44 am
Further– when Breitbart SORT OF gets Mel, the dog he sees himself AS is the Suffering Jew who Suffers with other Fellow Sufferers. He may never attain the sophistication (in the old-school sense) that there are people who NEVER EVER frame themselves in this peculiar way. In fact, they may have suffered MORE IN REALITY. But their suffering is not a locus of authority. “My people may have suffered in history—and so therefore I am an authority and my point-of-view is privileged over yours!” What a piece of work!
#8 by BGLass on 02/02/2010 - 10:56 am
Gawd!– Now I’m really pissed off. Anyway, sometimes one can just take Breitbart’s at their word— and DEMAND they detail EVERY single little instance of their Suffering (since their authority hinges on it, after all) and then judge it openly, to see if THEY really DO QUALIFY as Sufferers in your opinion. It’s best if they detail this suffering. Was it just historical, or did something really happen to them recently? If it was just historical, then do they suffer more or less than someone we SEE suffering NOW? If they aren’t the best Sufferer of all, they lose credibility.
#9 by Simmons on 02/02/2010 - 11:49 am
Some of our community activists posting the Mantra in full.
http://wvwnews.net/story.php?id=8497
I hope this goes to the right page so Bob does not get lost. I am trying to learn the tags, it would also help if we had the preview function.
#10 by grovernors on 02/02/2010 - 1:13 pm
I agree if you want to be called Asian goto Asia, if you want to be African goto Africa. There are no Asians nor Africans in America. America was founded as a beacon in the darkness, now its light is shrouded by a fifth column.
Freemen cannot be a slaves, and the ignorant cannot be free.
If you want truth and freedom you cannot accept corruption.
Substantive thoughts are hard to grasp because so few have experience. As this is the standard by example and effect, we are the insane for being nonstandard by definition. I believe some had it right 200 years ago trying to exile the treasonous with the TONA, or Titles Of Nobility Amendment.
TONA2009
“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, foreign power, or secret society, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
http://www.petitiononline.com/tona2009/petition.html
For if we cannot make a united stand against treason then all is lost and there wont be “WHITE COUNTRIES” for tolerant folk to live in for much longer.
Can I see the genocide and a global homogeneous human? Yes, we are being bred like dogs I feel. Social engineering is unconstitutional and unnatural. I do not want a transracial mutt race for the humans, as this I feel will stymie genetic variance over a prolonged term. I feel genomes sholuld be preserved if only for genetic viability sake.
I would like to live in a world without racism but not a world without race.
http://indigenousamerican.blogspot.com/
#11 by Simmons on 02/02/2010 - 2:19 pm
I’m all for Mantra purity, but I also remember it as a way of thinking as well.
Such as a commentator could Jew it up such as; Is Israel only for Jews, then why are they proponents of white genocide?